![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
And I only asked bc..
[quote="In post 447
Asking weird questions always helps. Keeps you guys on your toes.[/quote]
So, 9 1/2 make your toes feel comfortable enough??
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
In post 367, Srceenplay wrote:Math. A pretty good town player.
I do not intend to hammer, given your role hint in #432.In post 426, Srceenplay wrote:Maybe someone better unvote before LEGO shows back up.
You've done that, but added little to the game. That in itself deserves a lynch. You have a high post count, but if you look at your ISO, a grand majority of those are joke / troll / short posts that add nothing. Looks to me like a scum that is staying active... but not scum hunting.
Ok, well, I personally feel that after RVS, we shouldn't vote for activity: I find it extremely scummy to do so. It is a very easy way to make a mislynch, while many scum I've seen are active, kind of leading the town. OTOH some roles like doctor traditionally "lurk" to slip under the radar, which makes this a way to possibly get a PR mislynched. This is very scummy to me.In post 287, Srceenplay wrote:Early I thought Espeonage was scum but the more they post the more I feel better about them. They don’t feel like scum.In post 277, skitter30 wrote:And what do you like about Espeonage?
Also, you've played with creature a lot, right? At what point do we start worrying about his lack of content?
Yes creature lurking could be scum.
I forgot about him.
VOTE: creature
What the hell are you talking about?In post 456, legoboyvdlp wrote:I do not intend to hammer, given your role hint in #432.In post 426, Srceenplay wrote:Maybe someone better unvote before LEGO shows back up.
So policy over a scum read huhIn post 457, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:Then claims VT my head hurts this game....lets face the screenplay was policy and I'm happy with my vote there. Jay is scummy though
Why would they not? This is an example of a bad WIFOM argument: it cannot be proven true. +1 scummy point for towm leaning mutant based on that.In post 152, Srceenplay wrote:You don’t vote claimed BG day 1 no matter how much you think you scum read them.In post 147, mutantdevle wrote:VOTE: Almost50
You get a town lean for your bad Vote. Scum would never try that.
I think I have the scum team poe out.In post 459, legoboyvdlp wrote:You've done that, but added little to the game. That in itself deserves a lynch. You have a high post count, but if you look at your ISO, a grand majority of those are joke / troll / short posts that add nothing. Looks to me like a scum that is staying active... but not scum hunting.
Creature isn’t voted because they aren’t posting.In post 460, legoboyvdlp wrote:Ok, well, I personally feel that after RVS, we shouldn't vote for activity: I find it extremely scummy to do so. It is a very easy way to make a mislynch, while many scum I've seen are active, kind of leading the town. OTOH some roles like doctor traditionally "lurk" to slip under the radar, which makes this a way to possibly get a PR mislynched. This is very scummy to me.In post 287, Srceenplay wrote:Early I thought Espeonage was scum but the more they post the more I feel better about them. They don’t feel like scum.In post 277, skitter30 wrote:And what do you like about Espeonage?
Also, you've played with creature a lot, right? At what point do we start worrying about his lack of content?
Yes creature lurking could be scum.
I forgot about him.
VOTE: creature
In the second place, well, you don't come across as rude, but more... shall we say, obnoxius. If you aren't pynched today, and as it looks you might not be, well, I hope your playstyle improves into Day 3
Well, good... but why so convinced he is scum in this game? Wasn't he prodded and then replaced? Has he been active site wide? As I said, I find activity lynches extremely suspicious. If they are active elsewhere, but not here, then sure. But lynching them if they haven't even logged in?In post 395, Srceenplay wrote:Creature slot.In post 389, Sky_Paladin wrote:@Screen
If there was one player you could get a flip on right now, who would it be and why?
I’m most confident with that slot being scum.
Entirely on creature meta.
I think the day has lasted long enough and lines have been drawn.
Creature flips scum, puts scum team behind and a nk information could help with Poe.
I don’t think any scum is going to come out and vote anyone right after they claim a pr. They would be to cautious/self conscious to do that.In post 463, legoboyvdlp wrote:Why would they not? This is an example of a bad WIFOM argument: it cannot be proven true. +1 scummy point for towm leaning mutant based on that.In post 152, Srceenplay wrote:You don’t vote claimed BG day 1 no matter how much you think you scum read them.In post 147, mutantdevle wrote:VOTE: Almost50
You get a town lean for your bad Vote. Scum would never try that.
In post 339, skitter30 wrote:Also for Creature, he's been active recently (ie this morning) elsewhere on site and in other games; it kinda looks like he's actively avoiding this one.
My read listIn post 465, legoboyvdlp wrote:The hell are you talking about? I'm not lynching a claimed PR... that's what scum do.
Ok, explain how it is PoE'd out? Thought process behind that?
In post 469, skitter30 wrote:For like the sixth time:
In post 339, skitter30 wrote:Also for Creature, he's been active recently (ie this morning) elsewhere on site and in other games; it kinda looks like he's actively avoiding this one.
In post 471, legoboyvdlp wrote:I checked, and yes, he logged in tpday. But did he login before he was replaced?