Micro 759: Tarot uPick III - Game Over!
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
I've been adventurous the whole game with next to no company I'm bored of it -_-
It's pretty much just that you don't seem interesting in pushing/solving the game? Like your read on Dunker is pretty hedgy + your reasoning there was weakened by his most recent posting but he's still your top scumread with the reasoning now being that you think you stopped the kill + he has a wagon and you're still not voting him, think all that is a little weird considered together. There's some smaller things like the way you distanced yourself from acid's behavior unprompted and asked a question in 1310 that serves you no purpose if you're town but looks like you trying to lay cover for having the vote if you're mafia, which would more or less line up with you being self-conscious about it / not voting if you're trying to avoid attention in that regard.
Also, uh, haven't had the chance to see you interact or react to stuff so your slot is full of question marks.
hi meet my mafiascum gravestone, the flowers were probably left by camn or schadd or Prism, blow them kisses for me would you?-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
Yetichain Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: November 17, 2017
I have a couple of things.
If garaputo is scum, there isno explanationfor the no kill apart from acid not submitting a kill, which is very unlikely. It wouldn't have been my doing. Which nancy already knows.
So unless someone has another possible reason for the no kill, I'm strongly against his lynch today.
Secondly
1300 is just a lie? He claimed VT and his reason for thinking that was not role related at all, I don't know why he'd cover like that.In post 1320, Dunkerdoodles wrote:also i'm vt
jabarkus and nk15 both said this game was role madness which means they obviously had pr roles and i thought them thinking it was role madness made them them more likely to be mafia
I'm 100% on board with jailing me if we don't lynch scum today, it's not worth it to scum to no kill again to guilty me instead of taking a better shot, so there'll probably be a kill and I will be as clear as I can get.
In post 1315, Dunkerdoodles wrote:nancy please
This response to the vote is pretty rubbish though :/ why's it a scumclaim?In post 1316, Dunkerdoodles wrote:anybody that sheeps this is basically scumclaiming
Town:In post 1346, nancy wrote:Here's a novel idea.
Everyone in the game posts a readslist.
And if they're feeling adventurous... a line of reasoning!
nancy, garaputo, Not Known 15
Confused feelings:
Porkens, drealmerz7
Scum:
Dunkerdoodles, northsidegal
-Key
Also Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: May 2, 2017
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
???In post 1352, Yetichain wrote:If garaputo is scum, there is no explanation for the no kill apart from acid not submitting a kill, which is very unlikely. It wouldn't have been my doing. Which nancy already knows.
So unless someone has another possible reason for the no kill, I'm strongly against his lynch today.
????????
????????????
????
??????
??
hi meet my mafiascum gravestone, the flowers were probably left by camn or schadd or Prism, blow them kisses for me would you?-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
In post 1312, Yetichain wrote:the Dunkers JK is not the only possible reason for the no kill.
hi meet my mafiascum gravestone, the flowers were probably left by camn or schadd or Prism, blow them kisses for me would you?-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
Like, if there's no other explanation for the lack of a kill then Dunker is confirmed scum. You keep saying there is another explanation. And if there is another explanation then why do you have NK15 and garaputo as townreads? But now you're saying there's not another explanation??????
hi meet my mafiascum gravestone, the flowers were probably left by camn or schadd or Prism, blow them kisses for me would you?-
-
northsidegal Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
Yetichain Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 83
- Joined: November 17, 2017
what.nancy wrote:Like, if there's no other explanation for the lack of a kill then Dunker is confirmed scum. You keep saying there is another explanation. And if there is another explanation then why do you have NK15 and garaputo as townreads? But now you're saying there's not another explanation??????
Calm your farm and think it through.
I told you that ifacidwas scum that I didn't know what caused the no kill because it wouldn't have been me. Don't generalise beyond that point.
I thought I'd given you the information you needed (JK was not necessarily the cause of the no kill because it might have been me, if acid/garaputo is scum I didn't cause the no kill so it must have been something else) but clearly it's just causing more harm than good. I'm happy to claim if it will clear things up.
I have garaputo as a townread because if I caused the no kill, he is not scum, and if he caused the no kill, he is not scum. If we are the only two who could have caused the no kill which seems apparent so far, then my conclusion is that he is not scum.
I have NK15 as a townread because I townread them and their roleclaim.
Yes okay... so why did you say in 1300 you couldn't explain 494 without claiming when you clearly could?
-Key-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: May 2, 2017
um ???In post 1361, Yetichain wrote:Yes okay... so why did you say in 1300 you couldn't explain 494 without claiming when you clearly could?
-Key
if i say that the game isn't role madness that obviously makes me vt no?-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: May 2, 2017
-
-
fferyllt Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Titan of Trajectory
- Posts: 20510
- Joined: December 28, 2012
- Location: Left Coast
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: May 2, 2017
-
-
garaputo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 667
- Joined: September 27, 2017
Yes, I'm not sure on my read on dunker, but I am still more certain on dunker than anyone else. I agree dunker having a reason why, as vt, his position changed between 439 and 494 impacted my read from 1302 and 1308, but we actually discussed this. As I said in 1326 I'm prepared to accept the explanation given, but that shift was not the sole basis for my read. I think my 1306 and subsequent posts show that a major thought process (other than the WIFOM arguments I see from dunker, which in themselves are enough to worry) is trying to explain the lack of a kill. I think more likely than not it's because Dunkers is scum, rather than the target last night.In post 1350, nancy wrote:I've been adventurous the whole game with next to no company I'm bored of it -_-
It's pretty much just that you don't seem interesting in pushing/solving the game? Like your read on Dunker is pretty hedgy + your reasoning there was weakened by his most recent posting but he's still your top scumread with the reasoning now being that you think you stopped the kill + he has a wagon and you're still not voting him, think all that is a little weird considered together. There's some smaller things like the way you distanced yourself from acid's behavior unprompted and asked a question in 1310 that serves you no purpose if you're town but looks like you trying to lay cover for having the vote if you're mafia, which would more or less line up with you being self-conscious about it / not voting if you're trying to avoid attention in that regard.
Also, uh, haven't had the chance to see you interact or react to stuff so your slot is full of question marks.-
-
garaputo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 667
- Joined: September 27, 2017
This thought is based on bad assumptions.
It is true that I have 2 votes available but I can place them only on the same person simultaneously, in public posts.-
-
Dunkerdoodles Mafia Scum
-
-
nancy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9299
- Joined: December 26, 2016
- Location: lesbian heaven
-
-
garaputo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 667
- Joined: September 27, 2017
I haven't the foggiest idea.In post 1371, Dunkerdoodles wrote:so then who is woman of crystals?-
-
garaputo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 667
- Joined: September 27, 2017
I remember this one game I had a post restriction that I couldn't use the letter "e" in my posts.In post 1372, nancy wrote:This reminds me of that time I played in a game with Jesus and he randomly voted people and I got modkilled because I forgot to swear at the mod.
Modkilled
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.