Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Titus · Post Post #7 (isolation #0) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:06 am

Hi, PC. Please don't be the PC police.

VOTE: Firebringer

I has cold today. Will post slower.

Titus · Post Post #47 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 1:50 pm

In post 20, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:VOTE: Firebringer Because fire is scary and shit.

VOTE: BeBop

This is a scum post. Scum call players scary in RVS.

Titus · Post Post #52 (isolation #2) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:55 pm

In post 51, Errantparabola wrote:Ugh
Is this going to be one of those low activity blitzes

Firebringer wrote:Just looking at that vote count on me.

I am impresssed, who else besides maybe titus would have this many votes on them this early?

I amaze myself, I haven't even done anything

This is not a reaction that makes me very confident in fire being town

My gut likes it. My head doesn't. Why do you not?

Titus · Post Post #55 (isolation #3) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:03 pm

Cavalier is normal fire.

It does move the game forward. Read between the line, Fire is saying his wagon is unjust. Commenting a wagon sucks is moving the game forward.

Titus · Post Post #56 (isolation #4) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:04 pm

In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

You now are second on my lynch list.

Titus · Post Post #58 (isolation #5) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:08 pm

Yeah, ignoring this. I have a string of scum victories myself.

Titus · Post Post #69 (isolation #6) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:16 pm

In post 66, Firebringer wrote:
In post 52, Titus wrote:My gut likes it. My head doesn't. Why do you not?

Stop pretending you can gut read me Titus, you always buddy me as scum and I don't trust you anymore. >.>

*farts*

VOTE: Firebringer

Titus · Post Post #93 (isolation #7) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:54 am

Ranger seems very town Imo. Much like Sudioken and not blitz.

Be bop. Phantom. FB. Always Innocent is my scum pool atm.

Titus · Post Post #94 (isolation #8) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:55 am

In post 88, Errantparabola wrote:Im reading things but dont frel like phoneposting. Give me about an hour or so.
PC, i think this behavior is null for ranger, ive seen her make full reads in rvs before.

We are long outta rvs.

Titus · Post Post #95 (isolation #9) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 5:56 am

In post 51, Errantparabola wrote:Ugh
Is this going to be one of those low activity blitzes

Firebringer wrote:Just looking at that vote count on me.

I am impresssed, who else besides maybe titus would have this many votes on them this early?

I amaze myself, I haven't even done anything

This is not a reaction that makes me very confident in fire being town

In post 53, Errantparabola wrote:there's no town motivation for making it.
Fire made a post that talked about himself. How does that move the game forward?
I also have extremely minor problems with the cavalier attitude (is it faked?) but that can be ignored for now because that could be just playstyle.

In post 88, Errantparabola wrote:Im reading things but dont frel like phoneposting. Give me about an hour or so.
PC, i think this behavior is null for ranger, ive seen her make full reads in rvs before.

Wait, how can you think this is RVS but have a scumread on Fire?

Add Errant to the scum pool.

Titus · Post Post #98 (isolation #10) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:11 am

In post 96, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I am currently reading this game, where Ranger was town. Her behavior was somewhat different, though. It seems that she was less inclined to randomly "townread" people without explanation. Not that it tells us that much, since meta-reads are unreliable, but still.

In post 97, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 93, Titus wrote:Ranger seems very town Imo. Much like Sudioken and not blitz.

Be bop. Phantom. FB. Always Innocent is my scum pool atm.
Why do you think Ranger is town? You have played with her before, so you must have a meta-read on her or something.

You say meta is shit. Conclude my read must be solely meta.

Nope. Those posts are strong town.

Definitely on the right track with my pool.

Care to address the other reads? Why didn't you ask me my thoughts on you?

Titus · Post Post #114 (isolation #11) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:38 am

In post 71, Ranger wrote:At least one of {PhantomCobalt, Titus} is scum.

Dwlee is town; texcat and BeBop also are pinging for scum.

It's too early to tell for sure on Errant/Firebringer/AlwaysInnocent, but early indicators are town.
Squirrelly, not so sure about; still too early to say.

Here, we have strong positions taken here. I liked PC as scum, so Ranger stating one must be scum isn't a problem.

Dwelee is indeed obvtown.

Titus · Post Post #115 (isolation #12) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:38 am

Ranger scum doesn't take strong positions.

Titus · Post Post #118 (isolation #13) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:40 am

In post 108, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 75, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Looks like things have started moving forward while I was gone. I'll try to pay some reads tomorrow.

You'll
try
...
tomorrow
? This is a blitz game. How about
doing...today
?

Strong town here too. Yes!

Titus · Post Post #121 (isolation #14) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:42 am

In post 116, Errantparabola wrote:Titus did you ever explain ehy your head didnt like fire's wagon reaction

Fire seemed to be more focused on discrediting my method of reading him than sorting people.

Titus · Post Post #122 (isolation #15) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:43 am

In post 119, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 117, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Especially the townreading of random people seems odd. I
know
that I am town, but I have not said or done anything yet that could lead to a reliable townread. In fact, some people seem to be suspicious of me, so why does she townread me?

Titus you say you have AI as a scumread. How opposed are you to voting here?

VOTE: Always

Not very.

Titus · Post Post #124 (isolation #16) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:45 am

Talk to me about Dwelee squirrel. That seems to be our disagreement.

Titus · Post Post #128 (isolation #17) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:47 am

In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

I don't recall ever playing with you.

Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.

Titus · Post Post #132 (isolation #18) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:50 am

In post 89, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I know that people sometimes have weak reasons to have some ill-informed opinion about someone during this stage, but it seems like he is just throwing around reads for the sake of appearing town. He has not even explained
any
of these reads, as far as I can see.

I am compelled to leave my non-conformist identity behind and join the Ranger wagon.

This post is awkward as shit. You suddenly start talking in very distant language. Some people. They. Pings hard.

Titus · Post Post #134 (isolation #19) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:53 am

In post 130, Squirrelly wrote:Dwlee is doing a lot of joking even past the rvs stage while throwing shade at errant.
Also the vote on beebop and buddying.

In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 56, Titus wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

You now are second on my lynch list.

My most recent completed game he fooled everyone and was scum. Don't let him f-ing live.

In post 63, Dwlee99 wrote:But LOOK at that trenchcoat, yakko. It is the number #1 scum tell on idiot's guide to mafia volume pi. It is 100% accurate

In post 77, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 76, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 64, Firebringer wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

Ummm what game?
I don't think I have had a recent scum win.
Wait are you talking about me even?

As has been said...are you being intentionally dense?

^

I think I have with this vote
VOTE: Beboparebop
I do not like the promise of reads this early.

He's not buddying me. That's for sure. The tone wasn't serious in his early posts. I misread it. The trench coat is a joke. I liked the last post you quoted a lot. Each post in a blitz needs a purpose. Saying I will post reads later just looks like a way to dodge the spotlight.

Titus · Post Post #135 (isolation #20) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:54 am

In post 131, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 128, Titus wrote:
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

I don't recall ever playing with you.

Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.

Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?

Blitz 1. Sure. Let's discuss it.

You're town. Dwelee town. Ranger town (we should agree on this one). Let's go.

Titus · Post Post #138 (isolation #21) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:59 am

Word choice is how I start. Second, the word choice in that post is very different than others you have. You use a lot of I and specific names. That post is vague as fuck.

Also, town blocking is good.

Titus · Post Post #141 (isolation #22) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:07 am

Squirrel, talk to me.

Titus · Post Post #144 (isolation #23) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:14 am

@AI, It's good enough for me.

If you're so convinced Ranger is scum, why aren't you voting him?

"Some people", "sometimes" "they". When you provide no reference, it's vague and distancy. :p moon logic ftw

Titus · Post Post #153 (isolation #24) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:49 am

Ok, I will meet you half way. I take Dwelee as innocent. You take AI as innocent.

Your move.

Titus · Post Post #158 (isolation #25) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 8:18 am

Your question is so awkward to me. Content and gut are methods to sort motivation.

Oh I forgot.
UNVOTE:

Titus · Post Post #162 (isolation #26) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 8:29 am

In post 159, PhantomCobalt wrote:
In post 158, Titus wrote:Your question is so awkward to me. Content and gut are methods to sort motivation.

Oh I forgot.
UNVOTE:

Well do you read content or motivation more? Also can you answer my other question?

You're deliberately being dense. Content is what is used to determine motivation. One cannot be used more than the other.

Titus · Post Post #171 (isolation #27) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 8:59 am

In post 164, Squirrelly wrote:pers early reads:

Townie {titus, AI, errant, texcat}

Scummy {phantom, dwlee}

Don't know {ranger, firebringer, dominator}

Need more posts - everyone else

Ranger and Dwelee are town. Work with me here.

Titus · Post Post #178 (isolation #28) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:05 am

In post 167, Dwlee99 wrote:Titus, walk me through being a scum read of your to a "obvtown"?

Also, phantom, just lol. Am I trying to troll? You are joking.. right? What is even the point in posting that?

When I saw I misinterpreted your post (namely that you were joking about turbo lynching errant because he fooled you before), I townread you. I rarely buy such behavior as a joke but you didn't get defensive but demonstrated it.

Titus · Post Post #181 (isolation #29) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:07 am

In post 175, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 115, Titus wrote:Ranger scum doesn't take strong positions.

Wasnt that a huge tell we missed in blitz one that scum was hard defending each other?

Hard defense isn't a tell.

Strained defense

is an indicator. Persivul was straining to argue I was SK to protect Ocean.

Titus · Post Post #196 (isolation #30) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:34 am

In post 188, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 171, Titus wrote:
Ranger and Dwelee are town. Work with me here.

I'll work with you, i.e. I'm not voting either one of them, but that doesn't change my opinions at this point.

Ok. Phantom wagon?

Titus · Post Post #218 (isolation #31) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:09 am

In post 203, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 196, Titus wrote:
Ok. Phantom wagon?

Sure.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Phantom

- pers

Wait, you're a hydra? Wow I need to re read the first page.

VOTE: Phantom

Titus · Post Post #219 (isolation #32) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:10 am

In post 210, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 207, PhantomCobalt wrote:
In post 202, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 194, PhantomCobalt wrote:@Squirrely can you show me one of my posts that look like I'm faking town?

156

You throw in a green and a couple reds, but who do you follow up with? Titus, who is scum reading you. You're not after scum, you're trying to protect your own hide.

I'm scum reading you, Dom, and Ranger. How is that not scumhunting?
Scumhunting is more about the process than having a list of scum.

I like this post here.

Titus · Post Post #221 (isolation #33) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:18 am

Can you list hydras in the first post?

Titus · Post Post #225 (isolation #34) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:40 am

I am fine with Dom. Not full on town but ok.

Titus · Post Post #228 (isolation #35) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:53 am

In post 227, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 226, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 223, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What do people think about TheDominator (ISO)? While I have my doubts about Phantom, I sort of get why he would vote TheDominator. TheDominator's posting behavior is just... odd.
Even weirder than Dwlee's posting behavior.

What is that supposed to mean?
You're just not serious. Can you please be more serious?

Personality is not alignment indicative unless different than normal.

Vote Phantom please.

Titus · Post Post #230 (isolation #36) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 10:55 am

In post 229, PhantomCobalt wrote:
In post 225, Titus wrote:I am fine with Dom. Not full on town but ok.

How is he not scum to you? He just naked voted and hasn't contributed anything. I'm done if I get lynched before he does.

You being lynched means by definition you cannot play this particular game anymore. You can enter another.

Dom is easy to pick on. See Kingmaker.

Titus · Post Post #236 (isolation #37) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:14 am

In post 232, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 228, Titus wrote:
In post 227, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 226, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 223, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What do people think about TheDominator (ISO)? While I have my doubts about Phantom, I sort of get why he would vote TheDominator. TheDominator's posting behavior is just... odd.
Even weirder than Dwlee's posting behavior.

What is that supposed to mean?
You're just not serious. Can you please be more serious?

Personality is not alignment indicative unless different than normal.

Vote Phantom please.
So you are pushing me to vote for Phantom? I have been reading his ISO, but I cannot really tell if he is scum or not. Why should I vote for him? Unless you think I am wrong about Errant too.

Generally a specific request to vote someone is a push. Yes.

Phantom's ISO is terrible ate focused more on defend himself rather than scumhunting.

Titus · Post Post #237 (isolation #38) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:16 am

In post 235, PhantomCobalt wrote:
In post 234, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Fine, Titus. But you better have a good case. I am starting to think you are town, but I am well aware that you are quite capable of deceiving people, so I will still be keeping an eye on you. I will be voting for PhantomCobalt for now.

VOTE: PhantomCobalt

dont listen to her! make your own life decisions.

Who is scum? Push them.

Titus · Post Post #241 (isolation #39) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:19 am

In post 234, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Fine, Titus. But you better have a good case. I am starting to think you are town, but I am well aware that you are quite capable of deceiving people, so I will still be keeping an eye on you. I will be voting for PhantomCobalt for now.

VOTE: PhantomCobalt

So how familiar are you with me? I don't recall playing with you. Why are you fear mongerring me and going along in the same post?

Titus · Post Post #242 (isolation #40) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:20 am

In post 238, PhantomCobalt wrote:
In post 236, Titus wrote:
In post 232, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 228, Titus wrote:
In post 227, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 226, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 223, AlwaysInnocent wrote:What do people think about TheDominator (ISO)? While I have my doubts about Phantom, I sort of get why he would vote TheDominator. TheDominator's posting behavior is just... odd.
Even weirder than Dwlee's posting behavior.

What is that supposed to mean?
You're just not serious. Can you please be more serious?

Personality is not alignment indicative unless different than normal.

Vote Phantom please.
So you are pushing me to vote for Phantom? I have been reading his ISO, but I cannot really tell if he is scum or not. Why should I vote for him? Unless you think I am wrong about Errant too.

Generally a specific request to vote someone is a push. Yes.

Phantom's ISO is terrible ate focused more on defend himself rather than scumhunting.

well you have been dodging a question for 4 posts that doesn't even put pressure on you

???

Type out specifically what you think I am dodging. Either I answer or show you where I have.

Titus · Post Post #245 (isolation #41) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:29 am

@PC, you're not being explicit. I feel we had that conversation. Type out the specific question.

Titus · Post Post #247 (isolation #42) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:34 am

In post 115, Titus wrote:Ranger scum doesn't take strong positions.

Yes partially.

Titus · Post Post #250 (isolation #43) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 11:43 am

Which games?

Titus · Post Post #287 (isolation #44) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 4:16 pm

In post 281, Ranger wrote:{Dwlee, AlwaysInnocent}
{Yakko, Dominator}
{Errant, Firebringer, Flubbernugget, Squirrelly}
{gimick, ZZZX}
{texcat, Wanderer}
{Titus, Bebop}
{Phantom Cobalt}
For clarity: this is Wanderer and Phantom Cobalt moving down, not tecat/Titus/Bebop moving up.

Literally agree with all of this but AI is too high, Squirrely is too low, and I should be town.

Titus · Post Post #290 (isolation #45) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:35 pm

Ooh ABR, we are lynching PC. Is he your buddy?

Titus · Post Post #296 (isolation #46) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 8:22 pm

In post 294, Firebringer wrote:
In post 287, Titus wrote:Literally agree with all of this but AI is too high, Squirrely is too low, and I should be town.

You should never be in anyones town pool.

#StillSalty.

You will read me right eventually.

Titus · Post Post #299 (isolation #47) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 8:52 pm

Vote Phantom.

Titus · Post Post #301 (isolation #48) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:02 pm

*sigh*

Titus · Post Post #319 (isolation #49) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 5:26 am

Farside I am here. Let's talk. I want to get a town block going, the fact you two aren't giving me ranger who should be a shoe in is problematic. Talk to me.

Why did you move your vote?

Titus · Post Post #327 (isolation #50) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:26 am

1) Yes. Bebop is likely bussing. We can sort it out later. Find scum lynch scum. Then be certain on buddies.
2) Blitz One + Sudoken
3) which one would you like me to reread?

Titus · Post Post #328 (isolation #51) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:28 am

In post 326, Squirrelly wrote:I'd say only one good post by errant while the rest is just meh.
Firebringer is a scum read at this point. I'm used to him being more active and fluffy as town

Firebringer may be scum for the reasons you said.

Titus · Post Post #330 (isolation #52) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:29 am

Why are you talking about all your other reads when it's time for PC to pay the piper on his reads?

Titus · Post Post #332 (isolation #53) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:35 am

Ok. Well I will await your answer as I have errands and other games.

Titus · Post Post #335 (isolation #54) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 8:40 am

In post 333, Squirrelly wrote:Why is pc scum?

Zero content, buddying, AtE under pressure.

Titus · Post Post #341 (isolation #55) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 9:54 am

In post 336, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:
In post 324, Squirrelly wrote:
1) do you even realize there is more then 1 scum team in this game?

This is something that has been bugging me about the block forming. I could see one team forming a block to eliminate parts of the other team and get town credit.

VOTE: BeBop

I know I have a block going on PC scum but Phantom just slipped here. Town points to whoever highlights where.

Titus · Post Post #346 (isolation #56) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:01 am

Only if the slip is highlighted fast and uncontroverted. Hence why I want someone else to post it.

You're wrong Yakko.

Titus · Post Post #347 (isolation #57) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:03 am

In post 341, Titus wrote:I could see one team forming a block to eliminate parts of the other team and get town credit.

It's in this sentence.

Titus · Post Post #349 (isolation #58) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:09 am

If no one has answered this in 1 hour, I will explain the slip.

Titus · Post Post #351 (isolation #59) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:15 am

In post 350, Wanderer-nl wrote:Well I did answer, not sure if you registered it though.

Wrong.

Titus · Post Post #352 (isolation #60) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:16 am

I thought you meant you didn't care about my oferring of towncred.

Titus · Post Post #356 (isolation #61) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:32 am

Yes. Now why?

Titus · Post Post #359 (isolation #62) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:34 am

And who said this was multi ball?

Titus · Post Post #361 (isolation #63) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:35 am

VOTE: PC

Ok, my bad. You can possibly be town.

Titus · Post Post #365 (isolation #64) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 10:45 am

In post 364, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:
In post 363, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 356, Titus wrote:Yes. Now why?

Only way to "know" it is multi-ball is if the scum team is small. However, other people have already mentioned this earlier in the thread multiple times.

Or if the moderator says it is in the opening post.

This.

Titus · Post Post #372 (isolation #65) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:17 am

No it's L minus 1.

Titus · Post Post #379 (isolation #66) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:35 am

Reads?

Titus · Post Post #381 (isolation #67) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:45 am

You can give us gut feels that are reasonless.

Titus · Post Post #385 (isolation #68) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 11:53 am

In post 384, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:If you don't have time, why are you even on this thread? Saying that I'm scum, titus is town and squirrelly is a chipmunk doesn't take too long.

This post gives me warm feelies.

Titus · Post Post #387 (isolation #69) » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:33 pm

Give ur gut. Then support later.

Titus · Post Post #398 (isolation #70) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:19 pm

Only one death...

VOTE: Squirrel

Did you betray me? I think you tried.

Titus · Post Post #400 (isolation #71) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:38 pm

Sush you, let me pressure Squirrelly.

Titus · Post Post #402 (isolation #72) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:46 pm

Much better.

Titus · Post Post #404 (isolation #73) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:48 pm

Nope. I would like Squirrely to come on and defend herself.

Titus · Post Post #405 (isolation #74) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:49 pm

What's your stance there?

Titus · Post Post #407 (isolation #75) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:03 pm

Non responsive. I want to know your Squirrely read.

Titus · Post Post #411 (isolation #76) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:12 pm

In post 408, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 398, Titus wrote:Only one death...

VOTE: Squirrel

Did you betray me? I think you tried.

I have no clue what your issue is.
If you expect me to be a mind reader your going to be dissapointed greatly

And if I said you're the reason there was only one kill?

Titus · Post Post #413 (isolation #77) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:14 pm

Funny, I could a jailed you or kills repeat. Interesting you jump to lying.

Titus · Post Post #415 (isolation #78) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:17 pm

In post 414, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 413, Titus wrote:Funny, I could a jailed you or kills repeat. Interesting you jump to lying.

You voted me.
That doesn't imply jk or saving in the least

It implies you need to be resolved. Jailkeeper doesn't know whether they blocked or healed you. Thus needing resolution.

Titus · Post Post #417 (isolation #79) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:18 pm

Go ahead and push.

Titus · Post Post #419 (isolation #80) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:19 pm

Pretty sure you're scum so.

Titus · Post Post #421 (isolation #81) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:19 pm

In post 418, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 415, Titus wrote:
In post 414, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 413, Titus wrote:Funny, I could a jailed you or kills repeat. Interesting you jump to lying.

You voted me.
That doesn't imply jk or saving in the least

It implies you need to be resolved. Jailkeeper doesn't know whether they blocked or healed you. Thus needing resolution.

Your attacking when I soft claimed in this game?
You joking?

I don't do crumbs.

Titus · Post Post #423 (isolation #82) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:20 pm

In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

Titus · Post Post #426 (isolation #83) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:23 pm

No I really don't read crumbs. I leave em but I don't see em.

Second, you buy me jking you. So if that's the case someone else saw them.

Titus · Post Post #427 (isolation #84) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:23 pm

In post 425, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

And yet your attacking me for not dying?

Seriously that train of thought doesn't match

No I am attacking you because there was one death.

Titus · Post Post #431 (isolation #85) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:29 pm

In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?

Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.

Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.

If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.

Titus · Post Post #432 (isolation #86) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:30 pm

In post 430, Squirrelly wrote:By the way Titus looks for crumbs in this game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... b#p7364687
So again I'm going to call her a liar again

I didn't go looking for that. Twas a sledgehammer.

Titus · Post Post #434 (isolation #87) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:31 pm

I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

Titus · Post Post #438 (isolation #88) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:35 pm

In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

Titus · Post Post #439 (isolation #89) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:36 pm

So squirrely are you still going to call me a liar on jailing you?

Titus · Post Post #443 (isolation #90) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:47 pm

In post 440, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 438, Titus wrote:
In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

I wasn't on that wagon?
I put a question mark because persivul switched it again and I missed it

You backed off at the last second.

Titus · Post Post #445 (isolation #91) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:51 pm

Point blank: I healed or stopped you. I wanted pressure to determine which.

You said you crumbed a role. Said role must not get feedback, thus you would know I blocked you.

You made a post where you assumed my block to be true.

You're assuming I came out here and blatantly lied about jailing you for shits and jiggle. Nope.

Titus · Post Post #446 (isolation #92) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:51 pm

You are your slot.

Squirrels needs votes.

Titus · Post Post #448 (isolation #93) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:00 pm

Vote the counter wagon if a townie is lynched based on nothing. Not happy.

Titus · Post Post #449 (isolation #94) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:01 pm

Meaning the wanderer vote is based on nothing.

But hey multiball.

Titus · Post Post #452 (isolation #95) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:07 pm

And just how hypothetically would you be confirmable?

If you're certain I know, you're not saying anything I don't know. If I am town, yousmack me upside the head.

Titus · Post Post #454 (isolation #96) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:09 pm

In post 425, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

And yet your attacking me for not dying?

Seriously that train of thought doesn't match

Titus · Post Post #457 (isolation #97) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:10 pm

In post 453, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 452, Titus wrote:And just how hypothetically would you be confirmable?

If you're certain I know, you're not saying anything I don't know. If I am town, yousmack me upside the head.

I'm not going to explain to you

This confirmable is a fiction to save yourself isn't it?

Titus · Post Post #459 (isolation #98) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:12 pm

In post 455, Squirrelly wrote:Your the scum player faking a role that you don't have to lynch town.
I'll wait for others to look at it and question things here

So I randomly fakeclaim jailkeepers to start a day in violation of every scumrule I have?

Titus · Post Post #469 (isolation #99) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:19 pm

In post 464, texcat wrote:
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.

I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.

Yup.

Titus · Post Post #473 (isolation #100) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:22 pm

In post 471, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 469, Titus wrote:
In post 464, texcat wrote:
In post 442, Squirrelly wrote:Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.

I'm pretty sure Titus said that her scum read was due to your initial reaction to her claim. If you had started out saying thanks for protecting me, Titus would have said you're welcome and backed off.

Yup.

Fuck off.

Didn't realize you were interested in my masturbation habits.

So how are you confirmable? Why are you backing off if convinced? Why not argue scum jailkeeper?

Titus · Post Post #475 (isolation #101) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:24 pm

Ugh another false positive on that...and the mod puts that in multiball...

I just figured you were being arrogant atm

Titus · Post Post #480 (isolation #102) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:27 pm

UNVOTE:

Titus · Post Post #483 (isolation #103) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:28 pm

In post 479, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey guys I actually don't have any time to post this weekend but I will on Monday. Can someone give me a quick recap? Has anyone claimed yet?

Farside Always Innocent and I are confirmed town.

VOTE: Wanderer

Titus · Post Post #486 (isolation #104) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:31 pm

How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Titus · Post Post #488 (isolation #105) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:38 pm

In post 487, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 486, Titus wrote:How??? That sounds broke as fuck

Gf?
Protective/jk type can protect one but no more info for that one then

Totally not wat I thought you were claiming...

Titus · Post Post #492 (isolation #106) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 6:26 pm

In post 489, hi im Yakko wrote:I may or may not have skimmed the Titus v Squirelly. My understanding of it was a misunderstanding on titus' part. What misunderstanding I am not entirely sure. Whatever. Titus is dumbtelling right? What does that mean again? I'll go look on the wiki.

VOTE: texcat

I don't remeber them commiting to anything nor having any gamesolvey posts.

What is the case on wanderer?

I don't want a Texcat wagon today.

Titus · Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:55 pm

So much wall. Just tell me who to vote for.

Titus · Post Post #562 (isolation #108) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:39 pm

In post 561, AlwaysInnocent wrote:And please at least do
some
reading. Walls aren't necessarily indicative of good play, but we should step away from the one-liners whenever possible. At least make some contributions that aren't one-liners. Besides, it makes it a lot easier to read people.

I an wall. Just don't feel like it.

Short posts =/= not reading.

Not opposed to Ranger or Wanderer at this time.

Titus · Post Post #563 (isolation #109) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 3:55 pm

Just reaching major apathy in my games tbh.

Titus · Post Post #575 (isolation #110) » Sun Dec 13, 2015 6:50 pm

You're not a strong townread anymore?

Titus · Post Post #633 (isolation #111) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:52 am

VOTE: flubber

Mod confirmed multiball. Can't PoE to 3 ppl.

Titus · Post Post #634 (isolation #112) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:53 am

Plus how the fuck do you PoE Albert?

Titus · Post Post #650 (isolation #113) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:31 am

Flubber y u ignore my vote on u?

Titus · Post Post #653 (isolation #114) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:32 am

In post 649, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 633, Titus wrote:VOTE: flubber

Mod confirmed multiball. Can't PoE to 3 ppl.

Have you never seen an incomplete reads list before

You can't have a PoE to three people and then say it's incomplete. That's what happens if your PoE is too big not too small.

Titus · Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:21 am

@flubber do you seriously not see the problem with three scumreads and all others are town by PoE?

Titus · Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:28 am

In post 704, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 701, Flubbernugget wrote:abr always plays like this. perpetual null all the time. meh
Defending Albert B.?

*takes note*

Also, meta-reads are very misleading. I do not rely on them and neither should you.

I used to take that approach. Meta can be used for determining differences and asking about them. Similarities are meh. Meta is also good for selective messaging.

Titus · Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:33 am

In post 708, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey Titus, nice vote.

You should join.

AI you too.

Titus · Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:46 pm

In post 712, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Titus AI is one of your people?

Why don't I like any of them?

This is the first time I have ever played with AI.

None of my protégés are here unless you counter flubber because I iced for him once (which I doubt).

Titus · Post Post #722 (isolation #119) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:36 pm

In post 721, pisskop wrote:
Mod Error

What's this?

Titus · Post Post #732 (isolation #120) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 7:25 pm

Farside *bats eye lashes* please give me this one.

Titus · Post Post #748 (isolation #121) » Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:47 am

*bats eyelashes* wanderer is null for me. Prefer flubber

Titus · Post Post #760 (isolation #122) » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:31 am

VOTE: Wanderer

Not going to let this no lynch.