Large Normal 210 - Endgame

Fro99er · Post Post #2275 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:38 pm

In post 2266, StefanB wrote:I was quite sure that I couldn't hurt that much

sounds like a scum claim

Fro99er · Post Post #2276 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:38 pm

In post 2266, StefanB wrote:because there was an L-1 now and two players on L-1 is not very likly at the same time.

WAT

Fro99er · Post Post #2277 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:39 pm

my vote is still transcends, but this is scum for the record.

StefanB · Post Post #2278 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:43 pm

Yes but I didn't iso the masson. I did start to read the game from the beginning.
Should I stay quit and not post until I am caught up? Should I ignore people who talk to me?
I have not read a lot of the game I am currently on page 6. And I am not motivated to read faster at the moment.

Should I replace out so the mod can get a replacement that is good enough for Mister Frogger and Transcendent?
Sorry I do need a break from even reading, I am off, back in a few hours.

Transcend · Post Post #2279 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:48 pm

In post 2257, StefanB wrote:Hello what part of I am just started to read the game is unknown to you?
I am getting mostly getting Huhreads? at the moment?

At the moment the only one that I could scumhunt is you, Transcent.
At the moment I think every word you say is a lie. If the guilty were true, than you would have given more by now.
You get on my nerves and are playing extremly antitown.
VOTE: Transcent

On gambit okay, 2 are a bit much. Asking to do imposible thinks not a fan of. Are you just trying to demotivate me or looking for an easy myslynch?
I give everyone that I am voting anti-town at the moment this is not necesary scum, but I don't have that much to go on at the moment.

Fro99er:
I don't know him, but a fake guilty guilty is a special sort of bad play.
Normally I would have read the game than posted but that wasn't possible this game.

this is a thing

Transcend · Post Post #2280 (ISO) » Thu Mar 01, 2018 11:49 pm

UNVOTE:

can't lie i've been pretty unconfident that lovebird would flip scum but her d1 voting patterns were terrible

Aneninen · Post Post #2281 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 6:45 am

In post 2211, Dunkerdoodles wrote:
Searching for replacements for rb and Lovebird
If lovebird pms me in 2 hours they can have their spot back

In post 2214, Lovebird wrote:Been busy, sorry. Don't want to get replaced.

I don't know if I'm right but I don't think scum-Lovebird would have stayed in a situation like hers.

In post 2241, UnaBombaH wrote:I, for one, have no trouble believing rb was on a scumslot.

Neither have I.

In post 2249, StefanB wrote:Okay I want one minute of my life back. There is no guilty from my slot.
Looks angry at UnaBombaH/Transcent.

It was obviously a reaction test.
You shouldn't be angry because of that. Wouldn't you do something similar in an opposite situation?

In post 2249, StefanB wrote: Also if there is a guilty why isn't Lovebird lynched allready?
Why do you want the player who knows about zero of the game to hammer?

Mild townread on this.

In post 2256, Fro99er wrote:
In post 2249, StefanB wrote:Okay I want one minute of my life back. There is no guilty from my slot.
Looks angry at UnaBombaH/Transcent.
yo this sounds like scum

Why?

In post 2257, StefanB wrote: At the moment the only one that I could scumhunt is you, Transcent.
At the moment I think every word you say is a lie. If the guilty were true, than you would have given more by now.
You get on my nerves and are playing extremly antitown.
VOTE: Transcent

I guess others have told you why this vote was terrible.

In post 2257, StefanB wrote: Fro99er:
I don't know him, but a fake guilty guilty is a special sort of bad play.
Normally I would have read the game than posted but that wasn't possible this game.

If you mean the reaction test, I don't think it was bad play.
On the other hand, why wasn't it possible for you to read before posting?

Aneninen · Post Post #2282 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 6:51 am

In post 2262, Fro99er wrote:SO YOU DIDNT SEE THERE WAS A FLIPPED MASON ON POST NUMBER 1

In post 2263, Fro99er wrote:AND DIDNT CARE TO FIGURE OUT WHO THAT MASON'S MASON WAS?

In itself, it's bad gameplay but I don't think alignment indicative.
Also, it's not always true that another Mason claims after a Mason-flip. (Or at least, I remember a game where I was Mason and I didn't claim after my buddy had been Nightkilled.) But yes, he should have asked about it.

In post 2275, Fro99er wrote:
In post 2266, StefanB wrote:I was quite sure that I couldn't hurt that much
sounds like a scum claim

I simply don't get the whole post from him.

So far, Stephan could go either way. Still, I like my vote where it is.

texcat · Post Post #2283 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:38 am

In post 2280, Transcend wrote:UNVOTE:

can't lie i've been pretty unconfident that lovebird would flip scum but her d1 voting patterns were terrible

If Lovebird is town, why did he sit at L-1 for so long? Does that mean all the scum were already on the wagon or that scum off the wagon were abstentees or were scum just reluctant to hammer? I still think Lovebird is likely scum.

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2284 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 7:42 am

Usually if users post in other threads and not this one it's because they are scum.

Lovebird · Post Post #2285 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 8:12 am

In post 2283, texcat wrote:
In post 2280, Transcend wrote:UNVOTE:

can't lie i've been pretty unconfident that lovebird would flip scum but her d1 voting patterns were terrible
If Lovebird is town, why did he sit at L-1 for so long? Does that mean all the scum were already on the wagon or that scum off the wagon were abstentees or were scum just reluctant to hammer? I still think Lovebird is likely scum.

Scum were complacent with my wagon, on or off. Assemble planned to hammer me.

Aneninen · Post Post #2286 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:02 am

In post 2284, TwoInAMillion wrote:Usually if users post in other threads and not this one it's because they are scum.

Wait-oh.
I've checked and it indeed happened so. However, this was not the only game she didn't post in.
Nevertheless, we should wait until all the slots are filled, I guess.

Meanwhile.
Lovebird, what's your readlist now?

Dunkerdoodles · Post Post #2287 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 12:52 pm

Beefster replaces marshy

Just need 1 more for rb

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2288 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:06 pm

the 2319/marshy slot is looking very scummy as well.

scum r on da ropes.

Beefster · Post Post #2289 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:16 pm

Hello Everyone. Catching up.

texcat · Post Post #2290 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:19 pm

In post 2288, TwoInAMillion wrote:the 2319/marshy slot is looking very scummy as well.

scum r on da ropes.

But kokichi claims that slot is 100% town.

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2291 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:26 pm

It is. Also, I don't even care who we lynch anymore. This game is going so slow.

Transcend · Post Post #2292 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:32 pm

If i happen to survive, independent of this slots flip it will help me a lot

VOTE: love

Get this slot dead and give the replacements time to catch up at night

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #2293 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:32 pm

That's because scum know they are losing. There's not much to talk about when you know who the scum are.

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2294 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:33 pm

I still think Love is town, someone just vig Tex please.

Transcend · Post Post #2295 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:34 pm

I feel it to but the bed's been made.

Just hammer.

Beefster · Post Post #2296 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:37 pm

Skimmed through page 10. My first impressions are that the lovebird wagon is dumb. Let's see what the other 82 pages have to say about her.

Beefster · Post Post #2297 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:39 pm

Actually. Maybe I just just do an ISO for now since she's at L-1.

Transcend · Post Post #2298 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:40 pm

In post 760, Transcend wrote:kemme tell u a story about a birb named lovebird

In post 119, Lovebird wrote:VOTE: texcat
: welp that scapegoat failed

In post 149, Lovebird wrote:VOTE: 2inamillion
: welp that scapegoat failed

In post 222, Lovebird wrote:Okay, still kind of doubt it but I guess.

VOTE: rb
: welp that scapegoat failed

In post 505, Lovebird wrote:Feels like Kokichi is doing more joking around than actually playing the game or scumhunting.

VOTE: Kokichi
: let's see if this scapegoat works!

: and these 5 idiots are voting kokichi...

: yay i found something to park my vote on the rest of the day with no real conviction towards it at all ^_^

Beefster · Post Post #2299 (ISO) » Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:46 pm

UNVOTE:

I think my vote is on Lovebird. Better get that off.

Seriously. Anyone going after her is making a mountain out of a molehill.