I didn't think they were good reads. Yikes, those are bad reads. You get it?In post 774, thepixiecollective wrote:what was the problem you had with muffina's reads?
We don't understand your staunch resistance towards this wagon.In post 754, DrippingGoofball wrote:Please disengage caplawkIn post 718, camntsuki wrote:In post 691, DrippingGoofball wrote: When I look for bus'ing on day 1, I'm only for early adopters. Especially if the players shows signs of weakness. Objectively, the person I would consider the most likely bus on the wagon is you.
YOU REALLY THINK THE KURIBO/DUNNSTRAL DANCE WAS SCUM THEATER?
A: it's not impossible. You are overstating my position and I don't appreciate it.
okIn post 774, thepixiecollective wrote:I still haven't disagreed with this.
AND HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY JACK SHIT IN ADVANCING IT INCLUDING A REAOSN FOR IT IN THE FIRST PLACEIn post 748, Dunnstral wrote:I voted my scum read
HES MORE PREOCCUPIED WITH WASTING SPACE AND ARGUING WITH PEOPLE THAN FIGURING OUT READS OR LYNCHING HIS APPARENT SCUMREADIn post 755, thepixiecollective wrote:I AGREE. HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WITH IT EXCEPT SAY "YOU SAID GUT READ" AND POST MY ISO AS IF HE WAS ACTUALLY EVALUATING MY ALIGNMENT. INSTEAD HE WAS JUST TRYING TO PIGGYBACK ON DUNNS AND SAY THAT MY REASON FOR SCUMREADING HIM WAS BASED ON GUT.In post 744, camntsuki wrote:ADD WALL SPAM AS ANOTHER REASON WHY HE SHOULD BE ROPED
YOU LITERALLY ASKED MARIAR "IS CAMNTSUKI AN ACCEPTABLE VOTE"In post 779, Dunnstral wrote:That's not true, I've asked mariar and ag for support. I don't think I'm going to get it, though, unless they have a sudden change in heart
BAD IS BAD WHO KNOWSIn post 781, Dunnstral wrote:Can you explain to me how, if I'm scum, me allegedly not trying to lynch you is scummy? Especially with this wagon on me. Simplify it for me, please.
In post 778, camntsuki wrote:AND HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY JACK SHIT IN ADVANCING IT INCLUDING A REAOSN FOR IT IN THE FIRST PLACEIn post 748, Dunnstral wrote:I voted my scum read
You need to explain, in general, not necessarily related to me, how allegedly not pushing somebody else, in the wagon position that I'm in right now, indicates that I am scum. Because it's what you just said.In post 780, camntsuki wrote:HES MORE PREOCCUPIED WITH WASTING SPACE AND ARGUING WITH PEOPLE THAN FIGURING OUT READS OR LYNCHING HIS APPARENT SCUMREADIn post 755, thepixiecollective wrote:I AGREE. HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WITH IT EXCEPT SAY "YOU SAID GUT READ" AND POST MY ISO AS IF HE WAS ACTUALLY EVALUATING MY ALIGNMENT. INSTEAD HE WAS JUST TRYING TO PIGGYBACK ON DUNNS AND SAY THAT MY REASON FOR SCUMREADING HIM WAS BASED ON GUT.In post 744, camntsuki wrote:ADD WALL SPAM AS ANOTHER REASON WHY HE SHOULD BE ROPED
except you are connecting me to the player you are saying is my scum partner, so yes, you ARE saying I am scum because of it.In post 769, AnonymousGhost wrote:No, the not interacting with players thing was not connected to you being scum. It was me just making a point about how you, or your partner?, said that I was scummy because I didn't interact with you. That was me discrediting you.In post 760, thepixiecollective wrote:but you implied that I was staying away/not interacting with certain players (cos I was scum) which included staeg?
again lets break this down. if you think that muffina and I are scum together why wld you not push 1 of us? it seems like it wld further the game from your (very wrong) perspective more than a staeg lynch.In post 769, AnonymousGhost wrote:I don't know how to make this anymore clear.In post 760, thepixiecollective wrote:1 in which you are voting for and the other 2 are not connected to the player you are voting for butsomehow connected to each other.
I think Steag is scum, thus I'm voting for him. But that read isindependentof my scum reads on you and Muffin, which are the only two that are connected to each other. Staeg is not connected to either of your scum reads: I'm not scum reading him with either you or Muffin, but I'm reading you two as scum together.
Like... I think I get what you're getting at, but I'm not trying to connect all three pieces together at the moment. I'm not even going to try because that'd most likely be affected by conf bias and I'd be making stuff up for the sake of trying to fit it altogether.
then explain it to me in a tl;dr fashion that does not include a wall of quotes. because it seems like you are capable of concise and succinct thoughts so lets do that instead of a quote war.In post 769, AnonymousGhost wrote:What I want and what you think I want are two different things apparently.
Pedit: holy fuck the pedits....
(will take note of gender preference)In post 771, AnonymousGhost wrote:She.In post 767, thepixiecollective wrote:cos I said ag was shading us and he admitted to doing so.
And if shading is saying that I scum read you, but I want one of my other scum reads, then yes~ Give me all the shade~
I think it isIn post 772, Dunnstral wrote:Well, I don't think that's fairIn post 770, thepixiecollective wrote:you are being pushed for your lack of scumhunting.
because your vote on cupcake w/o you explaining it looks like you are just going along with a cupcake lynch and its not something you believe inIn post 784, Dunnstral wrote:Don't give me that. I want you to explain why It is scummy, because you are pushing it like it is a reason to vote for me. Unless.... you don't want to advance your scumread? No, say it isn't so camntsuki. Surely you can explain your reasoning here.
cupcake is asking why if you think he is scum are you not pushing his lynch since you are voting him.In post 786, Dunnstral wrote:In post 778, camntsuki wrote:AND HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY JACK SHIT IN ADVANCING IT INCLUDING A REAOSN FOR IT IN THE FIRST PLACEIn post 748, Dunnstral wrote:I voted my scum readYou need to explain, in general, not necessarily related to me, how allegedly not pushing somebody else, in the wagon position that I'm in right now, indicates that I am scum. Because it's what you just said.In post 780, camntsuki wrote:HES MORE PREOCCUPIED WITH WASTING SPACE AND ARGUING WITH PEOPLE THAN FIGURING OUT READS OR LYNCHING HIS APPARENT SCUMREADIn post 755, thepixiecollective wrote:I AGREE. HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WITH IT EXCEPT SAY "YOU SAID GUT READ" AND POST MY ISO AS IF HE WAS ACTUALLY EVALUATING MY ALIGNMENT. INSTEAD HE WAS JUST TRYING TO PIGGYBACK ON DUNNS AND SAY THAT MY REASON FOR SCUMREADING HIM WAS BASED ON GUT.In post 744, camntsuki wrote:ADD WALL SPAM AS ANOTHER REASON WHY HE SHOULD BE ROPED
I want camntsuki to explain why, in their own words.In post 792, thepixiecollective wrote:because your vote on cupcake w/o you explaining it looks like you are just going along with a cupcake lynch and its not something you believe inIn post 784, Dunnstral wrote:Don't give me that. I want you to explain why It is scummy, because you are pushing it like it is a reason to vote for me. Unless.... you don't want to advance your scumread? No, say it isn't so camntsuki. Surely you can explain your reasoning here.
you look like scftwr instead of pushing a lynch that you actually believe in
There are a good amount of players with less scumhunting than I.In post 791, thepixiecollective wrote:I think it isIn post 772, Dunnstral wrote:Well, I don't think that's fairIn post 770, thepixiecollective wrote:you are being pushed for your lack of scumhunting.
dissuade me
How about you talk about your staeg vote - do you still feel comfortable there?In post 790, Espeonage wrote:Normally I play at work between customers but how the actual fuck am I meant to do that with the thread like this. Like what the fuck guys.
Alright then. /shrugIn post 788, thepixiecollective wrote:except you are connecting me to the player you are saying is my scum partner, so yes, you ARE saying I am scum because of it.
FMPOV I'm voting scum, thus furthering the game. I'm not picky.In post 788, thepixiecollective wrote:if you think that muffina and I are scum together why wld you not push 1 of us? it seems like it wld further the game from your (very wrong) perspective more than a staeg lynch.
What exactly was IIn post 788, thepixiecollective wrote:cos the timing and interaction of dunns/muffina did not make sense from a town POV. and it seems weird that you did not pick up on that.
I want a Staeg lynch. He's a scum read and unrelated to both Muffin and scum theater.In post 788, thepixiecollective wrote:what is it that you specifically want? and besides "gut" and scum theatre with muffina, whom you cld also be going after but for some reason are not, do you think that I am scum?
Except Staeg is a scum read... so, my motivation should be clear.In post 789, thepixiecollective wrote:you are going for the "safe" read of a wagon that was already started that I am not really clear on your motivation for doing so except its popular.
