Open 698: Stack the Deck (GAME OVER)

Mulch · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:09 pm

In post 448, Chip Butty wrote:Good to see you getting involved, whatever your alignment. Might liven things up a bit.

It's been sort of hard to get into this game. Really boring game lol

Mulch · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:13 pm

The lurking is roughly NAI for assemble and I liked some of their earlier posts. I would rather not wagon them.

Mulch · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:15 pm

In post 418, UnaBombaH wrote:In the games where I join as replacement, I often get guiltied into changing my reads by more experienced players, because they devalue my logic or reads, but I have turned out to be correct multiple times now (even if I have failed in presenting the cas

Una, after the game, let's talk about this stuff. I can really relate to this post

Chip Butty · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:15 pm

Mulch, would you mind reading Alch and Luca when you have time?

Mulch · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:16 pm

I think that if Ice flips scum, Una is relatively spewed town. I don't think they are capable of scum theatre like this

Mulch · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:16 pm

In post 453, Chip Butty wrote:Mulch, would you mind reading Alch and Luca when you have time?

Sure

Mulch · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:19 pm

133 has weak reasoning, perhaps in a scummy way

Chip Butty · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:20 pm

In post 454, Mulch wrote:I think that if Ice flips scum, Una is relatively spewed town. I don't think they are capable of scum theatre like this

So vice versa as well?

Mulch · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:21 pm

In post 164, Luca Blight wrote:c) because I find asking for self-meta to be kinda pointless - if he's so aware of his own meta then it's devalued anyway, and if he's scum then again, why would willingly do Town's work for him? I'm not one to willingly supply self-meta myself regardless of alignment, so it would be a bit hypocritical of me to ask such a question.

@Luca

: I think I'm probably missing context for this, but why is this a reason to townread him and what exactly did he do regarding self meta?

Mulch · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:21 pm

In post 457, Chip Butty wrote:
In post 454, Mulch wrote:I think that if Ice flips scum, Una is relatively spewed town. I don't think they are capable of scum theatre like this
So vice versa as well?

I believe so

Realeo · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:23 pm

In post 439, Alchemist21 wrote:Did you see any times where Una fluffed until called on it and then claim it was his plan all along?

Either he didn't do it before or I didn't saw it. A quick ctrl-f shows this is the first time to use the word "fluff" in the context.

Mulch · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:24 pm

In post 165, Luca Blight wrote:but it's the reasoning behind it that caught me as a bit strange.

What reasoning? It was a fact...

Realeo · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:25 pm

In post 446, Mulch wrote:GameNBurger's recent two posts are bad imo. Willing to change wagons to him.

YOU and me can start gameNBurger's wagon together!

FOR WORLD PEACE!

Mulch · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:26 pm

I think that Luca's indignation and anger about the ordering of the town read fiasco with Ice is relatively villagery

Mulch · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:27 pm

In post 462, Realeo wrote:
In post 446, Mulch wrote:GameNBurger's recent two posts are bad imo. Willing to change wagons to him.
YOU and me can start gameNBurger's wagon together!

FOR WORLD PEACE!

VOTE: Gamenburger

Mulch · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:27 pm

I will give Luca a scum lean. I don't like some of his earlier posts

Mulch · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:28 pm

Oh yeah Iceguy's "capitalization" reading for Assemble is probably the mindset/rationality that I cannot relate with the most... I genuinely can't see how he could scumread someone for capitalization...

Realeo · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:28 pm

VOTE: Gamenburger

Mulch · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:31 pm

Alch is a town read... I can follow his thoughts and reads easily although I disagree with some of them... I really like 292 and 378.

Mulch · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:32 pm

And that's it for tonight folks. The day ends in 2 days, so it is time to consolidate wagons. Game/Ice wagons would be ideal. We should leave time to allow the person run up to claim. A frenetic and frantic deadline scramble won't help anyone.

PMysterious · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:35 pm

Vote Count 1.5

With 13 alive, it will take 7 to lynch.

Assemblerotws- 0
Realeo- 0
Chip Butty- 2 (Duckworth, CommKnight)
GameNBurger- 2 (Mulch, Realeo)
ironstove- 0
IceGuy- 2 (Luca Blight, UnaBombaH)
Luca Blight- 0
Duckworth- 1 (grapes)
Mulch- 0
Alchemist21- 0
grapes- 0
CommKnight- 0
UnaBombaH- 3 (Alchemist 21, Ice Guy, Chip Butty)

Assemblerotws has been prodded. He has 24 hours to respond, or he will be replaced.

Also, as for the countdown timer, it is on the first page. (I will definitely edit things in the first post during the Night Phase, since that's where activity grinds to a halt.)

Realeo · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:37 pm

Is GameNBurger genuinely read at a speed of 1 page every 48 hours?

Luca Blight · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:46 pm

In post 456, Mulch wrote:133 has weak reasoning, perhaps in a scummy way

Weak reasoning for a case on page 6?

We'll have to disagree on that.

In post 458, Mulch wrote:
In post 164, Luca Blight wrote:c) because I find asking for self-meta to be kinda pointless - if he's so aware of his own meta then it's devalued anyway, and if he's scum then again, why would willingly do Town's work for him? I'm not one to willingly supply self-meta myself regardless of alignment, so it would be a bit hypocritical of me to ask such a question.

@Luca
: I think I'm probably missing context for this, but why is this a reason to townread him and what exactly did he do regarding self meta?

Yes, you are missing the context. That was in reply to this question:

In post 137, Chip Butty wrote:@Grapes: sorry if I've missed this in your gargantuan posts, but can you please link us to a game where you were town and played in a similar style?

@Luca: Speaking of easy, how come you have accepted Grapes's account of his style without asking him what I have just asked him?

In post 461, Mulch wrote:
In post 165, Luca Blight wrote:but it's the reasoning behind it that caught me as a bit strange.
What reasoning? It was a fact...

How is

"You said you want to retract your town lean, that implies you think he's scum now"

a fact?

It's an incorrect interpretation
.

In post 465, Mulch wrote:I will give Luca a scum lean. I don't like some of his earlier posts

What don't you like, apart from 133?

Realeo · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:49 pm

In post 425, Chip Butty wrote:Damn! Forgot grapes again. Sorry, grapes. Second tier.

Something inside my brain keep pinging that ChipButty is scum with grapes.

Mulch · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Thu Sep 28, 2017 2:49 pm

In post 472, Luca Blight wrote:]

In post 458, Mulch wrote:
In post 164, Luca Blight wrote:c) because I find asking for self-meta to be kinda pointless - if he's so aware of his own meta then it's devalued anyway, and if he's scum then again, why would willingly do Town's work for him? I'm not one to willingly supply self-meta myself regardless of alignment, so it would be a bit hypocritical of me to ask such a question.

@Luca
: I think I'm probably missing context for this, but why is this a reason to townread him and what exactly did he do regarding self meta?
Yes, you are missing the context. That was in reply to this question:

In post 137, Chip Butty wrote:@Grapes: sorry if I've missed this in your gargantuan posts, but can you please link us to a game where you were town and played in a similar style?

@Luca: Speaking of easy, how come you have accepted Grape

I can't understand... can you explain it better?