Reasons:
1.
In post 801, Titus wrote:VOTE: hapahauli
I'm not dealing with toxic playing right now. If you're town and threatening to gamethrow, die. If you're scum, yippie.
This is lolbad and a great scum hammer (blaming the victim; playing off of not doing a catch-up, just going with the mob flow).
2.
Post 932,
Post 938,
Post 939,
Post 940,
Post 946,
Post 947,
Post 952 = hi I am going to just ask questions to appear active but not actually do anything substantive.
3.
In post 959, Titus wrote:Grendel's reads suck. Noted. But why does Grendel shoot RC?
r u srs
This is more of the same as the above posts, but honestly that question is really, really bad because I can't think of how a townread could give an informed, substantive response that can be convincing one way or another. SO why ask a question that will only give you a worthless answer? Because you're not interested in the answer.
I'm probably not explaining this well, but basically a response to this question can be used simply however the questioner wants--not to actually deduce the merit of the case against Grendel.
4.
In post 1075, Titus wrote:
?
There's a hidden dynamic that's confusing here.
VOTE: Grendel
I think this should get pressure too.
Oh wow I am not surprised at all that there's a Grendel vote after basically begging for a reason to be allowed on this wagon by obvtown frog.
And lol:
In post 968, Fro99er wrote:
I have no idea. The three of us (plus nancy) just finished a game where RC led town to victory. I'm guessing Grendel is aware of what town!RC can do.
This attempt to be engaged was a wet fart and so Titus went silent on it, but still nonetheless there's the Grendel vote.
5.
In post 1233, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Grendel
There's two optimal plays but we lost 1.
The first, quick lynch and lynch anything that doesn't claim mason.
Second, let the masons pick the choices with everyone contributing unless they feel buddied/incapable.
"Nobody asked, but here are two game strategies: one which I freely admit cannot be pursued and the second which absolves me of any responsibilities for my mislynches. Yes this is TOTALLY TOWN GUYS."
6.
In post 1257, Titus wrote: In post 1255, nancy wrote:Darklyn is apparently impossible to be scum according to Fro99er.
The only players that are impossible to be scum are the masons. I'm just rather annoyed at the claim situation at the moment.
<must input town frustration post to let others know I am town>
I also don't like
Post 1233
and
Post 1257 but that just boils down to not liking the feel of this commentary (game strategy out of nowhere, and not helpful but seems productive; trying to
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).