In post 2064, implosion wrote:If you say "yes, this is how we'd play together as scum" then I don't really get anything out of it.
This wasn't clear in other stuff you said.
Okay.
In post 2064, implosion wrote:If you say "yes, this is how we'd play together as scum" then I don't really get anything out of it.
In post 2064, implosion wrote:My guess would be that you'd answer it honestly even as scum. That's probably what I would wind up doing in that situation.
In post 2130, RedCoyote wrote:I can't believe Nacho tried to lynch me, that's what I can't believe. That scummy bastard. That so lit a fire under me.
In post 2136, Oversoul wrote:So, at the very beginning of replacing in I was like "hmm weird af that the little cluster of Fferyllt, Nacho, and Tammy is still alive". That is why I initially said that group has at least 1 scum. I still stand behind that comment.
In post 2136, Oversoul wrote:Reading through the thread, I think fferyllt is solidly town. I don't remember playing a game with fferyllt as a solo slot, but I think her play is town regardless. Fferyllt if you're scum at the end of this, I am going to be sadface.
In post 2136, Oversoul wrote:When I got to his claim, his VIG claim, it was pretty baller. Reminds me of my own types of claims. Placed at the tail end of the day, when putting Anen at L-1 at a time he thought Anen could be lynched. That all seems town motivated. However, holy fuck the coincidences of EVERYONE targetting Gnomeo night 1 is really, really, really not likely.
In post 2256, fferyllt wrote:I voted you, hoping you're town and you'll show it in your reaction and you'll do what I can't seem to do which is solve this game.
In post 2136, Oversoul wrote:So yeah, the claim itself looks legit but the play surrounding the claim looks so unlegit. Like god. I wish I was the vig. So sad. Anyway, implosion AGAIN choosing not to shoot is sketch as fuck. And if he *doesn't* shoot tonight he is 100% the lynch tomorrow. Even if scum have an RB, and it SURE as hell better not be a more than 2 shot RB or the reviewers sux, implosion should be confirmed tomorrow. Tammy should take a 50% on choosing one of RC/Implosion I think. HOWEVER, I think implosion should choose to shoot RC. BUT fuck. One of the main reasons I want to shoot RC is because of his claim.
In post 2136, Oversoul wrote:When I saw RC's claim that was like when my mind started to implode and leak out my nostrils and ears and tear ducts. It was bad. Oh my god bad. Miller is a claim that scum can preemptively play like... And RC in my mind is like the complete opposite of Implosion. Whereas with Implosion I HATED his play throughout the day, I thought RC's play was not that bad during the day. Whereas with Implosion I loved the claim, I hated RC's claim. I think both of those dropped the ball somewhat with how to play the role effectively. RC playing dumb about a death miller is also sketch too.
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:What do you think about the pieguy/notsci thing that's been simmering all game and broke out into a conflagration today?
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:Do you think as scum he'd feel the situation is dire enough for his slot that he'd hail mary? because if he actually has a PR then I feel like someone else - maybe implosion? - is lying. how to factor in Tammy's reaction that he's town?
In post 2267, Oversoul wrote:Yes. It is all poppycock.
I said what I said because you are trying to deviate from the Notsci lynch by getting me lynched. You know you have to do something magnificent now because fferylt no longer trusts you.
In post 2271, fferyllt wrote:Who becomes more scummy with the vt claim?
In post 2238, Wickedestjr wrote:Well why does "missing town traits" suddenly trump "different scum meta"? And what prompted this reread?
In post 2455, notscience wrote:Hey guys, the point of a massclaim is to claim your role truthfully.
In post 2242, Wickedestjr wrote:In post 2056, Nachomamma8 wrote:Picking up on who he's pushing instead of focusing on the reasons he is pushing them is a subtlety to me. Is this an unreasonable viewpoint to have? Why?
Uh... yeah I think the decision of who to push is a pretty crucial thing. I'm not sure how to explain this because it seems pretty trivial. The reasoning is probably easier to dissect and interpret than the target choice, sure. But I also think that scum put a lot of thought into picking who they will attack - e.g. what's safe, what's best for them and their partners, etc.
I've literally caught scum before with a case that mostly revolved around voting behavior.
I mean obviously it isn'tthatsubtle, or you wouldn't be referring to it now.
In post 2245, Wickedestjr wrote:What. Are you serious?
You said your problem with RC was that his hammer was too image-conscious. That was two thirds of my case against him! (First and third points)
This feels like a misrep
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:What do you think about the pieguy/notsci thing that's been simmering all game and broke out into a conflagration today?
In post 2479, Tammy wrote:Nacho - I realize you're a couple hundred posts behind but when you do get to my question about ffery I really want to talk about your concerns there.
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:Do you think as scum he'd feel the situation is dire enough for his slot that he'd hail mary? because if he actually has a PR then I feel like someone else - maybe implosion? - is lying. how to factor in Tammy's reaction that he's town?
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:how to factor in Tammy's reaction that he's town?
In post 2259, fferyllt wrote:Uncharted territory. You're coming off calm and disconnected. It's been like that to some degree all along, but today is more so.
In post 2324, fferyllt wrote:Nacho is the one I'm really worried about. he talked about our usual town mind meld, but I've only had flickers of that. the strongest flicker was on day 1 when he was rethinking Anen. If anyone was going to get into my head and see where my vote came from, it would be him. And instead, he scumread me for it. It's sitting out there in the thread in a strange place with no obvious antecedent because the drivers were all internal. Anyway, he's been going back and forth with you over one vote most of the game day while all this crap is happening between notsci vs pie. I wanted more indication of where his thoughts on oversoul were headed, but maybe that was unrealistic given his thread presence.
In post 2342, pieguyn wrote:Nacho's ffery push is scummy as fuck. What we're seeing here, folks, is cornered Nacho-scum flailing. He *convenienly* is ignoring the entire notsci/me shitstorm that's going on except for one weak as fuck sentence; he can't push me because he knows I'll run him into the ground if he even tries it after N1570, and he conveniently isn't going to push his partner notsci, so he's just making up a bunch of shit in order to *hopefully* get away with pushing someone elsewhere.
In post 2342, pieguyn wrote:This Oversoul wagon is one of the most shit wagons I've ever seen in my whole entire life.
In post 2360, Tammy wrote:In Tales of Vesperia when I an everyone else was reading you wrong and you thought there was a glimmer of ffery reading you correctly somewhere and faltering the like loss of an ally felt more real.
In post 2593, fferyllt wrote:And it reminded me of games where scum-you have pulled one townie out of the fire while pushng another townie into it.
In post 2362, Tammy wrote:Nacho :/
(I'm going to reread through oversoul and reread through a town and scum game tonight just to get on some grounding, but oversoul knows damn well I wouldn't just investigate him because he told me to.)
In post 2256, fferyllt wrote:In post 2251, Nachomamma8 wrote:
:/
Ffery, are you scum? I've been hoping you could sort of translate my thoughts wrt RC to wicked for me, and then right when I'm expecting you to step in and help, you vote me. Why?
I voted you because this game doesn't make any sense and I feel like it's because my reads are terrible. I've been trusting you and following you to some eextent but it's like I have a lump of ice in my stomach.
I voted you, hoping you're town and you'll show it in your reaction and you'll do what I can't seem to do which is solve this game.
In post 2597, fferyllt wrote:I feel like prior to today (and to some extent prior to my vote) you hadn't been doing this. You hadn't been working to get scumreads lynched.
In post 2402, Tammy wrote:Nacho - I kinda want to lynch you right now. How do you feel about that?
In post 2603, fferyllt wrote:I think so, because it was the internals - how I felt about the game state, and seeing another huge blow-up between pie and notsci, and seeing the oversoul replacement into the slot I most wanted to sort, and seeing the {you justifying your RC push to Wicked} thing becoming your main effort when you had time for this game that led voting you at that point.
In post 2409, fferyllt wrote:It's the same excuse I've been making for nacho all game. Limited time, phone posting, etc. I've been hydraing with him pretty much constantly since spring, and I know he's got small bits of time here and there to spend on mafia.
In post 2607, fferyllt wrote:What do you think about RC's play today?
In post 2410, notscience wrote:I think you've seen how nervous I am to push people I'm friends with lest i be wrong about the read
In post 2438, implosion wrote:I can very much see pie's reaction here as being that of scum-caught-for-the-wrong-reasons.
In post 2443, Tammy wrote:In post 2421, fferyllt wrote:In post 2417, Tammy wrote:In post 2363, fferyllt wrote:Tammy, in Vesperia you said the jazz hands were missing and he was being robotic.
Compared to this game, Vesperia had tons of jazz hands. That's one of the things that has been worrying me all along.
He is; you're right; he was.
Zodiac showed him being robotic, and he was town. And there was also another game I semi-followed that he was flat in as well and town.
I'm in the process of renegotiating the way I read him and what biases there are, but I'm also taking current games into account and trying to figure out what it means. If that makes sense.
But, if I was reading him on Tales of Vesperia model, I'd have tried to get him lynched day one.
This is why I was paranoid about both of you on day 1. I didn't want to spell it out, but I felt like ifIwas noticing the robotic thing, given that's not how I form reads on hm, it should have been much more evident to you.
I backed off, mostly because you gave me enough reason to think that's not a valid way to read hm now.
Yeah, I thought that might have been some of your concerns or at least some of my reticence to read him in the way I have.
We've played at my homesite and my old way of reading him held true, although the last game was behaviorally kinda a gimme, but still I read him very very easily as town in both games. Maybe the alt thing has something to do with it?
But what I'm left with if I'm deprived of tonal reading is people reading and that takes longer to feel anything about.
For me, right now, if you're scum here, you're scum with nacho. Basically because that's the only thing that makes sense to me for why he would be paranoid of you and discount your town tells, of which I'm pretty sure he's more adept than me at picking up. I don't believe that, it's just the one alternative I'm working with.
Oh wow I'm about to fall asleep but I also looked at the clock and I've almost been up for 24 hours. I'm going to ramble until I fall asleep! Øh Ill talk bout oversoul.
In post 2445, pieguyn wrote:Which, in addition to being the exact same fucking shit Nacho pulled in the last game where he was scum against me and got me mislynched (and he's doing the same fucking thing again here, he's just being a lot more low-key about it and doesn't have me as his primary read),
In post 2453, pieguyn wrote:*If* he is somehow town here, I will probably need to rethink everything about this game.