> top 3 spewed townIn post 584, Luka wrote: I think the top 3 are relatively spewed town at this point
> includes him
so it's just kay, right? are you really arguing that you are spewed town?
> top 3 spewed townIn post 584, Luka wrote: I think the top 3 are relatively spewed town at this point
I was working under the assumption that their read list was correct. I was saying that my reads generally align more with their world view.In post 620, humaneatingmonkey wrote: see, this is how i feel like you're TMI'd as fuck and you keep slipping. because you say things like this like your reads are 10x better and how the fuck would you know if your reads are better if we're in day 1 with so little information on the board
Yup!In post 626, humaneatingmonkey wrote: are you really arguing that you are spewed town?
Sure.In post 617, humaneatingmonkey wrote: I'm not convinced that there's a big reveal anyway.
HelpIn post 629, humaneatingmonkey wrote: TWTBAW
Are you asking what it means? Too wolfy to be a wolf.In post 631, KayJayQueue wrote:HelpIn post 629, humaneatingmonkey wrote: TWTBAW
please and thank you!
too wombatty to be a walrusIn post 631, KayJayQueue wrote:HelpIn post 629, humaneatingmonkey wrote: TWTBAW
please and thank you!
Yes I was asking what it means.In post 632, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are you asking what it means? Too wolfy to be a wolf.In post 631, KayJayQueue wrote:HelpIn post 629, humaneatingmonkey wrote: TWTBAW
please and thank you!
Can be worded like twtbw and tstbs (too scummy to be scum)
ProbablyIn post 568, Luka wrote:Feels icky to be honest but I'll ignore it for post game credit ^w^In post 550, Alianna wrote: humaneatingmonkey (E-2): Eiralox, Umlaut, Firebringer
It's a joke. RelaxIn post 571, Luka wrote:For everybody. Nobody gives a shit if you go 2/2 if you aren't able to convince people to follow you!In post 564, Hu Tao wrote: Yeah for mafia
Doubt
This kinda feels like you're just trying to save yourself and is giving me the pauseIn post 617, humaneatingmonkey wrote: VOTE: Eiralox
This is the best place for my vote. I really really want to sheep Firebringer instead but he's just not interested in the game as much as I want him to be. Eiralox has been delaying his big reveal and I'm not convinced that there's a big reveal anyway. Stop making yourself hard to read if you're town, please.
It was mostly their push on you that made me think about them again, and then I remembered they were replacing Ceejay who had been in my scum pool, and when I looked through their posts I got a bad gut feeling. Let me look through them again and either convince or unconvince myself of it in the process of trying to explain.In post 578, Luka wrote:@Eiralox @Umlaut @FirebringerIn post 550, Alianna wrote: humaneatingmonkey (E-2): Eiralox, Umlaut, Firebringer
Aside from their push on me, can you elaborate on the vote?
Also, anybody w/ meta able to tell me if they're a good town or not? Or, at least their general thought process as town.
I don't think the naked vote leans scum inherently, I just wanted to force them to verbalize why they naked voted so they can be readable.In post 643, Umlaut wrote: for HEM to really think it is meaningfully >rand scum.
Eiralox was trying to be sassy, so I went sassy. When they started to stonewall me, I brought it back to a level but they kept stonewalling me.In post 643, Umlaut wrote: HEM, is this a reaction test or what?
Part of the day. The naked votes on me came as I replaced in, and with no context, and in a part of the day where there isn't much activity from the game. Meanwhile I had more context for yours, and I asked for your reason anyway, and we're in a much deeper part of the gameIn post 643, Umlaut wrote: Why didn't you get on my case the same way for naked-voting you? What's the difference?
Okay fine, I'm not sure they're surefire definite slip. I feel like they could be slips and I feel strongly about them, and I voted and faked confidence to see their reaction. When their reaction was taunt and make fun of my mafia skills, I knew it was going to be a fruitless route so I dropped it immediately.In post 643, Umlaut wrote: a surefire definite slip
You sound like meIn post 642, Hu Tao wrote: Or maybe I'm overthinking in the moment. I'll think it over
For now, they might move up once I see their most recent posts.In post 615, Eiralox wrote: Hmm ok. It's just that Umlaut is beneath monkey in your list. So far I think Umlaut is playing the game just fine but yeah. Mostly he's got the vibe I'm looking for in town, the only Umlaut post that really pinged me was in fact his opening one -.-
For the bolded, I would like to point out that everything youre accusing of being a perspective slip is mostly lacking context to the point where I'm confused how you come to that conclusion? In addition to that, I would like to point out that the reads you're accusing people of downplaying are normally weak, the supposed "blatant perspective slips" is me saying that your read is weak at best, IE: The rationale to come for it is weak, not the conclusion which is just outright incorrect. I disagree that people are downplaying said moments. That aside, perspective slips aren't a very good reason to really scum read somebody IMHO.In post 629, humaneatingmonkey wrote: Okay, yeah, Luka I recognize you are being townread by many and maybe I'm wrong about you, so would you tell me what I should be townreading about you?I keep spotting perspective slips from you that I feel so strongly about. And that everybody seems to be downplaying because you've been making a lot of effort to share your reads, which people townread (I don't townread effort, and maybe this is the issue). Have you done anything that you or anyone with the skill level that you're projecting to have wouldn't be doing? I see you mentioned that you having a TWTBAW stance on Eiralox is something you wouldn't take, but I don't understand it. And you're open to eliminating them anyway, which makes the read meaningless - not that I'm against you eliminating them.