tarson wrote:1. I see the game as a massive probability tree that branches at every role and every outcome possible. As scum then I begin with several of the most important branches already set. The aim is always to end up in the set of branches where the win condition is set, and it's easier to work out which set that is when you know the more of the set-up. Both are challenging but I currently prefer scum more because I enjoy trying to convince others to head down the paths that lead to my win condition over trying to work out which paths those are.
Yo I didn't read this. Too many words.
Wicked wrote:Can you elaborate/explain this please? Thanks.
Yonzy, why no random vote?
I have more to say in a few minutes.
Yes I can. Most people in this game have had a little bit of fun and randomness to your answers, but YankCane seems to think he'll get town cred by answering them completely seriously. There's no attempt to joke around by him, meaning he likely sees it as a risk. Furthermore, his sentence "Regarding the Miller claim" adds nothing substantial to this game, while making it seem like he is doing some early analysis.
Wicked wrote:Firstly, the point he uses against el simo seems really weak/invalid. I don't see how saying he's been town in all of his other games is meant to imply he's town this game. Secondly, there's no reason for him to add the phrase "It's not a lynch-worthy case at this point, but better than an RV." unless he's scum giving himself room to backpedal. Finally, he adds a jokey reason to his vote despite already having a serious reason. The vote feels off.
I agree, actually. HOWEVER, He may have a point as well. I agree that "the point used against el simo is weak/invalid", as I definitely would not even consider voting a person ont hat alone. HOWEVER, If ConfidAnon considers it a scumtell, and is using a similar system to me (remember my points system where I + and - people, then what el simo did should be good for +1, put el simo in the driver's seat and therefore be better than a random vote to him)
that and I totally got caught as scum once doing exactly what he's doing (voting for someone becaues they are a better-than-random vote on weak evidence) and don't really feel it's a fair scumtell.
But your vote on him looks good.
LobsterCatapult wrote: pedit: shit. ninjad by wicked
It took you 8 minutes to write that post? Are you sure?
Early FOS's: Yank, ConfidAnon