Are you even reading this game???In post 1347, Toranaga wrote:what's the problem with it? you're wolfreading someone who happens to read a situation similar to you. so? how does that make anyone a wolf?In post 1342, I Am Innocent wrote:I’m not sure what you don’t get.In post 1314, Toranaga wrote:red is a very weak reasoning for a scum read so strong you're asking who tchill is partnering withIn post 801, I Am Innocent wrote:So which is your partner, Dave or Dunn? And which of those null reads is ur other partner?In post 763, Beefster wrote:Town
Tora, Maki, Dunn, Dave
Null
Jodaxq, wave (leaning scum), UCV, srceen, Innocent, HeWhoSwims
Scum
Tchill, Havo
This has been a crazy game. I wish I had some more solid scum reads, but nothing really pings my scumdar strongly. Lots of conflicting signals.
Love how you scum read Tchill13 and Havo 10 secs after you were agreeing with them that torr might be fake claiming.
VOTE: beef
another thought I don't buy from you IAI
1) I have the same gut read as player x and player y about situation z
At the same time as
2) my top scum reads are player x and player y
How does that add up?
The “I” here is beef
Player x and y were tchill and Havo
Situation z was ur mason claim
He (beef) was trying to cast shade on ur mason claim saying he had the same thoughts and concerns about the claim as tchill and Havo who were also doubting the claim.
Then in the next reads list had 2 scum reads. Tchill and Havo.
I don’t know about you but when players have similar reactions to me, it is usually a strong indication they are town.
So if beef wasn’t using that post to true up town reads of tchill or Havo, it must only have had one purpose. To cast shade on ur mason claim.