I like 255, I can definitely feel the lack of 'meshedness' so far.
72, you're so jumpy, dude. You seem to build cases out of single posts repeatedly;
266 is one.
And, then, see, right after that 72 went for c4;
276 and
277.
In post 293, safebet222 wrote:In the meantime let's give folks an even narrower choice.
UNVOTE: 72offsuit VOTE: muh316
Uh these two posts together are really weird. If 72's your highest priority, why switch to muh?
In post 303, safebet222 wrote: In post 299, JDye wrote:
Safebet read muh as neutral but now they're their second favourite elim candidate? What's muh done to move them from neutral to above Pig for an elim? If you think it's 72/muh (don't really think we should be looking at game solves a this point) why not keep your vote on 72?
Fair question...I only have one scum read... I've had my vote there for the better part of 3 days... The wagon isn't going anywhere today... Sometimes you don't get what you want. We have to get moving so I have a choice of 3 other wagons, time for option 2. Even a scum!72off recognizes that.
The question is why would you insist on leaving your vote somewhere that isn't providing pressure to move the game forward?
This isn't really how it works; if you have a scumread and people aren't voting for them, fight to convince the town that you're right. Don't just move off somewhere else. Yes you didn't have a ton of time but goodness you really weren't doing anything to move the 72 wagon forward.
305 echoes my thoughts there.
In post 312, safebet222 wrote:I've spent the better part of two hours looking over the game... It's time for bed...
I really liked what Egix has brought since Sunday afternoon. I'm getting town vibes from him. I really like the fact that he saw the 72off had so many scum leans. I don't get it either. I disagree with his cyl read however mainly because I wouldn't expect cyl to have any instincts as she seems to be brand new to forum Mafia. Maybe I'm off on that point... thoughts Egix?
Cyl - hated her last post... but I still think that it comes from not knowing how to respond than some sort of scumplay. The lurking over the last few days is annoying and I completely understand why people are on her wagon.
I'm hoping to get some clarity on which of the viable wagons is best...
I don't really see how seeing that someone has lots of scumleans is AI. All it takes is counting.
315; oh my goodness get your act together 72, dude. You must have called half the playerlist scum by now, with a great deal of confidence on most of those of calls.
Dude.
You find scum everywhere you look.
This is looking worse and worse; your progression from each read to the next is next to nothing.
I'll case 72, once I'm done reading. I'd do it now, but it could be that some incredible remark he makes in the next few hundred posts totally flips my view of him, or he explains all of his progression in one massively detailed post, or something like that, so I'll wait 'til I'm done.
And
316 has nothing of substance.
And
317 fails to answer to the point JDye brings up (he implies that he re-read and used new information, but doesn't say what it is!), and just moves against him in thoroughly baseless, evidence-less pushing.
320 from JDye hits the nail on the head, but it fails to take into account, too, the progression (or lack thereof) of 72's reads; he seems just to jump from one scumread to another, and push that until he finds a new one.
I don't like that JDye doesn't, then, push 72 as scum, but I'm fairly sure on him being town because of how his thoughts on 72 have aligned with mine, and his catch-up, among other things.
Ah I don't like
336. I mean, it could be playstyle difference, and a few people have done it, IIRC, but why would you not push for your scumread? Yes, compromise lynches are reasonable, but you should fight as long as possible to get your wagon through.
I kind of can't blame the town for the pig's death; I mean, 348, 'enjoy the egg on your face'? really?
Woah but
352 is out of the blue. Jeez.
366 is just weird; why, exactly, would you have one scum on muh and one on the pig? According to whom?
(ooh, look at me; the objective case)
I mean, scum on town lynches is often true, but why can't you have two scum on pig?
Why any scum on muh?
In post 381, 72offsuit wrote:Jailed players are slightly more likely to be scum who attempted a kill, rather than town who were targeted.
Why?
Good lord 72.
419 just hurts me. Is this the sixth person you've called scum?
You've pushed votes, but you have never, ever, backed down from a vote, and said 'no I was wrong here's why', you've just pushed slot after slot. You have no progression.
I don't see your points here; 'trying to figure out the game', yes, it's vague, but have you asked him to explain it? Question first, please shoot later.
As to him having two of your scumreads in common, but then putting you above cyl — that means so little. That's not scummy; people can share reads with each other but still suspect each other. I mean, there's only so many people here, and your view on someone is all but binary, scum vs. town, so surely people who think each other are scum are bound to agree on some points.
And then you say that you can 'really vibe' with 324, but then say that town!c4 has 'pretty slim pickings'.
And then you vote for JDye in
428. Man.
Man and then he jumps in
445, through the slimmest 'I can see this one post coming from a town!JDye', right after pressure is put on him by, guess, who, JDye.
And his justification for switching is, 'c4's case against Egix doesn't make sense to me'... Dude, if I voted for everyone who made a case that I didn't understand, I'd be be playing... wait... exactly like you...
The amount of unreasoned flip-flopping.
And then
447... man...
449; safebet sees it, though he doesn't push it.
I get Mizzy's thoughts on 72 in
451, but at the same time, all his activity has been so scummy. Sometimes scum effort, even when they don't need to; store up for the lean years, really.
I agree with
455, that's what I've said. It's such a small reason to change.
In post 456, Mizzytastic wrote:He is putting effort in though. Not to defend himself either but to try and produce reads. And a decent part of the player list has him as scummy and it's not changed his playstyle so I don't think he's doing it to get people to think he's town - if it is scum!72 I'm the only one he's really pocketed with it and he'd have found it easier if he didn't scum read over half the player list and hadn't been so hyperbolic. This game is dead, he doesn't need to produce that much text to look like he's trying to contribute.
Eh, yeah, but everything he posts is crap and he dodges actual questions put to him. Like, sure, plenty suspect him but do you see many votes on him yet? Not really.
And JDye has it right again in
458; 72 backs straight off when pressure is put on him, and just finds someone else to tunnel for a few posts.
Yeah,
463 is definitely a consideration; just because he doesn't need to effort so much doesn't necessarily mean he wouldn't.
People aren't always logical.
In post 467, 72offsuit wrote:Noone has even bothered to comment on my theory of town vs town wagons = low activity from scum on day one.
Barely anyone has given 2 shits about my ISOs.
He is efforting so he is scum, herp derp. Gee im a good scumhunter.
No one's bothered about your ISOs because they blatantly contradict things you've said before.
In post 497, 72offsuit wrote:Stating someone's cases arent groundbreaking actually suggests you know im town, otherwise you would just say my cases are FALSE rather than UNCONVINCING
These semantics hurt me.
In post 515, 72offsuit wrote: In post 511, Mizzytastic wrote:@72 what moved JDye temporarily from lockscum to scum read for you, before you moved him back?
Also if you liked my response to your initial push on my why didn't you act that way at the time?
He was always a scumread. Noone is strong scum day 1, despite what i write.
Yeah, that's the key thing here. You've called everyone strong scum, and plenty on day 1. You made those reads, and then you just... switched them. You never explained why you moved away from those cases, you just... jumped. You're not doing anything.
In post 528, 72offsuit wrote: In post 519, JDye wrote:Will probably look in more detail when I can be bothered to get on desktop and once I've got the two assignments due tomorrow finished.
Since I've at least started to respond to your ISO diving which you seemed very eager for me to do, perhaps you could answer my questions?
I have ZERO incentive to do this.
You are making ZERO effort to consider the possibility of !townMe and are not even remotely interested in looking for a second "scumread".
Which points to !scumyou 70% of the time and useless town the reamining 30% of the time
He's not putting effort into considering town!you because, a) he's confident you're scum because of all your baseless pushes and jumping, and, b) a lot of his time is taken up by responding to random, irrelevant crap from you.
In post 547, Egix96 wrote: In post 465, 72offsuit wrote:Cyl and Muh are
light townleans
who have
contributed next to nothing to this game.
Muh is scummier than cyl.
Do I smell... an oxymoron?
Damn straight you do.
Gah, I'm sorry I sound so bitter and generally insulting about 72. Just his every post seems so illogical and insulting, and I'm annoyed at the amount of crap that flows forth. I'm mostly annoyed that I have to read it, really; these last few pages have been awful.
In
559 I like that Mizzy considers something they were thinking about before; they talked about the time frame, and then realised, 'wait maybe not', and this post is the product of them thinking that through.
However
, I don't really see the point they're making about muh. I might reread the bit they're talking about in day one, but right now I just can't remember what went down.