pie 117 wrote:I think that, if he was actually pissed off at notsci, wanting to policy him would be something he'd have felt like doing at the start of the game or when he first started to push him.
More like it was just something I fell back on as a place to put my vote for lack of better place.
pie 117 wrote:I also hate that when Anen pushed him over it he wrote it all off as a "policy vote" when he had previously poked at notsci for a non-policy reason.
*shrug*
I think they can co-exist. I don't like him in general for how anti-town I consider his play, and I also found something I thought was legitimately scummy. I don't see a problem with that.
To be fair though, and I need to drill this in my head for future town games because I tihnk I've done this in the past, I need to be more aware of how easy of bait this is for people. When you start throwing words around like policy, people expect you to
solely
be voting someone because you don't like something about their personality or playstyle and that you think the person themselves is not conducive to a healthy town environment. When you mix that with actual scummy things that are entirely contained within the current game, that breeds understandable confusion that is ripe for scum to pick at and/or town to get confused by.
---
notscience 119 wrote:VOTE: RC
Were you just waiting for someone else to go first before jumping on?
---
Cheetory 137 wrote:If you felt like there was a lack of content early on in the game worth discussing, why would you want to push the game in this direction?
Fair point. Laziness, I guess.
Cheetory 137 wrote:"Guys the lack of content in this game is bad, I'm just gonna make silly posts at the person I'm voting."
Pretty much, lol. In reality I thought maybe it would endear them to me a bit more, but I wonder if I am just not cut out to be too jokey with people. It always seems to get me into trouble.
Cheetory 137 wrote:Overall the tone of his posting just feels inconsistent in a manner that feels forced and not real.
Of course it's forced. I drew town.
---
Wicked 139 wrote:As scum, would you ever entertain the thought of acting uninterested and policy-voting on page 4 just to go against your meta?
Well, how deep do you really want to go with this? Absolutely I would. I think I could calculate it better, however. But, and doesn't it feel like we say the same things over and over on this site, I don't want to really bring meta into it. Some days you're on, some days you're off. Sometimes happy, sometimes sad. We're not robots. Feelings matter. Emotions matter. These things change us. How we think, talk, posture...
Wicked 143 wrote:This is a stretch. Also, the implication is that Vinkah is defending his scum buddy, so this point kind of revolves around RC being scum. Yet you opted to stay off the RC bandwagon, perhaps to avoid looking opportunistic?
I like this point. I wanted to say something similar, but I couldn't find the right words for it. +Town points.
---
notsci 157 wrote:Its not so much the people saying it are its just like "inb4 scumteam whiteknights each other"
This is an unreasonable concern, I think, and isn't as likely to come from a townie than it is to come from scum frustrated that an early (which means almost necessarily weak) case is being brushed aside as the town start putting their thoughts together.
---
Layla 174 wrote:I came here seeing some posts but... I really have nothing to comment on right now. :/
Still waiting on RedCoyote, still waiting on Anenineninenineni.
Ah, ten-hour work day on Saturday and a three-hour drive. Big, cumbersome project going on this month. Hopefully I'll have more downtime during the week though.
---
Ane 194 wrote:Note the highlighted part.
And? This is slimy. You're trying to parse you saying "it sounded in your mind like" versus "it sounded like" in a dishonest way.
Ane 194 wrote:By the way, it's good to know how easily you can jump on a wagon which has just gained momentum shortly before.
I don't think that makes it any less valid. If you have an issue with the content, sure, you ought to speak up. This isn't fair otherwise.
---
Cheetory 195 wrote:My two dumb self-centered thoughts right now are that it seems like people are trying to make a PoE pool on D1 with eight pages which seems really strange to me and that it seems kind of balls that I'm being called scum for not being obvtown.
Isn't there some law about innocent until proven guilty!!?
:c
This seems so petty. To be fair, he cut it with a preface that they were self-centered thoughts, which takes the edge off some. Additionally, I like the fact that you're taking a stand against both Tammy and Ane. That strikes me as independent and, therefore, more townie.
---
Wicked 201 wrote:This is ridiculous. I have trouble believing that you believe any of this could be true.
+1
---
Ane 211 wrote:You must have realized that I'm without any allies in this game
This sort of melodrama is uncalled for and Ane seems to lack serious perspective. You can't help but notice how cagey he sounds.
---
Nacho 238 wrote:You think that I open up the game bussing my scum partner? That seems kind of like a poor choice to me.
This answer is so straightforward and factual. I have to wonder how anyone can't like at that and go, "Yeah, you're right". This whole post is on point.
---
implosion 242 wrote:I want to see what Anen does in this game when he is given more space.
I take this to mean you think he's performing well under pressure?
Town reads in no particular order: pie (the most fair detractor of mine, and I appreciate her seeking cooperation in forming a wagon on me ... I also like her being a bit of a wild card in the sense of defending Cheetory while supporting the case against Ane)
Wicked (like his points against Ane, seems like the lifeblood of that wagon in a good way ...
201 and
204 +1 each)
ffrey (extensively open, would like to converse with her more as I get my bearings and am able to commit more time to the game... work has kept me busy unfortunately ... I can single out posts, but very many are good)
Tammy (so far so good, another honest approach to the game that I cannot find anything devious in so far ... though I am open to perhaps not reading her closely enough)
Nacho (
154 I like especially)
implosion (
155 comes across as honest)
Cheetory (though I hate how it started,
195 ended strongly and gives a real independent (read: not part of a scumteam) vibe ... same with
203 ... his
253 is the real deal as far as scumhunting is concerned and I appreciate the inquisition it contains)
Vinhak (at first I weary of including him as it was liable to sound self-interested, but I've also appreciated his posts that don't defend me ... is he an alt? see
287,
292 and
297 for examples of towntells here. I don't even know this guy, but these little snippets read positive to me. I feel like I know him because I can relate to those feelings. Not a strong townread, but townread nonetheless)
Scum reads in no particular order: notscience (comes across as opportunistic, trying to force townreads of himself down players' throats)
Gnomeo (like the points Nacho made, have seen nothing from Gnomeo that otherwise contradicts these ... that said, I liked his
192, so I may hold off on this)
Ane (his paranoia and attempts at playing the victim are starting to reach critical mass... several examples but see
211 for a good one. I am not liking the way he's responding to his wagon at all)