In post 549, Chickadee wrote:I would be fine with Chumba or Profii. I've honestly been expecting more from the Profii slot.In post 33, schadd_ wrote:>implying my goal isn't to lynch you regardless of your alignment
Didn’t see anything worth responding toIn post 548, Tchill13 wrote:you didnt acknowledge the first post.
Cause I’m not worried about what you are doing right now. My sights are focused on 3 people. If one of them flip town I’ll reevaluate but everything I’ve seen points to them being connected.In post 548, Tchill13 wrote:and here i am wondering why you haven't asked me why i care who's lynched given my day 1 history.
We can’t all be town. There have to be some scum...
ever heard of a misreadIn post 476, Tchill13 wrote:@havo. Thoughts on chumba and osuka throwing multiple members out there but not me who's hard defending you?
In post 519, Jodaxq wrote:I think eth0s is very strongly town from the 1v1. I agree with the points TChill made about not wanting to expose himself with a fit like this if he were scum.
i agree that ethos comes off as town from the 1v1In post 520, Jodaxq wrote:Profii's behavior around the 1v1 is concerning to me. He popped in and out without trying to interfere with anything, he kept putting off having a reaction - "I'm not sure what to make about eth0s' breakdown," and he came in with a pretty opportunistic vote on Havo.
uncharacteristic != scumIn post 521, Chumba wrote:I do think that’s uncharacteristic for profli. He is usually more verbose and logical
to be fair, i like the thought of havo havoing himselfIn post 523, Jodaxq wrote:This post is really bad. Profii, who has made sure to let everyone know that Havo hammers at L-1 so we don't get a quick lynch, is talking in this post like Havo is a done deal and tried to push his lynch through quickly.In post 464, profii wrote:no point searching for another scum now because they will use our discussion to fiddle the night kills/actions/etc.
I think I'm on Havo. I think Chumba should just vote and Havo can Havo himself
i'm genuinely sorry for the fact that i haven't posted as much as i wanted to. i've been really busy with school (it's picking up)In post 527, Tchill13 wrote:hws, nero, schadd, osuka, nk15, sheep haven't provided enough info for me to feel good about my reads of them. lurking or not. it is only day 1 but i'd like to sort a bit more.In post 518, Jodaxq wrote:In post 513, Tchill13 wrote:Whoever pushed the havo lynch is scummy af because I completely forgot Nero was in the game which means half the player list is lurking. I'd rather rando vote a lurker at this point.Who do you think has been lurking? From what I can see it's only really HWS and Schadd. Maybe me also? This seems very aggressive to all of a sudden come out with "half the player list is lurking" when everyone but three had posted within the past couple of hours.In post 515, Tchill13 wrote:Well I'm sick of the lurkers. Jk get well soon.
In post 545, Havo wrote:Chickadee is obvious town.In post 540, Chumba wrote:like I get you think havo is town (you are wrong there) but seriously how the fuck is NK or chick not in your scum reads at all?In post 532, Tchill13 wrote:I'm fine with lynching Chumba, profii and... Schadd. in that order.
What game are you reading?
i know it wasn't directed at me but probably reading this oneIn post 549, Chickadee wrote:I would be fine with Chumba or Profii. I've honestly been expecting more from the Profii slot.In post 33, schadd_ wrote:>implying my goal isn't to lynch you regardless of your alignment
All my scum reads are in your town block...
Was exclamation point really what you meant to use? Cause if so idk what that means.In post 559, osuka wrote:uncharacteristic != scumIn post 521, Chumba wrote:I do think that’s uncharacteristic for profli. He is usually more verbose and logical
yes it was. sorry, i'm a nerdIn post 565, Chumba wrote:Was exclamation point really what you meant to use? Cause if so idk what that means.In post 559, osuka wrote:uncharacteristic != scumIn post 521, Chumba wrote:I do think that’s uncharacteristic for profli. He is usually more verbose and logical
Say what now?In post 562, osuka wrote:if this were my scumpartner i'd have bussed by now
If you’re town you need to re evaluate.In post 547, Chumba wrote:I don't think you know my town game.In post 544, Havo wrote:This isn’t Chumba’s town game.
I will say this can't be your town game though because you falsely accuse one person of somebody and give a free ride to the person who actually did it.
no way that is town ever.
"if this were" -> hypotheticalIn post 569, Chumba wrote:Say what now?In post 562, osuka wrote:if this were my scumpartner i'd have bussed by now
P.edit. Oh ok thanks. Idk why he told me that cause I wasn’t calling him scum.
VOTE: osuka
You leave me no choice.In post 573, Chumba wrote:Yeah went back and reread and saw you were voting her already. It’s late for me.
VOTE: havo
I’m not voting anyone else until this flips.
