@Beholder, terribly sorry about that last post. This is a repost from the correct account if you'd like to delete the first one. If that happens you might as well delete this note at the start as well.
@Albert B. Rampage, I assume that you're opposed to people not choosing any of the pantheons to worship when you're making your recommendation. Did you take the no worship option into account when making your list?
@Tarhindalur, interesting. Did you take into account the action shift with whatever you did that you think clears DTMaster? If not then you probably think that you're clearing Iecerint with whatever you did which would be interesting on it's own. In any case, I do expect that Papa Zito will be moving our vote next time he's about. If leaving it there now was likely to cause harm I'd move it but I think we're fine for now.
@Plum, Papa Zito and I have talked some about Mina in our quick topic and we do agree that she's much more likely to be town than scum at this point. She's trying to figure out what's going on in a complicated game while also showing awareness that we don't want scum to simply know what people's roles are from the outset for the most part. The questions are in areas that are potentially important to know about and the general level of of attention to detail is pretty good. She doesn't need to be drawing as much attention to herself as she is. On the whole we think that package is much more likely to come from a town player. A concise answer would be pretty sure.
I singled out Ortolan's entrance rather than DTMaster's because Ortolan was the one who said that the reasons for his entrance shouldn't be discussed. That's not a very satisfying answer; eventually we will definitely what to know why we've added players in the game. DTMaster has been the focus since then largely because he's been about and doing things that both Papa Zito and I haven't liked.
@DTMaster, we're focused on the post restriction largely because neither of us particularly believe it. I don't know why you'd assume that everyone would think that a violation would result in a removal of powers; there's really no one standard that I know of that gets applied to broken PR's. Actually, according to you, now that you've violated it (at least twice) you now say that you've gotten a warning and are no longer able to talk in a QT. Neither of those is the least bit verifiable to the rest of us which sort of goes against this:
DTMaster in 178 wrote:Oh well, if I get a rules infraction it'll confirm my PR. Cunts. Onwards to the scum hunting.
I also see posts 280, 542 and 543 lack cursing? Are we supposed to take it that the latter two were counted as a single post for some reason?
@dramonic, you seem to have objected to potential hydra play in a pretty reasonable way so I'll respond to you about it. Papa Zito and I aren't going to clear everything in our quick topic before we post in this thread so there won't be a complete sync of ideas in the game thread. On the other hand, we are discussing the major issues and we won't be having huge arguments in the thread. In the case of Papa Zito fixing his early vote for Tarhalindur (who hadn't posted at the time) rather than voting for rajrhcpfreak after I said he'd make a fine early wagon based on what little I'd seen the reactions that we're getting seem overblown. I've got no trouble with people calling us on disagreements where we're pulling in different directions and distracting the town but this is a case of pretty minor reads and early votes (and we've only got one to cast no matter how many people we find tempting to vote for between us.)
@totallynotmafia, you've pretty claim affiliation in some way with one of the pantheons. Do you know which players are in that pantheon at this point? I think I should know the answer based on what others are saying about other things but I'd like to have you confirm it.
@SpyreX, I think that it's pretty clear what Mina is trying to say in terms of daytalking in quick topics. At least I think it should be to anyone who isn't in a quick topic. It's fascinating that you say you're not in a quick topic and also seem not to be getting what she's about. Or do I misunderstand your level of understanding?
@Mina, as far as suspicions go I think ortolan is a reasonable place to look (conveneintly enough), SaintKerrigan's Post 488 raises alarms for me (he apparently thinks that Fate looks scummy but won't be interested in voting for him) and he's spent a huge portion of his effort focused on how worship votes work compared to scumhunting, Parama appears to be defending me for reasons that I can't see which I don't trust. I don't see much reason to like Chronopie's play at this point so he'd make my list as well. From what I see in our quicktopic it looks like I'm a bit more leery of Iecerint than Papa Zito is and at this point I'd put him behind the other four I mentioned anyhow so that's fine. There are also a number of people who just haven't been about enough: CryMeARiver; Kairyuu*; Snow_Bunny.
*Kairyuu has pretty decent reasons for not being about and is being replaced but I do still need to see more from that spot to come to any conclusions.
@Elscouta, as Papa Zito said, there really wasn't anything worth replying to in your post 331. On the whole it seems you've got curious ideas about what filler is and what would or wouldn't be worth talking about and you seem to be focused on us for what I think are unimpressive reasons but I'm waiting to see what you'll do now that nothing much is coming of it.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
. 
