Newbie 1717: Newbies Through the Looking Glass (Game Over)
-
-
Simoyd
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
@Lycanfire: I'm not sure if I'm reading this right. Can you clarify? Are you saying three people made posts leading the conversation, then you eliminated two through process of elimination? If not, what was Mizzy the third to do? I've read back in the thread and I'm totally lost. Maybe I'm stoopidIn post 46, Lycanfire wrote:Mizzy made a similar post, the third to do so.
Why not Meepo and Mizzy? Not Meepo because he is responding to pressure. That's just the way he chose to respond, and I don't disagree with the response on its own. IV had no meat in his post and I am hungry. Mizzy offered a lot more and seems more in character than IV is.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Deferring your certainty until it matters? Setting the stage for future slips?In post 35, Meepo wrote:I am pretty sure-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I take everything seriously. Even a joke has a motivation behind it. I didn't take his words seriously, but I think his motivation for the joke is up for debate. Mizzytastic, what were you more afraid of: the possibility that your opinion wouldn't be popular, or the possibility that you might be attacking town?-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Oof, I'm going to hold you to that.In post 114, Accountant wrote:I've never done a single reaction test this entire game
Okay, lemme post a wall on your ISO. I'm at work right now sorry so I can't spend a bunch of time putting it together. I'll do it first thing when I get home around 5pm EST. Sorry :S.
And yes I meet my promises, unlike everyone else I've seen who says shit like this.....-
-
Simoyd
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
This seems pretty town motivated from Meepo.In post 95, Meepo wrote:People please don`t voice your town reads so obviously just yet, because it will be easier to determine for scum who to kill during the night.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Accountant:
Post 9 looks like you might be bussing your partner, innocentvillager. You certainly don't think this is enough to wrap up the game. If not bussing, then is this a reaction test?
In post 12 through 26 you're tunneling really hard on Grace. I feel that post 13 and at the very latest post 16 clearly show her true colors, and continuing to tunnel seems to have yielded very little, if any value. I just get the impression that your motivation to tunnel was to keep up the bussing facade and not to find scum like town would.
How is post 76 not a reaction test? Why would town OMGUS (post 80)?
post 78 you flip around and write a pretty big section dedicated to not only defending innocentvillager, but trying to make people feel stupid for reading him badly. Why defend? Didn't he already basically say everything you said already, other than making other people feel stupid? And making people feel stupid like that isn't a reaction test how?
In the same post you also attack Mizzy, saying her post 30 is bad when 80% of it basically just looks like parroting of your own opinion earlier in the game, other than attacking your buddy innocentvillager. How is anyone expected to strike the heart of someone at this point? Why is jabbing and poking any different than what RC has done? Why no mention of that being bad for RC? So again, what is this then... reaction test? How do you differentiate between Mizzy appearing to look active and actually looking active at this point in the game?
For post 89 I think you're right and are trying to get RC to help you drive the town in the wrong direction. Since when does town ever ask someone to sheep them? AGAIN is this a reaction test? What is this? Why did you say this?
post 90: again defending innocentvillager. This seems to be a reoccuring theme...
post 98: for all the seriousness you've been portraying why say this? Maybe I'm missing something here. @Lycanfire: was post 99 serious?
post 103: Liking me is the obvious scum choice because I'm terrible at this game and obvious newb town. Attacking mizzie again for no good reason... I think the meepo wagon has really bottomed out and there's not really anything to push. This is besides the fact that I was voting meepo and not pushing either, but you like me?
post 105: I would like to see a detailed explaination on why you think that post seems nowbie townie and meaningful... I think IV is your buddy. You immidiatly respond positivly and defend him again in 107 the moment he's under fire... What is that!-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
What's there to say? You basically have one unquantified read to analyse and he already OMGUS'd it... Not sure what response you'd expect?In post 155, RadiantCowbells wrote:Note that Accountant hasn't said anything to me.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Do you really believe that?In post 124, Accountant wrote:It certainly was enough to wrap up the game if Meepo had been serious.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
ok...In post 124, Accountant wrote:Please explain how my post made people feel stupid.In post 78, Accountant wrote:currently I'm convinced that anyone who reads him anything but null is:
1) Scum making up a read
2) Misguided town who feels they have to have a strong read on everyone
3) Confused
What I mostly meant was #2 and #3 which are straight up personal attacks on anyone who was considering IV. The rest I've quoted here is of the same tone.In post 78, Accountant wrote:Any talk of InnocentVillager at this point is a distraction and if you're town you should focus on the people that matter.
You either think it's a scum read, or you think it's NAI. This stuff you said is only to manipulate. Now everyone has to see if they read a town or scum motivation from that manipulation.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I'm really trying to understand your read on Mizzy...In post 124, Accountant wrote:I don't expect Mizzy to strike at the heart of anyone. If she doesn't have something real to scumhunt, she be honest and say that she can't find any openings to question rather than trying to look good by jabbing aimlessly.
Would you prefer for her to just say "I can't find any opening to question" every 48 hours instead of at least trying to question and analyse? Wouldn't activity from her be good for town, regardless if she's scum or not, instead of making her feel bad about her direction and post less?
I think it would be accurate to quantify almost everything that happened before post 30 as "jabbing aimlessly", including your posts. I think everything I did before post 112 was "jabbing aimlessly" trying to hit something. Can you explain to me why you think this is a scum tell?-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Do you feel like you're under pressure right now?In post 164, Accountant wrote:It makes no sense to characterize this as a desperate move.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I think the "how" is questionable. You chose the "ask someone directly to sheep me" route. I'm concerned with what motivated you to choose that.In post 124, Accountant wrote:if a town member is confident they've found a good player to vote, they should want the rest of the town to vote with them.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
You seem to be doing it an unusually high amount, and your defense has no substance other than the defense he had already said, with a few personal attacks on top. I don't think it's certainly enough to wrap up the game, but I think it's unusual and I wonder about the motivation behind it.In post 124, Accountant wrote:Why do you think that me defending IV means that we both have to be scum together?
I wouldn't... I would attack the person who attacked my town read. Does that mean you think I'm scum?In post 124, Accountant wrote:All town would defend another player who they feel to be unfairly attacked-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I'm not sure one exists, but did you really expect to yield any fruit for this effort?In post 171, Accountant wrote:How else would I get RC to vote with me?-
-
Simoyd Goon
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Wait, so first you say there's a lot to lose, then you say the wagon is dead, so what is there to lose then?In post 164, Accountant wrote:
scum!Accountant has quite a lot to lose. The wagon on me was dead in the water after Grace backed off; like you said, nobody was applying a lot of pressure. It makes no sense to characterize this as a desperate move.In post 161, Lycanfire wrote:
Does scumAccountant have anything to lose at this point?In post 160, Accountant wrote:
If Grace goes "hey Mizzy is obvtown" and lists a bunch of reasons wouldn't that completely defeat the purpose of it?I don't like his newest post#154 because it sounds like a "validate my scumread" post.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
@Lycan: I got a few minor scum tells from Meepo at the beginning, but later I got a larger town tell (see 119). He's certainly not in my top two for scum at this time. I think he's about mid-field or null. Maybe a slight town read because the minor scum tells could be ego... I can go into more specifics if you'd like, not sure how much you're wanting.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I found one:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=64821
(Drixx is the other goon not listed in post 1 in that game)-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
In the end I was town-lean on meepo. This was a bigger tell to me than anything else I had on him.In post 119, Simoyd wrote:
This seems pretty town motivated from Meepo.In post 95, Meepo wrote:People please don`t voice your town reads so obviously just yet, because it will be easier to determine for scum who to kill during the night.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
^ I think I did that right and it should update...
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Just trying to apply some pressure, but I guess he's already got a free ride at this point anyways... Gunna spend some time to ISO you and lycan tomorrow evening and change my vote then.In post 291, innocentvillager wrote:No. We're not doing this for the very reasons Lycan suggested. I hate to admit it, but he's right on that part. tl;dr Pants's flip tells us nothing.
We are running out time. More votes on Lycan plz
Or Accountant if need be-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Thank Jesus!In post 299, Xalxe wrote:snoe replaces Pants98-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
"Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv"
^ Can someone explain this to me. I guess I'm missing the obvious but wouldn't scum be more motivated to defend themselves because they have more to lose from dying? Even in this game people have commented that forced or excessive defending is a scum tell. How is the opposite (not posting, so not defending) also a scum tell??-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Sure:In post 323, snoe wrote:Simoyd, can you give context for the quote?
^ He effed up the quote in 260, so I fixed it in my quoteIn post 260, Lycanfire wrote:
Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obvIn post 248, innocentvillager wrote:I didn't need to do any more defense of myself when Accountant had given basically the same defense I would've given, why put in the extra time?
But like IV said, you contradicted yourself:In post 310, snoe wrote:260: Lycan continues on IV. I think Lycan is tunneling here, but it may be townish tunneling. Lycan says “Scum don't have incentive to post while pressured, obv”, which is true but ignores that IV may be as busy as Lycan is.In post 323, snoe wrote:I guess scum have more to lose and hence a greater incentive to defend themselves in this setup-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Can you elaborate on that incentive? I don't understand why scum would be motivated to do that.In post 341, snoe wrote:Scum have incentive to lie low when under pressure-
-
Simoyd Goon
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
You're definitely not today's lynch, but certain flips would make me very suspicious later (for example accountant flipping town). Your reads seem consistent with mine, except I'm still working on ISOing IV and lycan. Not sure where they fit in right this second, but they've posted a lot more for me to work with. Will be done in a couple hours, sorry just got back from work.
Other thoughts... uhh not liking snoe's "stream of consciousness" notes. Maybe he just missed some things, but maybe he's trying to spread mis-information...
I'm not following this hate on mizzy. Not sure what the scum tells were there, looked like scum hunting to me...
let me know if you want more detail anywhere-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
You were shitting on him really hard without communicating your justification. Everything you said for the first while was basically "I vote accountant" over and over. Not sure how this is different from pants getting his free ride, other than that you're associated with accountant. My understanding is that getting a free ride is a scum tell. This would let town fight and lynch each other.In post 350, RadiantCowbells wrote:Why would an accountant townflip make you scumread me?-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I don't think it matters why... You agree that you were getting a free ride...In post 355, RadiantCowbells wrote:I 'got a free ride' because I was V/LA and people townread my playstyle.
My understanding is the lack of posting is the biggest tell on him. Yes he did that L-1 and yes his shit was shallow, but he ended up getting replaced so I think that all seems NAI because he could have just not been reading carefully/completely. That being said, the consensus was not to lynch pants today. How is that not a free ride?In post 355, RadiantCowbells wrote:Pants didn't get a free ride at all and was in fact heavily scumread.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
I think that the problem between you two is 92. Lycan chose 3 people in 46 who were arguing about joke posts, then weighed them against each other to find the scummiest. You weighed the highest in his eyes simply because you didn't post much. Although he mentioned the meta in 46, he clarifies in 92 that the comment on meta was more of a minor addition than a central point.In post 321, innocentvillager wrote:I'm baffled at why Lycan is not getting shitstormed by you guys. Can just one of you, even one of you just be like "hey IV, your case is full of shit and here's why: *makes intelligent case on why IV is full of shit and Lycan is not scum* ". If not, I don't see why you're not voting Lycan.
After that you continued to focus on meta, starting with [posts]104[/posts] and in many posts after that.
Not saying I agree or disagree with either of your sides. Just trying to stop any unfounded motivations (from my perspective, noise).
It doesn't help that lycan's wordings are almost always confusing... Maybe that's a scum tell because it's forced?
The question he answered twice was what I just said here above. I think Lycan sees your raising the meta item in 104 and after as complaining.In post 306, Lycanfire wrote:
Sure... I considered you or Mizzy as directing attention towards Meepo/Accountant/Grace for no reason. Mizzy offered a lot more and seemed well enough in line with her usual play. You left a question that was already answered twice and it seemed clear to me that you were happy if people kept talking about useless things. At this point, the IC was busy ripping into a newbie and another newbie had no idea what was going on. It's fine if they wanted to have a go at one another, but others needed to drag more people in this. I stepped up to the plate and chose you.In post 282, innocentvillager wrote:
I can't figure out what you're saying by this post, decrypt it for me plz?Lycanfire wrote:You're still ignoring my tell I pointed out in my first post. If you called my premise silly rather than complain all game I would have unvoted you ages ago.
---
Hopefully that helped... My perspective to follow-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
IV
You've been tunneling on Lycan. Based on both your wordings it really feels like a misunderstanding. I think the whole topic of meta between you two is NAI. I think any time the meta topic is used in one of either of your arguments as a motivator is NAI. The tunnelling bugs me a bit (which you admit in 262)... Spending so much effort arguing it and missing the meat of 92 bugs me a bit... Not a huge indicator for me though. For reference: 104, 248, 261, 267
Pretty early in the game 52 you're talking about manipulating the pace of the game. Not a big fan of this.
In 104 you say "Accountant is playing the classic null IC", but in 33 you said the game start doesn't usually look like this. If accountant is playing in a "classic" way, then how is the game unusual? Can you elaborate on this?
You seem to be undecided on pants and RC votes. Not liking RC for the unvote in 229 then recanting in 239. Same with pants, hating the L-1 in 146, then moving away in 291. Now for pants, there's a good reason I think. But I'm curious what caused you to be okay with your previous RC hate, as no real explaination was provided? Or do you still lean scum on RC? This waffling around gives me a slight scum read too. Wondering if you're just feeling the crowd to see what's safe.
The first paragraph of 321 feels very town motivated to me. And the recent snoe pressure feels like scum hunting.-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Lycan
I don't see how IV could possibly be manipulating the game by post 46. Trying to pick someone on vacation as an easy target?
I feel like your communication is often convoluted (post 75, 92 and 306). Also in 226 and 269 you killed the votes on pants, but these feel really forced and convoluted as well. You could have conveyed the idea with much fewer words. You basically just repeated yourself over and over... Additionally in 269 you say "I questioned why you were voting me at all if you were going to defend rather than attack all game". I've read it a dozen times, what does that mean? I wonder if the wording choices are complicated because you're hiding that you're scum.
I don't like the logic for your initial read on IV (92, 106, 118 and 260). I don't think scum would post less under pressure, and as the game went on he has posted plenty even without pressure despite disagreeing with you on this anyways.
In 130 you parroted part of my wall regarding Accountant defending IV, without adding anything. And in 156 you claim this to be your reason ("my own misgivings"), but it was already said... Trying to slide onto the wagon without a post-flip association happening on you later? Later In 260 you said you'd let accountant slide, but that's not what happened in 130 and 156. You did pressure him. This back and forth bugs me. What is your read on accountant now?
Also in 156 you mention that noone pressuring accountant, then say "Reeks of scum". Are you saying accountant reeks of scum? Or the situation reeks of scum?
Through 255 and 259 you claim to be able to call his alignment 100%! I would love to hear the explanation behind that! How was Accountant's answer not definitive?-
-
Simoyd Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 360
- Joined: May 2, 2016
- Location: Ontario
Well those were a lot shorter than I expected. The meta topic being NAI to me cleaned them up a lot. Here's my shit:
Town: { Postie }
Town Lean: { Harkonnen97 }
Mid: { Innocentvillager, Grace, RadiantCowbells }
Scum Lean: { Lycanfire }
Scum: { Snoe, Accountant }
VOTE: Accountant L-2
Spoiler: Unofficial Vote Count
-
-
-
-