I'd still like to know why that strikes you as odd. Self-voting is likely to be a prominent meta characteristic. If I found that you only ever self-voted as scum I'd have called you scum. Instead, I found a towngame where you were behaving the exact same way with Dunnstral, thus making it a townread.In post 3221, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't know why I'm shouting, I'm losing my mind.
TY. I don’t know how I missed this.In post 3206, Auro wrote:@Gobbles.In post 3168, Auro wrote:Mildly incorrect - did I say I didn't want to put her at L-1? I simply just didn't.In post 3148, gobbledygook wrote:You put Fish at L-1, then unvote. A day later and 200 posts later you are saying you want an NSG lynch but don’t want to put her at L-1.
I don’t get why you wouldn’t even vote NSG at that time especially when her wagon and Fish’s wagon were in direct competition with one another. If you were afraid of ending day, why even put Fish at L-1?
I wasn't afraid of ending the day at that point. L-1 FF was more of a reaction vote.
I don't think there was any danger of FF being lynched towards the end of D1; if they were still both at L-2 it would make more sense for me to lay a vote just to prevent FF lynch.
The lack of vote, etc is pretty awkward, right? As scum I'd prolly be more conscious of how my vote is in play, and prolly plan out a better trajectory regardless of who's getting lynched.
I don't see why you're so fixated on this alone - is there nothing else in this game that interests you?
If I was scum I wouldn't need to pocket you and maintain the pocket while dealing with your constant bouts of paranoia. You'd be dead by now.
Hammering me gives higher win chances than keeping me alive at this point if you're scum; blame can be shared between other town derps on my wagon.In post 3227, gobbledygook wrote:By the way, even if I was scum, I wouldn’t just lolhammer anyone who got to L-1, so I’m not sure what this is all supposed to accomplish.
@CheekyIn post 3225, Auro wrote:I'd still like to know why that strikes you as odd.In post 3221, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't know why I'm shouting, I'm losing my mind.
Gobbles what happened to that post you wrote a bit of every moment you could while you were away?In post 3230, CheekyTeeky wrote:All the emoticons tell me you're nervous Auro.
Never have I had someone effort to justify their townread on me after I've acted explicitly scummy. That's not normal and I don't get why you decided on Day 4 to start meta diving people when you're under the pump. You spent all day 3 pushing gobbles but today you decided to use meta to boost your argument. It reads like you're LAMISTing the shizz out of the thread because you have to, otherwise you would have summoned your solve powers earlier.In post 3236, Auro wrote:@CheekyIn post 3225, Auro wrote:I'd still like to know why that strikes you as odd.In post 3221, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't know why I'm shouting, I'm losing my mind.
Cheeky knows a hammer on me by town is plausible. Cheeky also knows that town shouldn't be lynching this early, if at all they do.In post 3242, Auro wrote:Cheeky dies, no matter who hammers me.
Sorry to belabor this point, but this is the revised statement concerning those actions right? Your big post had that comment incorrectly stated?In post 3234, Auro wrote:I mean lay a vote on FF to hope he gets lynched over NSG.
