I just saw this post.In post 401, Untrod Tripod wrote:remember that other game that we played that one timeIn post 398, xRECKONERx wrote:only if you're scumclaiming to me babe
where mollie derped around and we yelled at her the whole game and got a perfect victory and it was incredible
this might be That Game 2.0
I've got MS Paint running and waiting to make bad images you just say the word
I knew it was too good to be true for you guys to be niceIn post 401, Untrod Tripod wrote:remember that other game that we played that one timeIn post 398, xRECKONERx wrote:only if you're scumclaiming to me babe
where mollie derped around and we yelled at her the whole game and got a perfect victory and it was incredible
this might be That Game 2.0
I've got MS Paint running and waiting to make bad images you just say the word
You've said something like this as scum about me. Now I'm getting hesitant about my read on you.In post 405, Alisae wrote:Get it to L-2 again, I'll L-1 it and you can hammer (but I want a claim first). I'm only saying this because even though I think its flipping town
Thank you for this reactionIn post 429, Kokichi Oma wrote:You've said something like this as scum about me. Now I'm getting hesitant about my read on you.In post 405, Alisae wrote:Get it to L-2 again, I'll L-1 it and you can hammer (but I want a claim first). I'm only saying this because even though I think its flipping town
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
Ok so here is where the Majiffy read started. Me and Mollie both cover this read extremely well.In post 144, Majiffy wrote:Well we know I'm not going toIn post 23, pirate mollie wrote:I think alisae may actually make this fun
u fukkin lissen heerIn post 28, pirate mollie wrote:we cld always lynch majiffyIn post 25, Majiffy wrote:Later, yo
cos it wld be funny
Expectations ---------In post 32, Aristophanes wrote:OMG i forgot Majiffy was half my reason for joining this! =DIn post 28, pirate mollie wrote:we cld always lynch majiffyIn post 25, Majiffy wrote:Later, yo
cos it wld be funny
Reality ------------
A+
Why wait till tomorrow?In post 46, pirate mollie wrote:majiffy and I will likely get stupidly paranoid of each other by d2, (OR WILL WE?) there is no stopping that train.
we will sort each other out. I think. eventually.
mebbe
Actually that makes sense because there's a good chance one of us is dead tomorrow.
I suddenly understand the votes.
In post 71, PenguinPower wrote:In post 69, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:... Yeah they're speaking in Green Code. They're all colluding.
I'm sorry to make the rest of you as painfully aware of how well this gif works with that music as I was just made scrolling through this thread.
Not familiar with vonflare, huh?In post 78, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:Vonflare sure knows how to attract the weirdest players.
No we're going to do this for 20 more pages until we're 2 days out from deadline then rush a vote on whoever seems to be the second or third most annoying because most annoying player is obvtown as fuck don't you know how games work around here now?In post 89, Untrod Tripod wrote:can we start
You need to pack up all your shit and go sell it at the shit market cuz I don't want it
I'm here too asshole
The fuck is this wagonIn post 109, vonflare wrote:Untrod Tripod(5): PenguinPower, Aristophanes, Lovebird, Bambietta Basterbine, Not_Mafia
In post 127, Bambietta Basterbine wrote:It seemed more like he either doesn't like my type of humor or just thinks I'm using it as a cover to not be productive as scum.
Well that's what I've gotten from everyone I've play so far.Spoiler: Or, and this is going out a limb, it could be your playstyle is scummy.
Feck offIn post 139, pirate mollie wrote:is it time for me to death tunnel majiffy yet
I think I gagged a little, in my mouthIn post 142, pirate mollie wrote:shhh...In post 141, Alisae wrote:this isn't a bad thing (and probably a good thing for that matter)In post 140, pirate mollie wrote:asking for a friend
but I can see the MU in you :3
I want people to actually go read the post I linked. They're extremely similar, in that both posts express ideas that is what the thread is currently sharing.In post 164, Alisae wrote:Alright guys it was a trick question they're both bad posts that don't really add much to the game and they're both being posted from scumIn post 152, Alisae wrote:I rather play quake tho then out the read.
I'll out the read laterz
If anyone wants a hint tho, whats the difference between 144 and this post?
VOTE: Ma Jiffy
Also added by Pirate Mollie, its a post also functions as a way to remind us that he's here without actually doing anything. Majiffy isn't trying to play the game but moreso coast.In post 179, Alisae wrote:Yeah the catchup post is basicly a post that contains a lot of nothing and stuff that's extremely easy to say.In post 175, Kokichi Oma wrote:Can you explain your majiffy read? It just looks like a catch up post to meIn post 172, Alisae wrote:Yeah shit players won't read multiquotes.
Um that's not really something I should answer. Its better if you try to figure out if I'm town or scum yourself.
Like, I don't feel like he's scumhunting he's just stating extremely easy opinions to state.
--In post 259, pirate mollie wrote:we are, but it just might look a bit different cos some of us know each other pretty well.In post 195, Lovebird wrote:It seems like lots of people aren't really scumhunting. Why does it make majiffy scum in particular?In post 179, Alisae wrote: Like, I don't feel like he's scumhunting he's just stating extremely easy opinions to state.
majiffy's ketchup posts look super scummy for him IMO. its "hi I am here! shut up!" posts instead of actually trying to figure out the things he had read so far.
This post in of itself makes me think he's scum because for the most part, I feel like if he was town, he would attempt to try more with the playerlist to push reads and actually do things. Here he's nonexistant and doesn't really care.In post 428, Majiffy wrote:So I got caught up in Rocket League and forgot about this. I'll try tomorrow night.
Its moreso because there's 2 other scumfucks we can lynch today, and we'll be able to get a better idea on which one is scum via flips. Its why I rather lynch them later but not now.In post 435, Lovebird wrote:Why are we leaving "one scum in this pairing" to day two?
Also the point of this planing is to try to stay as cohesive as possible and to try to stay as a unit.In post 436, Lovebird wrote:I like it as a readslist I guess but I'd rather just go along with whatever I see. Not really seeing the point in so much planning.
he is basing a read on bambi for "bad logic' when it is an emotional post, while at the same time giving her an out with the italicized.In post 280, Sir Bastion wrote:@Reckoner
I actually have reasons from experience for most of my actions if you want me to pinpoint the exact posts in my history for them (the meta and timezone bits at least) we can, but if thats not necessary we'll get back to the game at hand.
For the opportunistic spot on a wagon. I'm going to assume you made this mistake because of the order of the votes in the votecount
But it looks like I didnt actually join a wagon..
right now post 225 is all sorts of wrong logic.
@Bambi do you have issues/concerns with those that started the UT wagon?
I dont really consider that an out as I actually want an answer, so great timing bringing it back to the forefront because in all of bambi's whinging about people being unfair to her (with another post at here which again repeats the same issue but now with the person on the wagon after her) she did skip over answering it and I want it answered.he is basing a read on bambi for "bad logic' when it is an emotional post, while at the same time giving her an out with the italicized.
how many times do we get the privilege of seeing coaching in a thread? not often, actually pretty seldom but wldn't it be glorious if this were true?
