But you two have been extremely active, so I don’t understand what you mean?In post 568, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:dammitIn post 567, SirCakez wrote:I did and I didn't see an explanation?In post 547, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 544, Daenerys and Dragons wrote: Why not advance something else then instead of complaining?
Dragons
Read Daeny's posts.Vibes from his posts. It's sorta gut.In post 556, tris wrote:woops. meant to quote thisIn post 543, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:I don't think the retreat was motivated by the new informationIn post 354, tris wrote:but there was new information, so how is that not reassessment?In post 347, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:Because it feels more like backpedaling due to pressure rather then a genuine reassessmentIn post 297, Kaname Date wrote:290
why is the progression bad? thinking a player is a newbie and realizing they really are not is often going to change a read considerably.
DragonsProbably cuz we're both busy and can't engage this game very hardIn post 560, Venus Mars and Pluto wrote:@D & D, while Cakez is frequently mislynchbait, from doing a cursory metacheck on Lillith, she is pretty good at obvtowning as town. So. why do you think you’re in so many people’s Poes?
~Mars
Dragons
~Mars