you dont actually know my towngameIn post 498, Not Known 15 wrote:Who just does not look like playing his towngame.
it's funny that everyone saying my townplay is bad has worse play
you dont actually know my towngameIn post 498, Not Known 15 wrote:Who just does not look like playing his towngame.
"I have all these scumreads but I'm gonna openly declare pressure on this other one that I'm not too sure about"In post 498, Not Known 15 wrote:It is likely that Havo and eth0s are scum.
We have HWS as possible scum.
Lurkers like schadd can always be scum.
But...
I'd like to see more pressure on another scumread of mine. Maybe there is more interest in voting a player who has acted strange and anti town. Who just does not look like playing his towngame.
VOTE: Sheep
Seriously? You OMGUSed me so hard earlier and I only moved off you to vote havo. Now you got the stones to imply I am
Correct. What is your problem with that?In post 501, eth0s wrote:"I have all these scumreads but I'm gonna openly declare pressure on this other one that I'm not too sure about"In post 498, Not Known 15 wrote:It is likely that Havo and eth0s are scum.
We have HWS as possible scum.
Lurkers like schadd can always be scum.
But...
I'd like to see more pressure on another scumread of mine. Maybe there is more interest in voting a player who has acted strange and anti town. Who just does not look like playing his towngame.
VOTE: Sheep
if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.In post 503, Not Known 15 wrote:Correct. What is your problem with that?In post 501, eth0s wrote:"I have all these scumreads but I'm gonna openly declare pressure on this other one that I'm not too sure about"In post 498, Not Known 15 wrote:It is likely that Havo and eth0s are scum.
We have HWS as possible scum.
Lurkers like schadd can always be scum.
But...
I'd like to see more pressure on another scumread of mine. Maybe there is more interest in voting a player who has acted strange and anti town. Who just does not look like playing his towngame.
VOTE: Sheep
In post 505, eth0s wrote:if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.
In post 460, Not Known 15 wrote:I have to agree with Eth0s, unfortunately. I am not sure if Ethos vs Havo is scum vs scum or town vs scum. But Havo's 1v1 behaviour was very bad. So was(here I agree with Tchill) the action of chickadee. Let's look what happens:VOTE: Havo
Still leaving a lot of important q's unanswered... I can't fathom how a townie would see our 1v1 as s/s.In post 507, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 505, eth0s wrote:if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.In post 460, Not Known 15 wrote:I have to agree with Eth0s, unfortunately. I am not sure if Ethos vs Havo is scum vs scum or town vs scum. But Havo's 1v1 behaviour was very bad. So was(here I agree with Tchill) the action of chickadee. Let's look what happens:VOTE: Havo
It reminded me of a Newbie game that featured such a 1v1... and both were scum.In post 508, eth0s wrote:Still leaving a lot of important q's unanswered... I can't fathom how a townie would see our 1v1 as s/s.In post 507, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 505, eth0s wrote:if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.In post 460, Not Known 15 wrote:I have to agree with Eth0s, unfortunately. I am not sure if Ethos vs Havo is scum vs scum or town vs scum. But Havo's 1v1 behaviour was very bad. So was(here I agree with Tchill) the action of chickadee. Let's look what happens:VOTE: Havo
TBF, scum members poking the shit out of each other is a somewhat common strategy...In post 508, eth0s wrote:I can't fathom how a townie would see our 1v1 as s/s.
In post 513, Tchill13 wrote:Whoever pushed the havo lynch is scummy af because I completely forgot Nero was in the game which means half the player list is lurking. I'd rather rando vote a lurker at this point.
Who do you think has been lurking? From what I can see it's only really HWS and Schadd. Maybe me also? This seems very aggressive to all of a sudden come out with "half the player list is lurking" when everyone but three had posted within the past couple of hours.In post 515, Tchill13 wrote:Well I'm sick of the lurkers. Jk get well soon.
Why does that make it likely that this was an SvS interaction?In post 509, Not Known 15 wrote:It reminded me of a Newbie game that featured such a 1v1... and both were scum.In post 508, eth0s wrote:Still leaving a lot of important q's unanswered... I can't fathom how a townie would see our 1v1 as s/s.In post 507, Not Known 15 wrote:In post 505, eth0s wrote:if it's me and havo scum then why aren't you hopping on one of our wagons... and why did you agree with me 100% on my scumread of havo when you thought I was finished with you? Why did you 180 back to being on the offensive about me once I was no longer scumreading havo? Your play is obviously dependent on others and your defensiveness and weird voting patterns/opportunism makes you a great lynch for today.In post 460, Not Known 15 wrote:I have to agree with Eth0s, unfortunately. I am not sure if Ethos vs Havo is scum vs scum or town vs scum. But Havo's 1v1 behaviour was very bad. So was(here I agree with Tchill) the action of chickadee. Let's look what happens:VOTE: Havo
When things were going to be serious... you suddenly werenot certainanymore and backed off.
I see a high chance for you both to be scum.
But if one of you isn't scum then it is you.
However, with 9 days before deadline I'd like to see more pressure on sheep because I am not sure if I will be alive tomorrow.
This post is really bad. Profii, who has made sure to let everyone know that Havo hammers at L-1 so we don't get a quick lynch, is talking in this post like Havo is a done deal and tried to push his lynch through quickly.In post 464, profii wrote:no point searching for another scum now because they will use our discussion to fiddle the night kills/actions/etc.
I think I'm on Havo. I think Chumba should just vote and Havo can Havo himself