Not sure I agree on that being a slipIn post 1616, Accountant wrote:scumslipIn post 1614, KuroiXHF wrote: Everything is true. I don't want to hammer, but I'd rather cry to sleep over mislynching a townie.
I
In fact that's something I would say
Not sure I agree on that being a slipIn post 1616, Accountant wrote:scumslipIn post 1614, KuroiXHF wrote: Everything is true. I don't want to hammer, but I'd rather cry to sleep over mislynching a townie.
I
And your opinion on the matter is...?In post 1619, BlackStar wrote:We heard you the first timeIn post 1618, Dunnstral wrote:I think pants is a townie
I disagreeIn post 1624, BlackStar wrote:Pants refuses to claim, or post a reads list, he hasn't given any reaction at all to being put at L-1 and instead of trying to defend himself or something he abandoned the thread. None of that feels like town
What would you prefer he claimed?In post 1631, BlackStar wrote:Oh, VT. Seems legit
I disagree, I was only pointing it out since blackstar says he refused to claimIn post 1632, pirate mollie wrote:he claimed vtIn post 1629, Dunnstral wrote:By the way pants has claimed, did you miss it?
if he flips town JS it sort of makes you look bad here!
You agree with the speed of the wagon and scummy players on it pointing to pants being town, right?In post 1643, MURDERCAT wrote:Agree with Dunn. If pants has no content in 24 hours the vote goes back because day 1 is the best time to kill a player like him.
UNVOTE:
I knowIn post 1664, Accountant wrote:Dunnstral do not answer that question I want mcat to answer
How so? Are you going to look over what I've been saying and decide that scum all piled onto him after all? (And that it's not kuroi)In post 1682, pirate mollie wrote:this isn't a bad mislynch even if it IS a mislynch which I highly doubt.
Who, me? If he's done nothing why are we trying to powerlynch him? Rachmarie was arguing about lynching inactives earlier but now wants to speed lynch pants before he's posted any meaningful contentpirate mollie wrote:In post 1681, Dunnstral wrote: that way I can take names of who are dragging their heels and navigate the game and I will be able to do this regardless of his flip. cos a jump off of this wagon w/o him providing a decent reason to do so and any attempt to deviate from it makes me think that scum want him around for some reason.
Yeah there wasIn post 1683, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:There is no hurry to hammer
I'm trying to expose scum hiding on this pants wagon.In post 1696, pirate mollie wrote:stop giving scum room to hide.
About what? Wouldn't you think scum would be bussing if he was scum? Was there anything else you said...? Or was it just that pants is scum and then kuroi is individually scum as wellpirate mollie wrote: if he flips scum are you going to listen to what I have said? somehow I highly doubt it.
I think he's town, but I am willing to consider him scum.pirate mollie wrote: and it does not look like you want to consider him as scum.
And if he flips town? What motive do I have for going into basically a frenzy trying to convince people of this as town?pirate mollie wrote:actually you will look bad regardless of his flip.
In post 1617, Dunnstral wrote:Not sure I agree on that being a slipIn post 1616, Accountant wrote:scumslipIn post 1614, KuroiXHF wrote: Everything is true. I don't want to hammer, but I'd rather cry to sleep over mislynching a townie.
I
In fact that's something I would say
???In post 1776, KuroiXHF wrote:I'm guessing Pants is scum. This doesn't sound like town just got lynched.
In post 1779, Dunnstral wrote:Seriously Mollie, Kaag, reread my case after this flip thanks
If I'm wrong about him being town, I'm still not wrong about scum being on the wagonIn post 1790, RachMarie wrote:@ Dunn
What will you do if you are wrong? And you could be wrong you know.
That's not really what I'm saying though and I don't have a game exampleIn post 1795, RachMarie wrote:@ Dunn can you point to me a game where a lynch of a town player had all 3 scum on the wagon? I really would like to see that, since my experience has been at least one on and one off the wagon. Also would love to see a lynch of a scum player that had ALL his scum budz on the wagon. I dont think it happens.
inb4 chilledtea is vigIn post 1809, KuroiXHF wrote:Agree with ChilledTea.
Don't agree with Blackstar, though I see why you'd want to.
Don't agree with KAAG and don't see why.
Look who's talkingIn post 1812, BlackStar wrote:You haven't posted anything worthwhileIn post 1807, Dunnstral wrote:So can my team pay attention to my posts when he flips town or are we just going to argue that "pants was bad/new! "
Nobody else reads this as something mafia says...?In post 1823, RachMarie wrote:Boys boys (and girls) you are all pretty.
Can we focus on the game stuffs? We do not know when the mod will lock the game and end twilight.
Because he tickles meIn post 1826, MURDERCAT wrote:Still wanna know why KAAG should be vigged
Yeah they'd betterIn post 1866, pirate mollie wrote: some of my reads may change depending on the flip.
I mean I guess we agree on the amount of people on the wagon but not on who is actually mafiaChumba wrote:And FYI since the game will be locked. if pants flips town I'm also replacing out. I can't play with a group of people who ignore actual scummy behavior and instead policy lynch a troll.
P.edit - if brawl and accountant are on the wagon then yes I agree there are 2 scum on the wagon.
TBG is voting pantsIn post 1873, RachMarie wrote:BTW Accountant did switch over to Pants, but TBG did not. MC Unvoted, and then after Pants was back to L-1 when Accountant voted for Pants, MC hammered (no relation to the rap star lol)
In post 1673, TehBrawlGuy wrote:VOTE: pantsVOTE:
he really should be at l-1 honestly, i'm fine with someone hammering
Have you not been paying attention to anything I've said?In post 1894, RachMarie wrote:So someone else must have unvoted or accountant would have hammered?
So will you stop ignoring me once he flips town then?In post 1901, pirate mollie wrote:not being ignored is the part of 50% of what constitutes good town play that I think you are incapable of grasping.In post 1893, Chumba wrote:I've been ignored all game with people telling me my reasons are bad. Why would I stay and just be ignored another day phase? People don't like my arrogance or confidence or my little jabs at them that they will ignore actual evidence. No thanks. It's clear town doesn't want to find scum, they'd rather an investigative role find them and in the meantime they just policy lynch bad players.In post 1884, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:If you think the town is weak, why not stay and help us? I don't actually agree, but I hate to see replaces based on in-game reasons rather than real-life getting in the way, they lead to bad feeling and there's really no need for that.
I can only speak for myself but you've not offended me: we just disagree.
what if he flips scum? are you going to stay in the gamer and apologize to every1 for being insufferable COS I WLD PAY MONEY TO SEE THAT \o/
and I wld even let bygones be bygones