Mini 555 --- LDF Mafia -- Game Over!
-
-
Korts Luddite
- Luddite
- Luddite
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: January 1, 2008
- Location: HUN BUD
-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
You are the one who incorrectly called me "most voted of the month." I guess you just can't count or don't really pay attention well.Korts wrote: But since you're here, suspicions of you are not necessarily expressed in votes. You have been attacked by Eljcko, JDodge, and ooba.
As far as the attackers of me that you pointed out, it really would not surprise me if 2 out of the 3 turned out to be scum.-
-
Thanatos Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 510
- Joined: November 7, 2007
-
-
UltimaAvalon Vote: UltimaAvalon
- Vote: UltimaAvalon
- Vote: UltimaAvalon
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: March 22, 2007
- Location: Texas
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Jdodge had them at the top of his people to kill list. Thats what i disagreed with and thats why i have them in my town listEl wrote:Now my question back is, after disagreeing strongly about UA and korts, why do you have them on your town list? You say nothing else about them in your analysis.
Half claims do not work . I think its better you claim your role nameSly wrote:Unfortunately, I wasted my investigatory skill on MBF last night, who turned up town and dead. Take this however you want to as I will not elaborate.
Please read post 242 (it's also down below on this post)El wrote:Solid point on ooba, still hasn't explained the hammer vote yet.
Buddying up? When i re-read i thought sly was scum and the people in neutral i wasn't sure about either way.Korts wrote:First, his only suspect is slysly, who has taken quite some flak the last couple pages, and is the most voted person of the month. The rest of the people on his list are either neutral or town, and the way I see it, he might be buddying up to these people.
Your post 88 was similar to the same thoughts i had when i read 78 ..Korts wrote:
Sorry, but I don't see where you said it before me. I'm not echoing you.ooba wrote:hasdgfas 78: A very weak FOS on Thanatos. Distancing ?
Korts in 88 echoes my above sentiment
Neither. I was commenting on the fact that everyone seemed to think Roy chambell could not be vanilla.Korts wrote:
Saving and buddying up to lovo, who he knows to be innocent? Or wanting brownie points after the lovo lynch?ooba, post 197 wrote: I cant see why you all do not believe the claim just because its Vanilla .. If we assume there are only few pro town power roles in the game - I think they'd go more to the others in the foxhound team than the colonel i.e Given a choice between Liquid snake and Colonel Roy Chambell , who would you choose to give a power role to?
There are a few possibilities which come to mind : UA could have been Roy chambell, UA could have had flavor information in his role PM which indicated which roles were probably scum. For the bolded , i never thought UA was bussing or setting lovo up , i thought he was sure lovo was scum from some info he had ..Korts wrote:
Point a) is nothing incriminating. Point b: what inside information would that be, Day 1? If you thoughtooba, post 242 wrote:a) I had read other lovo games and he didn't get this flustered while being attacked upon in them - thereby a 'I can't believe you guys are voting me for this reason' type reaction
b) I thought UA had some inside information which he didn't want to share with us from his own role.UA was bussing lovo or deliberately setting up a townie lynch, why didn't you vote him instead of lovo?
No i didn't - would like to hear your reasons for the same ..Jdodge wrote:Unvote, vote: ooba
Bet you didn't see that coming, did you?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And this is in response to the hammer .. A lot of you think it was scummy to hammer without presenting any case when i did .. What is the use of presenting a case against someone - It is so that they can respond to it and probably try to justify why your attack was wrong. On the other hand , once you hammer , its over - they cannot respond to it and it becomes useless. So posting a case with a hammer vote doesn't fulfill any purpose IMO ..-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Did I say that they didn't?Thanatos wrote:Town tend to attack town just as much as Scum, Sly.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Too bad, scum. I clearly stated that I would not elaborate.ooba wrote: Half claims do not work . I think its better you claim your role name
I'm not sure I have ever seen a scummier statement.ooba wrote: So posting a case with a hammer vote doesn't fulfill any purpose IMO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you please point out where I refused?UA wrote: Sly, why did you refuse to answer JDodge's question about mayonnaise?
I haven't felt the need. The game is not called Last Days of Coddling.UA wrote: And why have you yet to apologize to Eljcko?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
unvote
vote:ooba-
-
Korts Luddite
- Luddite
- Luddite
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: January 1, 2008
- Location: HUN BUD
Well, no, but it isn't Last Days of Up Yours for Suspecting Me either.Sly wrote:
I haven't felt the need. The game is not called Last Days of Coddling.
You didn't refuse, true. You just ignored it.Sly wrote:
Can you please point out where I refused?
I personally think there's logic in there. I mean, if the guy's already hammered, why ask any more questions of him? On the other hand, it doesn't hurt to state your reasons, sure. But that's a null tell, for me.Sly wrote:
I'm not sure I have ever seen a scummier statement.ooba wrote:So posting a case with a hammer vote doesn't fulfill any purpose IMO
Also, please don't be an ass, Sly. For me. For our love. I heart you, Sly!
ooba wrote: Neither. I was commenting on the fact that everyone seemed to think Roy chambell could not be vanilla.
Bolded part. You insist that we believe the claim.ooba, post 197 wrote:just because its Vanilla ..
I cant see why you all do not believe the claimIf we assume there are only few pro town power rolesin the game - I thinkthey'd go more to the others in the foxhound teamthan the colonel i.e Given a choice between Liquid snake and Colonel Roy Chambell , who would you choose to give a power role to?
Italic part(s). What I see here: "There are few power roles, and they wouldn't be Colonel Campbell, therefore Campbell is Vanilla"
Actually, I don't see in retrospect what point I was trying to make with this.
But you didn't tell us this thought. Actually, I don't know what point this is meant to be, either.ooba wrote: Your post 88 was similar to the same thoughts i had when i read 78
But the point is still that your list of suspicions boils down to one suspect, and it's the obvious suspect. Everyone else is in the neutral or the town, which, in spite of your explanation, gives me the feeling, as I said before, of you buddying up to these people.scumchat never die-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Refer to rule 0.Korts wrote: Well, no, but it isn't Last Days of Up Yours for Suspecting Me either.
It is amazing how many people in this game are named UA.Korts wrote: You didn't refuse, true. You just ignored it.
The hammer is the one vote that needs the most reason. The reason is not for the guy that just got hammered but for the remaining players. If you can't see the logic in this, up yours!!!Korts wrote: I personally think there's logic in there. I mean, if the guy's already hammered, why ask any more questions of him? On the other hand, it doesn't hurt to state your reasons, sure. But that's a null tell, for me.
Do you really want to get me going again? I guess it probably would pick things back up.Korts wrote: Also, please don't be an ass, Sly. For me. For our love. I heart you, Sly!-
-
Korts Luddite
- Luddite
- Luddite
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: January 1, 2008
- Location: HUN BUD
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
Let me try to rephrase what i said .. I essentially did the re-read in serial order ..Korts wrote:
But you didn't tell us this thought. Actually, I don't know what point this is meant to be, either.ooba wrote: Your post 88 was similar to the same thoughts i had when i read 78
When i read post 78 - this was the note i made:
"hasdgfas 78: A very weak FOS on Thanatos. Distancing ?"
And when i read 88 - i saw you had the same opinion about 78. Hence the note:
"Korts in 88 echoes my above sentiment"
There is a difference between saying somebody is neutral and somebody is town - if i had put all other 7 players as town and sly as scum , then that is buddying up. Here i'm just not sure about the others - its not a case of not wanting to step on other people's toes by saying 'ok i think he is scummy'.Korts wrote:But the point is still that your list of suspicions boils down to one suspect, and it's the obvious suspect. Everyone else is in the neutral or the town, which, in spite of your explanation, gives me the feeling, as I said before, of you buddying up to these people.
The reasoning can be given the next day instead of with the hammer vote if players deem it suspicious enough.Sly wrote:
The hammer is the one vote that needs the most reason. The reason is not for the guy that just got hammered but for the remaining players. If you can't see the logic in this, up yours!!!Korts wrote: I personally think there's logic in there. I mean, if the guy's already hammered, why ask any more questions of him? On the other hand, it doesn't hurt to state your reasons, sure. But that's a null tell, for me.
The only valid argument against what i do is that it might draw investigative night actions towards myself which would better be directed at scum. However that ties into the Meta of viewing a hammer vote with no reasons as suspicious.
And P.S : I Repeat , Soft claims serve no purpose whatsoever..-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
-
-
Thanatos Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 510
- Joined: November 7, 2007
-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
-
-
Sarcastro Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: June 2, 2006
- Location: Monkey Island
-
-
Korts Luddite
- Luddite
- Luddite
- Posts: 5752
- Joined: January 1, 2008
- Location: HUN BUD
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
Lloyd Vote Lloyd
- Vote Lloyd
- Vote Lloyd
- Posts: 1065
- Joined: December 17, 2005
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
SlySly Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5851
- Joined: October 18, 2007
- Location: Unknown
-
-
eljcko Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 146
- Joined: January 23, 2008
- Location: Kubismus
-
-
Andycyca Gets To Kill All Spammers
- Gets To Kill All Spammers
- Gets To Kill All Spammers
- Posts: 778
- Joined: July 31, 2007
- Location: The Tesseract
-
-
ooba Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5616
- Joined: September 14, 2007
- Location: Outpost 31
-
-
Sarcastro Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: June 2, 2006
- Location: Monkey Island
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.