i had apparently missed this.In post 329, Hopkirk wrote:13th16thIn post 200, Kop wrote:@mod V/LA for today, will be on tomorrow.Just noticed this. Did you think Kop was still V/LA, and does it affect anything that he wasn't V/LA at that point?
I know you voted Kurkin instead since you thought Kop was V/LA.
More thoughts on this to follow post response.
Not trying to fence sit over here. I just didn't see the merit in the the wagon, and jumped onto the last vote to chime in, as it was by far the worst.In post 334, Kop wrote:
@chickadee
I don't disagree with what you said to Brass, however the point that I do disagree with is, the fact that you have specifically said there were bad votes on TFL wagon. What I would be interested in, is what you see as the bad votes, and who you actually believe is scum being opportunistic. What you have done personally, is take a stance towards the whole TFL wagon, but not actually take it apart. The feeling I get, is that there is a chance that you are scum, see a wagon that isn't getting much resistance for it taking off, and your fence sitting trying to defend it subtly whilst not actually contributing to it by showing who the bad votes are. It reeks of if the wagon did take off and TFL is lynched, you'd take the stance 'I did say it was a bad wagon, there was bad votes on blah blah blah'.In post 76, Chickadee wrote:That’s bad reasoning.In post 75, brassherald wrote:VOTE: TFL
We haven't even heard from everyone yet. I have a bad feeling about someone asking for scum leans already.
TFL is null for me so far, but I think all the votes on him are bad votes.
Since when can’t we scum hunt until everyone checks in?
Yes, why do you not feel the need for it to be brought up again? I think I'd actually like to see your stance on the bad votes, you can't just say it's a bad wagon but not actually engage with any of those on the wagon, or even try to show us the bad votes then we can actually move forward on finding a ground that we can work from and find scum.In post 87, Chickadee wrote:I feel like I kind of already covered the TFL thing when addressing Brass. Didn't feel the need to bring it up again.
This isn't a defence. I'm sorry, it's not a defence. This is coming off weird. I just feel, I don't know, as if you are trying to avoid the issue in case you say something that could incriminate yourself, I just don't know. I don't see a town mentality in this sort of defence.In post 175, Chickadee wrote:In post 174, Hopkirk wrote:@Chickadee: Expanding on the above, the votes on TFL were (Nero, TPG, TNE, Brass, Hop). You seemed ok with TPG’s vote, later said mine was fine, and haven’t commented on Nero/TNE or followed up on them afterwards. It feels like you’re saying the entire wagon is bad, but only following up on Brass- while not looking at (or in two cases, not even mentioning) the rest of the wagon.
Idc personally I find your playstyle exhausting. I’d be fine with being lynched just to not answer your questions because I know you’re not gonna leave me alone.
This is a lieIn post 348, Hopkirk wrote:Kokichi is a good vote still. Still ignoring direct invitations to engage on multiple points despite allegedly wanting to engage more.
In post 355, Kokichi Oma wrote:This is a lieIn post 348, Hopkirk wrote:Kokichi is a good vote still. Still ignoring direct invitations to engage on multiple points despite allegedly wanting to engage more.
In post 337, Kokichi Oma wrote:Vote chick then. I may be bussing!
Note how 337, the only post Kokichi had made when I made 348, ignores 327 completely. You're claiming I'm not trying to engage with you while also intentionally ignoring my posts that reference you. This isn't the first time either- that's what 327 was talking about.In post 327, Hopkirk wrote:this quote is from me in response to 258 from Kokichi, as also quoted below:I tried to engage you a bit when I mentioned my initial dislike on you. Your engagement back seemed to focus on my light scumread of you rather than anything else, and you didn't really follow up at all there.
Not voting you yet since I don't like to unvote people who don't answer questions. Although that slot's subbed out I noticed- so that'll probably change unless the replacement is scummy too.In post 258, Kokichi Oma wrote:Hop, you have me at the bottom, but you haven't even tried to engage me much or even vote me. Why?I responded to the point where you claimed that I 'wasn't interesting in engaging' with you. Either you missed it, or disagreed but didn't want to talk about it. I don't like that.In post 315, Kokichi Oma wrote:Better question, how about you tell me why you vote me before you try to sort and interact with me? Especially when I was the one who said we should interact first.In post 311, Hopkirk wrote:Lets interact. There's three people I could vote here, and the other two are inactive enough that I won't get value voting to interact.
Do you feel that reason is also one a town wouldn't give?
I invited you to engage with me in regard to your read on Chick. You didn't take the implicit offer to talk about it. This extends the feeling that you don't want Chick actually lynched/pushed hard since you should be looking for opportunities to explain/debate the read on her if you believe in it.
You aren't making an effort to interact with me in 311. Even if you don't think I'm trying to engage with you, there's no reason you can't try and engage with me. But you're focusing entirely on my read on you rather than mentioning anything about my posts, my thoughts, or the areas where I disagree with you.
Also as a funny side point, you said that town don't justify their votes- but you're complaining that I haven't given enough justification for a vote on you.
As of my question, you had not revoted Kop.In post 350, Nero Cain wrote:i had apparently missed this.In post 329, Hopkirk wrote:13th16thIn post 200, Kop wrote:@mod V/LA for today, will be on tomorrow.Just noticed this. Did you think Kop was still V/LA, and does it affect anything that he wasn't V/LA at that point?
I know you voted Kurkin instead since you thought Kop was V/LA.
More thoughts on this to follow post response.
Yea, I unvoted Kop b/c I thought he was still v/la but you already knew that so idk what you are asking.
Explain the damn Chick read then like I asked.
Assemble replaced in and brass hasn't posted in 6 days so probably will be replaced.In post 361, Hopkirk wrote:@Almost50: Why Yurkin over Brass/Assemble?
Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:11 am
Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:01 pmIn post 166, yurkin wrote:I'm totaly gonna catch up tonight!in a 10hours or so after work>.>' vote me if I don't!!
Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:25 pmIn post 234, yurkin wrote:Started reading XD kinda dissapointed Hoprik is using so much meta, and with quite specific details to it.
P.S. Timestamps are adjusted to GMT+2, so may appear different to you but the same time gaps between them.
Who are you saying Assemble replaced?In post 363, Almost50 wrote:Assemble replaced in and brass hasn't posted in 6 days so probably will be replaced.In post 361, Hopkirk wrote:@Almost50: Why Yurkin over Brass/Assemble?
Yurkin has 4 posts. He posts roughly once every 48 hours and says he "will" do stuff but never does, plus he asked to voted if he doesn't deliver.
I did. I don't like her post, it sounds fake. Why explain you want more out of a slot instead of just voting. That's 100% theatre posturing
I see!In post 369, Hopkirk wrote:My problem here is that Assemble/Kokichi look like your most likely partners. It's a little worrying you aren't good at reading one, and voted Yurkin instead of the other (for doing the same thing).
