In post 1522, Thestatusquo wrote:RG3 led the league in Y/A, had a 102 passer rating and a 65% completion rate his first year in the NFL.
I think you're underestimating how badly his injuries sapped him of his abilities. He was obscenely good even not considering his running before he got injured a million times.
The Giants need to retool their offensive line, good thing Gettleman has a such a strong history of fixing glaring needs in his squads alone the O-Line, right?
Chloroform girl, how have you been?
Don't let me catch you sleeping again
You're only alive because I like you
It's been three years since you've seen the sunlight
But I know you're having fun
Bound, gagged and chained up in my basement
Then why are you commenting on Jimmy G, Beathard, and the 49ers?
'cause its like I can have an opinion. *mind blown*
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1524, scotmany12 wrote:Beathard's stats are also pretty awful in basically every QB related metric. Just because he hasn't been as awful as Kizer doesn't mean he has been serviceable.
I mean, he's a rookie on the nfl's worst offense. Not like that has anything to do with it. He's 50th in QBR and everyone has way more experience/is expected to be better. Bortles and maybe McCown are the only two that are mildly surprising.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1524, scotmany12 wrote:Beathard's stats are also pretty awful in basically every QB related metric. Just because he hasn't been as awful as Kizer doesn't mean he has been serviceable.
I mean, he's a rookie on the nfl's worst offense. Not like that has anything to do with it. He's 50th in QBR and everyone has way more experience/is expected to be better. Bortles and maybe McCown are the only two that are mildly surprising.
The 49ers do not have the worst offense in the NFL, especially not since the quarterback change. Both in the eye test and statistically, they are better than the Browns, Giants, Colts, Bengals, Cardinals. Probably more too. Beathard sucks. It's been night and day between Garoppolo and him. Basically everything you have said on this topic has been wrong.
He’s been nothing short of amazing. If there is any knock on Jimmy’s start, it’s that he’s yet to make many special throws down the field. He’s been racking up yardage without needing to thread tight windows. He’s made only two big-time throws compared to three turnover-worthy throws through four games.
At the same time though, over 35 percent of Garoppolo’s attempts have received positive grades. That’s an unbelievable rate. Even Brady and Wentz both sit below 30 percent. That’s good company for the young QB.
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
In post 1537, scotmany12 wrote:A shitty uninformed opinion...pretty sure you are just trolling, but in case you aren't
I mean there were a number of Houston games that came on and Watson did look really good to me. Is he a flash in the pan? A one hit wonder like RG3? Will his injury take away his run game and defenses won't need to worry about him being a dual threat?
Why not instead of trying to talk down to me explain why Watson is so horrible.
I feel like you and Scot have invented this argument that I'm saying that Bethard is better than Jimmy G. Though I do feel like you guys are being much too hard on a 3rd rookie.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 1537, scotmany12 wrote:The 49ers do not have the worst offense in the NFL, especially not since the quarterback change. Both in the eye test and statistically, they are better than the Browns, Giants, Colts, Bengals, Cardinals. Probably more too. Beathard sucks. It's been night and day between Garoppolo and him. Basically everything you have said on this topic has been wrong.
We are specifically talking about the 49ers offense pre Jimmy G. How does their receiving corp stack up against the rest of the NFL? Thier 0-line? Of course, your argument is that neither of these are the worst so I guess I've answered my own question. It would be interesting to see what the offensive stats would be like up until Bethards last start.
Of the offenses you've listed that are "worse", they've all had
MAJOR
injuries (save for the Browns who just have shit QB) and I sort of feel like its unfair argument. Of course, losing a starting QB or one of the best WRs in the league or a major RZ threat is going to impact ratings.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Tomorrow the browns shall achieve the imperfect season. I think we could have won a couple games this season since had we played harder in the games where we forced overtime. Did the 2007 lions or 1976 bucs ever go to overtime during their imperfect seasons?
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
In post 1543, PokerFace wrote:Tomorrow the browns shall achieve the imperfect season. I think we could have won a couple games this season since had we played harder in the games where we forced overtime. Did the 2007 lions or 1976 bucs ever go to overtime during their imperfect seasons?
No but the Lions had five one possession games which is the same as the Browns pending tomorrow's game.
KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare
I am not a big raiders fan they are the only AFC west team I care for. Our website does have quite a few raiders fan so I think this needs discussed http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... -available
Carr did not come back as strong as people hoped from injury and with their coordinator issues, raiders missed the playoffs this year. They did not miss it by a lot, and I don't think Jack was the cause. So getting rid of him feels like a bad move. Especially since Gruden wants to be with TB. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... den-return.
Last edited by PokerFace on Sun Dec 31, 2017 6:29 am, edited 4 times in total.
