Open 590: Diffusion of Power (Town Win)

Mentor · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 3:54 am

In post 23, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 14, Mentor wrote:/confirm

We can vote for people already?

VOTE: Mentor

False apprehension.

New scum spotted.

What does this mean?

Antihero · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 3:56 am

VOTE: GC

/belch

Vote edited for votecounter. Please capitalize GC.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:07 am

In post 23, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 14, Mentor wrote:/confirm

We can vote for people already?

VOTE: Mentor

False apprehension.

New scum spotted.

This guy knows.

In post 26, Antihero wrote:VOTE: gc

/belch

This guy doesn't.

Green Crayons · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:13 am

In post 25, Mentor wrote:
In post 23, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 14, Mentor wrote:/confirm

We can vote for people already?

VOTE: Mentor

False apprehension.

New scum spotted.

What does this mean?

You're concerned over whether we can vote, rather than the voting itself.

Green Crayons · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:14 am

In post 6, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Confirm! I finally rolled scum!

VOTE: House

Didn't you recently say you were going to do this when you, in fact, rolled scum?

Please confirm/deny truthfully, I don't want to do research.

Green Crayons · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:15 am

In post 27, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 23, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 14, Mentor wrote:/confirm

We can vote for people already?

VOTE: Mentor

False apprehension.

New scum spotted.

This guy knows.

In post 26, Antihero wrote:VOTE: gc

/belch

This guy doesn't.

Soft GC defense spotted.

BBT votes are acceptable.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:21 am

In post 29, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 6, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Confirm! I finally rolled scum!

VOTE: House

Didn't you recently say you were going to do this when you, in fact, rolled scum?

Please confirm/deny truthfully, I don't want to do research.

Umm, maybe? I don't know...

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:22 am

In post 30, Green Crayons wrote:
Soft GC defense spotted.

BBT votes are acceptable.

Instead of posturing, you should go ahead and jump on my wagon.

Mentor · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:38 am

In post 28, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 25, Mentor wrote:
In post 23, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 14, Mentor wrote:/confirm

We can vote for people already?

VOTE: Mentor

False apprehension.

New scum spotted.

What does this mean?

You're concerned over whether we can vote, rather than the voting itself.

Mmm.. not quite. I asked because I'm not sure what's acceptable or not and I wanna follow the mod rules, but that doesn't mean I'm not concerned with who's voting who. I think that's a pretty big leap to take without actually asking me what I thought about any of the votes.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:40 am

What do you think about the current votes?

Mentor · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:41 am

In post 2, davesaz wrote:Day will start after 10 confirmations

Because this says we start after 10 confirmations so I wanted to know if they were just joke votes or serious votes or what. The mod hasn't officially announced the start of the game so are all these votes actually meaning something or are people just joking around with each other? It's important for me to understand the basis and intention of a vote if I'm going to evaluate whether it's worthwhile or not, don't you think?

Mentor · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:42 am

In post 34, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What do you think about the current votes?

Well, see my last post. I'm not really sure. I'm having a hard time following the conversation, to be honest, and I'm still confused about the game start thing, because no one has really answered me.

Mentor · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:43 am

But I just meant that guy attacked me with a fallacious argument without bothering to actually question me first. It seems weird.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:44 am

I started off joking.

I'm not joking any more.

Mentor · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:46 am

In post 38, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I started off joking.

I'm not joking any more.

But you are voting for me.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:46 am

Correct.

Mentor · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:47 am

Unless I missed something, I don't see your reasoning posted.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:48 am

Take what GC said.

Apply it to me.

Mentor · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:48 am

I mean, you say you're not joking but you voted me without saying why, and this is the first time you're actually talking to me, so I don't really understand how you can vote someone first and then come up with reasons to vote for them after.

Mentor · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:49 am

In post 42, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Take what GC said.

Apply it to me.

Ok but that's his reasoning, not yours. What if he is scum?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:50 am

What if he is town?

Mentor · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:51 am

I also discussed why I thought that was a bad argument, but you don't seem to care about that. You are fine taking his argument as your own but unwilling to address any rebuttals for it?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:52 am

You seemed nervous to vote.

I'm going to take that as a newb scum tell.

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:53 am

What are your thoughts on the other players who have posted so far?

Mentor · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Sat Mar 14, 2015 4:53 am

In post 45, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What if he is town?

What if he is? I want to know why you think his opinion is more valuable than your own? I mean, if you agree with something, that's fine, but the fact of the matter is that he's wrong, and not only that, I made a very clear case on why his reasoning is faulty, but you haven't really talked about that.

I mean, if you don't know a person's intentions, it seems unwise to so easily follow their argument. It's not like you came up with it on your own so it's not like you know exactly why he made that statement. It seems kind of easy to follow someone else's reasoning, since when questioned you don't actually have to explain it, you can just say "I'm using his argument" and shirk all the responsibility for the vote.