Datisi's University [professors' pets PT]

[furtiveglance]

How do we want to play around my 'check', if I live?

[Datisi]

you received 0 SPR points from week 4.

[Titus]

Furtive, given we are getting no PRs, most of the good aligned PRs are dead or out of shots.

We kill RCE or Enchant here I think. Leaning Enchant. Enchant's right on me and unlimmable. We burn you (or me). I will fake some PR tomorrow using my universal backup.

Then we need Wheme to step up. Elim osaka, Dusa or Drew replacement.

I am debating whether to bus you or argue that both were t v t but I am leaning towards bussing.

[Titus]

Kill Enchant subject to change

[Datisi]

Kill Enchant subject to change

noting this as titus killing enchant.

[Titus]

Thank you.

We have 3 alive versus 12. We need the 3p to kill realistically.

10 8 6, we need 3 miseliminations and basically only that many available slots unless I can swing Ranger due to too many SPR

[furtiveglance]

you received 0 SPR points from week 4.

[furtiveglance]

Hmmm

I do think me and Titus could be the eliminations in a row

I have to come in with a check on Wheme, what do we think of that?

[furtiveglance]

Knowing our luck some old paragon is about to take the Drew slot

[furtiveglance]

RC/Ranger/Enchant are all in a confirmation chain.

Alisae is obvtown UTR.

So it kinda leaves Dusa, KKFC, Norwee, Drew slot and osuka as possible votes.

I honestly think osuka is most likely 3p tbh. I don't even know if it helps us to vote 3p out yet.

[Titus]

I legit think Ranger is 3p but I know that's not a popular opinion.

[Titus]

The 3p has to have a good claim and is not killing. I am beginning to think they cannot and have an obscure win condition.

[furtiveglance]

Knowing our luck some old paragon is about to take the Drew slot

Cephrir will probably see through us:(

[Titus]

Hmmm

I do think me and Titus could be the eliminations in a row

I have to come in with a check on Wheme, what do we think of that?

Claim not a VT. I suspect role madness.

[furtiveglance]

Wheme, is that ok by you? What are you going to claim? I can greencheck you if you want instead.

Also, I'm fine with the Enchant kill. They're at the bottom of a confirmation chain so will never get voted.

[furtiveglance]

We want to think about the possibilities:

I greencheck; Wheme claims PR

I greencheck; Wheme claims VT

I 'no' check; Wheme claims PR

I 'no' check; Wheme claims VT

[Titus]

If we were certain we wanted to burn you, you could greencheck wheme and he dispute

[furtiveglance]

It's up to Whemestar what kind of check I give on them and what they claim - I think my elimination will be inevitable regardless, although I won't self-vote or anything.

[WhemeStar]

Uhm idk

What do I even claim

[WhemeStar]

Also enchant is good killl

[furtiveglance]

Uhm idk

What do I even claim

It's probably easier for you to just claim VT at this point.

Do you want me to claim I've seen you as VT then? The other option is the slightly more risky one of me claiming to get the ambiguous result on you, you claim VT (disputing it), and then I probably still get voted but there's a slim chance you do.

Bear in mind that whatever either of us claims I'm most likely being eliminated tomorrow.

It's up to you.

[Titus]

Take the it call center claim truthfully and claim it's too expensive as most hate neighborizers.

150 points for a neighborhood is stupid expensive and I love neighborhoods. You could easily and convincingly say you studied 100%.

[WhemeStar]

Ok I’ll take that

[furtiveglance]

So Wheme, what shall I claim on you?

[WhemeStar]

If i studied 100% everytime I show up as VT right?