NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

[AntB]

Well I realise the game started, decided to post when I wasn't tired, come back and Night had started. You guys move fast. Here's my D1 review.

---

Wow.. day one over already.

---
PG1
---

Glad to see redF11 is being his usual self...

---
PG2
---
vifam rubs me wrong...

---
PG3
---
Rainman is one to watch methinks...

vifam and sorgster strike me as town on town in their back and forth.

---
PG4
---
@TheAwesomeAll - nor is it a scum tell.

@Paraffin - Haven't seen much better from you dude.

YAAAY self meta... I hate it *ptooie*

Short sweet posts...

---
PG5/6
---
bleh

---
PG7
---
RedFF reminds me of a slowpoke..

---
PG8
---
Wow this is all over the place really isn't it...

---
PG9
---
I need to hit paraffin with a brick... I'm going to clonk trekker one while I'm there too, I think.
Big image posts annoy me, vifam gets bricked too.
I said rainman was one to watch... x.x
uncledaphne seems to like using buzzwords.. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he is lynched at the end of this... and he shot himself. redFF found the body, old habits die hard it seems

---
PG10/11/12
---
Is uncledaphne high? Seriously if this guy isn't lynched I will ragequit...
@Uncledaphne - I suggest you join a newbie game The wiki is also a treasure trove of information.

redFF using newbie tells... those are awesome

uncledaphne just isn't even trying is he...

---
PG13
---
Something about those votes puts me off... but I'm not sure what...

---
PG14
---
Wow.. he was terribad wasn't he...

--------

ok, so 2 days, 13 pages of posts and a lynch. Ain't that nice.

Player -> Score

0=ZOMG LYNCH! 10=Scum Hunter Elite

Vifam -> 4
redFF -> 4
sorgster -> 4
TheRainMan -> 6
TheAwesomeAll -> 4
paraffin -> 4
eep -> 6
trekker -> 4

If you're not listed, you're neutral. This is taking the d1 lynch flip into consideration.

----

And now

@mod: I'm V/LA until Wednesday

. If you want to replace me, implosion, by all means I understand. I will be back and active though, I promise.

[AntB]

that post is me typing what I think as I see it. how does beating up on a town flip make me look town anyway?

[AntB]

Last one before I sleep.

My reads jumped all over the place, and for all the interaction I had D1 I may as well be a N1 replacement. I'll admit my reads are very middle of the road and hardly even worth mentioning. But as they are, that's what they are. When I'm back from Edinburgh, you may find a case, you may not.

If you want a FoS from me so badly, it would be vifam and redff currently. redff always stinks of scum to me however and I will need to reread vifam.

[AntB]

My V/LA isn't quite over, I'm currently shattered but here are my quick thoughts.

Also, in the sign up thread, TAA claimed he got vigilante, and the game will be over by the third day/night phase.
I think he is godfather or whatever and plans to finish off the town by then.

Pre-game bullshit. Only relevance it has is the fact sorgster posted it in game

AntB, what is your favourite colour?

0x191949

(IRC tell won't work here milady )

I'm going to vote AntB as he's the person I feel is scummiest at this point in time.

You know I haven't been lurking but I've been V/LA, don't you?

I'm leaving my vote on AntB, he hasn't posted in three RL days but he still was scummy as hell before that.

Fail reason is fail. I made 1 post and went V/LA. Either explain my scuminess or remove your vote plz. You last post states my neutral reads for your reason, I want more than that from you.


Sorgster leaves me wondering, TRM is town, Uprising is screaming scum but IRC meta is null at best on forums. Xanatos may as well not have even bothered.

More when I'm not shattered.

[AntB]

posting

[AntB]

VOTE: Xanatos

ISO this guy. He is one-liners and fluffier than cotton.

Voting =/= scumhunting.

Do some work.

Pot calling the kettle black

In one post alone I did more work than you (it is only marginally so, but still..)

Reasons for votes he's placed:
First Vote is META
Second vote is "curiosity"
Third vote is "interesting" (After Eep saying VOTE ME)
Fourth vote is You've done bugger all this game followed by the pot/kettle thing

Seriously...

@Xanatos
Do some work, then start telling others to do some work.

[AntB]

Stop role fishing and the signup thread isnt the game. The fact you're pushing TAA based on out of game exploits and otherwise bullcrap reasoning really has me doubting my zomgnewbtown read on you.

[AntB]

The only way Sorgster is town if if he's either VI or zomgnewbtown. We've already had a VI lynch. Trekker and vifam need more in their posts.

[AntB]

I'm willing to give sorgster a zomgnewbtown pass for now.I think we have bigger and better fish in the pond.

People to watch for various pro/anti-town reasons:
TRM
vifam
Xantos
Trekker
Hiraki

[AntB]

Its more than you've posted, and I said to watch them for various reasons, not ones to look out for as town/scum.

[AntB]

People to watch for various pro/anti-town reasons:

ones to look out for as town/scum

it isn't a town/scum list, just a list of people I think people should be keeping an eye on, and then attacking/sheeping as necessary.

[AntB]

@vifam
I re-read you, nothing changed. And you've ISO'd me? srsly? lol
You'll learn I am quite a vague person. I have my own method/madness thing going on.

---

The point of the list is to get you looking at players closer than you normally would and to formulate your own thoughts on them, If you really must know, 2 are town. Shift everyone by the same and they are together.

---

@redff1
You were almost on that list too btw... thought you'd like to know that.

[AntB]

If you want us to give you reasoning for YOUR scumreads you have another thing coming.

Nice threat. And its to make you look closer at the players I've mentioned...

---

QFT. Someone who has something to hide, and makes it blatantly obvious that they are hiding something, is scum.

Town hide things all the time. Also scum wouldn't blatantly hide something. The only thing I'm hiding is if they are town/scum. The people on that list are my strongest reads, one way or the other.

Scum will pick me off if I'm right, or try and and frame me if I'm wrong. All I'm doing is making them think.

---

No surprise at the redFF vote

---

Anyone voting me for that list needs to step back and use their brains and really think about it.

---

Self-voter ¬_¬

---

You really think if me and david were scum together we'd be happy at being the only two wagons? If it was the case, that would be epic bussing.

---

Self affirming townie scum... I hate those guys.

---

"I'm VT - Hey mod, can my ability hit anyone or my wagon?" - derp

---

Everyone is being very vague this game.. its interesting.

David needs to be lynched, he's basically hit self-destruct and town don't do that.

Seeing as everyone is bitching about my list, I'll turn it into the scums shopping list.
TRM and Hiraki are town, the rest are probsscum. Sorgster is VI/Newbtown.
redFF is also on the list now.

[AntB]

VCAWA needed... will do when I'm not half asleep.

In the meantime, I demand (yes, demand) a reason behind your vote, vifam.

[AntB]

I love awesomewm... anyhoo.

D1

Vifam -> trekker -> RVS
trekker -> paraffin -> RVS

uncledapne

-> Vifam -> RVS
redFF ->

Nunez

-> RVS
Stringer Bell ->

uncledapne

-> RVS

uncledapne

-> Stringer Bell -> OMGUS/RVS
redFF ->

uncledapne

-> RVS/Get an avatar
Gaylord Focker -> eep -> RVS
eep ->

Nunez

-> RVS
Daybid -> Gaylord Focker -> RVS
sorgster -> AntB -> RVS
paraffin ->

Nunez

-> RVS
trekker -> RedFF -> RVS
TheAwesomeAll -> sorgster -> RVS
sorgster -> TheAwesomeAll -> No sense (RVS Breaker.)
TheAwesomeAll -> sorgster -> 1: revote
Vifam -> sorgster -> 2: "Scum Caught"
eep -> sorgster -> 3: ???
TheRainMan -> Uprising -> RVS
paraffin -> Vifam -> 1: Poor hunting

uncledapne

-> Vifam -> 2: Overreaction

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 1 (sorgster)
Vifam - 2 (paraffin,

uncledapne

)
redFF - 1 (trekker)
Uprising - 1 (TheRainMan)
sorgster - 2 (TheAwesomeAll, Vifam)
TheAwesomeAll - 1 (sorgster)

uncledapne

- 2 (Stringer Bell, redFF)
Gaylord Focker - 1 (Daybid)
eep - 1 (Gaylord Focker)
--END COUNT--

David Xanatos

-> Vifam -> Aggressive vifam is scum
trekker -> paraffin -> Apparent chainsaw
paraffin ->

Mysterio

-> Spectating
trekker -> sorgster -> Better lynch
paraffin ->

uncledapne

-> Buddying and not hunting
Vifam ->

uncledapne

-> Agrees with paraffin

uncledapne

-> paraffin -> OMGUS
eep ->

uncledapne

-> For all the OMGUS

uncledapne

-> Vifam -> Obvious reasons
trekker ->

uncledapne

-> ???
(Sorgster makes a vote but it isn't bolded, so I assume it isn't counted)
redFF ->

uncledapne

-> scumslip
sorgster ->

uncledapne

-> scumslip

Mysterio

->

uncledapne

-> ???
Stringer Bell ->

uncledapne

-> Defending sorg (Note: Post content would indicate a sorgster vote over an

uncledapne

vote)
sorgster -> trekker -> Sheeping Vifam

--VOTE COUNT--
Vifam - 2 (

David Xanatos

,

uncledapne

)
Uprising - 1 (TheRainMan)
sorgster - 1 (TheAwesomeAll)

uncledapne

- 7 (Stringer Bell, paraffin, Vifam, eep, trekker, redFF,

Mysterio

) (L-3)
Gaylord Focker - 1 (Daybid)
eep - 1 (Gaylord Focker)
trekker - 1 (sorgster)
--END COUNT--

trekker ->

uncledapne

-> revote
sorgster ->

uncledapne

-> revote

David Xanatos

->

uncledapne

-> "Curious"
TheAwesomeAll ->

uncledapne

-> ???

D1 Analysis

RedFF kept an RVS vote on through and didn't provide much until near the end.
Vifam, trekker and redFF are my top scumreads from D1.

Replacments: Gaylord Focker = Hiraki | Nihilisticninja = nocase

D2

Vifam ->

David Xanatos

-> The "Curious" vote.
Vifam -> ??? -> ???
sorgster -> AntB -> Hasn't posted
eep -> Vifam -> Agressive but not firm enough
TheRainMan -> Vifam -> Attacking for reasons which aren't scummy
Stringer Bell -> AntB -> Non-commital
redFF -> TheAwesomeAll -> Looks like he knew daphne was town and setting up a lynch
sorgster -> TheAwesomeAll -> TAA claimed vig in the signup threads and also attempted to chain lynch me

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 1 (Stringer Bell)
Vifam - 2 (eep, therainman)
TheAwesomeAll - 3 (Vifam, redff, sorgster)
--END COUNT--

sorgster ->

Nunez

-> Fluff poster
Hiraki ->

Nunez

-> ???
TheAwesomeAll -> sorgster -> Weak pressuring and all over the place.
eep -> TheAwesomeAll -> Oppotunistic
StevieT92 -> sorgster -> Not wagoning, weak reasons and covering his ass saying he overreacted

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 1 (Stringer Bell)
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)

Nunez

- 2 (sorgster, Hiraki)
sorgster - 2 (TheAwesomeAll, StevieT92)
TheAwesomeAll - 3 (Vifam, RedFF, eep)
--END COUNT--

trekker -> Stringer Bell -> ???
Uprising -> AntB -> Scummiest at that point.
eep -> eep -> Something cool will happen

David Xanatos

-> eep -> Interested
sorgster -> eep -> cool thing
eep -> TheRainMan -> Provided nothing new, only defended people

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 2 (Stringer Bell, Uprising)
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)

Nunez

- 1 (Hiraki)
sorgster - 2 (TheAwesomeAll, StevieT92)
TheRainMan - 1 (eep)
TheAwesomeAll - 2 (Vifam, RedFF)
Stinger Bell - 1 (trekker)
eep - 2 (

David Xanatos

, sorgster)
--END COUNT--

Daybid -> sorgster -> Scummy bandwagoner
nocase ->

David Xanatos

-> Scummy on the uncledaphne wagon
Hiraki ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
redFF -> sorgster -> ???
eep ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
sorgster ->

Nunez

-> Done nothing
Hirkai -> TheRainMan -> Something isn't right
eep -> TheRainMan -> Arguing against TheRainMans claim that a

Nunez

flip will give us nothing.

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 1 (Stringer Bell)
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)

David Xanatos

- 1 (nocase)
sorgster - 4 (TheAwesomeAll, StevieT92, Daybid, RedFF)
TheRainMan - 2 (Hiraki, eep)
TheAwesomeAll - 1 (Vifam)
Stinger Bell - 1 (trekker)
eep - 1 (

David Xanatos

)
--END COUNT--

David Xanatos

-> trekker -> Do some work
Vifam ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
AntB ->

David Xanatos

-> One liners and fluffier than cotton
sorgster -> TheAwesomeAll -> Most suspisious on uncledaphne wagon

--VOTE COUNT--
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)

David Xanatos

- 3 (nocase, Vifam, AntB)
sorgster - 4 (TheAwesomeAll, StevieT92, Daybid, RedFF)
TheRainMan - 2 (Hiraki, eep)
TheAwesomeAll - 1 (sorgster)
Stinger Bell - 1 (trekker)
trekker - 1 (

David Xanatos

)
--END COUNT--

eep ->

David Xanatos

-> Relying on meta and distracting
sorgster -> trekker -> Sheeping Vifam
Stringer Bell -> AntB -> Blatently hiding things
redFF -> AntB -> ???

David Xanatos

->

David Xanatos

-> Self Vote - Come at me bro
Vifam -> AntB -> ???
StevieT92 ->

David Xanatos

-> Obvious scum gambit
redFF ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
sorgster ->

David Xanatos

-> Self-voting

--VOTE COUNT--
AntB - 2 (Stringer Bell, Vifam)
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)

David Xanatos

- 7 (nocase, AntB, eep,

David Xanatos

, StevieT92, redFF, sorgster) (L-2)
sorgster - 2 (TheAwesomeAll, Daybid)
TheRainMan - 1 (Hiraki)
Stinger Bell - 1 (trekker)
--END COUNT--

Vifam ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
Vifam -> AntB -> ???
Hiraki ->

David Xanatos

-> ???
eep ->

David Xanatos

-> Case presented in #642
Vifam ->

David Xanatos

-> Thats the hammer

D2 Analysis

Wow. Lots of votes I can't see any immediate reasons for
Vifam comes out of this screaming "I'M SCUM AND I CAN PLAY YOU ALL LIKE AN OLD FIDDLE".
trekker seems to have all but vanished, redFF still comes off as scum and I have an eye on nocase after this.

----

Vifam at this point is so obvscum to me its untrue. VOTE: Vifam. The play style, all over the place votes and over-aggressive attacks and comments,

[AntB]

If there's no reason given then I can't immediatly see it. Some are revotes which I forgot to alter actually.

And your ISO case on me was pointless as you didn't even follow it with a vote until today.


@redFF
Actually, people can get a lot of information from who voted when.

@Hiraki
Vifam isn't town dude, if he's town I'm a 3rd party treestump survivor.

[AntB]

yeah he does that a lot...

@Uprising
And you're telling me redFF isn't posting strange compared to what we know of him?

[AntB]

Vifam in brief
Has spent more time attacking players based on others evidence and dismissed all attempts to form a wagon on him.
Has linked himself in with trekker and redFF throughout the game.
Look at the voting pattern near the close of D2.

• Vifam -> David Xanatos -> The "Curious" vote.
  
• Vifam -> TheRainMan -> ???
  
• Vifam -> David Xanatos -> ???
  
• Vifam -> AntB -> ???
  
• Vifam -> David Xanatos -> ???
  
• Vifam -> AntB -> ???
  
• Vifam -> David Xanatos -> Thats the hammer

Blatently hammers David Xanatos, is present on both lynch wagons pushing the "He's an idiot" angle, pushing sorgster for being and idiot and is now seemingly trying to push it on me as well. Vifam screams of pushing easy mislynches.

More later.

Fixed list tags.

[AntB]

@Implosion/mod -> Fix that for me please.

[AntB]

That isn't the point. David probably knew Vifam set his death and accepted it.

[AntB]

#1 - Votes trekker -- Note how the two are practically up each others arses for the rest of the game after this btw.
#2 - Votes sorgster -- "Scum caught, you're welcome" - No reasoning given, nothing else at all.
#3 - sorgsters reation reeks of scum, apparently.
#5 - "Scum is still scum" -- How true.. and a "this post is scummy."
Nothing considerable has been built up on sorgster, the case from Vifam is essentially a vote then a build-it-as-you-go.
#6 - Attacks for lack of basic reading comprehension - can't even spell properly.
#10 - Tells sorgster to look at his vote.
#11 - Claims sorgsters vote was the result of a guilty conscience.
#12 - "Why ask to explain if you thought it was made up?" - uh... to catch him out? - could be a brain fart, doubt it. See #13 through #15 for why I doubt it. All are rage posts
#16 - Caught by paraffin - doensn't even defend.
#17 - Dismisses uncledaphnes vote for overreaction
#18 - "when I see something scummy, I'm gonna go after it" - exactly what I'm doing, yet you are attacking me for it.
#19 - Self meta.
#22 - Asks trekker who is scum. -- Following my current reads, possibly an attempt to discretely plan a mislynch.
#23 - "Noted" - trekker voted paraffin.
#24&#25 - Deliberatly mis-informs Oh-My-God-U-Suck as Oh-My-God-Ur-Stupid; posible attempt at starting an argument for an easy lynch - also finally attacks the poor scumhunting vote.
#26 - Dismisses David Xanatos vote as "weak meta".
#29 - Further dismissal of David Xanatos meta vote
#30 - Self definition of play.
#31 - Dismisses #3 as not as serious as it looked.
#32 - Sheeps paraffins vote on uncledaphne.
#34 - Further self meta.
#35 - Attacks a read change.
#37 - Goes with uncledaphnes list, asks about the redFF read.
#38 - Dismisses uncledaphnes attack on him as "thoughtless".
#39 - Uncledaphnes play is non-sensical and he is voting his obvtown read.
#40 - Attack uncledaphne some more.
#41 - Uncledaphnes defence of sorgster is "weak and suspicious".
#42 - "I don't want a quicklynch - I'm here for pressure" - Pretty much all the pressure you can apply has been applied at this point.
#43 - "I didn't push hard, sorgster is still alive and kicking" - was never sure of sorgster scum.
#45 - Tells uncledaphne to reread his post.
#46 - Reread again, highlights quicklynching and applying pressure.
#47 - Image only posts make me rage... as images speak a thousand words however, this one to me is basically laughing.
#48 - "He scumslipped - get him".
#49 - "He admitted he's scum (or a terrible VI)".
#51 - RedFF is good, he isn't scum on the wagon. Votes David Xanatos.
#52 - All caps - requests players to post.
#53 - Attacks Davids Meta push some more.
#54 - Attacks TTA (whoever that is)
#55 - Buys in to David Xanatos reasoning for TTA (who I'm just going to assume is TheAwesomeAll)
#56 - Isn't bothered by his own tunnel vision?
#57 - Attacks me for "beating up on uncledaphne to look town".
#58 - Attempt to set up my mislynch and dodging the question I asked.
#64 - Dismisses TheRainMans vote.
#78 - Vote for David, "NEVERMIND"
#79 - Claims I'm bussing David, but lets get him anyway.
#82 - I'm a good lynch because "I'm bad".
#83 - "Lynch all bad guys."
#84 - I'm bad because of an oppotunistic vote on David Xanatos. I gave a reason with my David Xanatos vote, Vifam hasn't. So who's the oppotunistic one?
#85 - Further attempt at programming that I'm bad into people.
#95 - Oh look, I'm scum again.
#96 - ISO on me without reason - Attacks me for not ISO'ing Vifam. I'm sorry should I announce everything I read in thread? I did re-read you. You were still scum.
#97 - If David is scum, I'm scum. So lets lynch David. --- At this point, Vifam has made it pretty clear I am his strongest scum read, so why doesn't he push?
#102 - Obviously misses my point and attacks me for it. Also attacks me for hiding my thoughts.
#105 - "trekker is town" -- again...
#110 - Vote jump to me - No obvious reason given.
#114 - Vote jump to David Xanatos.
#119 - Unvotes
#121 - Votes me again.

But is sticking with it this time.

#129 - Hammers David Xanatos
#132 - Opens instantly with a vote on me, providing no obvious reason again.
#134 - Points me back to the ISO case, which is now irrelevant.
#136 - Another all caps post. "I'VE PUSHED TWO FAIL WAGONS ON DUMB TOWNIES, BUT NOT TODAY." This says everything you need to know.
#137 - Misrep. I never said I would ISO Vifam. Attacks me for it.
#138 - Oh lovely WIFOM.
#142 - Depends on context actually, I consider them tells in the context of you.
#143 - Another attempt at discrediting me. Saying I deliberatly missed the case provided on me. I didn't, there was no vote on it so it wasn't going in the vote analysis. When I've put ??? there is no immediate reason, not that there isn't one. I said that in the post.
#144 - Most wouldn't consider this a tell.. but I do.
#147 - Translation: "Lets go 3 for 3, sheep me and while you're there, post more."


From the moment I come in to the game Vifam has been trying to get me lynched, based on a ISO analysis of THREE posts. Then taunts me to come back at him with a real case. I love it when scum are so obvious to me.

[AntB]

Vifam didn't push so much at that point, but NO votes he made on David had any obvious reasoning.In fact, the only reason I can discern at all was for David Xanatos "Curious" vote.

@HIraki
I'll push him all I want dude. And I'll laugh when he flips scum.

[AntB]

I'm not tunnelling oddly enough, I'm providing a case on a person I find incredibly scummy. Something you may wish to try.

[AntB]

@AntB, how did you figure that Stringer Bell was defending daphne, or that his post suggested a sorgster vote would be more logical

He wasn't defending uncledaphne, he was attacking uncledaphne for defending sorgster. At the time of reading the post seemed to attack and build a greater point against sorgster than uncledaphne.

---

IDK who to vote, so I'm gonna wagon AntB. vote: AntB

Oppotunity knocks, you answer, right? Shame oppotunity knocked a page or two ago and you missed it.

[AntB]

Also, uprising is town, if she was scum she'd be all over this like a rash.

[AntB]

OK, all you who think I'm todays lynchmeat...

Who are my buddies and why? Assume 3 buddies.

[AntB]

Yeah but it'll help for after I flip to see who associates who with me....

Hiraki, you better hit scum dude... UNVOTE: Vifam VOTE: redFF

[AntB]

@Vifam

Python 2.6.7 (r267:88850, Jul 10 2011, 09:55:27) 
[GCC 4.6.1] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> 99.9999999999 is 100
False

@SodaSpirit17
What about me is scummy? I can't defend against nothing.

[AntB]

You missed the entire day 1, and you rub me the wrong way, because you're trying to mislead us into people you know are town...

This is your entire reasoning? 36 pages, and this is all you get... I retract my read on TheRainMan - you just blew it clean apart.

You thought I was scum the entire time in Newbie, and we both rolled town. Does this change your opinion?

I love how you used one of your first games on site AND A NEWBIE GAME as meta to try and sway someone...
VOTE: SodaSpirit17

---

@StevieT92
Point 1: Yes, it's very middle of the road, yes it's non-commital - I work better live than watching re-runs.
Point 2: Put it back in context.

If

you want a FoS from me so badly, it would be vifam and redff currently. redff always stinks of scum to me however and I will need to reread vifam.

Point 3:

This is constructed to deliberately misrepresent me.

The list you mention is completely different to the list I am referring too at that time.
Point 4: You tell me who the players I've mentioned as probscum are please, because there are actually a few people I've made very minimal mention of or interaction with currently.
Point 5: Hiraki is town, he doesn't mess around and gets straight to the point. Put me in dip and shear my wool, I'm sheeping his redFF vote.

[AntB]

Uprising is town people, move on.

[AntB]

AntB needs to die. He sounds like scum to me.

Build a case then and prove you're more than VI.

----

@Uprising
Since when do you care if a vote is scummy or not..? O_o

----

@SodaSpirit17

Hmmmm... where to proceed from here... AntB is closer to death, so let's kill him imho. However, Up is on close watch..

Go swing from rope already. That post screams of "Lets mislynch faster" and possible setting up a chain lynch.

[AntB]

screw swype, get 8pen

@Sorgster
You only just think you can make a case on someone?! Sorry but even newbies aren't that bad.


@Vifam
Welcome back... glad to see you're still pinging my scumdar.

[AntB]

I have a case on you. Someone posted it earlier. I made a case against taa before but you guys said it wasn't enough, etc, etc.

Go sit in a corner and don't speak for the rest of the game.

--

Uprising is town. I will not vote for her.

--

Why have we not whaled on/lynched SodaSpirit yet?

[AntB]

@Vifam
You actually here or have you just poofed into nothingness?

[AntB]

@eep
Pick a side and stick to you, all your voting has me wondering...

[AntB]

That's about as much reasoning as you've given all game anyway...

[AntB]

@Sodaspirit
Because your are scum, I wouldn't vote someone I believe to be town, now would i?

--

P-EDIT
Oh awesomesauce on fried bread with salami. Lynching time.

[AntB]

Did you read the previous page? look at his reads you may get an idea.

@Mod: Limited access until further notice.

[AntB]

(will be to around sunday hopefully)

[AntB]

Basically once we're in lylo you just quickhammer, whoever wins beyond that doesn't bother you as long as you live.

I was sure I dropped a vote earlier... Well I'm set to hammer, any objections?

[AntB]

Vifams activity has been shocking since the dismissal of my lynch wagon... I don't like it. Its almost like it knocked all the air out of him...

[AntB]

MC sounds like I plan I get with.

@Mod: V/LA for 1 week from Saturday

[AntB]

Ninja phone-internet post

lolwut? I'm scum because I wasn't even here the first day? man I knew you were idiot town but jeeze....

ok, so Sorgster and Vifam are almost conftown (could be scum gambit still)... I'll have to wait until I come back to a stable connection to review my reads properly...

[AntB]

Back, reading.

[AntB]

Awesome, I'm scum with steviet purely because that guy appears to want to failepicbus me... and I'm "glad" to see sorgster is still VI.

AntB, what made you change your mind?

Uprising is a much more vicious and aggressive player as scum on the IRC (IRC Meta) and generally latches on to things like leeches onto skin. She's been more relaxed here.
This is where my mental dilemma comes in, its general forum scummy, but its her IRC town. I settled on her being town.

The fact that AntB was coming up, I was wanting to know why.

??

StevieT92 needs to swing methinks, but Stringer needs to swing first.

[AntB]

@Vifam
Look up tunneling.

[AntB]

@eep
Had a quick re-read, stringer appears to be well under peoples radars.

VOTE: StevieT92
Lets do this... still would prefer stringer lynch.

[AntB]

so much for claiming order...

V

ideo

T

ape

Also known as a Vanilla Townie

[AntB]

Which probably means ninja/godfather scum

[AntB]

Considering current claims, JoaT seems too weird to be conceivable....

wait for the rest of the claims... and 5 days means this looks like a quicklynch is going to happen :Z

[AntB]

do you think JoaT is weirder than rolecop?

Only just. The two claims seem overpowered compared to the rest of our claims and flips.

---

Uprising is town, hider mechanic is probably a funky one... blegh...

[AntB]

VOTE: Stringer Bell

[AntB]

So stevie is just fluff, I believe uprisings claim, I've said she's town throughout the game and see no reason at all to change that read at this point.

VOTE: Battousai

[AntB]

just checking in. No surprise at Uprisings death.

[AntB]

No lynch seems to be the better option here.
Waiting for eep before I vote.

[AntB]

although thinking about it, if I end up in the 3-way... I'm probably going to be boned.

[AntB]

Sorry, work sneaked up on me, day off and I dont have solid net access, gunna catch up now

[AntB]

Ok, im stuck between stevie and pine. Eep im pretty sure is town. I should be fully operational again Monday.

[AntB]

gah... can't figure this one out...

eeps has always been a town read of mine, pine is pretty solid town on reread, and stevie is blegh... he seems off to me.

[AntB]

Good luck with that.

VOTE: No Lynch
I don't see why we shouldn't. All 3 of you have solid town points, out of all I have Stevie is the weakest. Considering his pushes on Eep all game then the sudden MyLo switch to me and extra helpings of caps... I would vote for him currently, no lynch is the better option IMO.

[AntB]

Blegh, come back to see what I can pull and I'm dead... gg guys. I would never have suspected eep anyway.