Space Monkey Mafia: GAME OVER!

[Glork]

I don't believe this.

I have defended myself against the exact same

<<unacceptable language>>

argument in three or four games recently.

I begin games by behaving "off-the-wall" just as often as I begin games with cutthroat logic. If you'd like me to cite examples, just ask. I'm perfectly willing to do so.

[ibaesha]

I totally cut you a break for the initial off the wall behavior because I know that. The whole Nightson/Bogre voting error thing is not something I'm going to ignore though. Also, your off the wall behavior at the start of games is likely not indicative of your alignment, so attempting to use it as some sort of proof that you're pro-town fails.

[Glork]

I'm not trying to use it as proof that I'm pro-town. I'm saying that you can't conclude I'm scum because of it. StD's reason for voting me is that he thinks I'm being too off-the-wall. I am defending myself by saying "it is not an indicator either way. If you're going to vote for me, do it for a legitimate reason."



And seriously, if you want to know the duress I've been under lately, ask Amelia how my life has been lately. Go ahead. You can use AIM. Or ask AniX what I was up to last night. I'm not making this shit up. I'm just burned out and I made a simple mistake.

[Twomz]

unvote

This is your one extra chance for this game Glorky . I've been bandwagoned for less when I was town, and I'm willing to give him this one chance, mainly because I know he wouldn't act like this normally, as scum or town (he's not that stupid).

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

FoS: Glrok

Confirm vote: MBL

[Save The Dragons]

Please do so. Your play is looking a lot different from other games I am in with you.

I totally cut you a break for the initial off the wall behavior because I know that.

Same. I voted for you early on, then I'm like, 'nah, that's just glork.' I'm not getting that impression anymore.

I'm pretty sure you did do philosophy. I don't care that you made a mistake. Even without the mistake, you still ran a wagon and left it hanging to run up another wagon.

[Nightson]

unvote, vote: StD

<3

[Mr Stoofer]

Vote Count

MrBuddyLee: 4 (Fritzler, klebian, CES, inHimshallibe)
Glork: 3 (MrBuddyLee, STD, ibeasha)
Bogre: 1 (Glork)
Phoebus: 1 (Bogre)
klebian: 1 (Sarcastro)
bird1111: 1 (Twito)
Nightson: 1 (dahen)
Sarcastro: 1 (Phoebus)
Save The Dragons: 1 (Nightson)

It will take 9 of you to throw someone out of the airlock

Please note: I understand that life can be stressful but please watch your language when posting in the thread. See rule [15]. Let's have a good clean fight to the death.

[ibaesha]

[nicely]Mr. S, my vote is on Glork. [/nicely]

[inHimshallibe]

FoS: Glrok

Confirm vote: MBL

WINNER

^5

Seriously, though, Glork, the personal bit doesn't cut it. If you had let it drop with, "Geez, I made a mistake" I'd be more prone to believe you. Can't we lynch two people Today?

[Twito]

So why is noone else voting bird1111 who clearly tried to get my beloved MBL lynched?
Oh wait some others tried that too... hmm..
Does anyone wish to make this easy and claim scum?

[MrBuddyLee]

Glork, you dirty birdie.

[Fritzler]

Please note: I understand that life can be stressful but please watch your language when posting in the thread. See rule [15]. Let's have a good clean fight to the death.

hey, thats my rule to break...

[Glork]

Please do so. Your play is looking a lot different from other games I am in with you.

Sesame Street Mafia -- focused, completely unfounded, relentless attack on one player
Snakes on a Plane Mafia -- general ridiculousness for the entire day that I lived in that game. Probably the most absurd I've ever behaved in a D1. Wagon-pushing, lynch-mongering, shameless unfounded accusations.
Choose Someone Else's Role Mafia -- More general ridiclousness. Shameless trolling and spamming. Comment made on how I plan on hopping/starting as many wagons as I possibly can.
Newbie 254, to a lesser extent. Deliberate unorthodox, confusing behavior -- intended to spur reactions from other players
Mafia 54 -- focused, vehement attack on a single player, with shaky basis and shameless wagon-mongering



There. Happy?

[inHimshallibe]

Please do so. Your play is looking a lot different from other games I am in with you.

Sesame Street Mafia -- focused, completely unfounded, relentless attack on one player
Snakes on a Plane Mafia -- general ridiculousness for the entire day that I lived in that game. Probably the most absurd I've ever behaved in a D1. Wagon-pushing, lynch-mongering, shameless unfounded accusations.
Choose Someone Else's Role Mafia -- More general ridiclousness. Shameless trolling and spamming. Comment made on how I plan on hopping/starting as many wagons as I possibly can.
Newbie 254, to a lesser extent. Deliberate unorthodox, confusing behavior -- intended to spur reactions from other players
Mafia 54 -- focused, vehement attack on a single player, with shaky basis and shameless wagon-mongering



There. Happy?

No.

Leave us to the interpretation, and more than likely the future comparisons, of your playstyle.

Really though, let's get a simulposted tie vote on Glork and MBL.

[Glork]

This quickly seems to becoming one of those "I can't say anything right" situations.

[Nightson]

This quickly seems to becoming one of those "I can't say anything right" situations.

Z0/\/\G! Scu/\/\m0rz!!1!

[MrBuddyLee]

Glork, I knew you (cause your Glork) and Phoebus were already scum but you could at least pretend to hide it.

This quickly seems to becoming one of those "I can't say anything right" situations.

Z0/\/\G! Scu/\/\m0rz!!1!

bizarre humorous out of place suckup x 2, accompanied by no content whatsoever == solid scum lead.

fos: Nightson

[Glork]

Dear MBL,

Please stop failing.

XOXO,
Glork

[MrBuddyLee]

So that statement implies that you don't find Nightson's two comments cracking jokes about your scumminess the least bit suspicious. Got it.

In my book, one such comment might be ignorable, two is significant.

[Nightson]

So that statement implies that you don't find Nightson's two comments cracking jokes about your scumminess the least bit suspicious. Got it.

In my book, one such comment might be ignorable, two is significant.

Jokes aren't scummy MBL.

[ibaesha]

Well, something is up with Nightson and Glork.

unvote, vote: Phoebus

:badposting:

DEAR EVERYBODY PLZ KILL THIS GUY KTHXBAI

I was thinking that I had voted Nightson before, and not Bogre.

I misremembered who I had been voting for. Nothing more, nothing less.

Alright, so you thought you were voting Nightson and saw some reason (apparently his vote of Phoebus) and decided you wanted Nightson dead. Once you realized that you weren't voting Nightson, why didn't you change your vote then? Did he suddenly not need to be deaded for the post you quoted because he wasn't who you were voting in the first place? And what do you think of the two posts where he 'jokingly' calls you scum? I really don't get how you can go from wanting Nightson dead to defending him (the post where you say MBL fails), either.

Nightson, jokes don't necessarily equate to scum, but the if that's all you're doing, then you're not adding anything of content either.

[Fritzler]

i missed inHim, this is sweet to pla with him and glork

[Glork]

I was just pushing a wagon for basically on reason at all. I did not think I was being inconsistent. I don't particularly care for whom I vote right now. My "plan" (if you can even call it that) was to just push whatever wagons were most convenient or appropriate and see how people reacted. (This can be partially reflected in my comment towards MBL, that I was more interested in

other people's

reactions than his own.) Obviously, I botched that completely. I made a couple of comments that were inconsistent with my vote at the time, and a few people decided to jump on it. I found myself having to explain my mistake and defend my posting habits to this point, and that's pretty much where we stand now.


My vote remains as is because I have not yet found a suitable place for it. I don't have any real basis for thinking Nightson is scum. I don't have any significant qualms with the votes against me, since I completely understand where they are coming from. I think they're misguided, and I suspect that at least one of the people pushing against me are scum... but I can't really argue with why they are voting me.

[Nightson]

Nightson, jokes don't necessarily equate to scum, but the if that's all you're doing, then you're not adding anything of content either.

Not my fault nobody decided to comment on my vote on StD. In my book the most important thing Day 1 is discussion and whether it comes about through people being serious or people reacting to non-serious content it's all discussion.

That and there's the whole, I found them amusing thing.....