In post 257, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Guillotina
Between taking a joke a bit too seriously and having a pretty hard LAMIST tone I’m okay with this going aorn
Being ok with an elimination for someone not taking a joke is hardcore scum.
In post 280, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 260, Guillotina wrote:This sounds like you tried hard to find a reason to find me scum, cast a ridiculous vote on me and see if it gains momentum. This gets you lynched where i come from.
You really think you SCARE me? I eat players like you for breakfast. And I don’t think I had to “try hard” to find those reasons. The joke thing is self-evident and as for why it’s scummy, scum don’t really have the mental bandwidth to be figuring out what is and isn’t a joke effectively, they’re to busy trying to deceive everyone to allocate that brainpower. It’s not exactly scientific but it’s what I’ve discerned over time. And your LAMIST behavior comes from stuff like
162 where it seems a little theatrical to be making that sort of commentary, to the point I find it likely that it is actively staged. The desire to project a townie mindset seems a little TOO strong imo.
I replied to this here:
286
In post 308, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 282, DoubtingThomas wrote: In post 250, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh you just responded out of order. We played in the Merchant’s Daughter game, we were scum together
Tbh that delayed response has me like :S
wait btw did we win? wasnt Nancy Drew there
yeah we won
In post 286, Guillotina wrote:
Interesting choice of words. “I eat players like you for breakfast” in a game where scum are the cannibals. I know that remark is NAI but it was so funny! Lol.
Disregarding the rest of the post rn because it’s probably weaksauce nonsense
, why call this out if you don’t feel it’s alignment indicative at all? If I’m trying to legitimately send a message with that, it places me in a small set of players where if I’m town, it would be advised to not call such a thing out. I wasn’t exactly subtle about it, but you felt compelled to call it out for no constructive purpose. If you are town all you are doing is sounding like a smug smartass by calling something out like this. All you’re doing in that case is signaling that you’re desperate for validation of your intelligence. Which kinda lines up with the attitude you’ve already put out.
At this point I was suspicious of Gamma of being scum so I took a gamble and decided to pocket him.
(I still don't believe you didnt read the entire post considering how fixated you were onto me. So saying that you disregarded the rest of the post because it was probably weaksause, is bullshit! You needed to make time to answer to that.
In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.
Notice the aggressiveness of his replies, such aggressiveness is NAI and someone that is town is expected to be this way but...
In post 316, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 313, Guillotina wrote: In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah the entire point-by-point response was just twisting everything I said until you could reasonably turn it against me. No thanks, not dignifying that with a proper breakdown.
It was not my intention to twist and turn it against you. It's a habit. I'm a psychologist.
That may be so, but you seemed intent to take anything I said the opposite to what I meant if it served to debase my statement. That seems less like proper psychology and more like a self-serving implementation of it.
But setting that aside, it seems you are being genuine here. As such, I’ll let the push go
, but I’ll also state I still don’t really rate you. It’s easy to talk a big game, but without proper evidence I can’t tell how well you fit into those big shoes you’re trying to fill.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Chaos Triforce
Idk if I had been clear on this yet, but I feel like they generally haven’t been impressive, and Noraa in particular seems a bit off I think? To put a pinpoint on one of my issues, I feel like they’re a bit overly defensive about everything.
If he was town he'd bother to enquire what my reaction was coming from. Instead he accused me, he said that I was twisting everything until I could
REASONABLY
turn it against him. When I said that I town-read him for an excuse that only a wolf would believe, he dropped all weapons and dropped his push on me???
POCKET ATTEMPT: SUCCESS!
If he was town he would have said something like, "no wait minute you pushed on me and twisted my words to make me look like a wolf and now you townread me? Fuck that!"
I know I would have, you don't get to frame me and then stop my push because you say you town read me, if you town read me for that, then you must know I'm town.
But he didn't react anywhere near that way, at this point he surely thought that he had pocketed me! LOLSCUM
From this point forward I followed him to see who he'd wolf and town spew.
In post 361, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Yeeeaaah I'm gonna need you to back that one up. Though I also would like better explanation of why the people SRing superbowl are doing so too.
"Translation: Yaaah, I'm gonna need you to to tell me why you scum read bowl so I could pocket you too and I'm gonna need everyone to tell me why the SR superbowl to kill you tonight."
In post 372, Gamma Emerald wrote:town: tay, guillo,
weak town: chk, johnny, pj
bleh idk: superb, ari, dt
actually idk: sirius, poblong
scum: chaos
He pockets me and Taylor. I took a look at Taylor's games like she suggested and noticed that when she is town, she is care free and relax, like she is here. Evidently I put her in my scum list, to see if "Town" Gamma would try to convince me in detailed why Taylor was town, but he never did.
In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:why
agree, was in another game with him where he was town recently enough and I think his vibe here is different
he feels a bit tepid this game, is the best way to put it
In post 389, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 376, superbowl9 wrote: In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:why
agree, was in another game with him where he was town recently enough and I think his vibe here is different
he feels a bit tepid this game, is the best way to put it
You’ve been acting like bad play isn’t bad this game which is really confusing and pinging me a little? I feel like you should know bad play w/ your flair and join date. Haven’t called it out cause I want you to get to D2 at least this time ToT
My flair? also what "bad play" have you seen thus far?
TEPID: showing little enthusiasm
. I agree, Ari shows even less enthusiasm than chkflip.
Gamma, Superbowl interactions hint distancing. Gamma spews Ari town.
superbowl is ok with Gamma reaching D2, why though?
In post 415, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm gonna guess it's PJ based on posts regarding him from you? I also don't think Ari's been active enough you'd feel the need to make him feel comfortable.
This was a reply to my
413 post. Wolf Gamma would need to ascertain his position as my town read. Notice PJ didn't because she knew she was town.
In post 426, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 421, DoubtingThomas wrote:gamma what are your thoughts on this. seriously. this guy admits that he hasn't read bulk of my posts while giving an initial scum read on me for not liking my posts. and then now double downs on voting me even though my thought here is very transparent and easily followable for towns. take a stance.
It's dumb but PJ doesn't strike me as the pinnacle of intellectual play. It doesn't seem like what I've seen of him so far either, though.
I must admit. These two interactions are weird. I don't know if I'm looking at a case of Gamma pocketing DT or Gamma buddying up with DT. My problem is that only two cannibals know each other. Hmm. A new question arises, is a world where Gamma/superbowl is less likely than Gamma/DT?
I need your help town because I can't read DT so he could easily pocket me.
In post 495, Gamma Emerald wrote:
This is starting to run into trash take territory. Is there a legitimate reason what DT and guillo are doing is scummy? I don’t feel like what they’re doing is exceptionally policy worthy, otherwise.
Thanks for the pocket Gamma but this strikes me as odd. Before I townread you you were ok with lynching me because I didn't understand a joke and now you think it is outrageous to policy kill someone?
I can see how chkflip is LHF now.
In post 522, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 519, Chaos Triforce wrote: In post 513, Gamma Emerald wrote:You and I are both the type to be wrong on our most straightforward reads but be more tuned in on our subconscious SRs, I believe.
What’s your read list like rn?
Then I remember that you were the one that called me scum in like ur fifth post in this game. ur scum. there's no changing my mind here.
-nornor
I accept I might be wrong, in which case I’d like to know your reads, because if there’s someone bothering you and me simultaneously that might be a good person to home in on.
Then I think we should make sure Chaos Triforce lives another day, because you obviously feel threatened by the hydra.
In post 540, Gamma Emerald wrote:You’re legitimately trying to push 2 of my confident TRs for a policy yeet here. I’m not happy about that in the slightest, I know you’re a much better player than that.
Thanks for your confidence buddy! I hope after this you think the same! Much love!
In post 547, Gamma Emerald wrote:What are they doing that is “hurting the game health”? It honestly seems like you just want to get rid of slots you can’t manipulate.
Yah talk to your partner, he is ruining your perfectly formed pockets!
In post 550, Gamma Emerald wrote:Superbowl if I’m overrating your skill off our one game together it’s quite advisable to tell me now jsyk
I think it's ok to ask him privately. No judgement here, ok, that's a lie! Judgement shall be passed!
This.<Embrace The Void>
)
