In post 1392, Eragon wrote:also, i just remembered still no one has answered,
what was the general read on Dunn at the end of D1
I don't think I paid any attention to dunn. NSG was scumreading him and I think that's mostly it as far as anyone taking any stance on dunn.
finally gets me somewhere. cool
now.
i think there should be daychat based on it being MS norm and shows in the online setup spec, but just to be sure
@Flicker
is there mafia daytalk?
EBWOP
sorry flicker i didnt mean it uwu
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:04 pm
by Keyser Söze
In post 1392, Eragon wrote:also, i just remembered still no one has answered,
what was the general read on Dunn at the end of D1
He wasn't much of a big presence (thus,this would co-relate with no one having a strong read on him).
Nobody trusted him as a pantheon of towniness, neither had a hard scum read on him probably.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:08 pm
by Toranaga
In post 385, Dunnstral wrote:tinfoil theory: Eragon is scum and his partner(s) felt the need to welcome him in thread to try to seem like they're not talking in pt
Not a serious theory jsut something to consider I guess
In post 385, Dunnstral wrote:tinfoil theory: Eragon is scum and his partner(s) felt the need to welcome him in thread to try to seem like they're not talking in pt
Not a serious theory jsut something to consider I guess
In post 385, Dunnstral wrote:tinfoil theory: Eragon is scum and his partner(s) felt the need to welcome him in thread to try to seem like they're not talking in pt
Not a serious theory jsut something to consider I guess
If true, Dunn’s actually had the best game out of everyone
In post 491, Eragon wrote:Literally the only play is to kill volxen.
If we lynch him and he’s watcher, then someone else takes his place and we get their results N1
If we lynch him and he’s scum, GREAT!
If we don’t lynch him and he’s watcher, and he’s town, he dies tonight and we don’t get results for N1
If we don’t lynch him and he’s scum, we’ll then we lynch him tommorow, which is a day later than we should
this lacks nuance
My confirmation bias says it’s a bus post.
Perfect timing to try to get t/cred just as the lynch has all but been delivered.
You wanna talk about timing?
I replaced into the game, and made that post in under 24 hours of replacing in.
And there’s no other time I can feasibly make that post, as it was brought up when volxen claimed watcher.
So
1. I couldn’t have made it at a different time
2. I wasn’t even in the game at a different time
3. It was brought up by the fact hat volxen claimed watcher
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:41 pm
by Keyser Söze
Ok just seen you were in and out of class at school so maybe the ‘scummy pop in’ is purely circumstantial
the worst was talking about a world where both dunnstall and ausuka were town and it's a scary proposition but I'm gonna randomly guess that means kop is scum everytime and I'll be right too
Spoiler: rude comment inside, i apologize in advance
~
~
i
f
y
o
u
s
t
i
l
l
t
h
i
n
k
i
'
m
s
c
u
m
y
o
u
a
r
e
b
a
d
a
t
m
a
f
i
a
o
r
y
o
u
a
r
e
s
c
u
m
!
~
~
i am about to start my catch-up, but this post deserves a special mention.
I don't give a crap HOW rude it is, you could be the dickiest person out there and it doesnt matter(your not, just an example, hence the could), because getting angry/being rude isn't really scummy/bad.
But when you start going "If you think im scum that means your either shit or scum"
that type if post is BS and if your town, i sincerely hope you never make a post like that again as town.
if your scum, go right ahead
In post 254, volxen wrote:So Apparently, having reads and trying to help gamesolve is scummier than, say, doing absolutely nothing and actively lurking while being blatantly apathetic about it. Let’s look at 2.718’s, Toranaga’s and Sesq’s recent posts:
is worth his attention. I mean, what exactly was the purpose of this post? To prod dodge? Or is it more along the lines of “hey I probably could gamesolve, but it’s just not worth my time”? Whatever the case, it certainly didn’t contribute anything. Blatant active lurking and apathy.
And then in 215, he asks “everyone else” to get some wagons going because he finds the game to be getting “boring”. So rather than doing something productive himself, he is simply expecting
everyone else
to produce content. Again, blatant active lurking and apathy.
In 231, instead of helping to gamesolve he gives excuses for why he
isn’t
helping to gamesolve. Blatant active lurking and apathy.
Toranaga:
In 190, he literally admits to not having any interest in this game and blames it on everyone else. Again, a case of someone expecting everyone else to make the game interesting, rather than producing meaningful content themselves. Blatant active lurking and apathy.
In 192 he namedrops me, Sesq, and 2.718 as his scumreads, only to say that he could case all of us,
if only
he had the motivation to do so. He’s carrying himself with this “I don’t give a shit about this game, but if I did I could easily gamesolve the whole thing” attitude. Blatant active lurking and apathy.
In 243, he once again reinforces his lack of motivation in this game. Blatant active lurking and apathy.
Sesq:
He votes for me in 222, with no explanation other than “Yeah, I can see that”. Then in 249, he declares that he might as well vote for me because, hey, he didn’t have any of his own scumreads anyways. What is he trying to say here, that he doesn’t think for himself and try to gamesolve, but rather just goes with the flow? Blatant active lurking and apathy.
We’ve got multiple people who are engaged in blatant active lurking and complete apathy towards this game, and yet I’m the first one to even bring it up in this post. Why is that?
well yeah, if nothing else stands out to me
nothing is really super apparent with this gamestate and you looked kinda like scum so im gonna sheep it. what else did you expect?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:39 pm
by Toranaga
In post 346, Sesq wrote:the reason i was aggressive in earlier games is because i was an angry weird child and now am i unable to put passion into anything at all