I would pick vanilla town. Going in completely blind and trying to solve the puzzle of who is scum seems to be the most fun to me. Although I could see the excitement of the other roles too.
Because why not
In post 50, Xayzeck wrote:In post 15, pistachi0n wrote:VOTE: Ilhom because that picture of Donald Duck definitely makes it look like he killed someone.
In post 33, Ilhom wrote:
By my count there are only 3 votes on him, but the fact that you would be willing to put someone at L-1 this early concerns me especially in a game with new players. If that were the case all it would take is one dumb town to quick lynch someone with very little information, thus making them look extremely suspicious going in to the next day if the lynch turned up town. It would leave town in a very awkward position. A dumb mafia could also make the play but it would just be suicide for them at that point.
So do you think it's scum or town?
In post 65, Xayzeck wrote:In post 61, Ilhom wrote:An ambitious scum who unknowingly puts the spotlight on themselves early or a town that isn't entirely sure how the game works. Still neutral on her until I see more play because I could see people claiming ignorance in these games saying that they don't know better so they can slide through the game.
He's clearly aware of the concept of L-1 though, and he unvotes because he doesn't want a mislynch
Right pistachi0n?
In post 94, Megalo wrote:In post 86, Xayzeck wrote:In post 81, Megalo wrote:The vote was bad, as putting someone to L-1 just because is just ridiculous. The unvote was just as bad because he unvoted since it wasn't L-1, but his excuse is valid.
What excuse?
This one
In post 77, pistachi0n wrote:In the beginning of the game, I didn't realize that random voting with baseless accusations was part of the fun until it was pointed out to me after I made that post about not wanting to vote. Then I thought I'd join in on the fun, but not if someone was actually going to get lynched.
It's random voting, so you can't really blame him for not picking up on when that part ends in the first game. What is bad is when people are questioning him for random votes whose reasoning is literally just baseless accusations that mean nothing.
In post 187, Tetaes wrote:Alright, Time to do a little catchup.
...
Sooooo, Nothing too important, Eh?
Anyways, I probably wouldn't change my mind about Stabulous.
Also, any questions directly to me?
Because, I think I'm not really going to post anything for a whilw since I'm really busy and that my mind would probably not change except something really important happens.
In post 228, Nero Cain wrote:In post 208, Ilhom wrote:Ok then reverse what I said. Why do you not see either of us as towny? Even under POE there must be a reason why we aren't seen as towny.
Do yo even know what POE is? Like Meg has done shit all this game (and his second rvs type vote on Futan is pretty awkward). I'd have said that you are town "towniest" of my scumreads.
In post 264, Stabulous wrote:lying is scummy. Lying about basic game knowledge is just stupid.
In post 288, Nero Cain wrote:In post 286, Ilhom wrote:The only thing I'm blaming Stabulous for is scummy play
Can you sum up what he's done thats "scummy". I could be misunderstanding the argument here but it seems you are saying Stab is scummy b/c he wanted to hammer Tet but Tet self hammered without claiming and thus its all stabs fault.
In post 288, Nero Cain wrote:In post 286, Ilhom wrote:How is it not scummy for someone to lynch a person who claims a PR with no CC on day 1, a position very far away from lylo?
Who claimed to have a pr on d1?
In post 291, Stabulous wrote:I don't believe you can't tell the difference between lynching a habitual lurker who has given every intention of never posting anything useful without waiting for a post and lynching someone who has promised content and has delivered on promises in the past without waiting for a post.
In post 293, Stabulous wrote:
If he claimed JK/Cop with no CC he would be conf-town, but I've seen too many games where scum gets lucky with an early Doc/BP claim (they have a better chance at guessing because they have setup knowledge) and is regarded as conf-town for the whole game.
Let me repeat that: Scum has set-up knowledge and can find very good odds to make a claim that can't be CC'd. That's part of the design of Matrix6. Calling someone conf-town because their doc or BP claim was uncontested is, well, lying about basic gameknowledge.
You also need to learn to distinguish between "bad at mafia" and "scummy". You can accuse me of being bad at mafia for lynching someone who claims a PR if you like, that's your prerogative. But what on earth do I gain as scum from admitting I would have lynched someone who claimed doc? How is that alignment-indicative?
In post 308, Stabulous wrote:He was never going to claim. I was asking him for a claim for a full two days, during which he logged in to mafiascum and check the thread. If he didn't claim then, I wasnt going to pay much mind to whatver bullshit claim came next.
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:noIn post 290, Ilhom wrote:He pushes for pistachi0n's hammer on Tetaes without allowing Tetaes to even post anything.
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:In post 198, Stabulous wrote:Tet, you're at L-1. You should post all of your current reads in case you end up being lynched. If you're a PR, claim it when someone announces intent to hammer.
Are you even around right now?
If Tet had flipped scum I *might* consider this coaching but I think this whole "oh Stab didn't give Tet a chance" is proven false.
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:In post 201, pistachi0n wrote:I intend to hammer. I will not cast my vote until someone acknowledges that they have seen this post.
Here pist claims intent to hammer and seemingly doesn't care if Tet claims or anything. How is this different than what you are claiming stab did?
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:but both
In post 202, Stabulous wrote:I see it, but I think we should let him claim and post reads before you hammer. Can you wait 24h?
In post 203, pistachi0n wrote:Yes. I will wait until he says something.
seem to be willing to let Tet claim and jazz. Of the two Stab is the townier of the two. This continues to disprove your argument.
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:In post 231, pistachi0n wrote:I looked on Tet's profile and he was online this morning, which was after he was put at L-1, and didn't post anything to defend himself.
I am willing to hammer in one hour unless
a) Someone has already hammered first
b) Tetaes logs on and sufficiently defends himself
c) Nobody has acknowledged this post.
Here pist is doing exactly what you are accusing Stab of doing. Point B kinda points to her not doing that but meh.
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:In post 230, Stabulous wrote:I want to hammer Tet. I said 24h and I don't think we need to wait longer than that
This is apparently your point but I really don't get the "ZOMG he tried to get pist to hammer him before he could do anything." Tet had his chance do do something to change their minds in 187 but he didn't do anything.
Tl;dr
nothing in the thread supports your argument.
In post 327, Xayzeck wrote:In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Tetaes wasn't at L-1 at that point, and he could have been completely unsure or nervous on what to do at L-2. Regardless, this is completely irrelevant to my point.
He was. Tet was also at L-1 when he asked for the 24h window to respond. He dropped to L-2 then got back to L-1.
In post 328, Xayzeck wrote:In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Yes. 230. That is clearly a push for the hammer. Tetaes had made no posts since he was L-1 at this point.
Oh nvm you knew lol
In post 329, Xayzeck wrote:I like this case
In post 332, Xayzeck wrote:In post 330, Ilhom wrote:Your first post today is this? Not only are you completely wrong but the point Nero was making was irrelevant to my main argument against Stabulous
Derped on the L-1 thing.
Your point is that Stab didn't let Tet post before wanting hammer, right? Stab gave a 24h window, and when Tet failed he wants hammer. So did pist.
Let me see if this is right, you think Stab is scum because even though he gave Tet a chance, in the end Tet didn't post so that's about the same that's about the same as not actually giving Tet the chance to defend himself?
In post 323, Stabulous wrote:In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Also, if she was scum she could have just agreed with Stabulous and just dropped the hammer.
No, she couldn't have. It'd be completely out of character. I mentioned this in my earlier post, Pistachio is not exonerated for not taking the easy lynch- she can't even vote someone for two hours in a row, saying "eh yeah good point" and hammering would have (at least in her mind) been suspicious.
In post 355, Xayzeck wrote:In post 344, Ilhom wrote:fter reading that, understand that there is literally no reason as a town that you would want someone to get lynched before they have a chance to claim, but there is a reason for a mafia.
So let's say you're mafia, you outright say to town that you want to lynch this person whatever he claims, even if it's a PR.
Which alignment is more likely to say that, regardless whether they will get a claim?
In post 351, juckter wrote:Overall reads:
Ilhom - Null, I don't like your Stab case, seems nonsensical to me. Please explain it like I'm 5.
In post 388, juckter wrote:
Xay's reactions to Stab voting him earlier seem natural enough to not see it as bussing.
In post 411, Futan wrote:
Ok so if I take Juckters list and parse it from my point of view
Stabulous: Nero
Ilhom: pistachi0n, Xayzeck, Nero
pistachi0n: Ilhom, Xayzeck, Nero
Nero: Stabulous, pistachi0n, Ilhom
Xayzeck: Ilhom, pistachi0n
Ilhom and pistachio top the numbers.
In post 412, Stabulous wrote:Lynch: Nero, Pistachio
Could Lynch: Ilhom, Xay
Don't Lynch: Futan, Juckter
I think Nero slipped yesterday. Reaction testing would not justify the risk of more or less immediate loss by doctor claiming. The comment was pretty clearly a call for a doctor claim, and the argument "Oh I just meant in general" doesn't make sense to me.
In post 416, Stabulous wrote:UNVOTE:
I know it's cutting it close and I still want to lynch Pistach0 today, but we have time for responses about Nero that I need.
In post 473, Nero Cain wrote:This is really inexcusable for me as an IC. Though I'm not so bullish on Xay being scum right now so poe says scum are Futan and Ilhom. Discuss.
In post 478, enomis wrote:
@ilhom
but why is nero scum?
What happened to the analysis u did for the following post:
post 386 where u say if stab flip town, me and nero are scum team.(since pista is town)
post 255 ur wagon analysis.
Ur analysis seems to me that it is quite consistent to you that i am scum. So why i am town just because of nero's push on me? I think u made the post 386 analysis when nero was already pushing on me.
In post 491, Nero Cain wrote:In post 486, Ilhom wrote:I tell him he's just straight up wrong and he just backs away from it.
This never happened btw. Show me what you think is me backing down.
In post 487, enomis wrote:If not could you link me to where he back away.
Whats with the buddying and stab dieing??
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:noIn post 290, Ilhom wrote:He pushes for pistachi0n's hammer on Tetaes without allowing Tetaes to even post anything.
Yes. 230. That is clearly a push for the hammer. Tetaes had made no posts since he was L-1 at this point.
In post 497, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:Instead she would wait until Tetaes posts.
Which she did not actually say. She said ifSOMEBODYacknowledges this post.
In post 322, Ilhom wrote:
In post 320, Nero Cain wrote:In post 201, pistachi0n wrote:I intend to hammer. I will not cast my vote until someone acknowledges that they have seen this post.
Here pist claims intent to hammer and seemingly doesn't care if Tet claims or anything. How is this different than what you are claiming stab did?
It's different because she recognized it should wait and said 203. She didn't just push for the hammer immediately which would have been scummy. Instead she would wait until Tetaes posts.
In post 203, pistachi0n wrote:Yes. I will wait until he says something.
In post 203, pistachi0n wrote:Yes. I will wait until he says something.
In post 498, Xayzeck wrote:In post 475, Ilhom wrote:With Nero being scum Futan is most likely town due to the constant push onto him. It's possible his very early pressure on Xayzeck could have been a chance at distancing themselves since it was a silly reason. I'm not counting out juckter as a possibility either. So Xayzeck/juckter as potential partner.
What?
In post 511, Xayzeck wrote:In post 503, Ilhom wrote:I believe that was juckter's reasoning for originally not having you as partners. I don't think it's a strong enough reason for me to rule out the possibility.
I'm not sure I follow what you were saying in the quote, got lost by the last 2 lines, can you be a bit clearer?
Also, juckterscum with Nero?
In post 512, Xayzeck wrote:This should clear a Ilhom/Xay scumteam right