^In post 618, Eddie Cane wrote:you said to me that you playing differently than me (not lynching claims) doesn't make you bad, and now it makes people bad for being alright lynching a claim? backwards asf bro :/
Mini 1991: Taking Justice Into Our Own Hands (Town Win)
-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
There was a CC? Where? I missed it? lolIn post 623, Cedrick wrote:He CCs and now he’s basically confirmed scum? Sorry that is suspicious.
I was suspecting Lexa before her claim. I know you know this because you were defending her att. Her claim just adds to my suspicion of her. Is Lexa confirmed scum? Not 100%. But she's close enough for me to give her my vote.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
You keep on saying you aren't defending Lexa.In post 628, Cedrick wrote:Fitz actually said me scum reading him for pushing to lynch a Pr claim over a non Pr claim was me defending Lexa. How?
I’m against BOTH being lynched and I scum read mumble. That’s not defending anyone. It’s pointing out the bizarreness
If there are any town that disagree with this assessment please raise your hand lol.
Delusional.
And if you continued trying to lynch doc claim Mumble (like Lexa is if you hadn't noticed)...you wouldn't have a leg to stand on in saying people shouldn't lynch watch claim Lexa. Ergo you are defending her.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
Has Eddie defended Mumble to the same extent Cedrick has Lexa? I haven't compared. I know he town reads Mumble and has stated he thinks Mumble is town based on meta. And iirc Eddie suspects Lexa for meta. Was that right?In post 630, Luca Blight wrote:
In that case why are you townreading Cane when he's been doing the same for Mumble?In post 601, havingfitz wrote:I think Cedrick is scum. I just cannot see town hard defending someone on D1 and hard as he has...even before Lexa's fakeclaim.
And I, independently of anyone else's views, am townreading Mumble. And I think his claim is genuine. So I'm not likely to suspect someone who also thinks a tr of mine is town.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
You get more information regardless of who is lynched. duh.In post 636, Cedrick wrote:
More information.In post 635, Eddie Cane wrote:once again, what are you waiting for? like what do you want to happen that will make you decide whether or not to lynch lexa or mumble tomorrow?
First - I disagree scum is going to leave both alive. It’s possible they do especially if one is actually scum but the entire point of fake claiming is self preservation and trying to get a cc.
Second - wagon analysis would give me more things to consider. Getting people to focus elsewhere and scum hunt some more will probably be more difficult for scum.
1st) "It's possible" So you're saying there's a chance. Imagine that.
2nd) There's no wagon analysis if Lexa is lynched?Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
^In post 661, Papa Zito wrote:
The way you've disappeared recently is really concerning.In post 658, Lexa wrote:eddie i'm not power towning for 14 day cycles lolTown 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
Ski weekend commences in 2 hours.
v/LA until MondayTown 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
You did lie and I pointed the lies out. So no misrepIn post 670, havingfitz wrote:Nice MISREP on saying I am lying.-
-
Cedrick
-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
You're terrible. Saying you are hard defendind Lexa is not a lie. It's my opinion. If you deny you had defended her this entire game you are a delusional liar yourself. Take away the term hard defended if it knots your panties. Fact remains you've defended her the entire game.In post 682, Cedrick wrote:
You did lie and I pointed the lies out. So no misrepIn post 670, havingfitz wrote:Nice MISREP on saying I am lying.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Awoo Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: September 1, 2017
- Location: lmao city
-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
I don't fake v/las asshat.In post 683, Cedrick wrote:Now fitz is going to fake a v/la.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Papa Zito Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: April 5, 2009
- Location: Tejas
Here's where I'm at.
1.Alexcellenthas a grand total of 10 posts this game and 0 engagement. He's also currently not voting anyone. I don't know how we're supposed to get a read on a slot that isn't playing.
2. People have praisedAwoo's early case on Q and I thought it was terrible. I just think a lot of what he points out isn't really alignment relevant or interesting and I'm struggling to figure out how to sort him.
3.Cedrickremains my top scumspect but what gives me pause isn't the things he's saying but how he's saying them. He's (1) remaining engaged with the game despite fitz's tunnel when it'd be far easier to mellow out and (2) he seems utterly convicted about what he's saying even if the majority of it is batshit insane.
4. I remain completely underwhelmed byRiggswho was my pocket scumspect from early on but like Alexcellent I don't have very much to determine if this is a scumslot or just someone who doesn't really want to play the game. The main difference between the two is that Alex at least shows some depth in his few posts while Riggs is a giant vortex of suck.
5. I usedHavoto kill RVS early with his goofy declarative statement and after a flurry of posts defending himself he's done basically nothing. It makes me extremely wary because this looks like classic scum UTR behavior; no need to make waves while the town is screaming at each other over Lexa/Cedrick.
6. Speaking of,Lexa's gonzo claim and subsequent awful explanation for it combined with a lot of bad posting and recent UTR behavior make me think the others are right about this slot and I'm sorely tempted to move here, if nothing else than to remove a player I want nowhere near lylo and restore some sanity to the game.
7.Mumbleandrbboth occupy similar spots in my head where they "feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel" townish but by god they aren't trying very hard are they and I have this little voice in the back of my head (among the others) whispering to me that they're doing it on purpose to avoid detection.
In other words I really honestly and truly don't know where to go here because if I could firebomb most of the playerlist rn I would happily do soKappaJust MonikaAge is a very high price to pay for maturity.-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
Papa Zito's in a good place.Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
You said I hard defended her since my 3rd post of the game. That’s 10000000000% a lie.In post 684, havingfitz wrote:
You're terrible. Saying you are hard defendind Lexa is not a lie. It's my opinion. If you deny you had defended her this entire game you are a delusional liar yourself. Take away the term hard defended if it knots your panties. Fact remains you've defended her the entire game.In post 682, Cedrick wrote:
You did lie and I pointed the lies out. So no misrepIn post 670, havingfitz wrote:Nice MISREP on saying I am lying.
I don’t even think i hard defended her at all but I could see how somebody would think that after I called out mumble for his BS omgus accusation but even that wasn’t a defense of Lexa and that was way past my 3rd post-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
Literally nothing I’ve said is batshit insane.In post 687, Papa Zito wrote:he seems utterly convicted about what he's saying even if the majority of it is batshit insane.
I’m playing smart. Letting mafia resolve the PR claims is smart.-
-
Luca Blight Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10745
- Joined: December 21, 2013
-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
Lol....did you defend Lexa in your 3rd post?
Have you defended her this entire game...since your 3rd post?
Are you cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
Today’s lynch should be fitz. If not him I’d go gnr or maybe Eddie.
If we lynch a Pr claim it should definitely be mumble.
Like the reason that gives Zito pause about me is exactly what mumble has done. At least Lexa under pressure attempted to do something but mumble hasn’t done anything useful all game and is now hoping the doc claim buys him extra time.
I still won’t vote mumble today unless I absolutely have to-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
No I didntIn post 692, havingfitz wrote:Lol....did you defend Lexa in your 3rd post?-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
No I didn’tIn post 692, havingfitz wrote:Have you defended her this entire game...since your 3rd post?-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
-
-
Papa Zito Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 9792
- Joined: April 5, 2009
- Location: Tejas
See this is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. It's like you're on this damn holy crusade and only you can see the light while the rest of us blunder around slamming our shins on coffee tables like idiots. Do scum play with/fake this level of conviction? I don't know it's really weird????In post 690, Cedrick wrote:
Literally nothing I’ve said is batshit insane.In post 687, Papa Zito wrote:he seems utterly convicted about what he's saying even if the majority of it is batshit insane.
I’m playing smart. Letting mafia resolve the PR claims is smart.
Making assumptions about what the Mafia will do when you don't know who they are or the setup falls firmly outside the "playing smart" category, sorry bud. There's nothing stopping them from letting a couple of townies with super shaky claims and really weak dayplay live to cause havoc later in the game, that shit is solid gold in mylo. But the last thing I'm gonna do is get in a theory argument with a zealot so whoooooosh pretend I didn't say anything.
I'm gonna guess your eyes have glazed over a bit on the fitz vs Cedrick stuff but if you actually go back and read it everything fitz posts is right and everything Cedrick posts is wrong. Like if you took the two of them and wrapped them in copper wire you could probably power your house. I haven't stepped into that convo because well frankly I don't need to, fitz is fine but ffs how can someone be that wrong and town simultaneously?In post 691, Luca Blight wrote:@Zito- you gave two decent reasons why Cedrick might be town, so it begs the question why exactly does he remain your top scumspect? I don't believe you've ever properly explained this read.
I mean what is this. Come on.In post 683, Cedrick wrote:Now fitz is going to fake a v/la.
I guess what I was really trying to communicate with that post is that I have very few townreads and also while I have fairly strong feelings on possible red flips I'm still somewhat torn for reasons stated.KappaJust MonikaAge is a very high price to pay for maturity.-
-
havingfitz Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10118
- Joined: July 1, 2009
- Location: Here....no, here...wait! There!
In post 62, Cedrick wrote:In post 54, numberQ wrote:For example, fitz caught Lexa in a contradictionidk if i'd say that was a contradiction by lexa
Yes you did.In post 694, Cedrick wrote:
No I didntIn post 692, havingfitz wrote:Lol....did you defend Lexa in your 3rd post?
Yes you have.In post 695, Cedrick wrote:
No I didn’tIn post 692, havingfitz wrote:Have you defended her this entire game...since your 3rd post?Town 57w-66l :: Not Town 29w-16l:: TBD 2
V/LA on weekends (i.e. RL > mafia)
The shortest GTKAS thread ever!-
-
Cedrick Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 812
- Joined: February 7, 2018
That’s what it feels like tbh. I was taught that you never lynch a claimed Pr day one. In my years on this site I’ve seen so many more PRs lynched day one then I have scum lynched day 1.In post 697, Papa Zito wrote:See this is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. It's like you're on this damn holy crusade and only you can see the light while the rest of us blunder around slamming our shins on coffee tables like idiots. Do scum play with/fake this level of conviction? I don't know it's really weird????
Do we really want to gamble on potentially losing a doctor or a watcher?
If we lynch based purely on play. Hands down mumble is scummier yet more people town read mumble. Why?
He’s not enguaged. He’s not scum hunting. He attacked somebody for omgus which isn’t even scummy. He got agressive for a few posts when he didn’t really need to so it looked fake, then he vanished and hasn’t done anything since he has been under pressure. He comes back and claims Pr but still has done nothing.
I don’t see how anyone can tr that
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-