Open 884: Another Newbie Game | Game Over!

[heipizhu4]

VC 1.4

Vote Count 1.4

OopsieDaisy (2): Infinity 324, Mr.K
Gamma Emerald (2): Dunnstral, Dannflor
Purplemango (1): Gamma Emerald
Mr.K (1): OopsieDaisy

Not voting: (3 players)

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to secure an elimination.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2023-09-24 23:20:00)

[KittyTacky]

VC 1.4

Vote Count 1.4

OopsieDaisy: Infinity 324, Mr.K
Gamma Emerald : Dunnstral, Dannflor
Purplemango: Gamma Emerald
Mr.K: OopsieDaisy

Not voting: (3 players)

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to secure an elimination.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2023-09-24 23:20:00)

@Mod you forgot the vote numbers.

[Mr.K]

I almost want to scumread Dann for this but it doesn't feel like scum would be so brazen??? Null on Dann.

Yeah, I kinda look at what Dann is doing and think "Do I agree? Not sure. Does it make sense? Probably?" Could be scum playing complicated mind games, but if that's what he is he's doing it well, cause I think it's unlikely that I'd vote him on D1.

[Mr.K]

I think you're reading a bit much into 65/69

Can you elaborate what you meant with the "this line of questioning" in #65? I also had a reaction to this comment earlier, but I wasn't sure if I'm being biased because I had just got a "confirmation" (not literally a confirmation, but my read had just become stronger) on my read on Daisy.

[Gamma Emerald]

@KittyTacky

you seem to be checked out despite trying to poke the game earlier, what’s up?

I'm very sick, and also a printer I ordered arrived and I was setting it up. I have a life.

It wasn’t just your posting frequency that gave me that impression :/

[Gamma Emerald]

I think you're reading a bit much into 65/69

Can you elaborate what you meant with the "this line of questioning" in #65? I also had a reaction to this comment earlier, but I wasn't sure if I'm being biased because I had just got a "confirmation" (not literally a confirmation, but my read had just become stronger) on my read on Daisy.

I felt like Oopsie’s analysis of how players interacted with them was nuanced
That’s probably the best I can put it rn

[DragonEater70]

VC 1.4

Vote Count 1.4

OopsieDaisy: Infinity 324, Mr.K
Gamma Emerald : Dunnstral, Dannflor
Purplemango: Gamma Emerald
Mr.K: OopsieDaisy

Not voting: (3 players)

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to secure an elimination.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2023-09-24 23:20:00)

@Mod you forgot the vote numbers.

I also thought they did but apparently they never included numbers in the VCs. So I guess it's intentional.

[heipizhu4]

VC 1.4

Vote Count 1.4

OopsieDaisy: Infinity 324, Mr.K
Gamma Emerald : Dunnstral, Dannflor
Purplemango: Gamma Emerald
Mr.K: OopsieDaisy

Not voting: (3 players)

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to secure an elimination.

The day deadline is in (expired on 2023-09-24 23:20:00)

@Mod you forgot the vote numbers.

I usually don't include a vote number unless it is E-2 or E-1, but I'll make one if you wish.

[KittyTacky]

It makes VCA less tedious so please do.

[KittyTacky]

I think K is town.

[KittyTacky]

Something feels wrong when I'm the #2 poster in a game.

[OopsieDaisy]

I think K is town.

How come?

[Dunnstral]

Something I felt was a little weird was that OopsieDaisy's initial vote on me was just to tie my wagon to Gamma's wagon, but then later it felt like their internal reasoning for the vote on me had changed.

I think you're reading a bit much into 65/69
Of course my reads are gonna be shallow, there's very little to go on, and even when there is I tend to have a handful of reads that are shallow still
and I wasn't just pointing out an inconsistency, I was asking about it. There's a difference.

maybe!

ig also im a little surprised you didn't try to engage more with oopsie or the people scum reading her if you were finding yourself town reading her

I think this is a good point

[OopsieDaisy]

Something I felt was a little weird was that OopsieDaisy's initial vote on me was just to tie my wagon to Gamma's wagon, but then later it felt like their internal reasoning for the vote on me had changed.

What's weird about the reasoning for a vote changing as things happen in the game?

I started voting you to provoke a reaction from the game by evening up the wagons, then my vote remained under a different context when you gave a light push without a vote, and then it left once that vote abscence was explained. I don't see anything weird here?

[OopsieDaisy]

UNVOTE: Infinity

rvs is over

light tr on kittytacky

What made you tr Kitty at this point?

[OopsieDaisy]

In terms of my own reads.

I like Dannflor still, and I think I like Kitty.
Gamma/Cook/Purple I don't rly know how to go about sorting right now.
Waiting to hear more from Infinity/Dunn, my read is kinda dropping on these two a lil bit since they've kinda just been pushing me and not providing much else to the game.

I'm not seeing how Mr. K doesn't understand why I'm voting him? I think my explanation in 93 makes it pretty clear how I came to that conclusion.

[Mr.K]

I'm not seeing how Mr. K doesn't understand why I'm voting him? I think my explanation in 93 makes it pretty clear how I came to that conclusion.

Yes, it does. And this is the sort of explanation I was waiting for you to give, and the reason I had to kind of tip-toe around my answer when Dannflor wanted to know how I expected you to react. I wanted to hear the explanation from you.

So yes, it does explain your logic when voting me and I'm back to the original reason (the one Infinity pointed out first) for voting you. Didn't reply earlier cause I wanted to go through the game with fresh eyes and try to figure out if you're still the most suspicious for me.

Infinity 324 seems town to me.

Dannflor I covererd in #102

Dunnstral and KittyTacky - pretty much null.

Gamma Emerald is a tough one. A couple of her messages have felt off to me, and she's more or less explained them by vibes... vibes I don't agree with, but that's the thing about vibes, maybe we just feel differently. At any rate, I'd rather vote Daisy between the two.

Cook and Purplemango have been fairly inactive, which always makes me feel suspicious so I'm trying to remain aware of how inactivity doesn't necessarily mean scum. Purplemango is new too, which doesn't make it easier. I'm still waiting to hear the reasoning for Cook's town read on Kitty.

OopsieDaisy - I still agree with Infinity on #35. But considering that part of the reason for moving the vote was to see how she reacts (and that we've now seen), I do think I'd now rather move my vote on Cook. No-one's currently voting her so that inactivity feels awfully convenient. More importantly, I still find the randomly tossed town read off.

UNVOTE: OopsieDaisy
VOTE: Cook

[Infinity 324]

@Infinity what's your opinion on oopsie atp?

i think she's >rand scum, nothing she's really done has made me want to townread her, and her thoughts have felt a bit surface level still though it's early. why do you ask?

[Infinity 324]

112 feels like a towny-biased read focusing on her vote on dunn more than anything else, but disclaimer i have a terrible history of reading dunn.


i like 116 for similar reasons. also tending to think the inactives might be scum cause i have so many weak townreads but ehh

usually it feels easier to get the game going idk

[Dannflor]

i could vote cook

[Dannflor]

Why are you townreading Mr. K, Kitty?

[Gamma Emerald]

@Infinity what's your opinion on oopsie atp?

i think she's >rand scum, nothing she's really done has made me want to townread her, and her thoughts have felt a bit surface level still though it's early. why do you ask?

Both to get a better feel for you and to get a second opinion
Btw I don’t think “hasn’t done anything to get a townread” particularly translates to >Rand scum unless you have townreads on a solid chunk of the playerlist?

[Infinity 324]

i think it does when a player has posted enough, and she's getting there at least. and 35 pinged me.

how do you feel about mr k

[heipizhu4]

vc

[heipizhu4]

vc