In post 1093, Shinori wrote:##Unvote:
##Vote: Salamence
Keeping our choose where it is for now. Think salamence is most likely a better idea than BVO at the moment.
Is your friend caught up?
In post 1093, Shinori wrote:##Unvote:
##Vote: Salamence
Keeping our choose where it is for now. Think salamence is most likely a better idea than BVO at the moment.
In post 1022, Plessiezarus wrote:
Stuff like this post. Mostly. (For the record, my first game was 82.5, not 82.75).
Ever since Game 86 you seem to have made an effort into improving your game, which I'm not seeing here. As Tammy pointed out, most of the time you are playing, even when you do not have a suspect, you're in the discussion asking questions and being engaged in the discernment of alignment of players by expressing opinions or sharing thoughts.
Modding a game is evidently very different from playing one, which gives me a different perspective from the unspoiled one I get as a regular player. As a mod, already knowing your aligment, I get to see how you go about approaching the game and engaging the other players.
The way you seem to be pressing the few cases you made seems uncommitted and un-explanatory, coming from you. You aren't going over posts or being proactive. Except for calling Tammy town in 560 you weren't even invested the least in identifying players that you thought were town until called out for it. This is behavior I find disparing from somebody who's played more than 20 games (if my count is right).
I do not think you could be overwhelmed by the volume of posts in this thread. You've participated in large Westerosi games that require much more attention than this one, yet you strike me as trying to ride the wave here.
Now that you've claimed Mason, do you not accept you might have been acting differently from the way you usually do?
~ Zar.
In post 1098, Dolorous Edd wrote:Stefan is town bro.
In post 1089, Regfan wrote:I've seen her strategically lurk as scum before. Might not be the case right now but don't rule her out due to it.
In post 1095, Regfan wrote:
Thanks for killing my town-read on you Staeg. Post 648 shows that Kortuls actually reading through the game super carefully looking for information, not just information to fabricate reasoning to vote people with but information that would better help him attain reads, it's a very town-motivated mindset and not one that scum take when replacing into a game. His overthrought in Post 795 about the usages of the second kill despite it being spoken by everyone prior to him comes across as him really wanting to state what's on his mind whereas as scum he'd know posting something such as that has potential for drawing fire towards him and know that there'd be no gaining in doing it. His Post 1000 is another townish-tell, previous post of his shows that he still suspects Snow despite his mason claim stating that the reasons he suspects him are still valid so him checking up on the likelihood of his claim being legitimate flavourish is very natural. His taking into account his reads on the wagons in Post 1073 is again a town-tell and his attempt to get more infromation on the bvoigt case is too. Also the fact that when reading through Shadow he didn't just state posts he disliked but also linked to one that he did in Post 1081 is a big town-tell, scum don't go into an ISO going 'how can i find them scum and town', not at all especially not when they're planning on voting the person.
In post 1090, Regfan wrote:Nacho, convince me your Kortul scum-read isn't bullshit.
In post 1103, Regfan wrote:MoS, read Post 1095, then explain to me why Kortul is scum.
In post 711, Starbuck wrote:In post 487, Dolorous Edd wrote:Starbuck- You said first (before you picked yourself), that you would rather the Choice vig go in the hands of a VT. How did you expect to determine a person who is VT?
I know that I am a VT and that all I am is lynch fodder. So I hoped to do something useful.
In post 711, Starbuck wrote:I only came forth about my role because I felt (and still feel) the Choose should go to a VT to see it through on the town's wishes.
In post 42, Starbuck wrote:I just would rather put my Choose vote on someone that could be trusted to follow through on the action rather than give it scum or a policy lynch.
In post 32, Starbuck wrote:In post 15, Tyene Sand wrote:I'd rather not pre-determine the suicide vig's target, since town picks worse than random most of the time anyway due to scum input.
+1
In post 711, Starbuck wrote:I think you want to know because you want your team to know who not to fakeclaim as. That's what I'm getting from this.
In post 1009, Dolorous Edd wrote:Also, can the choice please be Feysal? Pretty please? With a cherry on top?
In post 998, Lyanna Stark wrote:Bvoigt - I talked about Shinori a bit, but since you were his partner, you should know more. Anyway, he seems much more relaxed than any of the times I've seen him as scum. But, he hasn't posted enough for me to get a real read on him yet.
In post 1053, DCLXVI wrote:
Oh please, and you were just going after me for being on a "useless" wagon.
I disagree with just about everything in this post. Furthermore, knowing that he replaced out, can't you see how many freaking games he's playing?In post 1035, Minimum wrote:In post 1032, Benmage wrote:Can you bullet for me the Sala case?
Meta is a big part of it. I've played with him and looked over the Kingdom Hearts game and he really did look town in both those games. There's also just a lack of scumhunting in his posts and recently he's simply gone completely inactive and basically not bothering to play. There are also a few statements that are clearly off (his original Feysalpost and "Hey!!! Someone understands me!!!! About time!!!") of a type that you'd expect Salascum to screw them up.
Where did you find the word "helpful"? If you had 20 helpful posts, you would skyrocket as a town read for me. Those posts were defense, conversations, comments, etc (ie something, that not only you may be interested in).In post 1082, Shadow1psc wrote:So you can concede that more than 20 of my posts are helpfulIn post 1081, kortul wrote:Finished the ISO of Shadow1psc. Out of his 70 posts, more than 2/3 are about nothing (that's like two extra pages to read). I just hate this style.
Hmm, i can swear i saw more choose votes on him when yesterday morning i was deciding whom to ISO. And didn't check this when i was done. *shrug* Then just consider this is as a statement of whom i find scummy (like your choose on me now), when i die those doing my ISO will be sure where my suspicions were. I am not choosing Feysal, will be doing ISO on greenknight today, so until then my choose vote will stay on Shadow. And i definitely not starting yet another vote wagon, spreading the votes close to deadline (read one of my previous posts).In post 1084, Mastermind of Sin wrote:Uhhh...Shadow had more votes than chooses...why the fuck would you be comfortable choosing him but lament the fact that he doesn't have enough votes to be a viable wagon?
In fact, to further illustrate this point, there are two vote wagons of 8 and 6 right now. There are also two choose wagons of 8 and 6. The competition for a Shadow wagon for both voting and choosing isexactlythe same. The only difference is that Shadow has more votes than chooses. So why the fuck would you say his vote wagon had no chance and then go ahead and choose him, which by your own logic has evenlessof a chance at succeeding?