mood lmaooIn post 621, davesaz wrote:By definition all reasons are bad given I'm town.
i never gave one, i was actually midway through typing it before you posted that
mood lmaooIn post 621, davesaz wrote:By definition all reasons are bad given I'm town.
wellIn post 622, Gamma Emerald wrote:noIn post 619, Scioness Sajj wrote:i guess what gamma means is that the rvs vote itself isn't really that ai but he feels it's more likely coming from scumIn post 470, tictac wrote:My gut reads are not at all like that. Comments on this from others please?
the RVS vote felt AI and I had a reason for it, but I had a gut "this looks wrong" feeling, rather than actually feeling like it was logical.
Maybe I should just use illogical in place of gut from now on
...
Wait what. What the fuck am I, Spock? (fyi I think the idea is fine I just wanted to make that joke)
..what were you townreading him for to begin with?In post 616, davesaz wrote:I might be wrong on Nosferatu. People who scumread me for bad reasons turned up scum in 4/4 of the most recent games I was in, on this and an alt. Gambler's fallacy applies though so Nos might just be the odd one out who is simply bad.
I dislike his posting style and disagree with some of his conclusions but on balance it looks like he's doing things to gamesolve. It isn't a specifics kind of thing where I can make post by post comments, it's more a running balance tone/gut thing.In post 628, Purrcocet wrote:..what were you townreading him for to begin with?In post 616, davesaz wrote:I might be wrong on Nosferatu. People who scumread me for bad reasons turned up scum in 4/4 of the most recent games I was in, on this and an alt. Gambler's fallacy applies though so Nos might just be the odd one out who is simply bad.
I mean, I did think that section was quite scummy and I'm definitely considering you a good lynch, but my Dave read is stronger and more interesting to push I think. Plus some of the votes on you have been weird. *cough* tictac *cough*In post 544, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh lol I thought Akarin was going after me
Actually tictac’s push makes a lot of sense to meIn post 637, Akarin wrote:I mean, I did think that section was quite scummy and I'm definitely considering you a good lynch, but my Dave read is stronger and more interesting to push I think. Plus some of the votes on you have been weird. *cough* tictac *cough*In post 544, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh lol I thought Akarin was going after me
In post 468, tictac wrote:Buut, this read used to be "gut", and I really don't see what changed to give it reasoning.
In post 469, Gamma Emerald wrote: It's a gut feeling
but there's a reason why I have that gut feeling
hopefully that makes sense
My gut reads that don't have reasons still have reasons, like meanie-pants=scum cat/anime avatar=town, "ur" instead of "your"=serial killer. I try to ignore these.In post 470, tictac wrote:My gut reads are not at all like that. Comments on this from others please?
popopo's reading the important parts
That's it?In post 639, Gamma Emerald wrote: As for my “dramatic improvement” that’s an overstatement firstly and secondly it was me not continuing to push something when I had been presented with a decent counter to my thinking.
In post 534, davesaz wrote:Umlaut's vote was clearly a RVS joke based on how much I get wagoned/mislynched.
Weird how Dave has brought this up twice since I started pushing him. One more time to really drill it in, marketing style.In post 601, davesaz wrote:it's rather funny that anyone read anything into Umlaut's vote because it was clearly a RVS joke about how Umlaut (and almost everyone else) ends up voting mislynchbait me at some point.
you could really benefit from shortening your posts.In post 475, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Reading 468 was quite discomforting to me. First Tictac started out by saying that Gamma might be scum due to having an informed POV, but that was because Gamma was acting differently than usual and breaking their meta read. Any player has a general knowledge of their own meta and can change it, so I don't see what the problem is. Then they went on say another post looked towny, but could have been made by scum, ending that section with no conclusion. Afterwards there were a few comments on posts, but several were completely irrelevant to the game and the only two that contained actual content involved agreeing with other's points. I feel like that post has little substance despite being relatively long.
But this is the basis for a scumread on Nos?In post 621, davesaz wrote:By definition all reasons are bad given I'm town.
TBH I don't even know if you've given a reason. I'm going to work. You can do us all a favor by enlightening me and the thread, or you can be an ass and make me look it up when I'm not working.
Guess which one I'm betting on.
In post 507, Akarin wrote:@Scioness:I want to know this tooIn post 427, Purrcocet wrote:what is the somethingIn post 212, Scioness Sajj wrote:this akarin - tictac interaction is something
i got the impression that you wanted to make it look like there was a something when really there was not a something
she decided to unvoted nos becasue pox7 and lapsa jonied the wagon. she doesn't have a read on them, they are null, and they give no reasons for their reads, she also asked them for elaboration and now is in the state of waiting for them to change their playstyle(?)In post 485, Saudade wrote:she did the what now???In post 439, Scioness Sajj wrote:she jumped off a wagon due to association with nulls with low content.In post 326, Saudade wrote:what makes you think shes not?
does it in need to be explained further?