Mini 1798: Greatest Idea (Game Over)

Micc · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:39 am

Votecount 4.07

iraonavp (4)

: Radiant Moonlight, SirCakez, Fate, Katsuki

Fate (1)

: iraonavp

Katsuki (1)

: Ranger

No Lynch (1)

: massive

Not Voting (0):

With 7 votes in play it takes 4 to lynch.

A lynch has been achieved.

Micc · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 4:48 am

iraonavp has been lynched Day 4. They were a

Vanilla Townie

.

It is now Night 4. The deadline for Night 4 is in (expired on 2016-06-28 11:48:32)

.

Micc · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:59 am

Fate has been killed Night 4. He was a

Town Conspiracy Theorist

.

It is now Day 5.

Votecount 5.00

Not Voting (5):

Katsuki, SirCakez, Radiant Moonlight, massive, Ranger

With 5 votes in play it takes 3 to lynch.

The deadline for Day 5 is in (expired on 2016-07-12 17:59:49).

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:07 am

So we hid behind Ranger.

Do we have any confirmation from anyone that Massive is not ascetic because if so we can lynch any of the lovers and autowin.

ISO · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:58 am

Last scum probably Katsuki
I am worried RM could be scum though

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:13 pm

For the record, we are compulsive hider. We would not have been able to make a nightkill unless we had a partner to do it; and if we did, why did we wait so long?

Katsuki · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:17 pm

Nope I'm still town. Plus I would never kill Fate, he carries me to victory as town every time I'm scum. I did ISO lovers over night and I feel confident that they're both town.

Now need to look at RM and massive. Personally I heavily disliked titus trying to push for me being a jester considering my role is literally confirmable by two other players and jester-lover isn't even a valid option. Instead of committing on a town or scum read, she decided to settle on Jester on D4.

What are your thoughts, cake/ranger?

Katsuki · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:17 pm

hmm...

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:22 pm

Really Cakez, we're going to do this here?

ISO · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:38 pm

What were all your cards RM?

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 12:43 pm

Do you think that we're scum?

ISO · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:04 pm

Possibly

ISO · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:04 pm

Better safe than sorry, it could be LyLo

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:11 pm

Jack-of-all-trades
Mafia Compulsive Hider
Mafia Godfather

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:16 pm

I am like 95% sure it is Katsuki in some form. Titus and I went round and round on who to hide behind.

Basically, we wound up going for the towniest uncleared person. Ranger pushing themselves to die yesterday and wifom made Ranger the best choice in the rare event of a two scum match up.

Given I have cleared SirCakez and Ranger now, scum in the lovers must be Katsuki.

For Katsuki to be town, massive has to be ascetic. (I don't think that's possible with Fate's checks though).

ISO · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:22 pm

:/
I feel like you would have picked scum with those cards. Don't you prefer scum to town RC?

Katsuki · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:29 pm

In post 865, SirCakez wrote::/
I feel like you would have picked scum with those cards. Don't you prefer scum to town RC?

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:30 pm

Umm, what?

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:30 pm

I have always preferred playing town to scum. Titus is the reason we picked scum on the first draw, and only because we rolled PGO. I insisted on playing town the second draw.

There is a huge amount of documentation for this.

ISO · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:34 pm

O.o
That's bizarre, I've always thought you preferred scum for some reason

Why take Compulsive Hider over JOAT?

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:43 pm

Because we are both nightkill bait and it's basically a bloodhound investigation potential wise.

JOAT wasn't even in consideration.

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:56 pm

The only way Massive could still be scum at this point involves him being an Alien Mass Redirector.

I'm going to take a sec to think this through.

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 1:58 pm

Need a massclaim and all the potential N3 results.

Radiant Moonlight · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:57 pm

What good is a mafia cop? Lol

massive · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 3:22 pm

Really bummed my role got marginalized so quickly. I went to turn in my night results last night and realized ... none of my choices make for any good info. I had already checked Fate, the lovers were all "cleared" by virtue of Werewolf Lover being a banned combination, and RM was just going to give me No Result again.

So I checked RM. And did get No Result.

So that, to me, puts the final nail in RM being town. Compulsive Hider makes sense and I don't think, if you want to be scum and you have two scum cards, you ditch Godfather as your role. Even if RM's third card was Ascetic instead (which is what he'd have to be in order to give No Results back), Mafia Godfather I think would be better than Mafia Ascetic.

In addition, I want to make it plain that No Result is different from Not Guilty, which is what my other checks were, and Fate clearly also knew this (noting the difference between RM and his result on me, say).

So, yeah, lynch all lovers.