So I townread someone for having similar thoughts and scumreads as me? What's so unusual about that? I thought it was pretty good for an early townread.
First, Smocaine put down a reasonless vote and didn't post anything beyond that. It wouldn't be too bad if he was more active and I could figure out his thought process, but he essentially placed down a vote and disappeared. We were out of RVS at that point. I wanted to know why he was voting for LLD.
Second, Smocaine was never a townread. In fact, I said that anyone on a wagon
with
him should think twice. This is because regardless of his alignment, Smocaine tends to push bad wagons. I just watched him lead mislynch after mislynch as town in The Mod is Mafia. So either scum or potential scum MVP as town, but not someone you wanted to follow. Also, another reason why I wanted reasons. I wanted to hold him accountable.
Where? I know I did so with Smocaine, and that I didn't like Math's reasoning, but I can't remember putting a lot of effort in discrediting any votes on the LLD wagon.
I still disagree with that interpretation of her play. I think it's more likely that she either saw Skirt as a good mislynch (if town) or was trying to distance (if scum). The whole idea that LLD was trying to keep Math and Skirt apart relies on an assumption that LLD saw Skirt as a threat, which I don't think is likely. And I know I wasn't the only one who expressed that opinion.
My clash with Skirt and subsequent V/LA was a pretty major event in the game. Fitz goes through the game and doesn't even mention it, but spends time on the LLD AtE. Then he puts me as his highest townread. That didn't seem right to me, as I figured that surely if he was townreading me so high, he'd have at least have said something about the Skirt interactions, or anything about me in general.
I don't do scum theater. Even with day talk, it's not going to come off as natural, and there are not many times that it's actually going to come across as genuine. If I was scum with Fitz, I wouldn't have given him a heads up about anything I planned on doing. And he definitely would have been on exactly when I needed him to.
Maybe you should read that post again. The situation changed and I got a strong townread on Math. There was no reason for me to be secretive about asking if Fitz had experience with Math at that point. You'll notice that I actually asked Math that exact question in that post you linked to, and that was because I didn't care about him trying to intercept and answer it ahead of Fitz anymore (In fact, I really didn't care about that line of inquiry anymore at all, but I like to be thorough.).
Dino was calling Bins scum for setting up Titus as a Fitz counterwagon, even though Dino had mentioned that he purposely set the two wagons as counterwagons to each other. I did not like that Math was calling Bins scum for a situation that he set up himself. Plus, I was never quite happy with the Fitz/Titus dichotomy that Dino kept pushing. It felt forced.
Asking questions about the informational value is not the same as objecting to it. Math said that the Fitz lynch would provide information on Bins and Elena. I wanted to know what kind of information, because I wasn't seeing it. His answer for Bins was weak, and I don't think he ever explained Elena. This was pivotal, as he was trying to sell Fitz as an informational lynch as opposed to Titus.
Now think about this. The Skirt/Transcend/Titus slot was one of the most talked about and interacted with slot in the game. Everyone in the game took some sort of hard stance on the slot. Compare that to LLD/Fitz, which was pretty weak sauce. So how is that wagon a better informational wagon than Titus? And why am I scum for asking this very basic question and actually expecting Math to follow through in his answer?
In post 2430, ChannelDelibird wrote:
Though Bulbazak eventually voted for Fitz, there was never any enthusiasm there, and it absolutely seems like he'd have taken another lynch if one had been offered that he felt safe in choosing.
The only reason I voted there was the "likely to pick scum" reasoning. I really didn't have that strong of a read on the slot, and I'd have much preferred lynching a scumread. I had townreads on Bins, Math, Dunker, and Radja. I was giving Titus some space. Everything else was more nebulous than I'd like, so yeah, I compromised. If there's anyone who actually likes this game state, please point them out to me.
In post 2430, ChannelDelibird wrote:
Compare Bulbazak's treatment of the LLD slot to
how he describes the slot Today: "Given the AtE, LLD looked like scum who was not in control" and likely to be considered "a lost cause" by scumbuddies early on. That doesn't jive with his 'talk me into it' approach to the slot for much of Day 1.
Wow. My view of the game changed once we actually got flips. Imagine that...
In post 2430, ChannelDelibird wrote:
Look at how much Bulbazak focused on Almost50, a read primarily driven by what Bulbazak saw as AtE. (Examples include
this,
this and
this but are also just a fair chunk of Bulbazak's Day 1 proactivity.)
Now let's compare that behaviour to
how Bulbazak responded to AtE from LLD. It's much more mealy-mouthed and noncommittal; just a matter of 'I'm doubting my townread now', which would certainly jive with his stated position Today that LLD's scumbuddies would feel that she were very vulnerable.
My scumread of A50 was not just about AtE. In fact, I mentioned it multiple times in my ISO. Here's just a taste:
In post 1603, Bulbazak wrote:
My scumread of A50 is not policy. I think people keep forgetting, and I know you're going to disagree with me on this, but this isn't just any normal mafia game. This is Team Mafia. In simplest terms, this means that I don't buy that town A50 would even think of throwing for lols when a title is on the line and there are judges taking everything into account for score purposes (read: tiebreaking). I don't care that it's lolA50, pulling this crap as town would be detrimental to his team, and I don't see him doing that.
In post 1638, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 1377, Almost50 wrote:Actually, THANK YOU KMD! Now that you reminded me, EVERY SINGLE PERSON who calls for my lynch "based on self-voting" I'm going to accuse them of being Scum, and I do have reason to .. precisely from that game, where NO TOWNIE voted Joda "because she self-voted", while 75% of the total Scum count in that game did. THANK YOU AGAIN.
I mean, let's just ignore the fact that the argument is less about you self-voting and more about why you would threaten to throw the game as town in a team based game with a title on the line.
In post 1699, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 1665, Almost50 wrote:I seriously (and extremely respectfully) want to ask: Why do people sign to games they don't intend to play? And why do it in THE TOURNAMENT? Like, if I had something planned, or expected to be unavailable for 3+ days I would not have played in the tournament myself. I get "I'll be busy on weekends" or "I'm V/:A for the next 48 hours", but I don't get "I'll catch up later" followed by "I'm beat and not feeling like, later" then "I have other plans, so later"...
Let's ignore the elephant-sized problem with this post existing for a moment and focus on A50 emphasizing the importance of this being a tournament. Now look back at my point about A50 not making that AtE game throwing comment as town in a Team Mafia game. Now back to this post.
You're welcome. Vote A50.
In post 1922, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 1784, Mathdino wrote:
2. Yes, town A50 would do that. Yes. I don't know what the problem you have here is. I haven't seen scum A50, no, but I know more than enough about town A50 to say YES JESUS CHRIST HE DOES DUMB SHIT LIKE THAT SOMETIMES.
You're trying to juxtapose a contradiction in A50's mindset between:
A. Threatening to throw the game and self-lynch.
B. Caring so much about the game and the tournament that he shames people for not participating.
I'm not gonna generate a narrative of A50 for you because I do think he should be the one to explain that, but his progression this game
has. made. sense.
Yes! He cares about the game and the tournament! That's my whole freaking point Math! A50 does things that doesn't make sense from a town point of view in that context, and everyone just shrugs and goes "A50 always does weird stuff. Nobody can explain it." giving him carte blanche to be as scummy as he wants. And then you say he's "low hanging fruit" when he's anything but. If he was low hanging fruit, Math, it wouldn't be this hard to lynch him. There's heavy resistance to this wagon, and everyone continues to hand wave everything A50 does, because A50 has spent a mafia career cultivating this meta, enabling him to exploit it to his benefit when it bests suits him, like, I don't know, the biggest mafia competition on site?!
So as shown there, my scumread on A50 was less about him pulling some AtE and more about how his actions were manipulative and did not make sense to me from a town perspective. I felt, and I emphasized this over and over, that he benefited from those actions more as scum and not at all as town. I did not see the town motivation, and that was the crux of my case.
Now we go to LLD's AtE. First, I wasn't actually here for that, as I had gone V/LA after flipping out on Skirt. Second, I did mention how I didn't like the AtE, as it was too close to my own V/LA, and it felt like LLD might just be trying to mimic me. Those were things I didn't know for sure, and given that I had a townread on the slot prior to leaving, it dented my read, but that was about it. Now, if you clearly believe that LLD was mimicking me, as I believe Math said at the time, then doesn't that mean that you think what I did was a town tell and that LLD was just trying to grab town cred for doing the same thing? I know this might have nothing to do with you, but I'm finding it difficult to believe that some of the people now scumreading me still hold the belief that I'm scum and that LLD was also scum mimicking me.
In post 2430, ChannelDelibird wrote:
By his own words, we know that scum!Bulbazak would feel obliged to suspect LLD after that behaviour - but of course it's never as easy as just throwing a player like LLD to the wolves, especially when you've already been townreading her early on. She's an advantage, even under suspicion, that scum wouldn't want to freely give up. So you end up with this fence-sitting and subtle shooting down of the wagon without ever being seen as too much against it.
So apparently you think I'm inept at scum. I seriously have a quote from a scum game in my signature, and you are making asssumptions like I am some sort of rank amateur. When I say what the optimal scum move is, that means I'm considering what I would do if I was playing scum in this situation. And if I was scum with LLD, I would have realized as soon as the meta scumreads hit that the slot was a goner. Maybe I try to keep her around for a game day or two, but once she vanishes, and once a replacement hit, especially one as bad as Fitz, I would have positioned myself onto the wagon as soon as possible.
Btw, you know who does that? Elena. She starts the game with a scumread of LLD. Then she townreads LLD, something that I gave Elena a townread for at the beginning of the game, but now I look back and wonder if that was a scum tell given the LLD flip. She later goes back to scumreading the slot, but only weakly. Meanwhile, she pushes elsewhere, particularly Bins. And when she gets on LLD, she only does so once it's obvious that's where the momentum is going. Look back at her vote again. That's the place I would be as scum on that wagon, and that's when I would have jumped on. Elena never hard pushed LLD/Fitz. You did (when you were here). A50 did. Heck, even Math did at the end. Elena did not. She said the slot was scum occasionally, but she was more focused on trying to lynch off of the wagon or say why those who were scumreading her for the same reasons LLD was (*cough* meta *cough*) were wrong and didn't know what they were talking about. And then after having not really hard pushed the slot, she then enters this day phase and tries to get credit for the lynch.
Seriously, CDB. Scum do not waffle on LLD/Fitz when the chips are down. They weak push and then get on at the opportune moment to gain credit.
In post 2430, ChannelDelibird wrote:
It also seems like mastina should be well aware of the likelihood that LLD would pick scum, and again that is addressed in the most fence-sitting way possible
here.
Go back and read that post again. Notice where I say that Mastina was talking to another team member about their game? Yeah...that was Eddie. The DEFCON note came out while Llamarble was still alive, and there was some paranoia there. So yeah, Mastina did not mention LLD, because frankly, she wasn't preoccupied with what LLD would or would not do. I just looked over those notes, saw that there was some general stuff that was good, and gave them. And I even think I said that I had some general stuff from Mastina that wasn't even for this game, and Math said he still wanted to hear them. So I was very forthcoming about those thoughts not being for this game specifically and just being general stuff meant for Eddie.