I feel like all scum are in:In post 2772, Krazy wrote:So who is scum?
Rogers, Naomi, Saudade, Gamma, Ethos.
I feel like all scum are in:In post 2772, Krazy wrote:So who is scum?
No offense but I think this PoE sucks, not because I am in it but because I am in it (long dramatic pause) AND Naomi and Light are in it. Something is off with your reads if you are getting that as a PoE (just my opinion sir). I think scum are gaming you on your town reads, just sayin'.In post 2775, Flavor Leaf wrote:I feel like all scum are in:In post 2772, Krazy wrote:So who is scum?
Rogers, Naomi, Saudade, Gamma, Ethos.
100% this. It makes zero sense for you to put both of us in that pool together. We can both be town together. One of us can be town, the other mafia. We can't both be scum together.In post 2782, Mister Rogers wrote:No offense but I think this PoE sucks, not because I am in it but because I am in it (long dramatic pause) AND Naomi and Light are in it.
Yes. If FL is scum this game, his play earlier defending Manatee was excellent and got me good. Still, I have a few plausible scum teams in mind that do include him.In post 2788, Mister Rogers wrote:Does anyone see what I am saying here.
Where did I say you couldn’t be?In post 2789, Light Ethos wrote:100% this. It makes zero sense for you to put both of us in that pool together. We can both be town together. One of us can be town, the other mafia. We can't both be scum together.In post 2782, Mister Rogers wrote:No offense but I think this PoE sucks, not because I am in it but because I am in it (long dramatic pause) AND Naomi and Light are in it.
In that context, your pool is incredibly unlikely to be true, as it requires either the scum team to be exactly Rogers, Saudade, and Gamma or a permutation of 1 in {Naomi,Light Ethos} and 2 in {Rogers, Saudade, Gamma}. I don't see that happening.
This is a misrep. I never said you guys were both scum nor both town, nor one or the otherIn post 2789, Light Ethos wrote:100% this. It makes zero sense for you to put both of us in that pool together. We can both be town together. One of us can be town, the other mafia. We can't both be scum together.In post 2782, Mister Rogers wrote:No offense but I think this PoE sucks, not because I am in it but because I am in it (long dramatic pause) AND Naomi and Light are in it.
In that context, your pool is incredibly unlikely to be true, as it requires either the scum team to be exactly Rogers, Saudade, and Gamma or a permutation of 1 in {Naomi,Light Ethos} and 2 in {Rogers, Saudade, Gamma}. I don't see that happening.
I have more consistency in reads when I’m scum. I can link you to games if you’d like, or can just ask players here who know me that I am by far more consistent as scum.In post 2788, Mister Rogers wrote:Call me a jerk (its easy!) but FoS FL for having "trouble" formulating his reads; inconsistency in the way reads have been formulated.,
Does anyone see what I am saying here. I am posting this more to make a note of it because something is not smelling right with the whole way TL has read the player list?
PEDIT: See this makes no sense to me. HOW can you accept Worst's claim because ur read of him is so super accurate?? But yet at the same time say that an almost perfectly good claim by Crimson is most likely false?
I don't think your logic regarding your reads?
You do realize that Saudade had a 3 person scum team for a while, right? Only the Krazy claim derailed it. Speaking of which:
Have you played with FL before?In post 2788, Mister Rogers wrote:Call me a jerk (its easy!) but FoS FL for having "trouble" formulating his reads; inconsistency in the way reads have been formulated.,
Does anyone see what I am saying here. I am posting this more to make a note of it because something is not smelling right with the whole way TL has read the player list?
PEDIT: See this makes no sense to me. HOW can you accept Worst's claim because ur read of him is so super accurate?? But yet at the same time say that an almost perfectly good claim by Crimson is most likely false?
I don't think your logic regarding your reads?
I know this VC is outdated but i'm pretty sure scum was in Saudade's wagon. Leaning for Frank here.
Now we are mind melding boom
Profii and I here literally just finished a partner game where he got to see all my thoughts on a game, and literally changed my reads completely within the same hour multiple times throughout the game.In post 2795, profii wrote:Have you played with FL before?In post 2788, Mister Rogers wrote:Call me a jerk (its easy!) but FoS FL for having "trouble" formulating his reads; inconsistency in the way reads have been formulated.,
Does anyone see what I am saying here. I am posting this more to make a note of it because something is not smelling right with the whole way TL has read the player list?
PEDIT: See this makes no sense to me. HOW can you accept Worst's claim because ur read of him is so super accurate?? But yet at the same time say that an almost perfectly good claim by Crimson is most likely false?
I don't think your logic regarding your reads?