Open 825 - PYP X/Y: HoS_S [game over!]

[Datisi]

vote count 1.12

with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-09-03 17:20:00).

yeet

Thor Ragnarok [5]:

Miss Midnight, Cat Scratch Fever, the worst, Titus, PenguinPower

House [2]:

ManateeGal, Gamma Emerald

Miss Midnight [1]:

Thor Ragnarok

Gamma Emerald [1]:

House

Cat Scratch Fever [1]:

Enchant

Harvey and Haley [1]:

Flea The Magician

Enchant [1]:

Bee

not voting [2]:

Something_Smart, Harvey and Haley

mod notes

~ dual mod iso

flavour

[Gamma Emerald]

Fwiw I intentionally avoid pagetops because they lose the context of the post

When you’re posting content, sure

[House]

How can you categorize earnest & unnatural together? That doesn't make any sense.

We're thinking of variant definitions for "natural", I guess. I mean in the sense of deviating from how you'd play without pressure. I believe that deviations in town play and scum play, while both might be different from usual under pressure, have differences in that town know they're being wrongly limmed.

-Harvey

Fair, but this would require a good amount of meta to be reliable simply because of the wide variance in playstyle and personality between players.

[House]

Cool. If Enchant votes me, the 4 of us can sing, "hail, hail, the scum's all here"

[Titus]

VOTE: Enchant

*prays this isn't a mistake*

[House]

VOTE: Enchant

*prays this isn't a mistake*

What swayed you too change your vote?

Not that i disapprove, mind... I'm just curious.

[PenguinPower]

VOTE: enchant

[Gamma Emerald]

“House acknowledge that his reaction to Gamma was undue” challenge

[House]

If Enchant gets to 7 votes, i WILL hammer that wagon without warning, so i suggest he treat L-2 as L-1 with intent.

Day 2, i will return to parking my vote on the cheater.

[Titus]

VOTE: Enchant

*prays this isn't a mistake*

What swayed you too change your vote?

Not that i disapprove, mind... I'm just curious.

Working with my TRs and the lack of a scumhunting based wagon. The reason I shifted to Thor was that I was alone on Enchant.

The concern I have is that I let one scum go to chase another.

[Gamma Emerald]

Ok cool
At this point House is refusing to acknowledge my responses properly because it would force him to either abandon or fake a new reason for his shut push on me.

[Titus]

If Enchant gets to 7 votes, i WILL hammer that wagon without warning, so i suggest he treat L-2 as L-1 with intent.

Day 2, i will return to parking my vote on the cheater.

Why will you hammer without warning?

[Titus]

I hate this but if we have vigs, they may need to shoot House/Gamma due to their 1 v 1 as they'll hammer each other in elo but they'll flip town. It's a problem.

[PenguinPower]

Day 2, i will return to parking my vote on the cheater.

let's maybe not.

[House]

If Enchant gets to 7 votes, i WILL hammer that wagon without warning, so i suggest he treat L-2 as L-1 with intent.

Day 2, i will return to parking my vote on the cheater.

Why will you hammer without warning?

The only way I'll come off Gamma is to end the day. And the following day, i go right back.

[House]

In other news, it seems someone has forgotten 399.

I didn't let that to be an asshole, i posted it to minimize the shit flinging that would inevitably happen if i didn't make that choice.

[House]

In other news, it seems someone has forgotten 399.

I didn't post that to be an asshole, i posted it to minimize the shit flinging that would inevitably happen if i didn't make that choice.

Edit

[Gamma Emerald]

I explained why it wasn’t what it looked like. You’re refusing to accept that, and at this point the only logical explanation is you don’t want to abandon your excuse to push me.

[House]

*praying flea is vig*

[Gamma Emerald]

So atp if there is a vig I 100% expect them to target house first because he’s not actually meeting me anywhere close to halfway here.

[Something_Smart]

Only logical explanation as in only explanation assuming House is acting logically? Or only explanation allowed by logic?

[House]

I don't play with cheaters.

[Gamma Emerald]

Idk
I personally try not to jump straight to “this person is breaking the rules” so I’d assume others would do the same but maybe House is just uncharitable, which still doesn’t justify tuning out my posts to this degree
So I guess the former

[Gamma Emerald]

I don't play with cheaters.

I’ve said a dozen times at this point I wasn’t cheating, but if you want to delude yourself into thinking I was, there’s a simple solution.

[Titus]

I don't play with cheaters.

I’ve said a dozen times at this point I wasn’t cheating, but if you want to delude yourself into thinking I was, there’s a simple solution.

You're not allowed to request replace outs.