In post 48, Harambey180 wrote:But then again I was just talking about lurking. Lurking usually is either scum or a PR but as there are no 'Power Roles' here I assumed that lurking is more likely to be scummy. Correct me if I'm wrong on this.
I think lurking/activity is NAI. Active lurking is usually scum, but can also be a PR.
Why is it necessarily overaggressive.
Also why is it PoE here. Especially so early on in the game, and with UCV not having made a single post, I'm really wondering why you think it's PoE.
the confidence is just bad
then "probably the partner" is forced
you are either obvtown or almost as good at scum as i am. bambietta is likely town so it's sort of poe
In post 48, Harambey180 wrote:But then again I was just talking about lurking. Lurking usually is either scum or a PR but as there are no 'Power Roles' here I assumed that lurking is more likely to be scummy. Correct me if I'm wrong on this.
I think lurking/activity is NAI. Active lurking is usually scum, but can also be a PR.
If you have a different look at the situation, please tell us yours. You only said you found t/t likely but you stopped there. Also you had a reason to question me (you had differing opinions), if you are going to question another player's thought process you oughta explain your own too.
@sheep
Responds to my post #37.
Responds to my post #40.
Does not respond to my post #39 while I specifically asked him a question here that's important enough for me to bold his name in the post.
In post 28, Harambey180 wrote:@Mumble Does this make sense to you or do you think it's differing from this?
It makes sense, but I disagree. While their 1v1 ended up making one of them suspicious, I don't think that it necessarily had to have. Nor, do I think that it's a good reason to eliminate the possibility that both are scum (or town).
I'm not eliminating those chances by now.
However, just purely theoretically the odds of them being S+T is 4/6. Check this if you want.
I'm not eliminating either of those chances, but for now I think it's good to assume it's S+T. Most likely that it's like this, seems decent to follow this idea right?
Well I made it to be funny, not to have a hidden agenda. Joking around can call the nerves before stuff, ya know?
And I knew what you meant. Your looking for the reasons why certain things are going on.
UNVOTE:
I'm there for questions if you want to ask them.
"The whole point of fighting is that you don't want to die! That you'll be killed if you lose! If you throw your life away in battle, where's the point in winning?!!"
In post 55, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Well I made it to be funny, not to have a hidden agenda. Joking around can call the nerves before stuff, ya know?
And I knew what you meant. Your looking for the reasons why certain things are going on.
UNVOTE:
I'm there for questions if you want to ask them.
Pretty much saying here: As long as you don't want to have information from me, I'm not going to give that information myself.
Come on Bambi, you know better than this. You don't always have to and shouldn't wait for questions to be asked.
If you have a different look at the situation, please tell us yours. You only said you found t/t likely but you stopped there. Also you had a reason to question me (you had differing opinions), if you are going to question another player's thought process you oughta explain your own too.
i know im town, so me/bambi is t/t or t/w
both are possible
i townread bambi so i find t/t more likely
In post 59, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:I was literally the first person that wasn't the Moderator to post here. Saying I only speak when spoken too is kinda shitty for an expression.
Unless the FoS isn't "Finger of Suspicion" and it means "Full of Shit".
Yeah you got a point here, regarding the beginning, I'd take it back.
However regarding just that post alone, it does fall in 'only speaks when spoken to' when you're asking for questions. It's not that I said that this was true for your entire gameplay so far, just that post and what's assumably coming next.
If you have a different look at the situation, please tell us yours. You only said you found t/t likely but you stopped there. Also you had a reason to question me (you had differing opinions), if you are going to question another player's thought process you oughta explain your own too.
i know im town, so me/bambi is t/t or t/w
both are possible
i townread bambi so i find t/t more likely
First of all, that's so LAMIST.
Second of all, try to look at it from my perspective.
I don't know if you are Town or not, for my view saying you are, does not matter.
Can you understand that from my point of view, it's pretty hard to go with a t/t situation here?
Although, gotta take that back. The one thing that does help the others is that you say that you townread Bambi, though it's open for all sorts of interpretations. Can't tell how much it'll help as of this moment...
Well, let me point something out since I'm accused of waiting for questions toward me.
We have two choices here. Lynch one of the mafia, preferably the Godfather, and win easy peasy. OR, we could say who we absolutely trust as town be hung so they can venge kill mafia. And with that information, we get the their partner rather easily.
In post 66, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i was talking fmpov. that's not lamist - lamist is hey im obvtown not hey im town from my perspective
In my eyes, it is LAMIST. Let me explain:
It should be obvious that everyone is trying to come over as a Townie, Townies and scummies. You should assume we'd see you as Town.
However, apparently you felt you needed to mention it. You don't need to. Of course when you are explaining your view, we're supposed to believe you on your word as being a Townie.
Thus, mentioning you are Town is slight LAMIST to me. On the other hand it could just be to clarify the situation but I've found that excuse to be LAME-IST, to come up with a new term.
In post 67, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Well, let me point something out since I'm accused of waiting for questions toward me.
We have two choices here. Lynch one of the mafia, preferably the Godfather, and win easy peasy. OR, we could say who we absolutely trust as town be hung so they can venge kill mafia. And with that information, we get the their partner rather easily.
What's the problem with trying to lynch a mafia?
I mean, on the way to the lynch, we're going to have some good assumptions about possible scum in the end.
We should always try to lynch the scum. In case we actually lynch a Vengeful Townie, well then that person should be able to make a good decision if we put enough work into trying to catch the scum.
So I don't get why you bring this up. What's the point in trying to lynch a Vengeful Townie, assuming he will venge kill a scum? Imagine he won't, then we lost (if I'm correct). That's also a big risk tbh.
My plan is: Try to lynch the mafia and if we didn't succeed there, then still hopefully we've done enough to get a venge kill right after.
Also here's a question to everyone. Please tell me honestly if you think this is a stupid question to ask:
Imagine that you were one of the two scum in this game (just imagine). Who of the other four players in this game, do you think would most likely be your scumpartner at this moment?
It could be game-irrelevant, I don't know. I just think it's an interesting question to ask.
