Wherein you are just making an empty value call on how Pistach plays and calling it scummy because it's active lurk and poor scumhunting as opposed to a weak player?
I mean, if I was playing like that, yeah, call me on it, it would make sense.
And if Hecatia suddenly went all cold logic and calmness, call her on that.
But that doesn't mean that sloppy scumhunting or cold logic are scummy - they are playstyle. I presume you understand this, so why not have just openly said to me that you had no clue about how Pistach plays as opposed to the twenty questions for it? Also, Pistach *is* doing stuff, yeah, maybe not enough to make you happy, but I wouldn't even remotely call her in the bottom five for this day phase, so why are you acting like she is? Are the other players who are derping around less bothersome to you? Why?
Like what?
Nacho is not posting much on the entire site, and though I might be able to squint and see an avoidance of this game, it is not particularly telling at this stage - unless you think I'm missing something?
I do care - but stating that I care has no meaning, and me going 'where the eff is Nacho!?!' also has no meaning, also, neither action will do much at this point and I'm not emotionally connected to this game enough at this stage to be pissed at people, I went through a phase of that last phase, but currently life is too busy for me to much care.
Posting as often here as in any other game she is in.
Posting about with the same Nacho habits where it *might* be a dodge, but you'd need to squint to call it that.
He is the only player you named that could basically cleanly be argued as ducking this thread - you are voting Pistach.
You are also ignoring Cataphant, who has had both heads be consistantly active on site, though maybe they're ignoring it due to 'lulz, hydra' but if absence is an issue to you, this guy is a glaring oversight to your rant that I do not grok.
In post 1339, farside22 wrote:You going to say everyone one of those players is town except cata then you can go fly a kite.
I would suggest that with a list of 4 you probably do have a scum listed in there.
That said, I could also list off a random 4 and manage about the same odds - bearing in mind the idea we're both town.
That doesn't actually provide a valid reason to lynch Pista over Cata though, does it? As it is equally applicable to both, with the added note that Cata actually appears to be lurking out the game while there is some disagreement at least between you and I about how useless and active lurk Pista actually is being, with only one of us claiming any awareness at all to what normal Pistach play should even be expected to look like.
