Dude, you said something super dumb (me switching tenses in one lost rings massive alarm bells) and youve refused to explain. If you're town, this is bad play.
I'm done with this. My votes sitting on you until I get an answer or you get elimmed.
Referring to safebet in 3rd person, is like you are speaking to the rest of town, pointing out an inconsistency of Safebet
Then you switch to talking to safebet directly, saying you dont think he should be doing a game solve at this stage, and then you come out with your own full game solve several posts later.
Yes. How does that ring alarm bells though? What's so suspicious about me doing that (switching tenses that is).
And more importantly, where do I come up with this game solve. At the time of you posting that, I hadn't posted a game solve. My only sve was posted about 10 posts ago.
In post 476, JDye wrote:Dude, you said something super dumb (me switching tenses in one lost rings massive alarm bells) and youve refused to explain. If you're town, this is bad play.
I'm done with this. My votes sitting on you until I get an answer or you get elimmed.
In post 474, JDye wrote:As for your reads, they're not exactly groundbreaking. Most of it has been mentioned by other people and I think you're coming at it with preconceived ideas on who is town and who is scum.
You answered by talking about things that just happened. You wouldn't have thought these things when you made that post because they hadn't happened and now you're flailing.
In post 489, JDye wrote:You answered by talking about things that just happened. You wouldn't have thought these things when you made that post because they hadn't happened and now you're flailing.
You couldn't answer the question and now you're trying to flip this on me.
I never said anyone's reads were particularly groundbreaking just that yours weren't. Pretty much all you said has been said before. Even your TvT theory was mentioned by someone else first.
Stating someone's cases arent groundbreaking actually suggests you know im town, otherwise you would just say my cases are FALSE rather than UNCONVINCING
You couldn't answer the question and now you're trying to flip this on me.
I never said anyone's reads were particularly groundbreaking just that yours weren't. Pretty much all you said has been said before. Even your TvT theory was mentioned by someone else first.
Then y comment on just 1 player as their cases not being groundbreaking?
why not INTERACT with the ACTUAL CONTENT IN THEM and point out specifically what you DISAGREE with, or which you dont read the same way?
