Newbie 1912 [GAME COMPLETE]

User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #275 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:28 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

I'd also like to know what makes you differentiate "actively lurking" from any other kind of lurking, because I'm not seeing Muh online right now and he's not saying things elsewhere on-site either. If he was posting elsewhere and ignoring this game I'd cede the point, but he's not as far as I can tell.
User avatar
Thespio
Thespio
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Thespio
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1669
Joined: June 3, 2015

Post Post #276 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:29 pm

Post by Thespio »

In post 274, Loopdan wrote:I'm pretty null on Pvt. His play is more relaxed than muh and when he asks questions it looks more natural.
How do you feel about him tunneling me and about his reason for voting at first?
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #277 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:35 pm

Post by Loopdan »

Oh yeah, before I forget it, here's an old post from the Mafia Discussion sub-forum, where Enter brings up an effective way for scum to derail a game.

Enter's discussion topic he started 3 years ago (under his Extrapolated Eagle login) discussing how effective it is when scum hardcore tunnels a player who would otherwise be hard to lynch.

Spoiler: Does the playstyle he describes look familiar?
In post 0, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:There seems to be an incredibly frustrating site meta that has developed since the last time I played about 2 years ago of hardcore tunneling a singular player, often a lynch that would be otherwise harder to achieve and it's getting under my skin. I have actually seen little to no tunneling from town in my recent games and deathtunneling has seemed to come almost exclusively from scum. I think this needs to be addressed, because this is ridiculous and frustrating to deal with.

Here's how it benefits the mafia:
1. It keeps doubt in the minds of town players that said tunneled player is town even if said player would often be considered strong town by day 2/day 3.
2. It keeps the victim from calling the predator out for fear of having "OMGUS!" screamed like a professional soccer player falls to the ground holding his leg and yells in pain when the ball is taken from him.
3. It gets the scum a town read because it's seen as "pushing his reads"
4. The scum player doesn't have to interact with the rest of the game or share reads other than "<victims name> needs to die, they're obvscum"

This needs to be callled out as scum like every time it's seen because it almost always comes from scum.


:lol:
User avatar
Enter
Enter
for the homies
User avatar
User avatar
Enter
for the homies
for the homies
Posts: 3901
Joined: December 27, 2018

Post Post #278 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:36 pm

Post by Enter »

In post 277, Loopdan wrote:Oh yeah, before I forget it, here's an old post from the Mafia Discussion sub-forum, where Enter brings up an effective way for scum to derail a game.

Enter's discussion topic he started 3 years ago (under his Extrapolated Eagle login) discussing how effective it is when scum hardcore tunnels a player who would otherwise be hard to lynch.

Spoiler: Does the playstyle he describes look familiar?
In post 0, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:There seems to be an incredibly frustrating site meta that has developed since the last time I played about 2 years ago of hardcore tunneling a singular player, often a lynch that would be otherwise harder to achieve and it's getting under my skin. I have actually seen little to no tunneling from town in my recent games and deathtunneling has seemed to come almost exclusively from scum. I think this needs to be addressed, because this is ridiculous and frustrating to deal with.

Here's how it benefits the mafia:
1. It keeps doubt in the minds of town players that said tunneled player is town even if said player would often be considered strong town by day 2/day 3.
2. It keeps the victim from calling the predator out for fear of having "OMGUS!" screamed like a professional soccer player falls to the ground holding his leg and yells in pain when the ball is taken from him.
3. It gets the scum a town read because it's seen as "pushing his reads"
4. The scum player doesn't have to interact with the rest of the game or share reads other than "<victims name> needs to die, they're obvscum"

This needs to be callled out as scum like every time it's seen because it almost always comes from scum.


:lol:
It's almost like 1, I've grown, and 2, I'm not tunneling you. I called you scum, you freaked out and accused me of confbias and tunneling. Quit your pathetic tirade and play the darn game.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #279 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:39 pm

Post by Loopdan »

In post 275, MagikHorse wrote:I'd also like to know what makes you differentiate "actively lurking" from any other kind of lurking, because I'm not seeing Muh online right now and he's not saying things elsewhere on-site either. If he was posting elsewhere and ignoring this game I'd cede the point, but he's not as far as I can tell.
Maybe "active lurking" isn't the right term. muh has the option selected that hides his online status when he logs in, so there's no way of knowing if he is actually here and not posting. That doesn't make him scummy, by the way.

What he is doing is popping in sporadically and selectively responding to the easy stuff.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #280 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:40 pm

Post by Loopdan »

@Enter - I didn't freak out. You kept yelling in ALL CAPS and repeating the same points over and over again, so I stopped reading your posts.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #281 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:41 pm

Post by Loopdan »

Actually, after reading that old post again just now I really do think Enter is more likely to flip scum than muh.

VOTE: Enter
User avatar
Thespio
Thespio
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Thespio
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1669
Joined: June 3, 2015

Post Post #282 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:46 pm

Post by Thespio »

In post 281, Loopdan wrote:Actually, after reading that old post again just now I really do think Enter is more likely to flip scum than muh.

VOTE: Enter
I dont think that old post reflects on him now, if you flip town I will seriously consider him, i think Muh is a little misplaced, so until they post more I dont think I could read them.
User avatar
Enter
Enter
for the homies
User avatar
User avatar
Enter
for the homies
for the homies
Posts: 3901
Joined: December 27, 2018

Post Post #283 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:47 pm

Post by Enter »

In post 280, Loopdan wrote:@Enter - I didn't freak out. You kept yelling in ALL CAPS and repeating the same points over and over again, so I stopped reading your posts.
You did freak out. I wasn't yelling, I was posting important points in all caps because I know people skim my posts. You saw it and got offended. That's a you problem.

You weren't reading my posts in the first place, you were cherry picking and you know it. You didn't even properly respond to my first post, you tried to just dismiss it by calling me bad town or scum.

Your current path of action right now by ignoring me when I call you out for using words improperly (tunneling, confbias) when I call you out for multi-posting (8 in a row? What even is that --especially as an IC?) when I call you out for bad play (sheeping another player? When has that ever been acceptable?) is child-like.

Stop dropping passive aggressive comments and saying my points are bad when you admit you're not even reading them. Stop playing in this off-the-cuff rage. It looks bad on you as a person and it's not beneficial to the mafia game in any form or fashion.
User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #284 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:49 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

I'm skeptical of something this old, especially since the whole point of that thread was to complain about a tactic that annoyed him. Can you find a game where he's done this strat himself to back this up in any way and prove that he would actually do something like this?

RE Muh: I'm sitting neutral on him right now. Despite the potential scumminess of his vote on you, I like that he immediately questioned Thespio for voting the lurkers in . In general a vote on a lurking slot isn't going to get you any information when you could be pressuring a more active slot to at least learn some things about them, and calling him out on that earns some town points from me to even the scales.
User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #285 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 1:49 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

All of this was to Loop of course.
User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #286 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:36 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

Here's my readslist as it stands, now that I've finished reading and processing everything.

Skellen - Town
Thespio, Enter -Townlean
PvtUrist, muh316, Munchmellow, -Null Lurkers
Loopdan- Slight Scumlean
Elements -Scum

A lot of this goes without saying (Skellen has a really easy to follow line of thinking, Ptv, Muh, and Munch are all lurking) but my big ping right now is Elements.

Elements has posted very little to actually push the game forwards at all. Unlike Muh, Pvt, and Munch, they have a lot more activity and still don't have anything noteworthy to ask or poke at? For as much as my slot hasn't done much until I replaced in, this slot has done nothing all game to push things forwards and be proactive, and that concerns me even more than Loopdan does right now. If you want an "active lurker" this here's the closest thing we've got right now.

VOTE: Elements
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:49 pm

Post by Loopdan »

In post 284, MagikHorse wrote:I'm skeptical of something this old, especially since the whole point of that thread was to complain about a tactic that annoyed him. Can you find a game where he's done this strat himself to back this up in any way and prove that he would actually do something like this?
No I can't. Unless I'm missing something, Enter has exactly one scum game since he talked about this strat. It was Micro 834 where he replaced into a game of experienced players in the late game and played completely differently from this game. So there's that.

But I do find it odd that after he was lynched he posted this in post-game:
In post 905, Enter wrote:My only excuse is that this is my first game in like 2 years, haha. WP though. And I didn't answer your question, NSG, but yeah that was a totally valid reason. I have a lot of respect for the way you kept your wits about you and recognized suboptimal play even when I was trying to tunnel you and throw you off your game. WP all.
If you read his ISO in that game you'll see his push on NSG isn't even close to the intensity of his push on me here. Yet he called his push on NSG a "tunnel" but says his push on me isn't a tunnel. Remember, this was ten days ago.

He doesn't have a scum game that looks like this game (but it's a sample size of 1). All he has is an old post discussing a scum strat that looks like what he is doing here. I've reviewed a few of his town games looking to see if he does this as town, and haven't seen it yet, but I have obviously not read all of them.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:50 pm

Post by Loopdan »

Also, Magik's entrance has been good so far.
User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:00 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

One game isn't enough for me to meta read someone on, and it was a replace-in quite a ways into the game too. The fight with NSG also seemed to consist of a whole lot of little posts, but nothing this big. A bunch of little posts sounds different to me than a few big ones, although I still agree that he's tunneled at least a little bit.

Either way that game feels radically different than what he's doing here, and this whole "He complained about something 3 years ago" thing doesn't really make me believe in it. This feels like a massive stretch to me to try and link these together in this manner.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #290 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:09 pm

Post by Loopdan »

He has 47 posts in this game (most are rather large). Virtually all of them here are pushing a lynch on me.

He had 49 in that game (most not that large). Only 16 have anything to do with NSG, and they pale in comparison to his push here.

So why did he characterize his push on NSG a "tunnel" but says his push on me isn't a tunnel?
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #291 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:14 pm

Post by Loopdan »

Alright I think I've said everything I need to say.

So go ahead and lynch me or lynch Enter. I'll gladly 1v1 with him now.

I DO NOT think we should be lynching outside Loopdan and Enter today. Scum at this point would love to move the lynch off of me because I've essentially claimed VT and they want to hit a PR or get a PR claim day1.
User avatar
Thespio
Thespio
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Thespio
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1669
Joined: June 3, 2015

Post Post #292 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:20 pm

Post by Thespio »

In post 291, Loopdan wrote:Alright I think I've said everything I need to say.

So go ahead and lynch me or lynch Enter. I'll gladly 1v1 with him now.

I DO NOT think we should be lynching outside Loopdan and Enter today. Scum at this point would love to move the lynch off of me because I've essentially claimed VT and they want to hit a PR or get a PR claim day1.
I’m fine seeing the 1v1, and I agree with the conjecture that we shouldn’t have anyone claiming D1, reguardless of role, as to avoid losing a PR d1
User avatar
MagikHorse
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MagikHorse
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1166
Joined: January 6, 2018

Post Post #293 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:28 pm

Post by MagikHorse »

I want to take you seriously, but I find it hard to when you do things like this. It's self-destructive in the worst of ways.

The question at the end of 290 is interesting to say the least, although I think it's more of a curiosity thing than anything that actually matters much. I'll have to see what comes of that one.
User avatar
Enter
Enter
for the homies
User avatar
User avatar
Enter
for the homies
for the homies
Posts: 3901
Joined: December 27, 2018

Post Post #294 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:31 pm

Post by Enter »

In post 290, Loopdan wrote:He has 47 posts in this game (most are rather large). Virtually all of them here are pushing a lynch on me.

He had 49 in that game (most not that large). Only 16 have anything to do with NSG, and they pale in comparison to his push here.

So why did he characterize his push on NSG a "tunnel" but says his push on me isn't a tunnel?
I had a constant push on NSG over time. I had like three posts before you started insisting I was confbiasing and tunneling, and you didn't even provide counter points for all my points.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #295 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:32 pm

Post by Loopdan »

@Magik - Don't forget that other post where he categorizes his own play as tunneling NSG was posted 10 days ago. This inconsistency on how he views his play here is more than a curiosity.
User avatar
Enter
Enter
for the homies
User avatar
User avatar
Enter
for the homies
for the homies
Posts: 3901
Joined: December 27, 2018

Post Post #296 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:32 pm

Post by Enter »

It was a couple posts within the span of a few hours before you dropped that claim.

And to be honest I'd hardly classify what I had against NSG as a tunnel, I wasn't even alive long enough.
User avatar
Enter
Enter
for the homies
User avatar
User avatar
Enter
for the homies
for the homies
Posts: 3901
Joined: December 27, 2018

Post Post #297 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:34 pm

Post by Enter »

Please answer the questions I asked you.
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #298 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:49 pm

Post by Loopdan »

Enter has 7 posts that are
not
about me. Here are the other 40+ posts calling me scum in less than a 48 hour time period.

Spoiler: This is what Enter calls "not tunneling" (You really should not expand this spoiler tag. I've warned you.)
In post 128, Enter wrote:Hey guys! I'll get to reading the game thread ASAP! I'll just start going through the first page and....
In post 18, Loopdan wrote:OK, so I thought I was the second vote on munchmellow until I saw that VC (vote-count) at the top. I didn't even notice Elements had moved votes.
In post 6, Elements wrote:VOTE: munchmellow
In post 11, Elements wrote:VOTE: pvturist
Whoever is second to make a vote with an arbitrary reason is scum
Elements, what is the purpose of this vote change?
In post 20, Thespio wrote:
In post 18, Loopdan wrote:OK, so I thought I was the second vote on munchmellow until I saw that VC (vote-count) at the top. I didn't even notice Elements had moved votes.
In post 6, Elements wrote:VOTE: munchmellow
In post 11, Elements wrote:VOTE: pvturist
Whoever is second to make a vote with an arbitrary reason is scum
Elements, what is the purpose of this vote change?
I dont think this is odd, I want to see some stuff from the other less active players, what did you find odd about this? why did it peak your interest?
In post 21, Loopdan wrote:
In post 19, Elements wrote:
In post 18, Loopdan wrote:Elements, what is the purpose of this vote change?
There wan't any real purpose other than to spark some form of discussion, which it now appears to have done
Yeah but then you just killed the discussion by saying that was it's purpose. You have to string out those kinds of plays if you want it to get something moving.
In post 13, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: Munchmellow

For not reading my IC post yet.
In post 24, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: Muh316
O_O

Alright. That happened.
In post 129, Enter wrote:
In post 58, Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
Glad to know you think you're town...
In post 66, Thespio wrote:
In post 65, Elements wrote:
In post 63, Thespio wrote:even though you are fascist scum
only when playing secret hitler
I like you now, im adding you, I played a game where someone who was not hitler indicated they were at the beginning because they are dumb and all the fascists outed themselves when she was elected. was funny.
Nice flip out of nowhere.
In post 76, Loopdan wrote:
In post 74, Elements wrote:
In post 69, Thespio wrote:if it is a NL or me I would prefer you kill me.
please don't say this. the first game of forum mafia i played someone said this. i came back half a day later to 9 pages of pointless discussion that basically destroyed the game
Thespio is correct that it's better to lynch than NL day1. But I don't like how he brought it up. It was out of the blue and looks like an attempt to declare his own towniness.
Looks like scum to you, but where's your vote?

On the guy that self-voted in RVS?
In post 109, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: MissDeadbeat

Thespio's lone vote isn't likely to mean much, but he's right. Her level of activity is unacceptable.
Thespio did something that looked scummy but you didn't vote him. She does nothing => null, but gets your vote?
In post 125, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: PvtUrist

This is a sheep vote for Skellen. He's my only strong TR right now, and I don't have any real scumreads.

This is L-2.

IC note:
Wiki entry for Sheeping
LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgoJ2AeUkAo

you change your mind
like a girl
changes clothes
In post 101, muh316 wrote:
In post 75, Elements wrote:
In post 70, Munchmellow wrote:Do you really feel it's double bussing? And why?
seconded
I was just playing devil's advocate on that one to see if someone was going to jump on it. I'm getting a good townread on Loopdan though. It looks like he's giving us game advancing content which is nice. It's generally towny if someone is going through the effort of reading metas.

Also, now that we've had a bit of an icebreaker UNVOTE: muh316
In post 100, Thespio wrote:VOTE: MissDeadbeat
Don't you think a policy lynch on an inactive player D1 will get us less information and we'll be in the same spot as we were D1?
I wouldn't be afraid to put that vote somewhere. Thespio and Loopdan are both good choices, cuz the mod will write in RED when they flip.
In post 130, Enter wrote:VOTE: Loopdan
In post 131, Enter wrote:Skellen reads town, though.
Elements also reads ... fine.
Thespio is full of words that mean barely anything w/ no vote and his "change of heart" on elements is weird.
Loopdan reads red.
In post 138, Enter wrote:Here's why Loopdan is scum (just a few of the reasons, there's a lot):


1. Loopdans' vote has changed like six times on six pages. That's actually ridiculous and insane for a game where nothing has happened.
2.
In post 76, Loopdan wrote:
In post 74, Elements wrote:
In post 69, Thespio wrote:if it is a NL or me I would prefer you kill me.
please don't say this. the first game of forum mafia i played someone said this. i came back half a day later to 9 pages of pointless discussion that basically destroyed the game
Thespio is correct that it's better to lynch than NL day1. But I don't like how he brought it up. It was out of the blue and looks like an attempt to declare his own towniness.
With Loopdans vote changing like the weather in Texas, this is the one of the few times he ACTUALLY has an even close to scum read, and his vote doesn't follow. This is weird on Thespio, specifically, because I'm scumreading Thespio because of Thespio's own actions in addition to his interactions with Loopdan which all seem more fake than soy milk. (no offense to soy)
3.
In post 92, Loopdan wrote:
In post 70, Munchmellow wrote:
Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
Looks like TvT to me, too. Could also be SvT (not sure about Loopdan).

So this implies you are TRing Thespio. Can you explain why that is? Not saying I disagree, just curious about your thinking.
Loopdan agrees and says "thanks, I agree, I am town" no explanation, but asks one of the other players to explain his post on Thespio. Here's why that's weird:
a) He didn't do it himself
b) Scum LOVE to know what town thinks of their scum buddies
c) His last post called Thespio as scummy
d) His "just curious about your thinking" is so noncommittal.
In post 58, Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
In post 125, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: PvtUrist

This is a sheep vote for Skellen. He's my only strong TR right now, and I don't have any real scumreads.

This is L-2.

IC note:
Wiki entry for Sheeping
This is so ridiculous I ran out of words the moment I started.
We are 6 pages into the game and he has ONE read? How does that happen? How does everyone else have more reads than him?
This is very noncommittal. He doesn't even accept responsibility for his vote.
In post 127, Loopdan wrote:This is a game of information.
Scum starts with an information advantage.
Town starts with a time advantage (manifested by their larger team).
Town wins if they gain equity in information before they lose their time advantage.

Town only wins if they gain information (or get lucky).

So start asking questions. Admit if you don't get something. Speak up when something looks off. Stop worrying about if it makes you look "scummy". Vote your scumreads. Tell your townreads that you TR them (sometimes this is counterproductive later, but for day1 don't hold back).

This slow game-state is as much my fault as anyone's. I've been a bit pre-occupied with RL. I'll do my best to re-read and post some thoughts on all players in the morning.
"Look at me, I'm town because I share information on how mafia works"

Actually so many of his posts are like this.

For anyone wondering why noncommittal is bad:

Scum don't want to commit to something or look wishy washy on their reads because they want to keep the lynch open in case they need to hammer. They don't want to accidentally strong town read someone when everyone else is scumreading them because then it looks weird when they have to turn around and hammer.

SO. Long story short:

Thespio's posts amount to
1. hypocrisy (asking to explain when not explaining himself, on the first page when he jumps elements for changing his vote and then immediately changes his vote when Thespio says it's ok to do as town)
2. talk about mafia in theory/ meta to look like he's talking about something
3. Vote moving around like crazy
4. REALLY awkward interactions w/ Thespio that amount to nothing for either of them (even though they try to look like they push each other a little)
5. Sheeping his townread (what even? this is DAY 1. Push someone. Try to get scum reads since you don't have ANY)
6. noncommittal reads (How do you not have ANY SCUM READS and ONLY ONE town read?)

I could go on. The thing I quoted on page one also was weird. I could talk more about his weird interactions w/ Thespio. And there's probably even more.

In addition, even if he's not scum, we should policy lynch him for the octuple-post on page four. What even is that.
In post 139, Enter wrote:
In post 127, Loopdan wrote:So start asking questions. Admit if you don't get something. Speak up when something looks off. Stop worrying about if it makes you look "scummy". Vote your scumreads. Tell your townreads that you TR them (sometimes this is counterproductive later, but for day1 don't hold back).
In post 125, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: PvtUrist

This is a sheep vote for Skellen. He's my only strong TR right now, and I don't have any real scumreads.

This is L-2.

IC note:
Wiki entry for Sheeping
Like the fact that these two posts are right next to each other is insane.

"Post, ask questions, find scum"
"I have no clue who scum are, so I'm going to sheep my only town read"
In post 150, Enter wrote:
In post 143, Loopdan wrote: @Enter - TvT was referencing Loopdan vs. Skellen. Sorry you wasted so many words but you need to reread those interactions.
That's my point, dude. YOU ARE loopdan. Thespio says "I think this is TvT" referencing you and skellen. And you say "I agree"

My point is: glad to know you're town.

And the thing about Thespio doesn't matter. You said:
So this implies you are TRing Thespio. Can you explain why that is? Not saying I disagree, just curious about your thinking.
So you're either asking for why are they townreading Thespio (who you JUST scumread) or why are they townreading you (which you should agree with anyways).

I didn't misread anything. There's only two options here, and the Thespio thing makes more sense to me (that you just misunderstood what they were saying about TvT or TvS.

And I said that you changed your vote "LIKE" six times. FOUR on six pages is STILL ridiculous, considering especially how d1 went over and the last day. Stop trying to hide behind technicalities.
In post 151, Enter wrote:Especially the WAY you flip your vote (and also didn't place it) when voting Thespio.
In post 155, Enter wrote:
In post 145, Loopdan wrote:You aren't reading very closely. I've voted four times. You must be including Element's two votes that I quoted in . But even if it had been six times. So what? Are you arguing that it's more likely that I'm scum throwing out these votes to try and see what will stick, than I am town trying to sort players through discussion and pressure? Explain why vote changes like mine are scummy. You don't get to just declare something is scummy and have everyone believe you.
I've put far more explanation into my single vote on you than you have on all four of your votes combined.
Your vote changing four times in six pages is still wildly ridiculous considering one of them was on an inactive player, one was a SHEEP vote, and two were in RVS. This is what I mean by your play is hypocritical - you say one thing (asking me for more info on my vote) and do another (don't provide reads w/ your vote).
ALSO your vote changing four times in six pages is still wildly ridiculous considering you don't have a SINGLE scum read and you have ONE strong town read. Almost every other player in THE GAME has contributed more than you have.

I'm saying your vote changing so much is indicative of you not knowing who on earth you should vote and trying to find a wagon where it will stick. Especially w/ no reads in the process. To call it fence-sitting would be an understatement.
You are conflating me saying that I don't like how Thespio brought up the "lynch me before no-lynch" thing with me thinking he is scum. That's not how that works.
So, as I said, (and you accuse me of not reading closely), you saying you don't like it and not putting your vote on him is wrong.

I would feel your constant vote change is MORE acceptable if you had maybe put your vote on him here, because this is one of THE ONLY TIMES IN THE GAME where you give reasoning for thinking someone might be scum. ACTUALLY THE CLOSEST YOU'VE GOT TO A SCUM READ and your vote doesn't change to him? WHY?

WHY are you SHEEPING TOWN after asking town to scumhunt and voting for a LURKER when you just said you think this is weird/ you don't like it. You told another player to be free w/ their vote (IIRC) and yet your vote (ha, i guess it's free) has been on four different players for some of the dumbest reasons I've ever seen.
You entirely missed this. TvT was Loopdan v Skellen. But now I see why you missed it because I wrote Thespio instead of Skellen when I asked Munch about it. :facepalm:

You last point was about me being noncommittal. OK. It's page six. I found one strong townread and that's pretty good progress. Contrary to what you seem to think you are doing here, you don't solve the game on page six.
Oh. I guess there was the third option, that it was about Skellen. Seems a bit like a freudian slip, tho.

You being noncommittal after asking town to be scumhunting is disgusting. You not having any scum reads on page six and SHEEPING your townread is dumb. It's PAGE SIX you should be scumhunting. Your vote should be wherever you think the player is the most scummy. You don't sheep unless you have no clue where scum are and you think that trying to talk about it would derail a current conversation and even then you said he was at L-2 (which to me implies you want him lynched). Who even brings up L-2? I guess it's fair to do, it just looks REALLY weird.

Anyways, it's PAGE SIX and I haven't seen you scumhunt at all in any form of acceptable manner. You even swapped votes in RVS after asking elements why he swapped votes in RVS (implying it looks weird to you). You even voted a LURKER which gets you nowhere. The one big time I remember you calling out someone for being scummy, YOU DON'T PLACE YOUR VOTE. Please, find another time you called someone scummy, that just makes it worse. You're saying things look weird/off to you and then voting for lurkers and sheeping your one town read.


======


can we just talk for a minute about how wild and bad it is to be sheeping? Especially in a newbie game, ESPECIALLY as IC, ESPECIALLY ON PAGE SIX when you have NO IDEA WHO SCUM ARE. If you don't know, please try and find them. If you have nothing on page six as IC that's a bad sign and you should be asking people why they have stronger reads than you do.

Also, what is your experience playing Mafia?
I played off site from about 2012-2014. Onsite in 2014, onsite in 2016, onsite in 2018. What's yours.
In post 156, Enter wrote:@Loopdan

If you don't know where to look, what to ask, what to do, feel free to ask a player.

They know what to do apparently.
In post 154, Munchmellow wrote:
In post 148, Thespio wrote:Your concern is valid, engage with me, i would like to get a better read on you.
If you could lynch two people, who would they be (and leave MDb out of this, because she is obv not a lurking scum but is probably gonna be replaced so her inactivity is NAI).

Would you hammer your strongest townread, just to get a lynch D1?
This is A GREAT question for someone who looks like they're trying to avoid playing the game by talking about the theory behind it.
In post 165, Enter wrote:
In post 160, Loopdan wrote:Stop misrepresenting my play.

1. Four votes on six pages is
not
ridiculous, especially at the start of the game. For you to use this as part of your case is absurd.
2. I'm not going to argue with you over whether four is "like six," but the way you just doubled-down on using this as proof that I'm scum seems indicative of how you are trying to force a case on me rather than develop a genuine read.
Lol. If you think your four votes aren't ridiculous, that's you. The way you voted was dumb. The way you haven't offered a reason for anything is dumb. The way you just say "misrep" and other big words to look smart when we both know I'm not misrepping anything is dumb. For you to take the fact that I said you used four votes in six pages as ridiculous and just IGNORED the part about how you haven't offered a good reason for any of them is dumb. The fact that you regularly ask for people to go in depth and explain and the only "explaining' you've done is point out that MS has a wiki and you're capable of using it in a string of eight posts (which is beyond ridiculous) is dumb. The fact that you keep ignoring and failing to quote large important parts of my posts and cherry picking and taking the parts you want to address out of their context is dumb. The fact that you do all of this while accusing ME of misrepping is dumb.

I could go on and on.
Your play is ridiculously suboptimal for town and you have no excuse as an IC to have NO READS on page six and be SHEEPING your townread. In regular games do you know how fast you get lynched for that? It's possible mafia has changed since I played a while ago, but sheeping is pretty much always looked down upon and VERY RARELY acceptable. I have personally NEVER seen an acceptable reason to sheep and the fact that you call yourself out on it is BAFFLING to me.

There is no way in my mind that I can justify you being town.

Let's pretend you are town for a second. Why are you playing defensive as crap right here? PLEASE OMGUS MORE. You're making literally every newbie mistake if you are town (which I do not believe in the slightest). If you were town as an even somewhat seasoned mafia player, you would at the VERY LEAST try to prove your town when you got called out for sheeping and AT LEAST post a reads list with one or two reasons.

The fact that you have as many posts as you do w/ so little content is insane.

So this is the only insightful thing Enter has said about my play, so I'll be glad to explain it. I liked Thespio's entrance to the game and didn't have any problems with him until that one post talking about no-lynch. Do you know how often town players make scummy sounding posts? I don't vote every single time I see one, sorry. Especially not with a newer player who has, let's just say it, kinda an odd style. And I don't think voting Thespio there would have helped me sort alignment when we had already established a conversational rapport. is the post in question here. If anybody wants to see my train of thought, go back and check my next few posts after that.
This is an excuse. Also stop only quoting one or two of my points and then saying "THIS IS THE ONLY THING ENTER IS SAYING. LOOK AT THIS GUYS, DON'T ACTUALLY READ HIS POST."

Whatever. Let me get this straight though.

You are SCARED (in the first four pages of the game) of putting your vote someone who MIGHT BE TOWN. Because town sometimes makes scummy posts? You see someone post something that pings you as off, and you don't investigate? You just say "hmm, this pings me as off" and then follow-up to townread him almost immediately after? In a game where you don't have ANY SCUM READS you just continuously justify your lack of a vote on someone who posted something that looked scummy to you because they MIGHT BE TOWN. You are currently voting someone you DO NOT HAVE A SCUM READ ON, but you wouldn't vote for someone that looked scummy to you because they MIGHT BE TOWN? What happened to scumhunting and pushing your reads? How did you make that AWFUL vote flip in RVS after accusing elements of making a bad vote flip and yet you still won't flip your vote to the ONE PLAYER that you scumread. How is this logical in any form or fashion? I fail to follow any towny train of thought coming from this play. Your post here sounds more like you're defending Thespio as town than it does that you're defending your thought process.

And for people who want to meta me (which I recommend against, it's very rarely useful, at least for me) my other usernames are Tr1ckster and Extrapolated Eagle.
In post 166, Enter wrote:
In post 162, Loopdan wrote:And I told Skellen to
use
her vote. Which is exactly what you are saying I am scum for, btw.
Yes, it is. Because you're not using your vote when you see someone scummy, you're just sheeping your town reads. What even is that?

How do you have a standard for someone else you can't maintain yourself?
In post 163, Loopdan wrote:I honestly thought Enter was probably town with that entrance, but now he's completely failed to re-evaluate prior positions and is repeating the same bad arguments. He does not look like he is trying to sort a player.

Enter is either:
1. Badtown tunneling and confbiasing hard
2. Scum trying to manufacture a case

@Enter-- You said you've played on this site before. Please share your prior usernames so we can look into how you play as town and scum.
This is OMGUS and you know it. Post a reads list please. Give at least one solid reason for at least three of them. I know it's been hard for you to find a reason to vote someone this game that wasn't "RVS" or "isn't playing right now" but I need you to pull through for me. I honestly don't care too much what the reason even is, make something up. I'm just gonna look at it closely when you flip scum.

And let's be clear on the four votes thing. The four votes is ridiculous not in and of itself, stop saying that's why I'm saying it's ridiculous. You're taking me out of context and that's absurd. Please address why you thought it was a great idea to flip your vote in RVS right after calling out elements for doing so. Please explain why you thought it was smart to flip your vote right after applying a "pressure" vote to the only lurker in the game.

And stop getting angry at me cuz I won't let you have control back. You and Thespio drove the game into silence by townreading everyone and forgiving everything you saw as "that player MIGHT BE TOWN" (you did this with Skellen, too) and then you blamed the lurkers for it(which is a p common newbie scum tactic from what I've seen, I might add). You won't push anyone for reads, you want to sit so squarely on the fence that it's beginning to dig a hole into your stomach.
In post 167, Enter wrote:
In post 161, Loopdan wrote:Just so we are clear: Enter is trying to sell these three posts...
In post 125, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: PvtUrist

This is a sheep vote for Skellen. He's my only strong TR right now, and I don't have any real scumreads.

This is L-2.

IC note:
Wiki entry for Sheeping
In post 126, Loopdan wrote:So why am I TRing Skellen? His progression of his read on me makes way more sense coming from town than scum. Most importantly, he went back and re-read interactions and changed his thinking based on that. In a short, slow game like this do you know who goes back and re-reads and then hands out a townread on the IC? Town players who are frustrated that nothing is happening. Scum prefers for the game stalls out because it maintains their information advantage.

So yeah, Skellen is either town or is a helluva scum player for this being his first game.
In post 127, Loopdan wrote:This is a game of information.
Scum starts with an information advantage.
Town starts with a time advantage (manifested by their larger team).
Town wins if they gain equity in information before they lose their time advantage.

Town only wins if they gain information (or get lucky).

So start asking questions. Admit if you don't get something. Speak up when something looks off. Stop worrying about if it makes you look "scummy". Vote your scumreads. Tell your townreads that you TR them (sometimes this is counterproductive later, but for day1 don't hold back).

This slow game-state is as much my fault as anyone's. I've been a bit pre-occupied with RL. I'll do my best to re-read and post some thoughts on all players in the morning.
....as
In post 155, Enter wrote: WHY are you SHEEPING TOWN after asking town to scumhunt and voting for a LURKER when you just said you think this is weird/ you don't like it. You told another player to be free w/ their vote (IIRC) and yet your vote (ha, i guess it's free) has been on four different players for some of the dumbest reasons I've ever seen.
Yes. I am saying that. Just because you say
"oh hey, I'm lazy" or "oh hey, I'm scummy" doesn't excuse lazy/scummy play. It still means you're scum.
When you tell town to be looking for scum, YOU SHOULD BE DOING SO YOURSELF.

SET. AN. EXAMPLE. Sheeping is the utmost paragon example of laziness/lack of scumhunting in a mafia game. I challenge you to try to find a better example.

And no, challenging me on "free with vote" instead of "use your vote" to me it means the same thing. I don't care. Either way YOU ARE NOT USING YOUR VOTE.
TWO EXAMPLES in the posts you've quoted and the arguments you've made of holding town to a standard you yourself do not meet. => You do not meet the standard for town. => You are not town.
In post 168, Enter wrote:Ugh. I hate myself for doing this, but every time I go to go back to "view my posts" again I see another one of these inane comments. I guess I'll just close the tab after this one.
In post 162, Loopdan wrote:And I told Skellen to
use
her vote. Which is exactly what you are saying I am scum for, btw.
Stop taking my words out of context. I'm saying you're scum for telling her to use your vote and you're not using yours.
[quote="In post 163, Loopdan"\]Enter is either:
1. Badtown tunneling and confbiasing hard
Just out of curiosity:

Define tunneling/confbias for me and then explain how I, having just Entered (haha) the game thread, have become convinced by my own argument that I have not yet made?
Tunneling is an even worse excuse because you're implying that I've been seeing you as scum for a while (as far as the connotation is concerned).

Please at least call me scum and don't sit on the fence about it if you think I'm bad. (even though I walked in the game thread and all of a sudden we have two viable wagons and both of them are on scum)[/quote]
In post 169, Enter wrote:I know, I'm the worst.

Alright, so Town, to answer the potential question of "Why is Loopdan making silly excuses that don't make sense in order to try and call Enter town while simultaneously implying he might be scum?" like in this post:
In post 163, Loopdan wrote:I honestly thought Enter was probably town with that entrance, but now he's completely failed to re-evaluate prior positions and is repeating the same bad arguments. He does not look like he is trying to sort a player.

Enter is either:
1. Badtown tunneling and confbiasing hard
2. Scum trying to manufacture a case

@Enter-- You said you've played on this site before. Please share your prior usernames so we can look into how you play as town and scum.
Really, there's two answers to that question:

1. He just saw a couple other players call me town, and he doesn't want to look weird by pushing me for the rest of the day and then last minute flipping so that he can hammer someone else, because that would look weird for him, so he's hoping someone else will call me scum so he can see me as a viable lynch, at which point he will likely place his vote on me (and possibly do it while "sheeping" someone else so he doesn't take responsibility for it )
2. Scum are often cautious about pushing for lynches on town. Often, I've found, they prefer to sit in the middle of the wagon, so no one points a finger at them when the player flips GREEN. So again, he's waiting for someone else to push on me so that he can follow-up and not have to take responsibility.

The fact that his vote is still on PvtUrist (who he said he didn't have a scumread on) and not on me (who he just said is Bad Town or Scum) is ridiculous.
In post 171, Enter wrote:
In post 170, Loopdan wrote:
In post 163, Loopdan wrote:@Enter-- You said you've played on this site before. Please share your prior usernames so we can look into how you pla
Try reading my posts all the way through. I answered your question.
In post 177, Enter wrote:Just wanted to put these next to each other:
In post 166, Enter wrote:Post a reads list please. Give at least one solid reason for at least three of them. I know it's been hard for you to find a reason to vote someone this game that wasn't "RVS" or "isn't playing right now" but I need you to pull through for me. I honestly don't care too much what the reason even is, make something up. I'm just gonna look at it closely when you flip scum.
In post 173, Loopdan wrote:Yeah I think we are done here, Enter. You haven't even asked me any questions.
But yeah, I don't think you really have a way out of this one. My only real request -which is the reason I asked you to post reads, but you've indicated (3? please don't yell at me for getting my numbers wrong again, I know how much they matter to you) times that you will not ever actually read the things I post - that you should at the very least fix yourself, post reads/read the actual thread.

Skellen
(and anyone else curious)
As to why he made post 125 as scum - You can watch a trend throughout the days if you go back and read through of him gradually getting more and more comfortable. He probably WAS actually reading people's posts and trying on day one, but town kept letting him get more and more comfortable until he could get away with just skimming posts, giving people a townread, and moving on with his life. You can see this in the whole "TvT debate" we had earlier, which likely looked like it was absolutely nothing, but the fact that he lost track of who he was even talking about and dropped a different name can be indicative of him beginning to slip on his attempts to look towny. I think by the time he got to 125 (especially in a slow game where it feels like you're winning, it's easier to begin to slip on things), he felt like he was in complete control of the game (it certainly looked like he was). That's part of why the post following the one that made him look so scummy is so very damning. Town has time/scum has information. As days go on w/ less posting/less information/less looking like control of a lynch, scum will get MORE comfortable while town will become less comfortable and begin to freak out. I think in a normal game where he'd been kept on his toes all game, he never would have made such a horrendous post, but the fact that he felt like he was in control and had no sense of danger is what makes him so condemned.
In post 178, Enter wrote:
In post 92, Loopdan wrote:
In post 70, Munchmellow wrote:
Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
Looks like TvT to me, too. Could also be SvT (not sure about Loopdan).

So this implies you are TRing Thespio. Can you explain why that is? Not saying I disagree, just curious about your thinking.
This is one example of what I'm talking about:

He REALLY means to be talking about Skellen here but he says Thespio. Sure, people make mistakes like this, but not when you actually want an answer to your question. If you're just thinking "I should post just to post," you're much more likely to make this mistake, but this is a Freudian slip, he wasn't actually thinking about Skellen, because none of that really matters to him.

The most interesting part is that NO ONE CALLED HIM ON IT and therefore he got even more comfortable. He probably wasn't thinking about it at all when he posted it, it was just a post to make a post, and once he made one like that and get away with it, he felt more comfortable applying himself less, so he didn't catch himself when he made scummier and scummier posts throughout the game thread.

Also, something you'll notice is that he seems to put a high value on reading other people's games and seeing what they're doing. I used to try to do this, I almost guarantee he will get close to nothing out of it, but it's a pretty decent excuse for him to stop digging a hole for himself. You'll notice that you probably started thinking he looks a little more towny after asking for that, and he's probably not even gonna come back with results.

He's also telling you that I'm not asking any questions for him, but aside from the fact that I have at least three times now (I think it's four?) specifically asked him to post his reads at a bare minimum, if someone calls you out for not posting reads, for not scumhunting, do you think the correct response is to get defensive or to begin scumhunting and posting reads?
In post 179, Enter wrote:A list of questions derived from my posts for you, @Loopdan (and some I came up with on the spot)

First and foremost, please define tunneling/confbias for me and explain to me how I am already convinced and blinded by reads I didn't even have when entering the game thread? I will almost be happy if you just explain this one at all because it will mean that you're not just using giant mafia words to sound like you know what you're talking about.

Why is your vote currently on PvtUrist?

Do you think sheeping is acceptable? If yes, provide circumstances/reasons.

If town has a time advantage over scum, but scum has an information advantage, why would you feel comfortable not scumhunting and instead sheeping someone else's vote?

Why were you thinking about Thespio when you posted asking why Skellen was town?

Why were you questioning why another player was town reading Skellen, when you had already said you were townreading her (and provided no information in the process)? Why in this process, did you take a noncommittal stance and imply you didn't particularly feel one way or another about skellen?

Why is your vote not currently on me, even though (according to you) my play is suboptimal as town and indicative of scum?

What do you hope to find my reading my meta?


In addition to this, please post a reads list.
In post 180, Enter wrote:I realize now that Loopdan may not have been able to recognize I had a question for him here because I screwed up the quote box and he can't read around it, so I fixed it.
Please still respond to this.
In post 168, Enter wrote:Ugh. I hate myself for doing this, but every time I go to go back to "view my posts" again I see another one of these inane comments. I guess I'll just close the tab after this one.
In post 162, Loopdan wrote:And I told Skellen to
use
her vote. Which is exactly what you are saying I am scum for, btw.
Stop taking my words out of context. I'm saying you're scum for telling her to use your vote and you're not using yours.
In post 163, Loopdan wrote:Enter is either:
1. Badtown tunneling and confbiasing hard
Just out of curiosity:

Define tunneling/confbias for me and then explain how I, having just Entered (haha) the game thread, have become convinced by my own argument that I have not yet made?
Tunneling is an even worse excuse because you're implying that I've been seeing you as scum for a while (as far as the connotation is concerned).

Please at least call me scum and don't sit on the fence about it if you think I'm bad. (even though I walked in the game thread and all of a sudden we have two viable wagons and both of them are on scum)
In post 183, Enter wrote:1. I don't know you but I probably have around as much experience as you do. The fact that you don't know that shows you barely read my posts. Please actually read them and play mafia instead of being dismissive.

PvtUrist is town./

You and Loopdan are scum.
In post 187, Enter wrote:Alright. Sorry for being a bit terse earlier, I was doing something else and it gets under my skin when people get all uppity and dismissive, especially in Mafia.

Thespio, you're being dumb. I said in a post earlier that I have two accounts dating back onsite in 2014 and 2016.

The fact that you straight up dismissed my posts to the point of not reading them because I was pointing fingers at you says a lot about you as an SE (if you're town for some reason.) The fact that you would just not read something because you thought "oh it's prolly just a newbie being a newbie so he doesn't know enough to make a good point and is just scared of people w/ more experience than him" isn't an attitude that should be reflected in SE play.

Now, let's get to this really crappy PvtUrist scum read you've got goin on here:
In post 181, Thespio wrote:Reads(town to scum)
Loopdan- Loopdan is progressive in the game, pushes everything forward, I feel like their experience shows and they are getting flak for it. (@skellen, the reason why there are no skum reads for loopdan is because there isnt enough clash between the less active members, its one thing about newbie games that take place over holidays that suck. now is when im developing mine because people are actually posting)
Skellen- The clash and pressure they are misplacing on loopdan is genuine IMO, i wish they would redirect it.
(null)

Enter- I feel enter is missing the game, they havent really talked about anyone just pointed alot of fingers. both at an SE and IC, it comes across as a lack of trust in experience. I do think they are almost a town lead.
Elements- this one is shifting for me, in the RVS i was joking with them but i dont think they left this stage, im not getting a scum vibe but im getting a *I dont care* vibe. their posts dont actually lead to anything. I never thought they were scum at the beginning i was poking them to see a reaction, didnt really get one

Munchmellow/muh316- not enough posts
missdeadbeat-null, 1 post, hate players like this

(skum lean)

PvtUrist, PvtUrist, PvtUrist: look at their posts, dear god they tunneled me from the start, they are watching the game but not contributing, they arent progressing the game, they get on me for points that make no sense, they literally dont bring up anything that is even questionable, I understand why people thought was susp it was an innocent gesture since 3 people were playing the game BUT PvtUrist didnt even care, they focused on me saying i would talk about girls (which i said as a joke because i was a single college kid when i played last and now I'm married), they then switch it to something utterly stupid again. The things i look for in scum are:
1- Inactivity
2- Accusations for reasons unknown
3- Avoiding confrontation

PvtUrist hits all of these, so PvtUrist here are my questions for you:
Explain why you think im scum
Explain why your reads on everyone else are so vaugue
How do you feel about the lack of activity
Why are you lurking

VOTE: PvtUrist
Would still like more from Deadbeat but they seem to have left the building....

@Enter give me your honest opinion about PvtUrist, also whats your lynch order at this point?
To address point 1:
Looperdan also has been in the game six pages without saying very much at all as far as the game is concerned. PvtUrist has MORE reads than he does. Why are you not questioning Looperdan?

point 2:
Looperdan has made 4 votes this game. Two with no reasoning (in RVS, which is fair), one on a lurker (which is a pretty common tactic for scum players), and one as a sheep vote to another town player. That was the extent of the reasoning he gave. PvtUrist has given more reasoning than that for his vote on you. Why are you not questioning Looperdan?

point 3:
Please point me to what posts of yours PvtUrist has avoided and where he's avoided confrontation. From what I've seen, his posts have been more indicative of town than almost anyone here. You and looperdan both have cherrypicked and avoided what I'm actually saying, you especially, by being dismissive of my experience (which in a newbie game is dumb and unacceptable).

Now, some questions of my own, for you:

1. Why are you so dismissive of the possibility that Loopdan could be scum?
2. Why are you ignoring and refusing to point any suspicion towards Loopdan?
3. Since when is pointing fingers (or pushing reads, as I call it) a bad idea?

I disagree with you on a lot of points. I think you've got a closed mind on how this game is going to run and that you're driving it into the ground with ideas like "everyone can be town" (not what you're saying, but what you're coming off as) "let's lynch the lurkers" and "we should policy lynch of no lynch d1." Whatever. Game theory doesn't matter and it's possible you're just town, I have a tendency to read these things (people disagreeing with me, playing in ways that I would argue are suboptimal) as scummy, even though they're definitely not as suboptimal as some of the things OTHER PEOPLE here have been doing. I just did a quick reread of you and I'm not as convinced you're scum. I think you pinged a bit when I was reading Loopdan and that caught me off-guard, but I'll maybe case you tomorrow or something.

If you are town, PvtUrist is a bad lynch right now. Please read through my loopdan case SERIOUSLY and respond.
In post 188, Enter wrote:@Thespio

This is more scumhunting than Dan has done all game. I challenge you to find a post of Dans that competes w/ this in any way shape or form.
In post 112, PvtUrist wrote:My reads are lame so here's a few questions;

@Skellen ignoring the 2 inactive players, who do you feel to be the scummiest/towniest right now? How different do you feel with forum Mafia vs IRL?

@all reads on Thespio? Namely his page 2/3 fluff and scum slip.

It would certainly be convenient if the
lurking scums
inactive players decided to show up.
This is more reads and more thought than anything Loopdan has at the moment.
In post 136, PvtUrist wrote:Read update;

{Urist} conf town
{Skellen, Loopdan} lean town
{Elements} null town
{Enter, MissDeadbeat, Munchmellow, muh316} null
{Thespio} null scum

Skellen; Loopdan explains how I feel about him/her well in

Loopdan; ISO reads town

Elements; felt town from first read, but I guess there wasn't as much content in his posts than I previously thought they did.

Enter; feeling null, interested in where he reads Loopdan as red.

MDb/Munch; would appreciate a few more posts from either of them.

muh316; null right now

Thespio;
isn't talking about girls=scum
safely parks vote on inactive player rather than engaging with the more active players

In addition, PvtUrist is pushing his scumread (you) and his reason makes sense (you're pushing lurkers, bro, that's dumb. Stop doing it.) Also he has a reason. Unlike Loopdan.
In post 192, Enter wrote:
In post 190, Thespio wrote:Ok m8 lets go over this, putting aside that you think offsite experience makes you a master of the meta on a completely other site, and flipping out because you dont think anyone is reading your posts (which we are), there is nothing in what you are posting that isnt just you repeating yourself. You think its loopdan so you post 4 things about why you think its loopdan but they are all the same reason. You think its me and you make a page long post about how its me but is mostly just quotes and you playing WIFOM. You also seem to get arrogant over lurkers, why would town be INTENTIONALLY LURKING as Pvt has? who is that helping? he even acknowledged he was and said its just because hes lazy. WHY DO YOU BUY THAT?

Now another thing, why is pvts case against me better then any speculation loopdan has made?
Lets follow his actions:
RVS on me
Thinks its sketchy i had banter with elements. which you should see as me interacting with town since you are so dug in on loopdan and I.
Pvt calling me as scum slipping because i made a joke about how as a college kid playing with other college kids in my college we talked about girls and I asked a female in game a question.
EXPLAIN WHY THIS MAKES ANY SENSE

Puts me as scum with no reason beyond the prior
asks skellen a decent question, believes its be for the reason in post 110
pushes me for the same reason in post 110
filler
States he is lurking intentionally
Changes his reason for it being me to trying to get activity out of less active players, also thinks im not engaging with active players. Which I was, ive posted more then him most of which was town hunting and establishing who i think is town

So heres my questions, why do you think pushing a joke makes him town? why do you think 9 posts, 1 filler, 7 pushing a joke, 1 a change from joke to policy, are somehow helping us here? If you think hes town defend his reasoning. to me it looks like he is trying to get his rvs vote lynched, never met a townie who has played like that.
Alright m8, putting aside that I've been on this site since 2014 under different usernames, you just don't happen to actually read what I'm saying (which you aren't, cuz this is the third time I've said this).
You're making a shit ton of bold claims there and you won't even acknowledge or respond to what my points (yes points plural, it's not just me repeating myself, I think you think skimming = reading) against loopdan are. Why not respond to them?
I've seen town lurk a million times before and I'm going to see town lurk a million times again. From here, PvtUrist doesn't even look bad because he at least contributes to a game thread.
His vote was on you, you didn't do anything, he prolly had a legitimate scum read on you (but it was only gut until you started actually pushing lurkers). You've looked like shit for town all game. Let's look at your loopdan posts, though.
In post 191, Thespio wrote:
In post 146, Loopdan wrote:
In post 132, PvtUrist wrote:1) Thespio does not deny his scum allignment in #122

Wait. I thought you were joking about the scum slip thing in . You serious?
In post 145, Loopdan wrote:
In post 138, Enter wrote:1. Loopdans' vote has changed like six times on six pages. That's actually ridiculous and insane for a game where nothing has happened.
You aren't reading very closely. I've voted four times. You must be including Element's two votes that I quoted in . But even if it had been six times. So what? Are you arguing that it's more likely that I'm scum throwing out these votes to try and see what will stick, than I am town trying to sort players through discussion and pressure? Explain why vote changes like mine are scummy. You don't get to just declare something is scummy and have everyone believe you.
In post 138, Enter wrote:
2. With Loopdans vote changing like the weather in Texas, this is the one of the few times he ACTUALLY has an even close to scum read, and his vote doesn't follow. This is weird on Thespio, specifically, because I'm scumreading Thespio because of Thespio's own actions in addition to his interactions with Loopdan which all seem more fake than soy milk. (no offense to soy)
You are conflating me saying that I don't like how Thespio brought up the "lynch me before no-lynch" thing with me thinking he is scum. That's not how that works.
In post 138, Enter wrote: 3.
In post 92, Loopdan wrote:
In post 70, Munchmellow wrote:
Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
Looks like TvT to me, too. Could also be SvT (not sure about Loopdan).

So this implies you are TRing Thespio. Can you explain why that is? Not saying I disagree, just curious about your thinking.
Loopdan agrees and says "thanks, I agree, I am town" no explanation, but asks one of the other players to explain his post on Thespio. Here's why that's weird:
a) He didn't do it himself
b) Scum LOVE to know what town thinks of their scum buddies
c) His last post called Thespio as scummy
d) His "just curious about your thinking" is so noncommittal.
You entirely missed this. TvT was Loopdan v Skellen. But now I see why you missed it because I wrote Thespio instead of Skellen when I asked Munch about it. :facepalm:

You last point was about me being noncommittal. OK. It's page six. I found one strong townread and that's pretty good progress. Contrary to what you seem to think you are doing here, you don't solve the game on page six.

Also, what is your experience playing Mafia?
In post 127, Loopdan wrote:This is a game of information.
Scum starts with an information advantage.
Town starts with a time advantage (manifested by their larger team).
Town wins if they gain equity in information before they lose their time advantage.

Town only wins if they gain information (or get lucky).

So start asking questions. Admit if you don't get something. Speak up when something looks off. Stop worrying about if it makes you look "scummy". Vote your scumreads. Tell your townreads that you TR them (sometimes this is counterproductive later, but for day1 don't hold back).

This slow game-state is as much my fault as anyone's. I've been a bit pre-occupied with RL. I'll do my best to re-read and post some thoughts on all players in the morning.
In post 126, Loopdan wrote:So why am I TRing Skellen? His progression of his read on me makes way more sense coming from town than scum. Most importantly, he went back and re-read interactions and changed his thinking based on that. In a short, slow game like this do you know who goes back and re-reads and then hands out a townread on the IC? Town players who are frustrated that nothing is happening. Scum prefers for the game stalls out because it maintains their information advantage.

So yeah, Skellen is either town or is a helluva scum player for this being his first game.
In post 92, Loopdan wrote:
In post 70, Munchmellow wrote:
Loopdan wrote:
In post 57, Thespio wrote:I think this is a tvt fight
I agree.
Looks like TvT to me, too. Could also be SvT (not sure about Loopdan).

So this implies you are TRing Thespio. Can you explain why that is? Not saying I disagree, just curious about your thinking.
In post 90, Loopdan wrote:Someone needs to shake this game up.
We are still pretty much in RVS.
In post 87, Loopdan wrote:@Skellen - The tone wasn't intended to be ominous. It was just my way of making it seem like maybe I had an actual reason to scum-read you for your self-vote. Sometimes that leads to others jumping on the wagon, sometimes it leads to others screaming over and over that they demand an explanation of the unexplained vote, sometimes nothing really happens.
In post 59, Loopdan wrote:Skellen's post is pretty good. I don't agree with everything he says, but his thinking is clear and he does look to be approaching this exchange from a mindset that wants to solve rather than lynch.

Skellen, you should be using your vote. I know you said you come from live games where a vote is final, but here you need to use it as a weapon. If nothing else, you should vote whoever appears scummiest. It allows for others to then build on those "wagons" with their votes and that's where pressure and sorting of alignments starts accelerating. You can always move your vote as your reads change.
In post 18, Loopdan wrote:OK, so I thought I was the second vote on munchmellow until I saw that VC (vote-count) at the top. I didn't even notice Elements had moved votes.
In post 6, Elements wrote:VOTE: munchmellow
In post 11, Elements wrote:VOTE: pvturist
Whoever is second to make a vote with an arbitrary reason is scum
Elements, what is the purpose of this vote change?
all loopdan of the above are loopdan posts with more progression then all of pvts combined.
146 You're joking, right? Loopdan worries about the one thing he always does... how people are reading you.
145 is Loopdan being defensive, no intentional progression there, he doesn't even respond to everything I'm saying
147 Talking about game theory is not progression. Sometimes it's even distracting from something that's actually going on. You know who finds it easy to talk about game theory all game? Scum, because then they don't have to do things like give reads that will screw them over later
126 I'm not even going to begin w/ this. Not only do I fundamentally disagree w/ him (slower games are easier to go back and read and people seem to be legitimately scared of giving him a scumread due to him being IC), but he has a single town read and this is the only explanation he has given to this point. PvtUrist gives more explanation in his reads the post before.
92 Is Loopdan sitting on the fence and looks like he's retconning a read he just gave (which is super scummy to me), as well as dropping a Freudian slip that looks pretty condemning, IMO. He asks someone to explain a townread on a player he just said he had a townread on and gave no explanation for.
90 Is Loopdan asking someone else to do his job (as VT)
87 Is Loopdan defending his vote flip in RVS... defensiveness is not progression
59 Is Loopdan discussing game theory
18 Is Loopdan asking someone why they changed their vote in RVS (what was he expecting) and then later he berates him for answering his question

You're joking about this being more progression than what PU put out right? Did you even read what you linked me? I'm starting to think you just quoted everything with more than one line in it, but that's not true because Loopdan has been spamming the thread for six pages with game theory. A lot of the posts you quoted are the reason we were in a stagnate town to begin with. Every time someone got close to pushing reads, Loopdan would do that thing where he'd be like "You're prolly town." It looked to me like he was doing it so people would townread him. PvtUrist is maybe one of the only people impervious to that stuff.

And I hate to break it to you, dude, but you've been pinging MY scumdar since page 2, and PU ACTUALLY has a decent reason for voting you. You should stop w/ the OMGUS
In post 194, Enter wrote:
In post 193, Thespio wrote:
In post 192, Enter wrote:And I hate to break it to you, dude, but you've been pinging MY scumdar since page 2, and PU ACTUALLY has a decent reason for voting you. You should stop w/ the OMGUS
Two things. if you are under an alt list your accounts. explain what point he has. thats it. then i will vote myself because of how toxicly bad you are at this game. you think pushing a joke is a serious development and you follow up with me saying we need to push lurkers as a condemnation. its cute but i dont think anyone here is reading it the same way, including pvt. im slipping you down, sr all the way. that or youre anti town. Im leaning scum because i want to hope someone with alts (playing a newbie game in a newbie slot) wouldnt be anti town.
The funny thing is I've already listed them. Sorry you want to play against your WINCON (which is against site rules), but if you'll help me lynch scum, sure.

My alts are Tr1ckster and Extrapolated Eagle. I'm not playing with an alt, this is my main account. I don't use either of those accounts anymore and haven't for some time.

PvtUrist's big solid reason for pushing you is that you're pushing lurkers => causing the game to run slow and grind to a halt. This is pretty common for scum.

Please vote yourself now.

This is intent to hammer in 8+ hours, after I see a significant number of people have responded
because I don't think this game is going very far after this. I honestly almost see this as game solved.
In post 201, Enter wrote:Alright. So I've been pretty back and forth on my read for Thespio, which is why I've been really rather hoping to get a Loopdan lynch today so we can re-examine Thespio tomorrow.

The biggest part causing me to reconsider my scum read on him is how quickly the wagon formed. One thing that is often good to look at in mafia games is who is pushing what wagon and when. Day 1 wagons are often really quite hard to work up to a lynch, especially w/o scum. This is one reason why very often townies are lynched on day 1; scum controls a little over 20% of the vote and they both know who they want lynched - anyone but them. The Thespio wagon built pretty quickly after my arrival, which is somewhat surprising, since I didn't really push him at all. My thought is that town was looking for someone to push that wasn't a lurker, but was under the influence of loopdan/Thespio => didn't really want to try to solo push one of them against the crowd. So, considering Thespio is at a potential L-1 right now, let's look at who's on this wagon:
Thespio (3) -
PvtUrist
,
Munchmellow
,
Elements
And for the sake of analysis, we'll consider Thespio's as a self-vote.

Munchmellow doesn't have very many posts this game, but the ones she does have, I follow and share a thought process with. She suspects Loopdan in 70, reexamines her read and explains why Thespio feels off in 137 (which I agree with, BTW, the whole "self -vote" thing is a level of AtE that shouldn't be accomplished by anyone other than a newbie, IMO)
[BTW, Thespio, if you're reading this and you still think for some reason that Loopdan's 92 was serious, you should notice that Munchmellow responds as if he's asking about you and he still doesn't notice, which should trigger the thought in you that it's pretty apparent loopdan is asking questions to ask questions and has nothing he's looking for] Anyways. Munchmellow posts reads in 140 - which I agree with, and it makes me happy that it's a pretty full reads list. I feel pretty solid on Munchmellow for town.

Elements follows Munchmellow. ISO-ing him and one could easily see how you might think you're ISO-ing the same person. Again, I agree with his thoughts, his reservations on the whole self-vote thing, his questioning of double-bussing. I like him for town.

PvtUrist - This one is weird, because it does still feel, in the slightest way, a bit weird to me that he has maintained his vote on Thespio since game start. But. Here's why I think he's town: He was the first player to drop reads. Loopdan's vote on him is super weird and he avoids responsibility for his PvtUrist vote (which loopdan would WANT responsibility for PvtUrist flip if he was bussing his buddy). When PvtUrist did drop those questions in 112, they were pretty decent questions and indicate some small amount of town - motivation. Yes, my town read on him is weak. No, it doesn't matter, because my scum read on Loopdan is ridiculously strong, and there isn't two scum in [PvtUrist, Loopdan]

Finally, Thespio:
I disagree with the idea of lynching yourself. Let's start there. Yes I was ok with it when I started mafia, but I've grown and changed a lot, I think. You have a role-pm from the mod that says you're town. That is the largest confirmation you will get and the first piece to the logic puzzle that is mafia. (it's a little more than a logic puzzle, but bear with me). The only time you should ever be ok with yourself being lynched is never, IMO, because you should always be doing your best to be the largest asset to town when you're alive, and when you're dead, you have no control over the game. I have seen so many times where it looks like town has won because everything is set up perfectly and some charming mafia goon wins over the heart of the guy heading off his lynch and all of a sudden town loses in a 3p LyLo. Sure, at the end of day yesterday, everyone agreed that if you self-voted then they would lynch the mafia goon you were so certain should die if you flipped town, but people change. People's read change. A lot. Especially over night. However, I will not lynch based solely off the fact that people are willing to play sub-optimal town games in this way, because I'm pretty sure there are mafia players that will disagree with me on the self-vote being suboptimal. Whatever.

Let's get to the next issue: Self-vote threats: This is an entirely different matter because it is the lowest of low AtE. While talk of lynching yourself can be considered mafia theory, threatening to self-vote is a spastic response of emotion that belongs nowhere except every once in a while, from a newbie, in a newbie game. Then the threat should be squashed by the IC and everyone should move on with their lives, because it's bad. It is very bad. I view self-votes in mafia games like I view threats to wreck your own car because it would get attention. Will I lynch for it? Not always. Did it make me think he was almost definitely scum for a moment? Yes. This is one of the very few places that meta-ing someone does come in handy for me. When I see someone make dumb newbie mistakes like this, I go back and look at past games and see if they make the same mistakes in those games as town. So, let's see what we can find:

In Newbie 1640, Post 190 viewtopic.php?p=7160867#p7160867, Thespio says:
:roll: This helps no one. if you honestly got him lynched and he was town, then its likely a scum driven lynch and thus if you are town you will have scum backing as well. Ultimately you could both be town.
Indicating an understanding that self-flipping and threats of such are rarely reasonable.

And in Newbie 1625, Post 982 viewtopic.php?p=7160867#p7160867, Thespio says:
There kill last night is basically WIFOM. I think its odd you countered immediately... But I also think Jorams timely absence is quite mysterious too... So im lookin @ Jorams post about being investigated a possible scum slip. I also think Aku is lurking pretty badly... Anyone have any think aku might have used Bulba as a train after we all were questioning him?
Again indicating how much WIFOM surrounds a kill. Sure, he's talking about a night kill here, but the point is across that once you're dead, you're not as effective and it is so easy to WIFOM everything out. Even if PvtUrist was scum, day 2 when we tried to lynch him, he would start explaining everything for Thespio and Thespio wouldn't be there to correct him. I've seen it so much, and Thespio seems to understand this, too, which makes me think he's prolly scum, using AtE.

Up until this point, I had been doubting my read on Thespio, but the threats to self-vote is so bad and talk of self-lynch over no-lynch is so bad, I don't think I can fathom him flipping town.

In addition he had some weird interactions at beginning of day, his teasing flip w/ his read on elements was weird, and his pushing of lurkers is bad. I also don't like how he dismissed the Skellen v Loopdan as TvT and Loopdan chimed in. Anyways, I'm super distracted right now, so I will get back to this later, but as of right now, I feel pretty solid on my scum read on Thespio.
In post 206, Enter wrote:
In post 205, Thespio wrote:
In post 203, Enter wrote:
In post 202, Thespio wrote:@Enter, I will reply later today, I genuinely appreciate an actual well written read like what you gave, the one sentence ones like what pvt gave kill me.
That's fair, I have no intent of hammering while there's valid discussion going on.
Also I want to apologize for antagonizing you just reading through this I think you are town (if you read my recent games you will see me do it alot), Pvts still is my main scum read, I understand your reasoning (if im scum and he started on me me why would he leave) I would like more from him. After this I would say i TR you. ill post a reply to all of it in about 2 hours.
Yeah sure. It's mafia, dude, I understand. What happens in game, stays in game. I'm a bit antagonistic myself, but with purpose. I understand you wanting to see more from him, I wouldn't mind more myself. I do see town motivation in a few of his posts, however, and I don't see that in Loopdan, and due to Loopdan's (I think it was 125?) I don't think PvtUrist and Loopdan can both be scum => PvtUrist is town.
In post 213, Enter wrote:I think I've said this before, but I'll say it again:

I understand distancing and bussing. I've played with people that exclusively bus. I've been scum when my partner said "it sucks to be you, but I exclusively bus day 1" (that was offsite)

This isn't that.
In post 125, Loopdan wrote:VOTE: PvtUrist

This is a sheep vote for Skellen. He's my only strong TR right now, and I don't have any real scumreads.

This is L-2.

IC note:
Wiki entry for Sheeping
He refuses responsibility for PvtUrist's flip. The big two reasons scum bus is for town!cred or to avoid getting scum!cred. He gets no town!cred if he takes no responsibility for his vote. He knows PvtUrist will flip town and he doesn't want to be looked at as a guy who's pushing the wagon.
These games are from years ago, ive changed, i understand personal loss for general gain, I became a stockbroker, got a job with the govt, learning to play losses is important, and I didnt understand it then, read my more recent games.
Anndd this is why I don't like meta-ing people. I still disagree with you, but as long as you're not disagreeing with yourself this isn't a point of contention and I really would rather not worry about it right now, because it's distracting.

As far as where we go from here, I want very strongly to lynch Loopdan today. I don't want to lynch you right now. I can try and re-summarize my loopdan argument, but I feel what you want are specifics, and if I give you specifics you'll just end up with a post wall that is larger than the sum of the ones I posted earlier, so I highly recommend you read that more carefully if/when you get the chance (if you haven't already)


===============================================

Some things I'd like you to examine, taken this is your reason for TRing Loopdan:
Ive leaned town on him for a while, The reason I like loopdan is I read him town after his spat, it genuinely seemed TvT.
1. After the spat, he's quick to call himself town (as well as the other person). He's so quick to avoid that turning into a real confrontation. If he really believed it was TvT, why didn't he say so sooner? His flip was awkward.
2. The whole spat was weird. Skellen called out Loopdan for doing dumb stuff, Loopdan got evasive and explained why he did the stuff he did (which is exactly what he told elements NOT to do only a few posts before).
3. Look at his in contrast with his . He admits that pushing lurkers is dumb and then he pushes a lurker later.
4. Look at his and in contrast to his . He accidentally gives out a town read and then implies he will retcon it.
In post 214, Enter wrote:Oh also
I find this interesting, do you think Loopdan to some degree has aligned with me for favor? it does look like he defends me to some degree. I still want more, an active town is a happy town, but I lean town after reexamining them.
You two have really weird interactions. I do not like your interactions. I don't like how he was really willing to change his vote so quickly in RVS and from to but he wouldn't put his vote on you when he didn't like what you said.
In post 219, Enter wrote:
In post 218, MagikHorse wrote:Greetings all. I'm at work right now and need to read the thread a bit deeper (especially regarding the Loopdan stuff going on), but here's a question to buy a little time for that so this slot isn't totally useless.

Enter, why do you think Loopdan's vote on Ptv isn't distancing/bussing? You seem to know exactly what that looks like, and I want to know exactly why you think its unlikely here.
*deep breath*

Check out my , it's six posts above yours. Also my says the same thing. If you have specific questions about that, feel free to ask.

@Thespio: I'm working on PoE as far as who Loopdan's partner is right now, I'm not ignoring you.
In post 221, Enter wrote:
Just taking a moment in the middle of my searching for Loopdan's partner to point out that this moderator is off the charts great. The vote count and vote record on page 1 with links is game changing. This is my nomination for moderator of the year, you can mark me in the record right here and now folks.


@Skellen - I'll agree that PvtUrist is lurker-y. The thing with lurkers is that scum!lurking often looks like town!lurking from what I've seen. Your read seems like you're applying your thoughts to his absence, and while I agree with that process, I would ask you this: Considering cases against Loopdan and PvtUrist, which appears scummier to you, and why? If you townread Loopdan, please explain in depth. I understand that PvtUrist doesn't look like an example of town, but from my perspective it looks like you're projecting your own reasoning on his absence (which isn't necessarily wrong, it just might sway your read further towards scum or town than you wanted to.) Since most of my points against Loopdan are relatively concrete (as far as I'm aware), and I doubt they could be scum together, I doubt PvtUrist is scum. I would really like to hear your opinions on this.
In post 226, Enter wrote:As far as Loopdan's partner, let's examine the possibilities:

1. PvtUrist: Loopdan doesn't take responsibility for his vote, like he should if he knew PvtUrist was flipping scum. => I think PvtUrist is pretty much conftown when Loopdan flips scum
2. Skellen: Skellen reads like town to me. makes them look town, I think. I think it's pretty rare for scum to call other scum hard town read without other townies agreeing, also the debate at the beginning makes me think it's TvS => Skellen is town.
3. muh316: Kinda weird vote from Loopdan in RVS. Also second one to jump on Loopdan after I came in, and continued to press. Looks kinda town to me (although there really isn't much interaction between them, muh316 calls out Loopdan, Loopdan says "later" :/ ).
4. Munchmellow: Again, not a lot of interactions outside an RVS vote from Loopdan. She's placed suspicion on him before. Reading her as pretty town-y.
5. elements: Weird interaction between elements and Loopdan on Loopdan's side, again. :/ And again, we see another case of elements calling him out for being weird.

You might begin to be seeing a pattern here. Everyone here has called Loopdan out for weird things. I think most of the people in this group are less likely to be his partner than the other two, but it's pretty hard. Elements, for example, could easily be just following other people's example by calling out Loopdan out for his weirdness. If I had to pick a name out of this list on the spot, it would prolly be elements based on the fact that Loopdan didn't vote him when elements made a weird move w/ his votes, even though he did vote muh316. Although that might point more towards muh316, as it seems to me that Loopdan is more scared of pushing a wagon on town.
====

6. Thespio: weird interactions w/ Loopdan. One of the only people to not call him out for weird stuff in the game thread.
7. MissDeadbeat/MagikHorse: Actually nothing this game. Loopdan was awful quick to get his vote off MissDeadbeat. This signals to me that she's the most likely here to be scum. In addition, he took full responsibility for his vote on her. My suspicion is that he saw Thespio vote her, thought to himself "Oh crap better bus her, it's maybe over for her" and then swapped to PvtUrist once he saw a way out.

My conclusion: Of every player here, I would really like to see more from MagikHorse (and if I don't, I will be a very big fan of their lynch on day 2).
In post 223, Thespio wrote:@Enter, I have a question for you, say we flip Loopdan and hes town, whats your next course of action?
I will seriously reconsider my take on PvtUrist
In post 227, Enter wrote:
In post 224, Skellen wrote:Got too distracted so I am keeping it short. Since he is the other hot topic in the vote count at the moment it's next to Thespio. Regarding him I am a little bit indecisive. Rethinking his play yesterday made him suspicious in my eyes, his defence is a mixed bag for me now. I think his reads seem comprehensible from his point of view, but then right after that he defends Loopdan twice with pitting him against PvtUrist. Ugh. Why even doing someone else's job? I think Loopdan did even the same with Thespio? If these two are the scum team it's more turning into a slapstick team. This is actually fuel for Enter's original scumteam Loopdan/Thespio theory, although
it's becoming so obvious that I just can't believe it can be that easy.


Otherwise his defence is rather predictable, I mean I share his suspicion of PvtUrist, but I was hoping his opinion of Loopdan would be a little bit more ambitious as I kind of hinted yesterday. However now his opinion seems to change, I am not sure how to interpret that. Either he is really questioning him more or it's the last effort to burn some bridges between him and Loopdan, although I might think it's almost too late for that. Guess it will also depends now too what Loopdan's next move is and where Thespio's new read is leading to.
There should be a "like" button for mafia. Bolded is why I'm spending so long trying to reconsider.
In post 230, Enter wrote:
In post 228, Thespio wrote:
In post 226, Enter wrote:In post 223, Thespio wrote:
@Enter, I have a question for you, say we flip Loopdan and hes town, whats your next course of action?


I will seriously reconsider my take on PvtUrist
Ok if I flip town who do you lynch?

Im rereading the game in between work (going very slow) just want to establish your PoE
If you flip town considering what?

We lynch you day 1: No matter what you flip, I flip Loopdan tomorrow.
We lynch Loopdan day 1: He flips scum, we re-examine. I've shared my thoughts on this. He flips town, I seriously reconsider PvtUrist
In post 229, Skellen wrote:
In post 221, Enter wrote:
Just taking a moment in the middle of my searching for Loopdan's partner to point out that this moderator is off the charts great. The vote count and vote record on page 1 with links is game changing. This is my nomination for moderator of the year, you can mark me in the record right here and now folks.


@Skellen - I'll agree that PvtUrist is lurker-y. The thing with lurkers is that scum!lurking often looks like town!lurking from what I've seen. Your read seems like you're applying your thoughts to his absence, and while I agree with that process, I would ask you this: Considering cases against Loopdan and PvtUrist, which appears scummier to you, and why? If you townread Loopdan, please explain in depth. I understand that PvtUrist doesn't look like an example of town, but from my perspective it looks like you're projecting your own reasoning on his absence (which isn't necessarily wrong, it just might sway your read further towards scum or town than you wanted to.) Since most of my points against Loopdan are relatively concrete (as far as I'm aware), and I doubt they could be scum together, I doubt PvtUrist is scum. I would really like to hear your opinions on this.
I will admit I might be a little too hard with him here (PvtUrist). I think for me it's ultimately difficult to read him, when he is so "streamlined".

I agree that Loopdan/PvtUrist is not possible and no, I can definitely rule Loopdan out as townread at the moment as I am not fond of his behaviour after you started your attack. I am just not sure yet if he ends up as neutral or scum for me. Please wait a little bit for my read on Loopdan, I was orginally planning to wait for an improved defence of him, but since I am most likely not here tomorrow and I am getting frustrated with his stalling, which looks like playing on time until it hits one of the other two, I am rereading everything at the moment (including your guys exchange *shiver*).
I personally do not think Loopdan plans on responding to the large slew of questions I have given him. Based on his most recent post, he appears to be ignoring me.
In post 233, Enter wrote:
In post 232, Thespio wrote:At this point I feel like Loopdan to me seems scummy, I honestly believe i missed most of his actions over the weekend when I was at my friends funeral. Apologize guys, I do want to say that Pvt is more scummy in my book, them hitting at each other doesnt make either mutually exclusive and I would prefer we lynch Pvt at this point.
Let me pitch you a better deal. You agree that PvtUrist can't be scum if Loopdan is scum, right? And you agree that Loopdan is scummy? Let's flip Loopdan. If he's red, we don't have to worry about Pvt. If he's green, we have had more time from Pvt to examine his posts and the like.
In post 236, Enter wrote:
In post 234, Thespio wrote:
In post 233, Enter wrote:Let me pitch you a better deal. You agree that PvtUrist can't be scum if Loopdan is scum, right? And you agree that Loopdan is scummy? Let's flip Loopdan. If he's red, we don't have to worry about Pvt. If he's green, we have had more time from Pvt to examine his posts and the like.
So we play my logic with the self lynch, we have a guaranteed town if he flips green, if he is we know where to go, if he isnt we got scum, then there is a possibility of a perfect game. Im hesitant but its logical, give me some time to mull it over.
I live and breathe for the perfect game. Think of it this way, if we flip Loopdan we have a 50% chance of confirmed town.
In post 235, Thespio wrote:
In post 233, Enter wrote:
In post 232, Thespio wrote:At this point I feel like Loopdan to me seems scummy, I honestly believe i missed most of his actions over the weekend when I was at my friends funeral. Apologize guys, I do want to say that Pvt is more scummy in my book, them hitting at each other doesnt make either mutually exclusive and I would prefer we lynch Pvt at this point.
Let me pitch you a better deal. You agree that PvtUrist can't be scum if Loopdan is scum, right? And you agree that Loopdan is scummy? Let's flip Loopdan. If he's red, we don't have to worry about Pvt. If he's green, we have had more time from Pvt to examine his posts and the like.
Also I dont think they are Mutually Exclusive, meaning they could be teammates just seperating, counter counter deal, Ill vote loopdan if we get loopdan to talk about Pvt and I think its fishy. Before we he flips I would like it enitrely ruled out that he is scum.
I doubt he will talk much at all. He's probably realized his hole is too deep, but I'm more than willing to wait. I don't want to lynch PU today.
In post 245, Enter wrote:
In post 242, Loopdan wrote:@Skellen - thanks for that unannounced L-1 vote.
Please contribute in some positive form instead of being passive aggressive and lurking. Weren't you gung-ho about lynching lurkers earlier?

@Skellen, the unvote was not necessary.
In post 265, Enter wrote:
In post 259, Thespio wrote:@Enter, if he flips town how do you see Muh316 at this point?
Doesn't change my read, really regardless of what Loopdan flips.
In post 263, Munchmellow wrote:Well, I'm not jumping on that wagon. I read everything, I get where they (mostly Enter) are coming from, but something smells fishy here. It seems like Loopdan reads obv scum to a lot of people and I just don't see it coming from an IC. The only thing that really stood out for me is policy vote on MDb- @Loopdan, can you explain that.
So, if he flips scum - lesson learned for me not to trust my gut next time.
My read on PvT also changed to null-scum.
If Loopdan didn't have the title of IC, would that change how you read him?
In post 278, Enter wrote:
In post 277, Loopdan wrote:Oh yeah, before I forget it, here's an old post from the Mafia Discussion sub-forum, where Enter brings up an effective way for scum to derail a game.

Enter's discussion topic he started 3 years ago (under his Extrapolated Eagle login) discussing how effective it is when scum hardcore tunnels a player who would otherwise be hard to lynch.
In post 0, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:There seems to be an incredibly frustrating site meta that has developed since the last time I played about 2 years ago of hardcore tunneling a singular player, often a lynch that would be otherwise harder to achieve and it's getting under my skin. I have actually seen little to no tunneling from town in my recent games and deathtunneling has seemed to come almost exclusively from scum. I think this needs to be addressed, because this is ridiculous and frustrating to deal with.

Here's how it benefits the mafia:
1. It keeps doubt in the minds of town players that said tunneled player is town even if said player would often be considered strong town by day 2/day 3.
2. It keeps the victim from calling the predator out for fear of having "OMGUS!" screamed like a professional soccer player falls to the ground holding his leg and yells in pain when the ball is taken from him.
3. It gets the scum a town read because it's seen as "pushing his reads"
4. The scum player doesn't have to interact with the rest of the game or share reads other than "<victims name> needs to die, they're obvscum"

This needs to be callled out as scum like every time it's seen because it almost always comes from scum.
:lol:
It's almost like 1, I've grown, and 2, I'm not tunneling you. I called you scum, you freaked out and accused me of confbias and tunneling. Quit your pathetic tirade and play the darn game.
In post 283, Enter wrote:
In post 280, Loopdan wrote:@Enter - I didn't freak out. You kept yelling in ALL CAPS and repeating the same points over and over again, so I stopped reading your posts.
You did freak out. I wasn't yelling, I was posting important points in all caps because I know people skim my posts. You saw it and got offended. That's a you problem.

You weren't reading my posts in the first place, you were cherry picking and you know it. You didn't even properly respond to my first post, you tried to just dismiss it by calling me bad town or scum.

Your current path of action right now by ignoring me when I call you out for using words improperly (tunneling, confbias) when I call you out for multi-posting (8 in a row? What even is that --especially as an IC?) when I call you out for bad play (sheeping another player? When has that ever been acceptable?) is child-like.

Stop dropping passive aggressive comments and saying my points are bad when you admit you're not even reading them. Stop playing in this off-the-cuff rage. It looks bad on you as a person and it's not beneficial to the mafia game in any form or fashion.
In post 294, Enter wrote:
In post 290, Loopdan wrote:He has 47 posts in this game (most are rather large). Virtually all of them here are pushing a lynch on me.

He had 49 in that game (most not that large). Only 16 have anything to do with NSG, and they pale in comparison to his push here.

So why did he characterize his push on NSG a "tunnel" but says his push on me isn't a tunnel?
I had a constant push on NSG over time. I had like three posts before you started insisting I was confbiasing and tunneling, and you didn't even provide counter points for all my points.


His 16 posts on NSG in his last game... that was tunneling. But not this. :roll:
User avatar
Loopdan
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Loopdan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2256
Joined: May 13, 2016

Post Post #299 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by Loopdan »

In post 297, Enter wrote:Please answer the questions I asked you.
Post them again (concisely). I'm not wading through your posts to find them.

Return to “Completed Newbie Games”