Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Flubbernugget · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:05 am

In post 680, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 676, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I don't have a solid grasp on this game because I hae no idea what's going on with Titus and Squirely. They are both PRs, and Titus is a JK, Squirely is some kind of PR that doesn't get mod feedback. Is this the gist of it? Because I don't really understand.

People say AI solely because of his play? Or did I miss something?
I post a lot.

Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 668, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Anyway, could you answer Titus' question why you are wrongly applying PoE to three scum, knowing there should be more?

You could answer 658 as well
You first. Then I will answer.

wow really are you reading

At the time, I had 3 scum reads. The wanderer case makes sense and yakko's play is bullshit. I had a slight scum read on dw and didn't see any additional posting from him so that stuck. Everyone else is town by poe. Yes, I'm wrong, because two/three scum in a game this size isn't probable. But are all your reads right all the time?

Flubbernugget · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:06 am

abr always plays like this. perpetual null all the time. meh

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:10 am

In post 700, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 680, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 676, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I don't have a solid grasp on this game because I hae no idea what's going on with Titus and Squirely. They are both PRs, and Titus is a JK, Squirely is some kind of PR that doesn't get mod feedback. Is this the gist of it? Because I don't really understand.

People say AI solely because of his play? Or did I miss something?
I post a lot.

Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 668, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Anyway, could you answer Titus' question why you are wrongly applying PoE to three scum, knowing there should be more?

You could answer 658 as well
You first. Then I will answer.

wow really are you reading

At the time, I had 3 scum reads. The wanderer case makes sense and yakko's play is bullshit. I had a slight scum read on dw and didn't see any additional posting from him so that stuck. Everyone else is town by poe. Yes, I'm wrong, because two/three scum in a game this size isn't probable. But are all your reads right all the time?

No. My reads need constant revision. But I do not base my reads on false premises, e.g., that there are three scum, when it is pretty much certain that there are more.

Titus · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:21 am

@flubber do you seriously not see the problem with three scumreads and all others are town by PoE?

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:25 am

In post 701, Flubbernugget wrote:abr always plays like this. perpetual null all the time. meh

Defending Albert B.?

*takes note*

Also, meta-reads are very misleading. I do not rely on them and neither should you.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:26 am

What is this your second game? "I don't rely on meta reads" no really? I don't believe you!

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:27 am

Link me to your newbie game I want to make fun of you.

Titus · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:28 am

In post 704, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 701, Flubbernugget wrote:abr always plays like this. perpetual null all the time. meh
Defending Albert B.?

*takes note*

Also, meta-reads are very misleading. I do not rely on them and neither should you.

I used to take that approach. Meta can be used for determining differences and asking about them. Similarities are meh. Meta is also good for selective messaging.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:29 am

Hey Titus, nice vote.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:31 am

In post 706, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Link me to your newbie game I want to make fun of you.

While it is true that I am new to this site, I have been playing this game since 2008. But whatever, right?

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:32 am

I feel that you are taking it too personal.

Titus · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:33 am

In post 708, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey Titus, nice vote.

You should join.

AI you too.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:34 am

Titus AI is one of your people?

Why don't I like any of them?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:34 am

In post 711, Titus wrote:
In post 708, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey Titus, nice vote.

You should join.

AI you too.

Already there.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:37 am

In post 703, Titus wrote:@flubber do you seriously not see the problem with three scumreads and all others are town by PoE?

well I just said i know my reads are wrong because of it

so no I have no clue

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 11:55 am

In post 711, Titus wrote:
In post 708, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Hey Titus, nice vote.

You should join.

AI you too.

I am not saying that Flubber cannot be scum, but I would rather prevent another Phantom-like mislynch.

Titus · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:46 pm

In post 712, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Titus AI is one of your people?

Why don't I like any of them?

This is the first time I have ever played with AI.

None of my protégés are here unless you counter flubber because I iced for him once (which I doubt).

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:17 pm

AI where have you played forum mafia?

TheDominator37 · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:43 pm

In post 672, AlwaysInnocent wrote:
In post 670, TheDominator37 wrote:Prodge
Are you actually going to contribute...
anything
this game?

Lurk

texcat · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:53 pm

I would not be against a Dom lynch.

Squirrelly · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:02 pm

I'll be honest.
I'm just beat tonight. I had a really crazy day at work and I just want to go to sleep.

pisskop · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:28 pm

Mod Error

Titus · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:36 pm

In post 721, pisskop wrote:
Mod Error

What's this?

pisskop · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 2:39 pm

Mod Error

Duh

Mods have games they play too! And sometimes they mispost and don't want to delete the spot because ethics.

Ranger · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Mon Dec 14, 2015 3:11 pm

AlwaysInnocent wrote:I am talking about rational scum.

So am I. Think like a scum player,

especially

in a game where the roles aren't known. What freaks you out more? A player who has given reasons which aren't accurate and who is presenting no threat...or a player who,

mysteriously

, for some reason

you don't know

, is scumreading you? Are they a cop with a guilty? They might be acting like one with their unwavering vote. They're not explaining the read, what if they've got some super-case for why you're scum they're just waiting to spring at the moment least convenient for you? Rational scum are terrified of lists without reasons.

However, not sharing them is objectively bad play.

Incorrect. Not sharing reasons is, by your subjective opinion, bad play. It is in no matter objective.

Flubbernugget wrote:Yakko
Wanderer
Dwlee

For now everyone else can be town by poe

Not sure if scum slipping they're hunting for one faction only. (Who may or may not be aware Dwlee's dead.)
Or just town slipping they don't know there's two, unaware Dwlee's dead.

Need more to be sure, but if I were to

guess

, I'd go with the latter.