In post 312, juckter wrote:I'd like to hear your thoughts on pistachi0n, Ilhom, and Xay. I want to evaluate which scumlean to follow, and whether Xay's towniness still makes sense to everyone else.
If I assume my current reads are correct then scum are Pistachion and Ilhom. I still read yourself and Xay as town. Leaning town on Stab and Nero, although Nero seems to have it in for me.
When I've got some time I'll go and see what I can find to back up my reads. Unfortunately on 16 hour work days due to nearing go live date on a project.
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Tetaes wasn't at L-1 at that point, and he could have been completely unsure or nervous on what to do at L-2. Regardless, this is completely irrelevant to my point.
He was. Tet was also at L-1 when he asked for the 24h window to respond. He dropped to L-2 then got back to L-1.
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Tetaes wasn't at L-1 at that point, and he could have been completely unsure or nervous on what to do at L-2. Regardless, this is completely irrelevant to my point.
He was. Tet was also at L-1 when he asked for the 24h window to respond. He dropped to L-2 then got back to L-1.
Your first post today is this? Not only are you completely wrong but the point Nero was making was irrelevant to my main argument against Stabulous.
In post 330, Ilhom wrote:Your first post today is this? Not only are you completely wrong but the point Nero was making was irrelevant to my main argument against Stabulous
Derped on the L-1 thing.
Your point is that Stab didn't let Tet post before wanting hammer, right? Stab gave a 24h window, and when Tet failed he wants hammer. So did pist.
Let me see if this is right, you think Stab is scum because even though he gave Tet a chance, in the end Tet didn't post so that's about the same that's about the same as not actually giving Tet the chance to defend himself?
In post 321, Nero Cain wrote:I don't like his posting today. I don't like how he moseyed onto the Stab wagon.
I can see the voting point, I don't see what's bad about his posting
Aren't those one in the same?
Futan's reaction to me calling him scum is much more muted then yesterday.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Well, when I was at the store today I was mugged by a guy with a flaming skull and crossbones shirt and so I think it was Futan.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 337, Nero Cain wrote:Well, when I was at the store today I was mugged by a guy with a flaming skull and crossbones shirt and so I think it was Futan.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 330, Ilhom wrote:Your first post today is this? Not only are you completely wrong but the point Nero was making was irrelevant to my main argument against Stabulous
Derped on the L-1 thing.
Your point is that Stab didn't let Tet post before wanting hammer, right? Stab gave a 24h window, and when Tet failed he wants hammer. So did pist.
Let me see if this is right, you think Stab is scum because even though he gave Tet a chance, in the end Tet didn't post so that's about the same that's about the same as not actually giving Tet the chance to defend himself?
I feel like a broken record at this point and after this just iso me and really try to comprehend on what I'm saying.
286 explains my view on the 24 hour window. 322 talks about pistachi0n wanting to hammer, I just see most of her play as scared new town play. After reading that, understand that there is literally no reason as a town that you would want someone to get lynched before they have a chance to claim, but there is a reason for a mafia.
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Also, if she was scum she could have just agreed with Stabulous and just dropped the hammer.
No, she couldn't have. It'd be completely out of character. I mentioned this in my earlier post, Pistachio is not exonerated for not taking the easy lynch- she can't even vote someone for two hours in a row, saying "eh yeah good point" and hammering would have (at least in her mind) been suspicious.
Exonerated for not taking the easy lynch? I must have missed when this was mentioned?
In post 277, Stabulous wrote:Hammering me before I post tonight is a scum claim. I'm on my phone and will post in a couple of hours.
Last post was 22 hours ago.
This is one of those pressure point posts that I think often come from scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 346, Ilhom wrote:juckter and pistachi0n can you both post your reads?
Stabulous is scummy, both because he was pressuring me to hammer when everyone else was urging me to wait, and because he's egging me on today.
Nero is also scummy, because he emphatically defended me when everyone else thought I was scum. I'm wondering if he's mafia using that tactic to either make me more likely to defend him if other people think he's scum, or to make me look suspicious if he dies and is implicated as scum.
