Mini 1700: Space Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 67, Firebringer wrote:Pedit: Don't we all?
Not all, no.
You will be surprised to learn that there are some evil people who are only looking to lynch innocent townies like myself!-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 78, Fraggernaut wrote:5. I asked you a question which you havent answered.
In post 77, Fraggernaut wrote:I asked does my early analysis worry you. Which I haven't got a answer to yet. It was ahypothetialquestion
Does it matter that you haven't got an answer when the question was hypothetical?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
What's the joke?
Claiming scum as scum and then saying it's a joke and everyone ignores? that would be amusing for you, yes.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 87, Fraggernaut wrote:Apparently it matters to someone else, so if it matters so much why won't they answer it.
They are not related. Does it matter if the hypothetical question is or isn't answered? (no).-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 95, Sword Master wrote:I had nothing to post so I just put something random down. I don't have enough time to post as I am packing for my holiday soon.
You should have claimed town (exactly like me) if you didn't have anything to say but wanted to post something.
What did you expect to happen by claiming mafia?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 67, Firebringer wrote:I have no opinion on Fraggernaut except he is try hard right out of the gate.
In post 71, Firebringer wrote:I have Fraggernaut leaning town right now. I don't think scum like to get so much attention on themselves this early into the game. Just from my experience but scum try to lurk first few pages I think.
This is weird.
(Am I doing it right GlassCannon?)
UNVOTE: Sword
I will do some serious posting over the weekend.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 161, Garmr wrote:Hey there slandaar can I ask who do you think is the towniest player and the scummiest so I can get a better grasp of what your thinking at the moment
For towniest: Sword
For scummiest: Still contemplating.
In post 165, Fraggernaut wrote:The fact that you're comfortable placing a vote on a Un'cced PR claim is very worrying.
You are misrepresenting my actions.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 162, Firebringer wrote:I am very worried that we have a train on someone who claimed Day 1. Feels like a scum wagon forming.
I honestly think Swords claim is legit and the people trying discredit are either bad town or just scum.
Could you give names for who you think are bad town and scum for discrediting the claim please.
In post 185, Scorpious wrote:@RedFF, what do you think of this latest move by Sword?
Bad question. Although your point is OK, it's on a player whom you really shouldn't be wasting effort to read. Do you think your point makes a difference with the whole Sword situation?
------------------------
I really didn't like this:
or:
In post 102, Fraggernaut wrote:This confuses me. Seems troll-ish.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 218, Fraggernaut wrote:I'll provide this when I do my ISO analysis. I've already said what needed to be said in the interactions with Garmr. How am I misrepping when you placed a vote on Sword & left it there? It was worrisome so I flagged it.
What? I didn't ask you and obviously didn't expect you to answer as it wasn't your quote. Now you have me intrigued though so do provide
You said I was comfortable voting an uncc'ed PR which completely misrepresents the situation. I voted an unclaimed player not an uncc'ed PR. (You can vote uncc'ed PR's but this claim is a special situation)-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 230, Fraggernaut wrote:You voted for a uncc'ed PR.
I voted an unclaimed player.
In post 230, Fraggernaut wrote:
He claimed & essentially gave what his role does. How is this situation different? He's still a uncc'ed PR. Not sure what you're trying to say here.
I voted an unclaimed player who later claimed PR. You say you dislike my vote as I was comfortable voting an uncc'ed PR. This is a complete misrepresentation as I had shown no indication I was comfortable with such an action.
For reference: when we are talking about uncc'ed PR I am just talking about this scenario not in general. (Replace uncc'ed PR with claimed vig)-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 225, Firebringer wrote:
Congrats on reading 5 posts and getting scum. Want a medal? For biggest fail of year?
I swear some players just make you want to hit your head against wall and quit.
Maybe you should interrogate red on his suspicion of you? I mean he could be scum trying to mislynch you!-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Alright something needs to happen.
In post 106, Scorpious wrote:Slandaar seems just invested enough but says he wants to find scum.again,slight town read.
I am conflicted on this.
1. It seems like scum would read me null at this point in the game.
2. It is literally ridiculous to even mention me saying I want to find scum in his read.
Post your opinions.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 265, Scorpious wrote:1. I'm not quite sure where you are going here.. I think you are town..
2.Why is it ridiculous? At that point,that is essentially all you had posted..
In point 1 I am saying, I think, scum would read my play as null as it seems the thing to do considering the situation.
If I say I want to find scum does thisreallyinfluence your read on me? just going to believe me?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 269, BlockyMan wrote:If you were lying, you would just say VT, or Cop, or Doctor.
You wouldn't say vigilante, and he also added in role modifiers, which REALLY makes me suspicious.
This really doesn't make any sense.
I assume you mean 'if you wern't lying' but then why wouldn't he claim vigilante if he is a vigilante?
Blocky the 'coming soon' needs to explain this not just post some pointless reads.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 283, GlassCannon wrote:Hey Slandaar, can you elaborate on #1? Why would scum read you null at this point?
Because:
1. They have to explain it (Could be difficult)
2. Why would they when they can leave me as null?
3. I hadn't really done anything and so null seems the standard (easy) read for scum to make.
In reference to Point 2 - I should have looked at least somewhat lynchable at the point he made his post.
In post 283, GlassCannon wrote:It looks like you're saying you think Scorpious is scummy, based on #2, or at least badtown, but in #1 you're saying he's not scum because he's reading you.
You are correct which is why I opened with 'I am conflicted'.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 329, Fraggernaut wrote:In post 326, Slandaar wrote:I think I like a Blocky lynch.
Any specific reasons why you think a Blocky lynch is good here? This seems like a fluff sheep play.
In post 269, BlockyMan wrote:Im leaving my vote on Sword for the day.
If you were lying, you would just say VT, or Cop, or Doctor.
You wouldn't say vigilante, and he also added in role modifiers, which REALLY makes me suspicious.
In post 286, Slandaar wrote:I assume you mean 'if you wern't lying' but then why wouldn't he claim vigilante if he is a vigilante?
No Reply.
An answer (which is sensible) is required to my question otherwise we assume Blocky is scum.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
What's this Scorpious? I see no answer to my question?!
Allow me to remind you of it:
In post 385, Slandaar wrote:Scorpious what is your opinion on Blocky?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 445, Scorpious wrote:Well,up until 22,it was RVs nonsense..
125 was a horrendous vote..
then he questions your Sword read. (208)This one bothers me because it seems like he's asking why you are discrediting the "easy" lynch of the day..
262 comes off to me as " people always think I'm scum,so dont do it this game. Woe is me everyone is always wrong about me.. Please dont think I'm scum this game.. Dont like it..
269 he tries to justify his Sword vote. I feel like he thinks this still might be an easy lynch for scum to push..
275 is more woe is me,talking about how 2-3 votes on him are still RVs..
284- lazy ass reads
296- another one on a super inactive player..
339- another declaration of staying on sword.
375-useless fluff
wow,I didn't realize how friggn scummy he really looked.. I would support a blocky lynch..
(sorry for lazy format,on phone)
I forgive you for lazy formatting.
What do you think about the idea that if he is scum he wouldn't try to push a lynch on a claimed vig who is never being lynched? I mean scum should try to look town and he clearly isn't doing that by trying to lynch claimed vig, right?
In post 446, Scorpious wrote:Because I form my own opinions Slandaar..
I am very glad to hear that Scorpious.
I was simply making the point that maybe, considering deadline is approaching, you should have an opinion of some kind on the leading wagon without having to ISO them.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 523, Scorpious wrote:@Slandaar
that was quick(10 posts) There really is nothing to research on him..
he's apparently been looking at ISO since last Friday. Realistically, there is nothing that rings to me as scum aside from inactivity..
we need to get our shit straight though. We are going to start pushing it. I think D1 lynches are imperative. So I would support a gray lynch if needed.
OK I will summarise the case against Gray
1. Gray decided it was a good idea not to catchup in the game (this one) that is near deadline and help lynch a good candidate (in his mind). Instead he posted elsewhere (a lot).
2. I have not found scum (at least none I am sure about) so the lurkers have a much much higher chance of being scum than would normally be applicable.
3. He replaced into this game and has provided no real content at all. He should not have done so if he had such time issues. This again points to scum rather than town with genuine time issues.
4. His I am very busy argument is very bad in conjunction with point 1.
Is this a defence?
Flip scum -> Good times.
Even in the event you are town it doesn't matter what you posted it's what everyone else posted surrounding the lynch.
In post 533, Fraggernaut wrote:@Slandaar Why do you think there's no need for a VC? Town should always want to know where votes stand. Especially if someone is placed at L-2 or L-1.
If everyone just votes Gray why do we need a VC? we don't.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 537, GrayFoxxxx wrote:@Sland,Scorp
Didn't know I would be losing my job when I replaced. Sorry to disappoint you.
You didn't disappoint me.
In post 537, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
Your 4 reasons for voting me are redundant as well. They are all just worded differently. Well 3 has nothing to do with me.
They are all different. 3 relates to you.
In post 537, GrayFoxxxx wrote:
But to address your point(s)-
My posting has slowed down ALOT in the last few days. Be careful talking about ongoing games. I'm not going to touch on that anymore.
More tonight.
Not talking about ongoing games we were talking about your on-site activity levels.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 623, Doctor Vahlen wrote:Ok, my slot had claimed yesterday. I shot nugget because I felt he was scum. We are indeed missing a kill. I'm not sure what information this gives us yet, but it should be immensely helpful with things down the road.
Who is nugget?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Alright we need to have a better day than yesterday, so, I will actually post contents!
Scum: Scorp/GCslot/Gray maybe fragger. Let me see if I can find some questions for these chaps...
In post 473, Scorpious wrote:I'm sorry.. You have to explain this to me a little better.
What "further sentiments" are being cemented? and how does this relate to grayfoxxx in any way?
Hello Scorpious
What do you think about Yolo? what do you think about Gray? I don't want to see any of this ISO business to create a read.
In post 568, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Meant 2 here, not 3. Posting in next couple of hours
Hello GrayFoxxxx
You didn't post in the 'next couple hours' I am very disappointed! Will you be posting your thoughts today? What do you think about my other scumreads? (Scorp/Fragger and GC/Fitz)
OK after reading I changed my mind it's not fragger... well lets move onto Fitz...
In post 519, havingfitz wrote:Quick post since I know D1 is coming to a close. I just skimmed over the game and didn't take page by page notes as usual (no time).
Just going off gut and memory:
Didn't care for Fragger early in the game but I think he might have gotten better as the day went on. Need to ISO him.
Sword is apparently a VI. Can't believe his claim with only 2 votes on him. Probably town.
Post 375 and Post 498 make me ok with Block going.
Everyone else tbd.
Will lay a vote down before deadline (probably on BlockyMan) but will try to peruse more of the game as time permits and see if that changes my mind.
Hello HavingFitz
Now that our friend Blockyman has died painfully you have no listed scumreads. Please could you enlighten us to your current thoughts on the situation? specifically I would like you to mention my other scumreads.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 632, Scorpious wrote:@slandaar,honestly. It looks like his vote goes where the wind takes it. They seem a little weak and somewhat forced?
I dont like how he stated he was leaning firebringer(who I'm suspicious of also for dodging questions..) then jumped on the blocky wagon with his next post.
I switched also,however I felt my reason was more clear.
What do you have against people using ISO?
I think you only answered one of my questions!
I don't like people who need to ISO players to have an opinion - you should already have one without me asking you.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 636, Doctor Vahlen wrote:guessing I would likely shoot the person requested isn't bad.
Seems pretty bad to me.
Lets not waste our time assuming scum would shoot who someone requested. The best, most logical, assumption is scum could not assume who you would shoot as such you were very likely shot and red very likely protected you as you were a claimed confirmable PR.
This then leaves the question where your shot went so going back to my previous post we should start there.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Yeah you should!
It is possible. I would suggest very, very, unlikely though.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 643, Doctor Vahlen wrote:VOTE: Fraggernaut
Don't play dumb. You're smarter than your current play.
Slandaar's assumption is a reasonable one, so is Garmr's. I am not sure how much headway will be made but the information is useful to our PRs at least.
Can you please check/confirm you submitted Fragger. This is actually important. If you submitted Nugget you wouldn't have made a kill.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Doctor could have been roleblocked Fragger. There may have also been a slight fail during the kill submission. What is so unbelievable?
Don't you find it likely that Red protected the claimed PR and scum shot the claimed PR? It does make a lot of sense and as you say scum shooting the claimed PR seems most likely.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 659, Fraggernaut wrote:Also if you want to look at D1 reads, I was one of Red's top town & they pushed heavily for a Fire lynch. They were also skeptical of Sword's claim but also agreed that we would never lynch a uncc'ed PR d1. Right now I believe in a weird Slandaar/Fire/Doctor world. If Doctor isn't lynched or dies n2 then they're almost certainly confirmed scum in any world.
That's a very strange world. I suppose it's not much stranger than you failing to read and interpret what I say in any sensible manner. Do you understand why Red dies if scum shoot Doctor and Red targets Doctor yet?
In post 675, Garmr wrote:I like how slandaar is trying to work out what's happening between Dr and fraggers phone post
I try
There has not been much activity from the three amigos so far.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 677, Fraggernaut wrote:When did I ever say I didn't? We'll never know till after the game who Red saved. I'm looking at the fact that there was only one kill during the night. I found it weird how quick you came to the defense of Sword's slot when you placed a vote on Sword d1. Remember when I pinged you out for it? Or are you just pretending that never happened? There could also be the world where Red bodyguarded me, his top town read & Doctor with the fake claim as scum attempted to kill me as they're trying to say & Red died instead.
The point is; there are a few very plausible scenarios where Doctor survives the night as town and his kill doesn't go through. Let's use a checklist:
Is it likely Red protected the claimed, confirmable, PR (Doctor)? Yes.
Is it likely scum shot the claimed, confirmable, PR? Yes.
Is it likely Red protects Fragger over the claimed, confirmable, PR? and over myself? and over Deas? Possible but unlikely (very unlikely I think).
Is it possible scum have a RB? Yes.
Is it possible then that Doctor is town who shot you and Red protected Doctor? Yes. It is quite plausible indeed.
I find it incredibly strange you don't see this.
This:
In post 653, Fraggernaut wrote:If scum shot the claimed PR & they were protected that would mean the claimed PR shot Red, not me. See the flaws here?
Is just nonsense.
I want you to actually think about things. (I actually think there was a failed submission to the mod but we will see in due course)
I don't know. You tell me.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Slandaar's scumreads as mentioned at the start of the day:
Scorpious.
GrayFoxxxx
HavingFitz
Total content produced today between the three: 0.
That, my friends, is one huge coincidence. Gray has failed to produce anything of worth after making numerous promises to do so. Scorpious is just not doing anything and Fitz has declared VLA after doing pretty much nothing.
I suggest everyone just pick one of them and vote-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
-