Cephrir expects three or four scum, says we should assume four scum because of that possibility. And then concludes by stating there probably aren't four scum. While these statements are completely contradictory they certainly don't look good to me.Cephrir wrote:I came into this expecting 3 or 4 scum, and at this point could still see either. IMO we should just assume there are 4 because it's a possibility, even if it's less likely especially given the existence of the vanilla 2 vs. 10 setup.
...
I don't think jammer slipped up, especially given that there probably aren't 4 scum.
Mafia 98 - Apennine Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
Debonair Danny DiPietro Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5487
- Joined: January 21, 2009
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
I'm in the Sens/Zach camp that NK speculation offers no substantial benefit and several potential harms.
Unvote; Vote: Cephrir-
-
GIEFF Internet Superstar
- Internet Superstar
- Internet Superstar
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: October 15, 2008
You misquoted, jammer. Sensfan said this, not me.Sensfan wrote:My vote for him is because I think he's more likely than the rest of you to be Scum.
If this game has 4 scum, I think you are very likely to be one of them, jammer. This has not changed. What did change was my opinion of the likelihood of there actually being 4 scum. Does that make sense?
----
Mastin, are you still happy with your vote for BM? (I know I already asked this, but wanted to make sure it didn't slip through the cracks)-
-
Yaw Yawesome
- Yawesome
- Yawesome
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: February 9, 2004
- Location: Nairobi, Kenya
Vote Count:
jammer (2): Kairyuu, SensFan
GIEFF (2): Zachrulez, jammer
VP Baltar (1): camn
Battle Mage (1): Mastin
broomhead (1): alexhans
Cephrir (1): Debonair Danny DiPietro
Not Voting: Battle Mage, Cephrir, VP Baltar, broomhead, SpyreX, Benmage, GIEFF
8 to lynch
Benmage's vote not counted, because I don't know who he's trying to vote for.Success breeds suspicion-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8553
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
Unvote:
Still not liking any of the Jammer votes. Gieff's doesn't stand out anymore though, and his position seems reasonable.
Post 6
and
Post 10
These posts establish an attempt by Mastin to both clear himself based on the nightkill and gather scum suspects based on the nightkill.
Like Sensfan pointed out not too far back in the game, what's up with all this nightkill speculation?
Control of the game based on the nightkill seems to be Mastin's motive, and I'm happy to put a vote on him. (I'm clear! But these people are scummy because they know Has!)
Vote: Mastin-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
I played a game with GIEFF once.
We were scum together.
He was brilliant as scum.
We should probably lynch him before endgame... regardless of anything that may happen between then and now.
(how is THAT for saying something scummy?!!?)"if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
-
-
jammer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 307
- Joined: June 13, 2009
You pull conclusions far to soon for my opinion. If the number of scums I called was 3 you where ready to vote me off without any though at all.GIEFF wrote:If this game has 4 scum, I think you are very likely to be one of them, jammer. This has not changed. What did change was my opinion of the likelihood of there actually being 4 scum. Does that make sense?
(and yes, sorry I messed up some quote tags)
@Zach, I'm surprised that makes you feel save in calling me town.
Would you have voted me if I stated that there where 3 mafia?
@camn, why ask specificly VP's opinion about hascow, earlier?
@Kairyuu, What do you think about the opposing of the meta N0 kill from SensFan. While he is suspected becouse of this by you and Mastin.(top-suspect)-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
When I saw Hascow dead, I wondered about it.jammer wrote: @camn, why ask specificly VP's opinion about hascow, earlier?
I looked at his recent games. Especially an ongoing one. That is all I should say about that.
VP I have played with a couple times, and I respect him.
I think that he is the kind of player that, AS SCUM, given a night 0, he would choose to eliminate someone that hethoughtmight be a detriment to the gameplay as a whole. Like a lurker, or someone who might replace out... or someone he thought was "mediocre".
He has that kind of integrity.
Now... I have unvoted him, but I still suspect him. His response is simply filed away in the camn-memory-system for later.
i agree we can't get too crazy on outguessing the scum.. especially N0 scumkills..... so I table VP for now."if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
Zachrulez Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8553
- Joined: December 5, 2008
- Location: Minnesota
-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
QFAT. But it is Mastin who appears to be leading the charge, and i'm not sure that's his style.Zachrulez wrote:
QFTSensFan wrote:Seriously, guys.
SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THE KILL.
Its something the Scum have 100% control over, and I'm betting most/all of the Scum are now trying to use that to also control the Day phase.
Vote: Ben
Clearly a wannabe mage.
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
GIEFF Internet Superstar
- Internet Superstar
- Internet Superstar
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: October 15, 2008
-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
When skimming, i didnt spot that Mastin came right out of the gate with this mindset. That is genuinely scummy (Albeit from a gutshot OMGUS perspective).Mastin's first post wrote:Interesting choice. Has wouldn't be my choice with players I know;
I will look up which players have played with hasdgfas, as they are most likely scum.
I'm not sure why you make the assumption that people who have played with Hasdgfas are more likely to kill him than people that haven't. You must rate his play pretty highly if you think that anyone that knew him would have killed him instantly.
I think if i'd chosen the kill, i'd have probably picked you. Simply because, as scum, i cba to trawl through a massive thread, when i dont need to find scum. Ofc, this is all a pointless convo, because there are multiple scum, and it's probable that the decision wasn't unanimous.
That said, whoever is scum, i do appreciate not being killed. Was looking forward to an old school game like this
why do you need to emphasise that you always do it? hahaMastin wrote:'Til then, I'll do what I always do in the RVS:
Unvote, Vote: Mastin
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25334
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I don't get what's wrong with discussing the NK as long as we aren't ridiculously serious about it. I would never lynch based on something like that and I don't think anyone else will either, so why not talk about it? And it did a fine job getting this game off to a quick start.
@DDD: Fair enough, it's contradictory. But does that really matter?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Smells....town. But i dont get the fixation with namedropping players you know. It ain't cool, and it ain't productive. Whoever did the italicising and underlining thing at least actually achieved something.alexhans wrote:I've played with Hascow before and he was not a very active scum player... at least in that game. Maybe it was because the town had 80 % of lynchable material (Empking, Zwets, Dejkha, Wall-e and Hewitt). Anyway... If I had to kill... knowing there were no protections whatsoever... I would've killed... sensfan? Mastin? someone random that I don't know? Probably I wouldn't have had a voice in a scumteam....
Anyway... 16 playing... 25 % means 4 scum. 31.25 % is 5 scum... too much...
also... the n0 kill was unstoppable.. so we should count 15 playing... 33.33 % is unlikely
What I assume:
15 mislynch 14 L-8 (scum is 50 % of a lynching waggon)
14 kill 13
13 mislynch 12 L-7 (scum is 57 % of a lynching waggon)
12 kill 11
11 mislynch 10 L-6 (scum is 66.7 % of a lynching waggon)
10 kill 9
9 mislynch 8 L-5 (scum is 80 % of a lynching waggon)
we can basically mislynch 4 times (MAX). This is going to be one LONG game...
Players:
Battle Mage
SensFan (Is supposed to be good)
alexhans
GIEFF
Cephrir
VP Baltar
Debonair Danny DiPietro
Kairyuu
camn
broomhead
SpyreX
Zachrulez
Benmage
Mastin
jammer
Bolded I've either played with, or know by reputation.
this is funny...
I'm tempted to vote VP Baltar because he is always scum...
I'm tempted to vote Mastin for self voting...
I'm tempted to vote Kai to OMGUS...
I'm tempted to vote camn because she is voting her fianceé
*Alexhans recruits Kai...Kairyuu wrote:vote: alexhans
Obvcult. Speedlynch GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGO!
New postPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:02 am (Yaw posted the first post of the game)
I'm researching who to vote...
well...Vote broomheadbecause he is probably hiding among unknown players.
Mastin posted again while I was writing this... and DDD too...
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
Not necessarily. It could be a revenge kill. It could be someone that HASCOW is particularly good at reading....Battle Mage wrote: You must rate his play pretty highly if you think that anyone that knew him would have killed him instantly.
It could be a lot of things."if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Lol, your first assertion doesn't make sense. Please clarify. If you can convince me, i might string myself up.Mastin wrote:
Meaning only those who have played with hasdgfas could've suggested the kill, hence, narrows down our suspects. It most likely would be an experienced player, like BM.With this having no power roles the basic idea is going to be a lobotomization from the scum.
Hence, BM is scum.
And, no, we're not waiting 'til Day Three to make sure.
If you've done your research, you'll have a good indication that the latter point doesn't apply to me. I'm a lil disappointed.Mastin wrote:
Anyone who played with him before and liked his play.So, who would think of hasgafads as a key lobotomy point?
truth is? Oh dear, it's starting again!Mastin wrote:but truth is, I probably would've killed Alex or an EM player. Maybe Kai instead.
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Yaw Yawesome
- Yawesome
- Yawesome
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: February 9, 2004
- Location: Nairobi, Kenya
-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
"could" isnt a particularly useful word in this instance. If you want to make a case based solely on Kill WIFOM, i'm saying you should at least research all the contingencies properly.camn wrote:
Not necessarily. It could be a revenge kill. It could be someone that HASCOW is particularly good at reading....Battle Mage wrote: You must rate his play pretty highly if you think that anyone that knew him would have killed him instantly.
It could be a lot of things.
Do YOU think anyone fits yours?
Why not let Mastin defend himself?
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
camn soundtracker
- soundtracker
- soundtracker
- Posts: 7530
- Joined: April 14, 2008
- Location: GMT +9
Your statement was logically flawed.
And yes, VP fits my theory on the nightkill.
But I don't think it is enough for a lynch.
Wheras policy-lynching GIEFF for being too awesome... that might be doable..."if you weren't trying to be so unnecessarily mysterious all the time we wouldn't have these misunderstandings" - Yosarian2-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Haha, you're including urself as a heavy hitter, amirite? xDcamn wrote:
^^this.Mastin wrote: Look for who would kill the cow.
I don't think Hascow was killed for lobotomy. . . no offense intended, but there are some pretty heavy hitters on the playerlist.
Unless they are ALL scum, I think hascow was picked for a different reason.
VP? what is your opinion of Hascow as a player?
why wouldnt he be? Mastin loves random voting.GIEFF wrote:Mastin, are you still happy with your vote for BM?
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Good spot! /sarcasmcamn wrote:Your statement was logically flawed.
In all seriousness, whilst my statement obviously was not entirely accurate, it was quite clearly an accurate representation of the stance Mastin has assumed. I still dont really see why you appear to be trying to bail him out here...
If he wants to make a case on WIFOM grounds, let him research it properly.
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
do you know Has?Zachrulez wrote:Unvote:
Still not liking any of the Jammer votes. Gieff's doesn't stand out anymore though, and his position seems reasonable.
Post 6
and
Post 10
These posts establish an attempt by Mastin to both clear himself based on the nightkill and gather scum suspects based on the nightkill.
Like Sensfan pointed out not too far back in the game, what's up with all this nightkill speculation?
Control of the game based on the nightkill seems to be Mastin's motive, and I'm happy to put a vote on him. (I'm clear! But these people are scummy because they know Has!)
Vote: Mastin
self vote? lolBenmage wrote:VoteBM
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Benmage Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13727
- Joined: December 20, 2008
Alrighty then, here’s my catchup post from whats been posted thus far. It’s done chronologically so if the start of my posts feelings shift by the end, so be it.
It is an interesting attempt Mastin could be employing here as scum. Especially as he so justly declared how he would have acted. But if he really was scum, wouldn’t acting the way one would expect you to act be illogical while acting in contrast to the predictable action be most rational.SpyreX wrote: However, the tinfoil says that Mastin as scum could go the brazen I wouldn't do this as scum because it would be awesome.
QFT, beautiful. I despise all lurkers.alexhans wrote: Im glad... but people should still vote eventually... For a reason... but vote. We can not afford lurkers (active or not) or inactivity...
Mastin wrote:
Meaning only those who have played with hasdgfas could've suggested the kill, hence, narrows down our suspects. It most likely would be an experienced player, like BM.With this having no power roles the basic idea is going to be a lobotomization from the scum.
Hence, BM is scum.
And, no, we're not waiting 'til Day Three to make sure.
So aren’t all roads point towards Battle Mage?Mastin wrote:
Because, why would hascow be killed? There has to be a reason. And that reason means that the person who killed hascow probably knew him.Besides that, why is the kill of hascow so special?
More common scum kills would be people like Sensfan, Kai, myself, maybe Alex, etc.
Not hascow.
Him. Him.Only becouse some didn't play with her and wouldn't kill becouse of that?
And, yes. They wouldn't kill hascow because of that.
Wrong, he said “believable truth”, twisting of words is scummy.GIEFF wrote:Jammer stated there are 4 scum as a factGIEFF wrote: I think the second explanation is far likelier, and hence, my vote. Unless jammer has another townie-based reason to so readily assume 4 scum.Yeah I do. In most games of 9 (newbie setups) we have a 7-2 ratio. In many mini normals we have 12 with a 9-3 ratio. From the newbie setup to the mini normal we gained 3 players, 2 town and 1 scum. Now in this game we have no powerroles and a free NK, N0 for scum. So even though we started with 16 players we really only get to play with 15. That’s a 3 person increase from mini normals. Using the same town-scum ratio we can assume an addition 2 townies and 1 scum. That 16th player is probably town to be used as slaughter ….So assuming 4 scum in this game seems most logical. I could understand only 3 scum since we have no powerroles, but 5 seems way to many.jammer wrote: Could you say what sounds like a reasenable amount, if that is incorrect.
Geeze, I don’t think he did. He used Alex’s interpretation anyways and you’re getting hung up on semantics where you misquote to begin with, but he states it as believable truth.GIEFF wrote:But the reasonableness of the assumption is just a secondary point. Where you messed up, jammer, is in revealing that you KNOW how many scum there are - you are not guessing. Scum know how many scum there are, and town don't. This is simple.
Interpret this:
Fact: There are 3 scum in this game.
Fact: There are 4 scum in this game.
Fact: There are 5 scum in this game.
He said believable, stop misquoting. I don’t see the biggest difference between ‘reasonable’ and ‘believable’.GIEFF wrote:I said it is reasonable. I did not proceed as if it was fact, as you did. I know you understand the difference.
3 does seem to be making more sense.Cephrir wrote: I don't think jammer slipped up, especially given that there probably aren't 4 scum.
@Post 45, Zach…no need to quote the whole thing, but awesome and well done.
Didn’t he state this, or others at least. The answer seems so glaringly obvious why ask such a stupid question. Didn’t you even provide the mathematics behind it suggesting 3 scum with no powerroles would be most balanced…GIEFF wrote: Can you give your reasoning as to why "3 scum tends to make a lot more sense in this type of setup?"
Well looks like post 52 answers it anyways.
QFT.Zachrulez wrote:Jammer, your scumminess drops because you went along so easily with an assertion from Alexhans that there are 4 scum, and it's becoming quite apparent that 3 scum is likely based on how the distribution of roles would have to be to get the closest to balancing this game.
It was a joke, because of your other post specifically stating not to do it. I’m sorry. Also “vote” wasn’t even bolded, that was to make it not count.Yaw wrote: Benmage's vote not counted, because I don't know who he's trying to vote for.
Seriously he could still be scum saying 4 when there may even be 2. Who knows, writing him off as town for agreeing with anothers scum numbers seems scummy.jammer wrote: @Zach, I'm surprised that makes you feel save in calling me town.
Would you have voted me if I stated that there where 3 mafia?
Oh this game is going to be fun.Battle Mage wrote:Vote: Ben
Clearly a wannabe mage.
*Stare*camn wrote: Wheras policy-lynching GIEFF for being too awesome... that might be doable...
Vote Mastin-
-
Battle Mage Jester
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.