The scum team is Human Destroyer, goodmorning, and the Mehdi Hydra.
You're welcome
In post 345, JacobSavage wrote:Cool Story. What makes you think that?
In post 363, Human Destroyer wrote:Phoneposting is dumb
In post 339, JacobSavage wrote:Okay I'm willing to hammer Josh. Is that okay?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: JacobSavage
Scummiest post in the goddamn game. Where did your strong town read on him go?
In post 344, PJ. wrote:Hi
The scum team is Human Destroyer, goodmorning, and the Mehdi Hydra.
You're welcome
Vote: Human Destroyer
Where the fuck did this come from?
In post 358, PJ. wrote:In post 345, JacobSavage wrote:Cool Story. What makes you think that?
conforming to an anti town idea in order to fit in, the way he maddogged the josh wagon for silly reasons
Goodmorning for starting a stream of anti-town posts.
Mehdi is gut mostly along with his play between him and HD. I'd be willing to discuss the possibility of Serra being the 3rd scum instead of the hydra simply because he calls out the hydra for doing something antitown and then contradicts himself by doing something incredibly similar.
Not a big fan of the hammer offer coming from jacob with 2 replacements incoming and more then week before deadline. but he's likely town
Jenniferr is town(mostly because Joshw as town and her posting reaffirms)
@KX, unvoting because of a replacement is kind of silly. You're obvious new town but why the unvote? Do you find the Josh slot(now inherited by jenniferr) to be a town slot or a scum slot?
goodmorning reaffirming my heavy scum read on her with the whole unvoting the replacement thing and then voting another lurker. I'm very willing to switch my vote to her if the better and much more tasty Human Destroyer wagon doesn't happen.
How am I "conforming" to these supposed "anti town ideas" to "fit in" if a) I was the one driving the Josh wagon and b) I have a semi-unorthodox scum read on Jacob?
In post 362, PJ. wrote:Man, my scum reads are so damn good
Maybe in some other dimension, they are.
In post 366, Human Destroyer wrote:I always do scum lists. Just search around, you'll find them.
Except the case wasn't bad (it isn't applicable anymore because Jennifer strikes me as town on first impression but whatever)
In post 367, KX wrote:Given the current situation, even if you're making a false case, there simply isn't enough to go off of for anything substantial to emerge. The idea behind making a false case should be that a person who's mainly considered town has been, in their own way, flying under the radar, and avoiding criticism. Your goal would be to create a prob
In post 378, Human Destroyer wrote:@Panzer
a) Why would a case more likely come from a scum mindset than a town mindset?
b) Which case(s) is/are false and why is/are it/they false?
In post 377, KX wrote:Pretty much just be more specific. You've made a number of claims so far, but call me stupid, I haven't been able to figure out how you arrived at those conclusions. Site specific examples and explain the reasoning behind your conclusion. I mean, you've made stabs at how your logic fits together, such as #358, but, at least for me, you never quite connect them together or to reality. I don't entirely disagree with you, as I said I find they should be investigated more, but I'm not seeing you doing that.
In post 392, Docteur Gudsight wrote:And panzer isn't the argument on cases just that it's a different way to push things? HD thought jacob was scum. He pushed by a case which generally has more weight attached. How is pushing his scum read like that scummy? The back and forth discussion you're saying is a problem never occurred (and I'd argue back and forths are the best way to really see people pressured and discuss things instead of just having them calmly comment).
~M
In post 413, Docteur Gudsight wrote:All. 1 sentence each is enough.
And I thought it was directed to me but I gave my feelings on gm at the top of this page and bottom of last page. I don't think he's scum. Go iso him and he does have content.
~M
In post 417, JacobSavage wrote:Who is GM?
In post 451, goodmorning wrote:
In post 359, goodmorning wrote:
Panzer wrote:Goodmorning for starting a stream of anti-town posts.
Pics or it didn't happenOK, where? You're making a pretty brazen assertion here sans evidence.
Answer this please.
In post 457, JacobSavage wrote:Firstly,
UNVOTE:
Secondly don't really get what thus whole GM thing is, personally I haven't seen it but then again maybe need to read closer.
In post 515, ArcAngel9 wrote:Panz, whats your read on GM? I am sorry if you have already stated that before.. but if you can put it across that would be great.
@Mod - Can we get current VOTE tally?
In post 521, Human Destroyer wrote:In post 518, JacobSavage wrote:Avoiding the wagon on Venrob and his own Wagon. Tunneling on KX and then disappering, fun fact he did't site flake, he just disappeared, thats not a good sign especially that close to a lynch.
So everything you said you found him town for.
Scum found guys. Vote Jacob. Ra ra ra.
In post 555, Human Destroyer wrote:@Panzerjager: So you're going to join a wagon your second scum read is driving?
In post 559, KX wrote:Panzerjager, I have no clue wtf he's doing. He's been calling people out on things which make no sense at all to me, then following these calls. I really just am not sure what to make of it, but it doesn't seem like normal town to me.
In post 574, Human Destroyer wrote:In post 568, PJ. wrote:In post 555, Human Destroyer wrote:@Panzerjager: So you're going to join a wagon your second scum read is driving?
You're not my second scum read, and you're not driving anything. You're not the only one pushing the wagon and you're mostly why I've been hesitant to post on him. Because you and him are probably not scum together, so if I'm holding true to my original post i shouldn't vote him(reads change obviously). This post is ridiculously scummy, though. Trying to seek approval for finding scum that hasn't been found yet. Trying to insinuate somebody else is being scummy for a non-reason.
Either way, more votes on goodmorning scum please.
The fuck?
Where the fuck did I ask for approval in this lynch? Anywhere?
You're one to talk, Mr. Being Pro-Town is Scummy.
In post 578, Human Destroyer wrote:Howisit seeking approval?
I'm driving the fucking wagon. That's stating an objective fact, not "seeking approval".
You're really stretching.
And no, those thingsaren'tscummy.
is it though. and I didn't even say I was going to. I said I would consider it. You are being very liberal with the english language here. Using the definite of "He's voting" as the future of he is "going to". Neither of which are true.Human Destroyer wrote: -Voting a player his "scumread" is pushing the lynch of
In post 589, KX wrote:So Panzer, since your actions are making me believe you're scum as well, why am I not scum? After all, by objecting to you and calling your claims ludicrous, I'm obviously HD's scum partner panicking about him getting offed. Or am I not scum because unlike HD I've been somewhat inactive and withdrawn instead of getting things done? But wait, that can't be, I've made lists and cases, so forget that, I'm scum just like him!
In post 590, PJ. wrote:In post 589, KX wrote:So Panzer, since your actions are making me believe you're scum as well, why am I not scum? After all, by objecting to you and calling your claims ludicrous, I'm obviously HD's scum partner panicking about him getting offed. Or am I not scum because unlike HD I've been somewhat inactive and withdrawn instead of getting things done? But wait, that can't be, I've made lists and cases, so forget that, I'm scum just like him!
I'm convinced from your early play that you're a newer player. also aren't you IRL friends or friends from another site with HD?
In post 609, goodmorning wrote:In post 599, KX wrote:I feel as though very little has been gained since they were subbed in other then some repetitive (and meaningless) arguments.
QFT.
Like a lot.
Seriously, Panzer. Seriously.
I think we understand what you're saying.
I think you're getting votes becauseit's stupidwedisagreethink what you're saying is scummy.
Vote: Panzer
You know what's more anti-Town than walls and cases?EVERYTHINGSTARTING MASSIVE STUPID ARGUMENTS THAT COMPLETELY DISTRACT THE TOWN.
Oh yeah, I WENT THERE.
In post 241, goodmorning wrote:Alright, I didn't wake up this morning when I was supposed to and I don't have a super duper huge amount of time now. Here is my readslist, I'll get into reasoning later tonight or tomorrow first thing.
Towniest-leaning
HD
CD
serra
KX
Jacob
Null
Klick
Spence
hydra
Null
AA9
Nic
Josh
Ven
Scummiest-leaning
In post 164, JacobSavage wrote:KX is town, as inNEVERshould be lynched under any circumstances. Scum do not stay up til 3am making a big post listing all of his reads. Scum try and avoid giving them so the fact 1. he gave them voluntarily and 2. he did them so late at night when sleep is far more important. Either he's town or he's scum and didn't read his Role PM.
In post 595, Human Destroyer wrote:In post 588, PJ. wrote:1) You can convince people that someone is scum without making a case or posting a wall. shocking I know.
2)is it though. and I didn't even say I was going to. I said I would consider it. You are being very liberal with the english language here. Using the definite of "He's voting" as the future of he is "going to". Neither of which are true.Human Destroyer wrote: -Voting a player his "scumread" is pushing the lynch of
3) Only small because it's a scumslip you did. Scumslips are generally small.
4) 1 vote on me that is obvious OMGUS = OMG HE'S CALLING ALL HIS VOTES SCUM GUYS.
You are getting worked up and creating a case on over me "calling you scum for things that aren't scummy". If that were true, you wouldn't be getting so worked up over it. You are panicking over something that wouldn't be such a big deal if you weren't scum.
1) Except I don't have to use the same methods you do; you have made a big deal about my methods being scummy, when they are in fact not.
2) Typo on my part. Should've been "going to". "I'm considering it" does kind of imply "I'm going to", whether you like it or not.
3) It's not even a scumslip. I asked you a question, and you called it out as a scumslip.
4) Yes, because a vote with reasons can simply be dismissed as OMGUS. Keep doing that, it'll take you far.![]()
OH WAIT A SEC
Did I ever mention how Panzer said "scum lists are anti town", but then completely ignored Klick's? In fact, he didn't mention Klick even once in his ISO. Go look for yourself. In fact, Klick's ISO is scarce as hell. How is my scum list so much more scummy than Klick's to him? Double standard says hi.
In post 632, Cheery Dog wrote:In post 620, PJ. wrote:I would also like to note how ridiculously fast my wagon is building, a grand indication that it is on a townie.
Goodmorning's wagon grew at the approximately the same speed, so come again with this point?
In post 651, serrapaladin wrote:Alright, listen up everybody.PLEASE DON'T SKIP THIS POST!
Given the nature of the game we definitely need to get someone to claim in the next 48 hours to be certain we don't end in a No Lynch. Viable candidates at the moment areJenn, GM, Jacob, and Panzer. CanKlick and KXplease place their votes on one of these four.
I've already made my opinion clear that I'd be most happy with a Jacob lynch, but I am willing to comprise if it means avoiding an NL.
I would highly encourage everyone that would be on-board with aJacoblynch to move their vote there, so we can assess whether we can get a majority.
Alternatively, please justmove your vote aroundso see whether we'll get a majority anywhere. I would implore everyone to be willing to vote someone they don't have a strong scumread on come deadline to avoid a No Lynch.
Most importantly though, for the next days, we needACTIVITY. So please do post often, and don't go on making any more excessive walls of reads. We need to figure out who is willing to vote for whom, and soon.