Moi wrote:Well iStark is scum. I did take an action last Night so his Tracker result on me is bogus.
My results showed up that you didn't. So, obviously I'm not lying.
As far as possibilities thy are;
1.You're scum partner with Rban and bussed him today to get town credit.
2.Most likely, you noticed my soft claim which most didn't on D2 and had you or one of your partners mess with my results. But I'm petty sure it wasn't block since I did get results for my actions.
3.Or we are both town and scum misguided my actions? I highly doubt that as there will be to many PR's to keep that balance right in this game.
MoI wrote:I followed Rban yesterday and he took no action. So his "I bodyguarded Amrun' is also a lie. Lopsy didn't take any action Night 1 because he's a flake apparently.
This is just plain BS.
Lopsy was one of the most active & pro-town players on D1 and I highly doubt that she would flake on night action if she is indeed town PR, unless of course she is scum & you didn't bother to fake your target for N1.
MoI wrote:iStark can hang tomorrow as there is no way we have both a Follower and Tracker as Town in this set-up.
I agree with this though, there is no room for both of those roles in town ranks.
I know I'm town so obviously you're scum trying to make most out of your partner's lynch.
VOTE: MangaofIllusion
MoI wrote:Um why isn’t a Godfather something you consider as a possibility for Korlash being scum who turned up Town to a Cop investigation? Am I missing something in my re-read.
I think odds of Korlash being scum are slim but unless we get a Godfather flip from Rban or iStark I’m not ruling it out.
Keeping our options open by spreading suspicions about most confirmed townies, are we?
MoI wrote:I ISOed the thread to see how you came confirmed Town and want your input on the following –
Your premise is that the Mod confirmed both yourselves and Amrun as Town via posting inappropriately in thread and that confirms at least one more player (Korlash) and the game was not stopped at that point?
Obviously since player you replaced was not around to object and stop the game as only scum would want to top a obvious town win game.
MoI wrote: My role and the Voyeur role both are Miller neutral. And the ‘too much Power’ thing should be really apparent now.
Yes it is and you flip scum in that equation as I've confirmation for my results.
--
AD WROTE: Not to curb your style MOI, but Rban did claim to be roleblocked so if he's telling the truth, then it's possible you may not have seen him go anywhere. Clearly though, you should think Istark is the lair here and there is no excuse for that, so why vote Rban?
If we are lynching anyone, it's gonna be Istark (besides we should lynch the scum that has an active power first anyway)
And what makes his claim true? did I miss something or you're seriously missing lot of things?
MoI wrote:
Well he claimed to be roleblocked. Here's the question of the Day - why would scum have specifically rolelblocked Rban over either of the claimed Cops? Unless I missed him claiming a protective role between page 5 and the current day's posting I can't see any reason for scum to have randomly targetted someone who hadn't claimed. Unless of course your premise is that Om isn't a Town Cop and thus wasn't in jeapordy. Is that your line of thinking?
Again, trying to create doubts about our own confirmed players and PR's, real pro-scum play MoI.
AD wrote:
Well, Yeah, I fully believe Om is a town cop, I mean scum *could* have killed Amrun, decided to let Om cop and tried to frame someone hoping Om copped them. The obvious cop target imo was Rban soooo. but yeah, otherwise scum roleblocking him is not likely. I found his claim pre-mature anyway and sensationalist, like a "this is so unbelievable town might buy it" sort of thought process.
I don't mind lynching Rban, but from your point of view Istark is confirmed beyond a doubt. So I am I suprised.
Please note that I'm ruling you out being scum because I'm not sure why'd you'd claim when Rban most likely would be lynched.
Wait what? why would it stop him from claiming and discrediting most of the obvious towns like Om and even Korlash to some extent(I'm not even going to mention myself).
It's optimum scum tactic in this game considering two of the towns were mod confirmed.
I don't know why you think he wont claim, If it wasn't for Om's results from last night I would be betting my mony on you being his scum partner right about now.
AD wrote:
He claimed to target Lospy. It was spurned on by RD's instigations so I am presuming that istark paniced and claimed his target for the night. If he was actionless, why would he claim to be a tracker, instead of say, spitting in RD's face and saying 'you got nothing! Ha!'
I bet Istark was truthful about what he could be truthful about (hoped Lospy was a VT) and braced for the worst. The more I think about it, the more I think Istark is the manipulator type role (framer etc.)
Wtf? just so you know I could have claimed I was role blocked since I did soft-claimed on D1 -.-
Or claim that Om visited AD since he had claimed his results before mine. -_________-
Why would I even bother to take risk of lying about lopsy when there are this kind of options available? I see lot of hiccup's here AD.
Posting before getting results for this nights actions.