Yes. They were not involved in the 1v1 discussion until it got defused(not fully, eth0s still scumreaded Havo for a bit). They were involved in the grammatics fight, fair point. I wouldn't fight against their inclusion in the claim group but the bigger it becomes the worse it is- we don't want to see all our PR's in that group. Or help scum to find out the remaining PR's.In post 869, profii wrote:out of interest, given the involvement of tchill in the dramasphere/lynchpool whatever you want to call it, is there a particular reason you haven't included him?
Mini Normal 1989: A Perfectly Normal Day -- Game Over
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
-
-
Chumba Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: December 30, 2015
I don’t get how the person who made this post
Now wants 4 more people to claim.In post 756, Not Known 15 wrote:with 2 VT claims already been made we cannot afford more claims this early, to protect our power roles we cannot keep putting people under claim pressure and then backing off.FYI: Activity on weekends are usually minimal
Alt of Robbnva and Jake From State Farm among others.-
-
profii Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6791
- Joined: December 19, 2017
fair point, I don't think your plan will fly with the group or the people you wish to claim but I still think its a clever idea.In post 875, Not Known 15 wrote:
Yes. They were not involved in the 1v1 discussion until it got defused(not fully, eth0s still scumreaded Havo for a bit). They were involved in the grammatics fight, fair point. I wouldn't fight against their inclusion in the claim group but the bigger it becomes the worse it is- we don't want to see all our PR's in that group. Or help scum to find out the remaining PR's.In post 869, profii wrote:out of interest, given the involvement of tchill in the dramasphere/lynchpool whatever you want to call it, is there a particular reason you haven't included him?
I see your point but I think the idea is the 4 identified players have a high chance of flipping at least 1 scum, which you must agree with based on your havo stuff, so the idea is to trap these specific dudes. I think that also reduces the risk of requiring future claims as we have something to work with.In post 876, Chumba wrote:I don’t get how the person who made this post
Now wants 4 more people to claim.In post 756, Not Known 15 wrote:with 2 VT claims already been made we cannot afford more claims this early, to protect our power roles we cannot keep putting people under claim pressure and then backing off.-
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Wtf?! How can asking for four claims at this point come from town?In post 859, Not Known 15 wrote:There is at least one scum in Havo/eth0s/chumba/chickadee. Likely two. Maybe even three.
Three of them have told us all things that do not add up(Havo, Eth0s and Chumba). Havo and eth0s were on a 1v1. Chickadee intervened. Chumba tried to.
Something is really wrong here. I have the feeling that one of Havo and eth0s is definitely scum, and that one of the later is also scum trying to defuse a 1v1 with scum. Of these two Chumba is the more interesting candidate, because their attempt was not as in the open as the one of chumba.
I think we even should consider a massclaim for those four right now, because it nails down scum in these four to an early claim, and that can be very dangerous for scum in some circumstances. It also forces scum to clear scummy (strong)power role claims there via nightkill to prevent them from getting night info that clears them and incriminates scum.
What happened to your suspicion of HWS?-
-
Chumba Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: December 30, 2015
-
-
Jodaxq
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
Well that is a good question.In post 876, Chumba wrote:I don’t get how the person who made this post
Now wants 4 more people to claim.In post 756, Not Known 15 wrote:with 2 VT claims already been made we cannot afford more claims this early, to protect our power roles we cannot keep putting people under claim pressure and then backing off.
I have reconsidered my stance. Usually, yes, you would not want to out even more people.
But Havo, eth0s, Chickadee and you are, for me, caught in a group that is heavily scummy as a whole. If there are legit PR claims there then scum will only help us by eliminating them. But more importantly, right now it is the worst time for scum there in this group to fakeclaim. They don't know what the PR's outside of the group are and if there is a rolecop then they are toast. Which means that we can trust these claims more than tomorrow, or in two game days. Equally importantly, scum do not have daychat unless they have an encryptor(daychat by default must be announced in the rules and it isn't in the rules), which means that they can not work together to forge claims today.-
-
Chumba Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: December 30, 2015
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
It still exists.In post 878, Jodaxq wrote:What happened to your suspicion of HWS?
They are a potential third scum outside the group.
Additionally, we do not need to ask them for a claim anymore.-
-
brassherald he/himJack of All Tradeshe/him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: New York
This is a painfully obvious PR Hunt for Not Known 15, guys. We definitely do not need claims from 6 people day 1.
He would have claims from almost half the people in the game, and then has a much better chance of hitting one of the power roles at night. Get out of this stupid Havo v. Chumba thing and vote Not Known. What more do we need?
And, would a PR even CC a fake claim Day 1? I feel like scum would welcome a 1 for 1 trade of a Goon for a PR. We should just be voting NK right now.-
-
Jodaxq
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
Why do our PR's need to CC a fake claim Day 1? They should NOT counterclaim Day 1. A counterclaim on day 2,3 or 4(depending on the color of the Day 1 flip and the type of role) is fast enough.In post 884, brassherald wrote:This is a painfully obvious PR Hunt for Not Known 15, guys. We definitely do not need claims from 6 people day 1.
He would have claims from almost half the people in the game, and then has a much better chance of hitting one of the power roles at night. Get out of this stupid Havo v. Chumba thing and vote Not Known. What more do we need?
And, would a PR even CC a fake claim Day 1? I feel like scum would welcome a 1 for 1 trade of a Goon for a PR. We should just be voting NK right now.-
-
Chumba Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2094
- Joined: December 30, 2015
-
-
brassherald he/himJack of All Tradeshe/him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: New York
Then why would we do a mass claim?In post 886, Not Known 15 wrote:
Why do our PR's need to CC a fake claim Day 1? They should NOT counterclaim Day 1. A counterclaim on day 2,3 or 4(depending on the color of the Day 1 flip and the type of role) is fast enough.In post 884, brassherald wrote:This is a painfully obvious PR Hunt for Not Known 15, guys. We definitely do not need claims from 6 people day 1.
He would have claims from almost half the people in the game, and then has a much better chance of hitting one of the power roles at night. Get out of this stupid Havo v. Chumba thing and vote Not Known. What more do we need?
And, would a PR even CC a fake claim Day 1? I feel like scum would welcome a 1 for 1 trade of a Goon for a PR. We should just be voting NK right now.-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
We will get roles on these four. We will probably deal with the VT's and very low power roles first. Depending on the nature of the power roles mafia may have the urge to remove one. The mafia there will be in a dilemma. Either they fakeclaim to avoid the day 1 lynch or they don't and risk to get outed later. If there are two scum in this group, which I suspect, then both can heavily backfire for mafia.In post 888, brassherald wrote:
Then why would we do a mass claim?In post 886, Not Known 15 wrote:
Why do our PR's need to CC a fake claim Day 1? They should NOT counterclaim Day 1. A counterclaim on day 2,3 or 4(depending on the color of the Day 1 flip and the type of role) is fast enough.In post 884, brassherald wrote:This is a painfully obvious PR Hunt for Not Known 15, guys. We definitely do not need claims from 6 people day 1.
He would have claims from almost half the people in the game, and then has a much better chance of hitting one of the power roles at night. Get out of this stupid Havo v. Chumba thing and vote Not Known. What more do we need?
And, would a PR even CC a fake claim Day 1? I feel like scum would welcome a 1 for 1 trade of a Goon for a PR. We should just be voting NK right now.-
-
Tchill13 Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11552
- Joined: March 17, 2017
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
This sentence does not advance the town play. It's commentary fluff. It makes you more suspicious.In post 890, Tchill13 wrote:Definitely doesn't look good for nk15. That's for sure.
What do you think about my claim proposal?-
-
Jodaxq Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 964
- Joined: October 8, 2017
Didn't you say you town read eth0s, Havo, and Chumba? Why are you okay with this then?In post 877, profii wrote:
fair point, I don't think your plan will fly with the group or the people you wish to claim but I still think its a clever idea.In post 875, Not Known 15 wrote:
Yes. They were not involved in the 1v1 discussion until it got defused(not fully, eth0s still scumreaded Havo for a bit). They were involved in the grammatics fight, fair point. I wouldn't fight against their inclusion in the claim group but the bigger it becomes the worse it is- we don't want to see all our PR's in that group. Or help scum to find out the remaining PR's.In post 869, profii wrote:out of interest, given the involvement of tchill in the dramasphere/lynchpool whatever you want to call it, is there a particular reason you haven't included him?
I see your point but I think the idea is the 4 identified players have a high chance of flipping at least 1 scum, which you must agree with based on your havo stuff, so the idea is to trap these specific dudes. I think that also reduces the risk of requiring future claims as we have something to work with.In post 876, Chumba wrote:I don’t get how the person who made this post
Now wants 4 more people to claim.In post 756, Not Known 15 wrote:with 2 VT claims already been made we cannot afford more claims this early, to protect our power roles we cannot keep putting people under claim pressure and then backing off.-
-
brassherald he/himJack of All Tradeshe/him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: New York
I've been reading this for about 5 minutes to see if I can read this in any way that makes sense and is good for town. I can't.In post 889, Not Known 15 wrote: We will get roles on these four. We will probably deal with the VT's and very low power roles first. Depending on the nature of the power roles mafia may have the urge to remove one. The mafia there will be in a dilemma. Either they fakeclaim to avoid the day 1 lynch or they don't and risk to get outed later. If there are two scum in this group, which I suspect, then both can heavily backfire for mafia.
NK15 for Day 1 lynch!
(I'm with Jodaxq on profii, too. He's being really weird about a bad PR Hunt.)-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
I didn't say that I town read eth0s, Havo and Chumba.In post 892, Jodaxq wrote:
Didn't you say you town read eth0s, Havo, and Chumba? Why are you okay with this then?-
-
brassherald he/himJack of All Tradeshe/him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5176
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: New York
That was a profii quote, buddy.In post 894, Not Known 15 wrote:
I didn't say that I town read eth0s, Havo and Chumba.In post 892, Jodaxq wrote:
Didn't you say you town read eth0s, Havo, and Chumba? Why are you okay with this then?-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
Oops.In post 895, brassherald wrote:
That was a profii quote, buddy.In post 894, Not Known 15 wrote:
I didn't say that I town read eth0s, Havo and Chumba.In post 892, Jodaxq wrote:
Didn't you say you town read eth0s, Havo, and Chumba? Why are you okay with this then?-
-
Tchill13 Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11552
- Joined: March 17, 2017
Why the hell would scum shout mass claim on day one?In post 891, Not Known 15 wrote:
This sentence does not advance the town play. It's commentary fluff. It makes you more suspicious.In post 890, Tchill13 wrote:Definitely doesn't look good for nk15. That's for sure.
What do you think about my claim proposal?
Why the hell would a towny shout mass claim on day one?
That's what I'm thinking.-
-
Tchill13 Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11552
- Joined: March 17, 2017
-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: September 15, 2017
Why do you think that my proposed forced claim for these four is not in the interests of town?In post 897, Tchill13 wrote:
Why the hell would scum shout mass claim on day one?In post 891, Not Known 15 wrote:
This sentence does not advance the town play. It's commentary fluff. It makes you more suspicious.In post 890, Tchill13 wrote:Definitely doesn't look good for nk15. That's for sure.
What do you think about my claim proposal?
Why the hell would a towny shout mass claim on day one?
That's what I'm thinking.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-